BNP Launches Antidote to Dumbing Down of Kids’ British History Knowledge

The British National Party has today launched the antidote to the deliberate dumbing down of schoolchildren’s British history knowledge with the launch of a new version of HE Marshall’s classic Our Empire Story.

The reprint of the 1908 classic, suppressed by the politically correct maniacs because of its overtly pro-British sentiments and riveting account of the creation of the British Empire, has just been completed and is available for the very first time today. Its unashamedly pro-British stance and the use of language which would be considered by the leftist extremists as very un-politically correct have prevented its republication until now.

Its launch coincides with a shocking report released by Professor Derek Matthews, an economics lecturer at Cardiff University, which showed that the twisted leftist teaching curriculum of the past few decades had so decimated young peoples’ historical knowledge that over 65 percent of them did not know that Queen Elizabeth I was queen at the time of the Armada.

Professor Matthews’ test was conducted over a three year period using first year university students, who presumably would have been the most read of the younger generation.

Only 15.5 percent of students knew that the Duke of Wellington was in charge of the army at the Battle of Waterloo. 34.5 percent knew who the reigning monarch was when the Spanish Armada attacked Britain and only 11.5 percent could name one British prime minister in the 19th century.

Only 40.5 percent could say what Isambard Kingdom Brunel’s profession was and a shocking 69.4 percent had no idea where the Anglo-Boer War was fought.

Professor Matthews, who lectures in economic history said, in a report on what he called the ‘death’ of school history teaching, that students in a typical tutorial had never heard of the Reformation and did not know what was meant by the term Protestant.

One thought Martin Luther was an American civil rights leader. His students were probably in the top 15 percent of their age group for educational success, he added.

“This implies that, all things being equal, 85 percent of my undergraduates’ age group know even less than they do.

“In other words, we are looking at a whole generation that knows almost nothing about the history of their (or anyone else’s) country. This is an outrage and should be intolerable.”

It is clear that the extremist leftists who run Britain’s educational system have engaged in a deliberate programme to rid British children of any sense of national identity, history or worth.

It is to correct this disgusting state of affairs that a serious amount of behind-the-scenes work was put into producing a new, but faithful to the original, version of Our Empire Story.

Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall (1867-1941) was born in Bo’ness, Scotland, and educated at Laurel Bank School in Melrose. She travelled the world extensively, living in Melbourne, California and China. She is famous for a number of best-selling children’s history books, including her 1905 classic Our Island Story: A History of England for Boys and Girls, which was a bestseller and for fifty years was the standard and much-loved book by which children learned the history of England.

H.E. Marshall also wrote:  Scotland’s Story: A History of Scotland for Boys and Girls (1906); Beowulf: Translations (1908); Our Empire Story (1908); English Literature for Boys and Girls (1909); History of France (1912); History of Germany; The Story of the United States (1919); Kings and Things (1937). Reprints of these classics are also in the pipeline and details will be announced shortly.

Our Empire Story is one of the great classics which emanated from the time when the British Empire was at its height. Spanning four continents, the Empire included Canada, Southern Africa, India, Australia and New Zealand — and this hugely entertaining book covers them all. This epic deals with each individual nation from the time of the first European settlement to the beginning of the twentieth century. Originally designed for children aged 9 to 12 years, the immense readability of Our Empire Story quickly gained it a far wider audience. It became a bestseller of its day.

Written in the colourful style of its time, complete with references which today would be considered very non-pc, Our Empire Story is an unashamedly pro-British book and is filled with stories of high drama, humour and tragedy. Above all, it serves as a lasting testament to one of the most powerful empires in history, 387 pages. Click here to purchase online.

In addition, Excalibur also stocks

H.E. Marshall’s classic Our Island Story: A History of Britain for Boys and Girls from the Romans to Queen Victoria.

First published in 1905, this children’s history of Britain, from the time of the Romans to the death of Queen Victoria, became an instant classic. Beautifully written, with the narrative sweep of the best story-tellers, Our Island Story went through many editions and has remained one of the most popular one-volume histories of Britain.

Leading historians of the present day like Lady Antonia Fraser and Andrew Roberts have testified to the effect that this book had on them by igniting a passionate love of history in young minds through its thrilling narrative. Softcover, 520 pp. 

Click here to purchase online.

Daily Mail Attempts to Deceive Its Readers on Forced Marriage Issue

The Tory-supporting Daily Mail newspaper has once again deliberately tried to deceive its readers with a blatant misrepresentation on the horrific 913 percent increase in forced marriages amongst the colonising Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations in Britain.

According to a report issued by the Forced Marriage Unit (FMU) - a joint operation run by the  Home Office and Foreign Office to try and counteract this Third World cultural practice which the colonisers have imported to Britain - there has been a 16 percent increase in cases over last year already.

The FMU, set up after the Third World immigration invasion started and funded by British taxpayers, has already received 770 calls for help this year. Projected forward, this means that in excess of 1,500 forced marriages will have taken place before the end of this year, an increase of more than 913 percent.

Despite the Daily Mail’s article specifically pointing out that the “practice affects mainly young Asian women, with more than a third of cases involving those aged under 18″, the photograph which it used to accompany the article was of a white couple wearing traditional western wedding attire (see above).

Under the photograph of a white bride, the Daily Mail put this caption: “Coerced: By the end of this year there could be 1,540 Britons who have been forced into marriage.”

This is blatant deception on two levels. Firstly, as the FMU report clearly states, the majority of the ‘victims’ of these forced marriages are young Pakistani and Bangladeshi girls, who are most certainly not ‘Britons’ by any stretch of the imagination; and secondly, the use of a white couple to depict a ‘forced marriage’ is obviously an attempt by that paper to create a totally false visual impression of the problem.

According to the FMU, 770 forced marriage cases were reported to the Forced Marriage Unit this year, up from 152 in 2005. The FMU report said that its advisors had spoken to “hundreds of schoolchildren who have confided to teachers that they fear they will be taken abroad in the summer holidays and forced to marry.”

This ties in with earlier reports which have revealed that at least 40 percent of under 20s in London are non-indigenous British, and there are ever increasing numbers of non-white youth across all corners of Britain.

To make matters worse, the Foreign Office minister who has now seen fit to comment on this disaster is Chris Bryant. “There is no culture in which this is acceptable in a modern world,” Mr Bryant said in his reaction.

Mr Bryant, however, is not the best person to comment on such matters. In 2003 he was discovered to have solicited anonymous sex and posed wearing only underpants on a homosexual dating site, Gaydar, while an MP.

* Colonisation occurs when an invading population reaches sufficient numbers and strength to force its culture and way of life upon the indigenous population. This is what is happening in Britain today.

Rapes in London Schools Rise 100% as Third World Population Reaches 40% of Under 20s

Rapes have risen by 100 percent amongst London schoolchildren over the last five years - directly mirroring the Third World colonisation of the capital which has seen at least 40 percent of the under 20 population become non-indigenous in origin.

The shocking sex crime figures were released by the Metropolitan Police yesterday. Of course they failed to link it to the figures in the recent Whitehall’s annual Regional Trends report which revealed that more than 700,000 children and teenagers in Britain are classed as non-white, and make up 40 percent of that age group in London.

Overall, rapes have more than doubled in five years and reported sex assaults have shot up from 165 in 2004/5 to 246 in 2008/9. The figures refer to cases on school grounds.

According to the new Met figures, almost 900 young boys and girls have been subjected to sex assaults including rape in London’s primary and secondary schools in the past five years.

The Met says that children as young as four have made allegations of rape. Commander Mark Simmons said the total of the reported sex assaults in independent and state schools could be as little as 10 percent of the real number occurring.

“We want to encourage young people to come and tell us what has happened to them. We want to assure them action will be taken,” Commander Simmons said, adding that the police have already been forced to assign 180 full-time officers to specific schools in London.

The Met figures show 52 children under the age of 18 were raped in primary and secondary schools since 2004. In that time a further 763 were the victims of other sexual assaults such as “penetration and inappropriate touching.”

Rape convictions rose in one year by 60 percent to 32 in 2008/9, while the number of alleged rapes soared 50 percent, from 10 to 15, in the same period.

Commander Simmons said the “peak age” of victims is 12 to 14, and mainly girls, but there are cases of boys being raped.

The Regional Trends report revealed that it is estimated that a third of all of London’s population is non-white, but this figure is to change dramatically as the predominantly youthful population matures.

Three London boroughs now have majority non-white populations: Newham, Tower Hamlets and Brent. Around 15 percent of young Londoners are classed as Asian and 14 percent as black.

Britain Becomes World’s Laughing Stock as 71% of All New Jobs Go to Foreigners

Britain has become the laughing stock of the world with a new international report which reveals that the percentage of new jobs here which have been taken by those born overseas is the highest of any of the major economies.

More than seven out of ten jobs created in the last ten years from March 1997 to March 2007 have been taken by those born overseas, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) revealed in a report released yesterday.

The OECD said employment in Britain had risen by about two million jobs over that period, but almost 1.5 million of this was accounted for by persons born abroad.

This translates to 71 percent of all jobs having gone to foreigners. In France, it made up less than 20 percent of the total, and in Ireland and Australia less than 30 percent.

Only the tiny country of Luxembourg (population 486,000) saw more of its new jobs taken by migrant workers, the OECD said.

Even the United States of America, which is being invaded by untold millions from Mexico and Latin America, only lost 58 percent of all new jobs to foreign-born.

Around 30 percent of all foreigners arrived in Britain on intra-company transfers, the OECD said. The system allows international companies to transfer their staff to the UK.

The companies did not have to advertise the post in the UK first and staff can stay for up to three years, plus a possible two-year extension after which they can apply for permanent settlement.

Last year it was revealed that one of the biggest importers of such immigrants was the Indian IT industry, with one company in particular bringing in over 11,000 persons per year.

The OECD figures do not include the 151,635 work permits given to non-EU nationals since March 2007 - a figure which has undoubtedly contributed to the rising unemployment rate of British workers. Unemployment rose by 290,000 from 1 December 2007 to 30 November 2008.

So much for Gordon Brown’s “British jobs for British workers” claim which has turned out to be yet another lie.

BNP Sleazebuster Mick Barnbrook Takes another Scalp as Harry Cohen Steps Down

British National Party sleazebuster Mick Barnbrook has taken yet another scalp with the announcement that Labour MP Harry Cohen is to step down at the next election due to allegations of expense fiddling.

Mr Barnbrook, a former Metropolitan police inspector, who is also the BNP’s spokesman on police matters, was the one who first raised the entire issue of expense fiddling with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards when he complained about Tory MP Derek Conway.

It was that complaint which resulted in the first review of MPs’ expenses. Since then, Mr Barnbrook has overseen the downfall of at least two other senior members of the Westminster gang, and has lodged complaints against a further 19 with the commissioner.

Mr Cohen, MP for Wanstead and Leyton, is one of the 19, and has directly attributed his decision to stand down as an MP at the next election to Mr Barnbrook’s complaints.

“A major influence has been recent events around Parliamentary expenses,” Mr Cohen told a newspaper.

“I am still awaiting my name to be cleared both by the Press Complaints Commission and the Commissioner for Parliamentary Standards after a complaint was lodged against me by a BNP member,” Mr Cohen said.

Mr Barnbrook has also requested the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to investigate Mr Cohen because he believes the matter is so clear-cut as to warrant criminal charges.

 ”Members of Parliament are able to claim up to £24,006 a year for a second home in order to be near to the House of Commons to vote,” Mr Barnbrook explained.

“Mr Cohen has nominated a one bedroom house seventy miles from his constituency in Colchester as his main home, rather than a big house he owns in his constituency of Leyton and Wanstead.

“By doing this he is able to claim the full additional costs allowance of £24,006 on the bigger house in Leyton, by nominating it as his second home. If he had nominated the one bedroom house in Colchester as his second home, the amount of money he would have been able to claim in additional costs allowance would have been substantially less.

“Mr Cohen is on record as saying that he lives in Leyton and only visits the house in Colchester on some weekends.

Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Cohen has claimed the full additional costs allowance since 1990. “If this is correct it means he has claimed £310,714 in total.”

One down, 18 to go, concluded a satisfied Mr Barnbrook.

Islamists Call on Muslims to “Take Revenge” on France for Banning the Burka

Al-Qaeda’s North Africa wing has called on Muslims to “take revenge” and retaliate against France for its opposition to the burka, the American monitoring service SITE Intelligence has reported.

Earlier this month, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the burka, which covers the whole face, was not welcome in France.

“Yesterday was the hijab (the Islamic headscarf long banned in French schools) and today, it is the niqab (the full veil),” Abu Musab Abdul Wadud, head of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb was quoted by SITE as saying.

“We will take revenge for the honour of our daughters and sisters against France and against its interests by every means at our disposal.”

The group also called on Muslims to retaliate for what it called French “hostility” against the community and its attempt to obstruct Islam’s practice on its territory.

“For us, the mujahedeen … we will not remain silent to such provocations and injustices,” Abdul Wadud said without elaborating, according to SITE.

“We call upon all Muslims to confront this hostility with greater hostility, and to counter France’s efforts to divide male and female believers from their faith with a greater effort … (by) adherence to the teachings of their Islamic sharia.”

He said Muslims in France, who are estimated at around five million, are “increasingly concerned about the practices of French politicians and leaders and their harassment.”

On 22 June, President Sarkozy said the burka was not a symbol of religious faith but a sign of women’s “subservience,” adding that the head-to-toe veil was “not welcome” in staunchly secular France.

France is home to Europe’s largest Muslim community and faces a dilemma between accommodating Islam and maintaining secularism. In 2004, it passed a law banning headscarves or any other “conspicuous” religious symbols in schools to uphold a separation between church and state.

Al-Qaeda number two Ayman al-Zawahiri criticized the law, saying the decision showed “the grudge the Western crusaders have against Islam.”

German Parliament’s Powers Are Usurped by Lisbon Treaty, Court Rules

The German Constitutional Court has ruled that critical powers of the German parliament are usurped by the Lisbon Treaty and that the country’s constitution must be changed before the treaty is ratified.

The Court ruling today said that the German constitution had to be changed to ensure that both houses of the German parliament, the Bundestag and Bundesrat, were not overridden by the decisions taken in Brussels.

These two legislative bodies had to have a say in the making of laws in Brussels, the court ruled.

The ruling confirms the long held British National Party position on the Lisbon Treaty which is that that agreement undermines national sovereignty and will see legislative power removed from all national parliaments and transferred to the EU.

Although the media are attempting to put a positive spin on the court’s ruling by highlighting the fact that the Lisbon Treaty will go ahead once the constitutional changes have been made, the reality is that if the amendment fails in the German parliament, the treaty will be dead.

Germany is one of the EU’s most powerful constituent states and at least 50 members of its parliament are known to be strongly opposed to the treaty.

The court’s ruling specifically called a halt to the ratification process until the German parliament makes the necessary changes. Specifically, the court ruled, the existing law which regulates the German parliament’s involvement in the implementation of European law needs to be strengthened before the ratification process can continue.

“It demands a strengthening of the parliament’s responsibilities on a national level,” said presiding judge Andreas Vosskuhle.

Germany is one of four countries that has still not ratified the Lisbon Treaty, which is in essence identical to an earlier constitution rejected by the voters of France and the Netherlands in 2005.

Ireland rejected the treaty in a referendum last year and euro-sceptic presidents in the Czech Republic and Poland have refused to rubber-stamp approval of the constitution.

One of the strongest critics of the Lisbon Treaty is Mr Peter Gauweiler, a member of Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (CSU) in the German Bundestag. The CSU is the sister party to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling Christian Democratic Party. Mr Gauweiler is also the chairman of the sub-committee on foreign cultural and educational policies of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the German Bundestag, and was one of the principal appellants in the motion which led to the recent German Constitutional Court challenge.

Mrs Merkel is strongly in favour of the Lisbon Treaty, and a falling out with Mr Gauweiler could provoke a parliamentary crisis for the ruling party. The German parliament is to gather for a special sitting on 26 August for a first reading of the new law. The vote in the lower house would then take place on 8 September, just weeks before Germany’s national election.

Hypocrisy: ‘Black Lawyer Society’ Chief Wants Race Laws Tightened against Whites

In a move dripping with the most outrageous irony, the head of the overtly non-whites only ‘Society of Black Lawyers’ has called for race laws to be tightened to prevent the British National Party from distributing leaflets such as the one used by the party in the  Greater London Assembly election last year.

Mr Peter Herbert, the chairman of the Society of Black Lawyers, has already formally complained over the BNP leaflet which showed how white British people have been ethnically cleansed from the streets of many parts of London.

Not too surprisingly, his complaint went nowhere, and in a childish outburst he has now called on the Government to change the law to outlaw any expression of indigenous aspirations - while, of course, ignoring the fact that he heads up an organisation whose membership is exclusively aimed at looking after the interests of non-white, non-indigenous people.

According to the blacks-only lawyer, the threshold for securing a conviction is so high that it is currently impossible to persuade the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to prosecute the BNP.

Of course, what he actually means is that he wants the law changed to prevent anybody pointing out that Britain is being colonised.

Furthermore, the ‘offence’ of incitement to racial hatred was created under the Public Order Act and therefore only applies to acts that take place or are witnessed in public. Leaflets pushed through a letter box do not qualify under this act, and it is this point in particular that has the blacks-only lawyer boss unhappy.

Astonishingly, Mr Herbert admitted to the extremist leftist Guardian newspaper that the only reason why he was now raising it as an issue was because of the rise in support for the BNP. “It is essential we are given the tools to deal effectively with this threat,” Mr Herbert told that paper.

This is not the first time that leftist cranks have tried to prosecute the BNP for telling the truth. Currently there are four people on police bail in Lancashire who were arrested after they distributed a leaflet pointing out the dominance of Muslim gangs in the heroin trade.

Ironically, the men are out on bail while the police still wait to hear from the CPS if there is even a case to answer.

Mr Herbert, who despite his penchant for black-only organisations, is the former chair of the Metropolitan police race hate crime forum, said he would push for a change in the law to try and prevent the BNP from continuing to exist.

Muslims in Britain Have Religious Duty to “Fight the British and Americans” says New Sharia Court Exposé

Muslims living in Britain are under orders from Sharia courts to regard “fighting with Britons and Americans as a religious duty” a shocking new report on Sharia courts in Britain has claimed.

Issued by independent think tank Civitas, the new report, called “Sharia Law or ‘One Law for All’?” and authored by Islamic specialist Denis MacEoin, also says that there are now around 85 Sharia courts in Britain.

The open declaration of war - Jihad - against ordinary British and American people by Islamic law courts is a damning indictment of the treason committed by the Tory and Labour parties in allowing millions of Muslims to settle in Britain.

In addition to the horrifying declaration of holy war against British and American people, the Sharia courts operating in Britain have also ordered that:

- Sharia law must override the judgements of British courts;

- Muslims living in this country are under orders to disobey Britain’s laws when it contradicts Islamic values;

- Muslims are forbidden to take out insurance, even if required by (UK) law.

- There is no requirement to register a marriage according to the law of the country;

- Polygamous marriage (that is, two to four wives) is legal; and

- A Muslim lawyer has to act contrary to UK law where it contradicts Sharia.

According to a press release issued today by Civitas, the courts operate inside the rapidly spreading network of mosques throughout Britain.

In the press release, Mr MacEoin wrote that it is extremely difficult to find out what goes on in these 85 courts, so he has relied on a range of fatwas issued by popular online fatwa sites, run out of or accessed through mosques in the UK as an indication of the sort of rulings these Sharia courts are making.

Only five of the Sharia law courts are publicly known and run by the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal, a body whose rulings are enforced through the state courts under the 1996 Arbitration Act.

However, Mr MacEoin said that “Sharia courts should not be recognised under the Arbitration Act.

“Sharia courts operating in Britain may be handing down rulings that are inappropriate to this country because they are linked to elements in Islamic law that are seriously out of step with trends in Western legislation,” Mr MacEoin wrote.

The revelation that Sharia rulings or fatwas are being enforced through state courts by the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) has alarmed many, especially as the Arbitration Act, under which this takes place, specifically excludes divorce and childcare cases.

“Under most interpretations of Islam a person who leaves the faith is an apostate who can be put to death. While this threat remains, it cannot be accepted that Sharia councils are nothing more than independent arbitrators guided by faith,” the Civitas press release continued.

“The reality is that for many Muslims, Sharia courts are in practice part of an institutionalised atmosphere of intimidation, backed by the ultimate sanction of a death threat. The underlying problem is that Sharia law reflects male-dominated Asian and Arabic cultures. It cannot therefore be accepted as a legally valid basis even for settling private disagreements in a country like ours, where our law embodies the equal legal status of everyone, regardless of race, gender or religion.”

Mr MacEoin wrote in his conclusion that the “introduction of Sharia law into this country is a recipe for a dichotomous legal system that holds Muslims and non-Muslims to different standards.

“This is not a matter of eating halal meat or seeking God’s blessing on one’s marriage. It is a challenge to what we believe to be the rights and freedoms of the individual, to our concept of a legal system based on what Parliament enacts, and to the right of all of us to live in a society as free as possible from ethnic-religious division or communal claims to superiority and a special status that puts them in some respects above the law to which we are all bound.”

* In their coverage of the Civitas press release, all of the mainstream media deliberately suppressed the part dealing with the Sharia courts’ declaration of Jihad against British and American people.

Get your sensational copy of  Sharia Law or ‘One Law For All’?  from Excalibur now!

Sharia courts are operating in Britain, handing down rulings that may be inappropriate to this country, being linked to elements in Islamic law that are seriously out of step with trends in Western legislation that derive from the values of the Enlightenment and are inherent in modern codes of human rights. Sharia rulings contain great potential for controversy and may involve acts contrary to UK legal norms and human rights legislation. Denis MacEoin argues against the wider use of sharia law.
About the Author: Dr Denis MacEoin holds degrees from Trinity College, Dublin, Edinburgh University and Cambridge (King’s College). From 1979 80, he taught at Mohammed V University in Fez, Morocco, before taking up a post as lecturer in Arabic and Islamic Studies at Newcastle. In 1986, he was made Honorary Fellow in the Centre for Islamic and Middle East Studies at Durham University. 
Price:  £7.50

Click here to purchase online

Government Admits Its Housing Policy Is Anti-British

The Government has admitted that its housing policy has always been anti-British and hence the sudden change in direction announced today, said the British National Party’s deputy press officer John Walker.

Speaking to BNP News, Mr Walker, who is also a councillor in North Wales, said that the announcement by Gordon Brown today that British-born people will now get priority in the housing queue over immigrants and ‘asylum seekers’ was “proof positive that British people are put last.”

“Why else would there now be a change in policy if the old one was not anti-British?” Mr Walker asked.

“For years the BNP has said that British people are put last in the council housing queue, and for years the Government and Tories alike have said we were lying.

“But now we have an official announcement from the Prime Minister that a new policy is to be introduced which will ban immigrants and asylum seekers from jumping the housing queue. Mr Brown is in effect saying that prior to this, immigrants and asylum seekers were jumping the queue - just as the BNP said.”

The policy shift was a transparent attempt to try and win back support which the Labour Party has lost to the BNP, Mr Walker continued.

“This is of course hopeless, and merely shows how out of touch Mr Brown and his party are with the electorate.

“People are upset over the fact they have been put last on the housing queue. But they are also upset over the selling off of all the public utilities, the bailing out of the bankster criminals, the flooding of our country with mass Third World immigration, the criminal foreign wars into which Labour and Tories alike have plunged our soldiers, the destruction of our educational system and so much more,” he said.

“To think that people are going to go back to the Labour Party just because the Prime Minister has admitted that his party’s housing policies are indeed anti-British is a delusion.

“Those who have seen through the Labour Party and have switched to the BNP are well aware that almost everything that comes out of Westminster these days is a pack of lies,” Mr Walker said.

“People know that the BNP was the only party which raised the issue of the anti-British housing policies, and that we were berated for doing so. Now that we have been proven right yet again, we are going to take the credit, and the other parties better accept it.”

Cultural and Religious Pluralism in Britain Has Killed the Church of England, Says Bishop

Cultural and religious pluralism has meant the end of the Church of England and the decline of Britain as a Christian nation, Anglican Bishop the Rt Rev Paul Richardson has warned.

In a move which confirms the British National Party’s warnings of the effects of mass Third World immigration, Bishop Richardson said that the rise in multiculturalism means that “Christian Britain is dead.”

Predicting that at current rates of non-attendance, the church would die out within a generation, Bishop Richardson said that declining baptisms and church weddings were a sign that the Church of England was on its way out.

The number of babies being baptised has fallen from 609 in every 1,000 at the turn of the twentieth century to only 128 in 2006/7 and church marriages have also dropped.

Of course, Bishop Richardson did not point out the obvious, namely that government statistics and anecdotal evidence show that nearly 50 percent of all live births in Britain are to Third World colonisers, and that this alone would have massively impacted the number of church baptisms and weddings.

The mass Islamic colonisation of Britain has meant the creation of a Muslim parallel society which will ultimately physically destroy all vestiges of the CoE and the falling baptism rate is but the precursor to this process.

Writing in the The Sunday Telegraph, Bishop Richardson said: “Many bishops prefer to turn their heads, to carry on as if nothing has changed, rather than face the reality that Britain is no longer a Christian nation.”

Instead of facing up to the reality of their own extinction at the hands of the colonising swarms from the Third World, the church leadership has rather spent its time spreading poison and lies about the British National Party.

The Church is now reaping what it has helped sow: The General Synod, the Church’s parliament, will next month consider proposals to cut the number of bishops and senior clergy amid fears over the Church’s finances.

Bishop Richardson said, “The church is being hit by a double whammy: on the one hand it confronts the challenge of institutional decline but on the other hand it has to face the rise of cultural and religious pluralism in Britain.”

He says that the way the Church responds to this will be “crucial in determining whether it will be able to survive as a viable organisation and make a contribution to national life.”

Foreign Criminals Find Safe Haven in Open Door Britain

Foreign criminals of the worst sort are deliberately entering Britain because of the open doors policy which effectively prevents them from ever being deported.

Albania’s police chief has warned that Britain has become “the favourite sanctuary for fugitives” including the most sought after murderers from his country.

According to new figures released by the Home Office, in the year to April, British authorities received more than 3,500 requests from foreign countries for the return of their criminals, a figure which had increased by 24 percent since the previous twelve months.

Of that number, more than 150 were suspected or convicted murderers. The astonishing total was up by a quarter on the previous 12 months.

Detective Chief Inspector Murray Duffin of the Scotland Yard Extradition and Intelligence Unit was quoted in media reports as warning that “Britain is becoming a magnet for increasing numbers of criminals from the former Eastern bloc countries which are now members of the EU.”

The number of criminals being sought by Poland has soared 14-fold since 2004 when that country joined the EU and its citizens were allowed to travel to and live freely in Britain.

The situation is now so bad that the Warsaw police actually send a charter plane to Britain every month to bring back criminals who have fled Poland for Britain, accused of crimes ranging from murder, rape and robbery to burglary, drugs and theft.

The Albanian police chief said that Britain is currently harbouring at least 80 Albanian murderers and 20 other serious offenders. Many are already British citizens after having claimed asylum by pretending to be from war-torn Kosovo.

According to British police figures, 20 percent of all offences in London are committed by those born overseas. This figure rises to 33 percent in the case of sex attacks, and 50 percent of all frauds.

To make matters worse, only a small number of those accused of crimes in their home country are ever extradited. 

Of the 3,526 foreigners for whom extradition requests were made by European Union countries in the past year, 683 were arrested and only one in seven - 516 - returned, according to the latest figures issued by the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

The wanted criminals avoid extradition by using easily exploitable legislation such as the Human Rights Act which forbids the breakup of families. In addition, they can also avoid deportation in cases where they might face an unfair trial, abuse of their human rights or the death penalty back home.

In this way, a criminal can merely claim that he or she might not get a fair trial in order to avoid deportation. Furthermore, if they claim asylum, then that process first has to be finalised - meaning that years can elapse before an extradition hearing can even start.

Recent high profile cases where these excuses have been used to keep criminals in Britain - at taxpayers’ expense for both benefits and legal costs - include:

- Estonian Fred Undrits, wanted in Estonia for arson. He was brought to the extradition hearing from prison, where he is serving a 56-day sentence for shoplifting. He has been in Britain since 2006 and his case will take years to decide.

- Albanian Shkelzen Gradica who has been convicted in Italy of attempted murder. His defence team has argued that deportation will breach his human rights because the trial under which he was convicted was based on an ‘unreliable witness.’ The possibility of a British court being able to decide whether or not that is true is almost impossible, hence the case hangs in limbo.

- Pole Maciej Blaszko has been accused in Warsaw of attempted robbery and driving without a licence. He has fought extradition with lawyers funded by the British taxpayer, arguing that the police case against him was prepared when he had already fled to Britain.

- Czech paedophile Julius Horvath was convicted in 1996 of the sexual assault and rape of a child in his home country. He came to Britain in 2000 and successfully claimed asylum, getting benefits and a council flat in Leeds. He has been arrested here for affray, being drunk and disorderly, serious assault and shoplifting. He cannot be deported because he has family in Britain and extradition would infringe his right to ‘family life’ under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act

Britain’s Shame: 1.4 Million OAPs Forced out of Retirement to Make Ends Meet

The disgraceful way in which Britain’s elderly people are the victims of decades of Labour and Tory economic mismanagement has been highlighted with the news that over 1.4 million old age pensioners have been forced back to work to make ends meet.

Research released by Key Retirement Solutions Group, a firm specialising in equity release schemes, found that 17 percent of pensioner households were receiving income from earnings in the financial year 2007-08, compared to 12 percent in 1997-98.

The figures also showed the proportion of pensioner couples supplementing their income through work had increased from 22 percent to 29 percent over the same period.

The announcement came on the heels of official figures which showed that British pensions are the worst in the developed world. A report from the Office for National Statistics showed that pensioners living solely on state benefits receive less than a third of the income of average workers, and put the UK at the bottom of a league table of 17 leading industrialised countries.

One of the major reasons for the increase in OAPs being forced back to work is the depreciation in pension values caused by ever increasing taxation on pensions.

Neil Duncan-Jordan, of the National Pensioners Convention, said many pensioners were being forced to work to stay above the poverty line.

“Britain has long had the worst state pension in Europe. If we had a substantial improvement in the state pension, then pensioners would have a choice whether to carry on working until they drop or not. At present, many of them don’t have that choice,” he said.

* Taxpayers will have to fork out an extra £2.3 billion a year to fund gold-plated public sector pensions as a black hole in the Government’s finances doubles in just four years.

The cost of looking after retired civil servants and other state workers is soaring because current public sector staff are not paying enough into the state pension pot, according to official figures hidden away in the most recent budget.

Forecasts show that officials expect the shortfall to have reached £4.6 billion by 2010-11. Over the five years between 2006 and 2011 taxpayers are expected to have to pay out £14.1 billion to bail out public sector pensions.

Criminal Somali Asylum Swindler Released to Prey on Brits Once Again

A criminal Somali bogus ‘asylum seeker’ who has robbed and parasited off the British public for over ten years has been ordered released from prison because of the Human Rights Act.

Ahmed Daq must be given bail because the Home Office has taken too long to deport him and his continued detention is now unlawful, a High Court judge has ruled.

Daq has a history of violent offences but in spite of this he is to be released because the Home Office is still caught up in debates over whether it is ’safe’ for him to be sent back to Somalia.

The decision was made even though Deputy High Court judge John Howell QC accepted clearly a risk of Daq, who had “embarked on a criminal career”, committing further offences or absconding.

Daq first arrived in the UK in 1997 and claimed asylum as a Somali national who feared for his life in his home country.

Addicted to alcohol and drugs, Daq committed 18 offences between 1998 and 2004, using 13 aliases. They included robbery, theft, two assaults occasioning actual bodily harm, possession of an offensive weapon - an axe - in a public place without reasonable excuse, using threatening words and behaviour, and seven burglaries.

He was last due to be released in June 2006 but was immediately served with a further notice of intention to deport to Somalia and detained pending removal. He has been in custody ever since.

The judge said because there is no imminent prospect of deportation, the Home Office could no longer legitimately hold him. He said: “Removal is not going to be possible within a reasonable time. Therefore his detention has become unlawful.”

The reason for the delay is because Daq has launched an appeal against his deportation in the Court of Appeals. His hearing has been delayed as the legal debate continues over whether it is safe to return criminals and failed ‘asylum seekers’ to the wretched Third World east African state.

He is currently being held in Bedford Prison following alleged incidents of aggressive and abusive behaviour, including attacks on other inmates, in immigration detention centres.

Speaking after the hearing, Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said: “The public are losing patience with these increasingly absurd decisions on so-called asylum seekers.

“This man has no right to be in Britain but has been playing the system for ten years with taxpayer funded legal aid.

“It is quite unacceptable that he should now be released when, as the judge recognised, there is a clear risk that he will commit yet more offences. If the law requires this then Parliament should do something useful and change it.” 

Colonisation of Britain Continues: One New Household Every Two Minutes

Mass Third World immigration has reached such epidemic proportions that even members of the parties responsible for the invasion policies have described it as “madness.”

According to figures in the recently released Office for National Statistics (ONS) Regional Trends report (which said that at least 40 percent of London’s under 20-year-old population was non-white), one new household will be formed every two minutes until 2021 with half of it driven by immigration.

The report revealed that 70 percent of the population increase up to 2031 will be due to immigration. It showed that the projected number of households in England and Wales will rise by nearly four million over 15 years, from 21.52 million in 2006 to 25.44 million in 2021.

Of these, more than a million will be in London and the South-east. By

2031, experts forecast there will be a further 2.5 million households in England - a total of 27.82 million.

Labour MP Frank Field and Conservative MP Sir Nicholas Soames, chairmen of Parliament’s cross-party Group on Balanced Migration, ignoring the reality that their own parties’ decades old open doors policies directly created the Third World immigration invasion, described the development as “madness.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of think tank Migrationwatch, said: “For years the Government have been in denial about the massive impact of immigration on housing.

“They cannot any longer deny we will have to build a new home every five minutes for the next 15 years just for new immigrants.

“Given the financial crisis that the Government faces, this is absolutely crazy. Where is all the money going to come from to build not only houses but also schools, hospitals and roads that will be needed?”

* Other shocking figures released by the ONS yesterday showed that 21.9 percent of new births in Britain are from a mother born abroad.

These figures do not include births from second or third generation immigrant women, who are not counted as foreign by the statistics service.

The number of babies born to immigrant mothers shot up by almost two thirds between 2001 and 2007. More than one in five children born in Britain in 2007 had a mother born overseas - a total of 160,300 compared with 529,700 for British-born mothers.

In the London boroughs of Newham and Brent - which the earlier ONS report revealed had majority non-white populations, 74.8 percent and 72 percent of all births were to foreign-born women.

The increase - well above the 6.4 percent rise in numbers of births among British-born women - is because more immigrants are coming to live in the UK, said the Office for National Statistics.

Robert Whelan, of the Civitas think tank, said: “This shows the impact that mass immigration is having on the demography of the country.

“It’s changing the make-up of the population. Many of the children now being born will be brought up in a different culture to that of the majority population. This suggests there may be issues in the future when the children grow up.”

British-born women will have a theoretical average of 1.6 children each. But mothers born outside Britain have an average of 2.2 children. Among women from Pakistan and Bangladesh the average is 4.7 and 3.9 children respectively.

Official projections suggest that the UK population will reach 70 million by 2028, and that 70 percent of the 10 million increase will be driven by immigration.

Rotten to the Core — BBC Chief Says Expenses Claims for Champagne and Handbags Were “Justified”

The Director General of the BBC, Mark Thompson, has justified more than a third of a million pounds in expenses claimed by his organisation’s executives, some of which was used to buy private aircraft flights, vintage champagne and new handbags.

Mr Thompson said, “Every one of those expenses in my view was reasonable and was justified.”

The BBC - which is public funded through the legally coerced television licence - pays 27 of its senior employees in excess of £195,000, or more than the Prime Minister’s salary. Mr Thompson earns £647,000 a year.

Matthew Elliott, of the campaign group TaxPayers’ Alliance, was quoted in the media as saying that Mr Thompson’s “defence of BBC executive pay and expenses rings a similar note to MPs saying they were acting ‘within the rules’.

“Taxpayers and licence-fee payers are tightening their belts during the recession, so they expect the BBC to enter a similar age of austerity. No vintage champagne, no private jets, no long lunches with colleagues.”

Mr Thompson claimed £2,236.90 of licence fee-payers’ money to fly his family home from a holiday in Sicily to deal with the Sachsgate affair, when BBC stars Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand left lewd remarks on the answerphone of actor Andrew Sachs.

Former BBC director of future media and technology Ashley Highfield charged the corporation more than £450 for the purchase of two iPods and more than £1,400 for two years’ worth of subscription to Sky. His pay in 2007 was £466,000.

His successor and current incumbent of that BBC post, Mr Erik Huggers, is no less shy in his claims. Apart from his salary, Mr Huggers has claimed £1,512.72 for a staff lunch at MipTV in Cannes, a £1,430.08 restaurant bill from Highfield for 29 people at a Las Vegas hotel, £1,624.48 on two private car bookings, and his own £53-a-month Sky subscription.

Documents released by the BBC following Freedom of Information requests show that its staff spent a total of £12.9 million on hotels in nine months between April and December 2007. During 2007 the BBC spent £13.6m on airplane flights. In addition, the corporation spent £13.8m on taxi fares and £5.2m on private car hire between April 2007 and March 2008.

* The BBC has spent many hundreds of thousands of license payers’ funds subsidising programming consisting of smear after smear against the BNP.

“Climate Change” — Liberal Fools Blame West but Biggest Offenders Are Middle Eastern Countries

The barrage of incompetent liberal fools led by Gordon Brown have demanded that European First World nations take the blame and financial responsibility for alleged global warming - when statistics show that the biggest per capita culprits for CO₂ emissions are Middle Eastern nations.

Mr Brown, pretending to be an authority on the subject, but revealing his total ignorance once again, called for “rich countries” to hand over £60 billion in cash each year to assorted Third World countries to “help the developing world cope with the effects of global warming.”

In a speech at London Zoo, Mr Brown said the cash offer was intended to break the “political stalemate over a new global deal on greenhouse gas emissions.”

However, statistics from the World Resources Institute (see map and statistics here) show that the nations which are per capita responsible for the largest CO₂ emissions are those in the Middle East.

According to the official data, the single largest per capita offender for emissions is the nation of Qatar, which has an emission count of 40.6735 per 1,000 people. Second on the list is the United Arab Emirates, which has an emission count of 28.213 per 1,000 people.

Third on the list is Kuwait, which has an emission count of 25.0499 per 1,000 people, followed by Bahrain with a count of 20.0253 per 1,000 people.

The United States of America, often blamed as the single largest producer, is in fact only fifth on the list, with an emission count of 19.4839 per 1,000 people.

The United Kingdom ranks 25th on the list, with a count of 9.23587 per 1,000 people. This is considerably lower than Trinidad and Tobago, which is seventh of the list with an emission rate of 16.8278 per 1,000 people; Singapore, which with an emission rate of 13.8137 per 1,000 people is tenth on the list; and Palau, in the Pacific Ocean, which has an emission rate of 11.9096 per 1,000 people and is thirteenth on the list.

Other nations which have higher emission rates than Britain include Nauru (19th on the list with an emission rate of 10.3924 per 1,000 people) and Saudi Arabia (21st on the list with an emission rate of 10.072 per 1,000 people).

Under Mr Brown’s proposal, funding for these “developing nations” would begin in 2013 and rise to £60 billion a year by 2020. According to Mr Brown, these funds would “be raised from private and public sources, such as levies on international carbon trading schemes.” In other words, the cost of funding these subsidies will come from ordinary people in western countries, either through increased taxation or increased consumer prices.

* Ironically, China, which ranks low on the per capita ranking because of its massive population, yet who in real terms produces only slightly less CO₂ emissions than America, has demanded even more by way of subsidies to fund “climate change” in that nation.

China and other nations in the G77 group have demanded that “rich countries” hand over one percent of their GDP, which dwarfs even Mr Brown’s proposal.

* The British National Party accepts that climate change, of whatever origin, is a threat to Britain. Current evidence suggests that some of it may be manmade; even if this is not the case, then the principle of ‘better safe than sorry’ applies and we should try to minimise the emission of greenhouse gases and other pollutants.

Latest Liberal Assault on National Identity Targets Jewish School

The latest liberal assault on the concept of any sort of national identity or sense of group self-belonging has come with an Appeal Court ruling which has forbidden a London Jewish school the ability to define who is a Jew and who is not.

The ruling - which may have implications for not only faith schools but all groups and organisations which have an ethnically based character, including the British National Party - was made after Lord Justices Sedley and Rimer, and Lady Justice Smith said it was “clear that Jews constituted a racial group defined principally by ethnic origin and additionally by conversion.”

The case was brought before the Appeals Court after the state-funded Jewish school JFS refused to admit a pupil whose father was Jewish by birth but his mother not.

The Appeals Court judges ruled that ethnic tests of Jewishness amount to racial discrimination. Faith schools may discriminate on religious grounds but the Court held that this involved a test of ethnicity - which they said is unlawful.

The JFS, formerly the Jews’ Free School, gives preference to applicants whose Jewish status is confirmed by the United Synagogue, which in turn requires that the mother of the child be Jewish, in accordance with Jewish law.

The case in question involved a child, named M, whose mother converted to Judaism from Catholicism in a Progressive synagogue not recognised by the Orthodox United Synagogue.

The father of the child appealed against the decision to exclude his child, and the Appeals Court has now ruled in his favour.

 ”The refusal of JFS to admit M was accordingly, in our judgment, less favourable treatment of him on racial grounds.

“This does not mean … that no Jewish faith school can ever give preference to Jewish children. It means that, as one would expect, eligibility must depend on faith, however defined, and not on ethnicity.”

The United Synagogue said the decision affected any branch of Judaism that defines who is a Jew on the basis of descent (whether matrilineal or patrilineal).

It said Jewish schools of any sort - Reform, Liberal, Masorti, Charedi, Orthodox, Federation and so on - would be prohibited from giving priority to applicants who were a member of the Jewish faith.

It added: “In future, all Jewish schools (whether state or independent) will need to adopt a religious practice test, until such time as the Court of Appeals’ ruling is successfully overturned or a legislative amendment is made.”

“Unless the Court of Appeals decision is overturned on appeal it will have a very serious effect on all Jewish schools and on many of our communal organisations.”

While the full legal ramifications of the ruling will have to be carefully considered, there can be no doubt that it is a serious blow to any organisation or group which seeks to self-define its membership criteria. This could have important implications for a party such as the BNP, which also self-defines its membership.

Although there is a large difference between a state-funded faith school and a privately financed political party, all BNP members should be aware that the latest ruling represents a serious threat to any group which seeks to preserve its identity.

EU President: After Lisbon Treaty “Nearly 100%” of European Laws Will Be Made in Brussels

The president of the European Union Parliament, Hans Gert Pöttering, has stated unequivocally that once the Lisbon Treaty is fully implemented, the EU will be responsible for “nearly 100 percent” of all laws made in Europe.

Speaking on a Coveritlive.com question and answer session hosted by NRC Handelsblad in the Netherlands, Politiken.dk in Denmark and Spiegel Online in Germany, Mr Pöttering repeated his earlier comment in the European Parliament about the full extent of EU control over individual nations.

Responding to a question about the growth of the EU, Mr Pöttering said, “As a member of the European Parliament since the first election in 1979, I have witnessed the whole development of the European Parliament.

“In 1979, the European Parliament had no legislative power. Today, the European Parliament is co-legislator in around 75 percent of European legislation together with the Council,” Mr Pöttering said.

“With the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament will be co-legislator in almost 100 percent of the cases. The European Parliament has the last word as far as the EU budget is concerned.”

Mr Pöttering also confirmed that the Lisbon Treaty will allow the EU to take over all legislation on agriculture, immigration and asylum, saying; “With the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament will become legislator for agriculture, immigration, asylum, etc. It is a task for the future to get more influence in foreign policy as well, although the European Parliament can influence foreign policy already through the budget of the European Union.”

The EU president also announced that a priority for the EU was to “take care” of farmers in the Third World. “The percentage of the European budget allocated for agriculture has been reduced over the years,” he said.

“In the future we have to take care of the interests of the farmers, especially small farmers, in the Third World, especially in Africa. In the framework of the World Trade Organization, we need new agreements that are favourable for Africa,” he added.

* Mr Pöttering’s self published biography on his official EU website says that he has an “interest in intercultural dialogue.” In 2006 he visited southern Spain and established links with the ‘Tres Culturas’ organisation in Seville, whose work “focuses on immigration issues and dialogue between cultures.”

 

Islamification of Europe: Germany’s Muslim Population Jumps to 4.3 Million

A new study released by the German government’s Interior Ministry has claimed that there are a million more Muslims in Germany than originally thought, bringing the total to 4.3 million or at least five percent of its population.

The study, commissioned by the Interior Ministry together with Germany’s Islam Conference, also showed that just under half of the Muslims in that country are now German citizens.

Previous estimates of the number of Muslims in Germany had been between 3.1 and 3.4 million. The research conducted for the new study revealed that the actual figure is a million higher.

The reason for the huge increase is that the study’s authors took more countries of origin into account than had previously been the case, and also looked at the children of Muslims with German citizenship.

Regarding the issue of citizenship, the study revealed that around 45 percent of Muslims living in Germany have a German passport.

Almost two-thirds of Germany’s Muslims are of Turkish origin, the researchers found, while smaller groups come from Balkan countries such as Bosnia or Albania, the Middle East and North Africa.

Almost all live in the states of the former West Germany and Berlin, with the most living in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany’s most populous state.

The study also found that the majority of Muslims consider themselves religious. Around a third described themselves as “very religious” and a half said they were “somewhat religious.”

Some 76 percent said they wanted Islamic religious education classes in schools.

The study’s authors also found that the Muslim community is home to a disproportionately high level of school drop-outs, unemployed and poor people - particularly among immigrants of Turkish descent.

* In 2007, more than 16 million people in Germany were of non-German descent (first and second generation, including mixed heritage). As the total population was some 82 million, this represents some 20 percent of the country’s population. However, not all of these immigrants were of Third World origin, and estimates are that between 12 and 15 percent of the resident population of Germany are non-white.

Ominously, the young are more likely to be of foreign descent than the old. Some 30 percent of the population aged 15 years and younger have at least one parent born abroad. In the big cities, 60 percent of those aged 5 years and younger have at least one parent born abroad.

Germany has also been a prime destination for refugees from the Third World, primarily because its constitution long had a clause giving a ‘right’ to political asylum. The German constitution, adopted after the Second World War, compelled the country to accept virtually any refugee who was fleeing political or social violence in their home countries. As most of the Third World is continuously in strife, this was easy enough to prove, and millions of non-whites, fleeing their self-created chaotic countries, entered Germany in this way.

The massive Turkish influx has generated another issue in Germany: that of the creation of a numerically strong Islamic base there.

An article in Der Spiegel, Germany’s best-known news magazine, entitled ‘How Islam Came to Germany,’ by Ursula Spuler-Stegemann contains many important examples of how Muslims are replacing German culture with their own:

“Muslims have achieved a great deal and changed a number of things that many Germans once took for granted. Nowadays, there are women-only swimming days for Muslims with female supervisors, where the pool windows are draped with heavy curtains to prevent outsiders from peering inside.

“Crosses have been removed from many hospitals and schools, and special Islamic prayer rooms have been introduced to factories and public buildings. And there have been many other changes. Muslim parents now seek to exempt their daughters from overnight school field trips and co-ed sports classes.

“The question of whether public employees should be allowed to wear Islamic headscarves has been referred to the courts, along with the issue of religious studies in schools. Germany has already begun providing university education for its Muslim religious instruction teachers and imams.

“It appears the quiet settling-in period has been replaced by a loud and demanding phase. This raises concerns among many Germans that the minority society may come to dominate the majority society.”

The largest source of non-white immigration into Germany has been from Turkey, although the liberal asylum laws that country had until the mid-1990s encouraged several million other non-white immigration waves from Africa and Asia as well.

As is the case elsewhere in Europe, the Third World immigration population is dramatically overrepresented in German crime statistics. In Berlin, young male immigrants are three times more likely to commit violent crimes than their German peers. Figures released by the German government in 2007 showed that 43 percent of all violent crimes in Germany were committed by people under 21 years of age, and that more than half were by foreign-born youth. When the figures are adjusted to include the children of Third World immigrants, this figure climbs even higher.

Once again, this is reflected in the prison population, where, as early as 1997, some 27 percent of the prison population in 1997 was non-German. No figures have been made public on prison inmates who are second or third generation descendants of Third World immigrants, but, given the statistics from elsewhere in Europe, no imagination is needed to draw the obvious conclusion.

- The second part of this article is extracted from chapter five of the book The Immigration Invasion: How Third World Immigration is Destroying the First World and What Must be Done to Stop It, available from Excalibur by clicking here.

Next Page »