The Left-Liberal protesters here and in the USA against Donald Trump’s ban on immigration from war-torn trouble spots in the Middle East display a depressing ignorance and ideological bigotry.
Support for these ‘refugees’ is line with the Frankfurt School /Cultural Marxist agenda of the destruction of Western Civilisation by destroying its Christian and ethnic character.
All this is proceeding apace with the importation of millions of Muslims into the West.
While enjoying all the benefits of the most successful Civilisation the world has ever known or is likely to know, the dimwit banner wavers seem stupidly unaware that in welcoming Muslims as ‘victims of white oppression’ and as an anti-West battering ram, they are welcoming their executioners.
And probably not just metaphorically, either. 
Islamic leaders such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi are on record as stating that Islam can conquer Europe through immigration and outbreeding Europeans.
Khalid Sheik Mohammed who masterminded the 9/11 destruction of the Twin Towers revealed under interrogation that the al-Qaeda strategy against the USA wasn’t just violence.
According to James Mitchell, the CIA operative who questioned him, Khalid Sheik Mohammad told him that, while not adverse to terrorism, the ‘practical’ way to conquer the USA for Islam was also through immigration and by outbreeding non-Muslims.
He said that Jihadists would immigrate into the United States.
Using the welfare system to support themselves, they would then spread the message of Jihad.
They would take full advantage of the culture of law and rights in the USA to protect themselves, lead demands for Sharia law to be accepted, and then when they felt strong enough, and the time was right, they would violently impose Sharia.
Does this sound familiar?
As Prime Minister and previously as Home Secretary, Theresa May must have had access to the information obtained by the Americans from the Guantanamo interrogations.
Despite all the evidence to the contrary, during her USA visit, she pronounced that Islam was ‘a peaceful religion’.
Perhaps she was taking advice from Liberal-Left civil servant advisors, who tend to be EU-loving One Worlders.
But peaceful?
When 109 verses in the Qur’an, the Islamic Holy book contain passages advocating deadly violence against non-Believers?
When according to standard Islamic exegesis, these verses ‘abrogate’ the earlier, more peaceful verses often quoted by Muslim apologists?
When the ‘Prophet’ himself ordered the assassination of individuals who wrote or stood against him? (Think Charlie Hebdo).
When he executed by beheading up to 900 Jewish men (numbers vary according to the sources) and sold their women and children into slavery?
When he took as a sex slave a woman whose husband, relations and friends he had just had murdered?
And when he ordered or personally led armed raids against his neighbours?
These raids were not invariably defensive either, as Muslims and their Western left-liberal allies often claim.
Some raids were done merely to acquire ‘booty’, including sex slaves.
Thus: ‘The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water.
Their fighting men were killed, and their women and children were taken as captives” (Bukhari 46:717)
What could be a clearer declaration of means and methods than the ‘Prophet’s’ boast’:
‘I have been made victorious through terror’? (Bukhari 4. 52: 220)
A chilling declaration indeed, the evil of which is reinforced by the fact that in Islam, Mohammad is the example Muslims must follow. For in the Qur’an, we read:
“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.” (Qur’an 33:21)
A religion founded on verses and actions such as these has violence, conquest, and hate at its very heart.
That doesn‘t stop Western bien-pensants liberals proclaiming that Jihadist terror attacks ‘Have nothing to do with Islam’.
It’s as if Jesus’ injunctions in the Sermon on the Mount, such as:
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy. ‘But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you’ had nothing to do with the forgiveness offered to their attackers by the relatives of victims of the Omagh bombings or those who survived Dylann Roof’s murders of black people at Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, Carolina.
Of course, most Muslims have not gone on Jihad and are never likely to.
Nor are they violent or overtly hostile to their non-Muslim neighbours, especially if they live in Muslim-minority societies or in areas which are not adjacent to non-Muslim populations.
Western leftists/liberals, anxious to exculpate their policy of the mass importation of Muslims point to this and argue that Jihad means internal spiritual struggle.
So too do Muslims who are keen to disguise the true nature and intent of their religion, as the doctrines of al-Taqiyya allow.
But the Sufi al Ghazzali, Islam’s leading commentator apart from Mohammad himself and who is considered a ‘moderate’, makes it clear, reflecting Mohammad’s own reported remarks, that Jihad means both spiritual struggle and aggression against non-believers.
“Declare your jihad on thirteen enemies you cannot see – egoism, arrogance, conceit, selfishness, greed, lust, intolerance, anger, lying, cheating, gossiping and slandering.
If you can master and destroy them, then you will be ready to fight the enemy you can see.
“…one must go on Jihad at least once a year… One may use a catapult against them when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children.
“One may set fire on them and/or drown them.’ (al-Ghazzali, Wagjiz,)
Muslims who do not engage in aggressive Jihad and who live peaceably are not ’moderate’ Muslims. There is no such thing as moderate Islam.
There are simply Muslims who are keeping their heads down because they prefer a quiet life when circumstances so dictate – Islamic commentators recommend this.
Or because they are bad Muslims who do not live up to the express dictates of their religion, just as there have been plenty of people called Christians who have not tried to live up to the Sermon on the Mount.
But it doesn’t take much to set alight a bonfire soaked in petrol, which is what Islamic teaching is.
Admitting multitudes of people with historical, ethnic and/or religious grievances against us, and who actively despise the West while accepting what it has to offer, is begging to be dominated by them.
To be dominated by a vastly inferior and barbaric culture and religion.
It is simply insanity.
