Yet another sign of the accelerating Islamification of Britain has come with the news that a Muslim prayer room has been specially constructed in the Government offices housing the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

There is no “Christian prayer room” in the new offices, which cost £3 million to upgrade. There is only a “contemplation area” and the Muslim area.

The refurbishment of Mr Ball’s offices have also included a massage room for him and his staff in case they get stiff spending the taxpayers’ money, or possibly from pain caused by sitting at their Italian designer furniture.

Mr Balls might need a massage after gorging himself at one of two cafes specially built in the new offices, or perhaps if he bumps into the black granite surface tops in the kitchen areas. 

Possibly Mr Balls might need massage after tripping on the grand staircase made from glass and surgical steel which cost several hundred thousand pounds.

The revelations around the luxury offices and the Muslim prayer room come the week after Mr Balls announced massive cutbacks in the Government’s education budget which could see up to 3,000 teachers lose their jobs.

Mark Wallace, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, was quoted in the media as saying that it was “appalling that with taxpayers struggling to make ends meet, record national debt and children leaving school unable to read, these bureaucrats have been splashing our cash on luxury offices.

“The first things that need to be cut are the excessive perks and lavish furnishings for which ministers use our taxes.”

Of more importance, however, is the fact that Mr Balls and his cronies specifically make plans for the Muslim area and not for any other specific religion.

This has to be one of the clearest indicators yet of the extent to which the Government is encouraging the colonisation of Britain by Islam.

The Conservative Party also studiously avoids discussing the invasion of this country by Islamic hordes and boasts several Muslims in its shadow cabinet.

Voters concerned about the colonisation of Britain will therefore find no succour in the Tories.

Labour Party MP Shahid Malik has predicted the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, “Allah willing”, within the next thirty years.

The remarks were made at the October 2008 “Global Peace and Unity” conference held at the Excel London centre, but were deliberately withheld from the video coverage released of that event.

The video speech in which Mr Malik made his remarks has now been released on the internet — nearly five months after the event.

The suppression of the video was clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and Labour elite, whose immigration policies have led to the situation where a Muslim cabinet minister can confidently predict the total Islamification of this nation.

In his speech, Mr Malik said that he was “proud of the achievements of the Muslims of this country since 1997.”

Referring to Muslim members of the British parliament, himself included, Mr Malik went on to say that: “In 1997 we got our first Muslim MP. In 2001 we had two Muslim MPs. In 2005 we had four Muslim MPs. In ša Allah, in 2009 (or) 2010 we’ll have eight or ten Muslim MPs. In 2014 we’ll have 16 Muslim MPs. At this rate the whole parliament will be Muslim.”

Mr Malik then realised that he had let the cat out of the bag by being too honest, and in an embarrassed tone, he backtracked slightly, saying that was not his intention “in case any members of the press are present.”

The crowd showed no signs of reacting to his remark, and, filled with confidence, he then resumed an explanation of how Britain is to be totally Islamified.

“I am confident, as Britain’s first Muslim minister, that, in ša Allah, in the next thirty years or so, we’ll see a prime minister who happens to share my faith,” Mr Malik said, in reference to the growing Third World population and immigration figures.

The people of Britain cannot say that they have not been warned.

This nation will be Islamified unless the Tory and Labour parties are rejected and the British National Party comes to power.

Mr Malik has spelled it out: the Labour/Tory aim is the destruction of Britain within thirty years.

The BNP seeks the preservation of Britain.

The choice is for the British people to make. It will be either one or the other.

Recommended reading: Jihad: Islam’s 1,300 Year War on Western Civilisation by Arthur Kemp.

For centuries, violent Muslims have been trying to capture Europe for Islam. Sweeping out from its origin in Saudi Arabia, Islam has expanded through violent conquest into North Africa, the Middle and Near East, and very nearly into Europe itself, attacking through Spain, Italy, and the Balkans. Each time, the Islamic hordes were turned back by a united European military effort.

Today, the Islamic invasion is not being carried out with sieges, scimitars, or cannon, but rather by immigration, birth rates, and demographics.

Given current trends, Europe is set to be overrun before the end of this century.

This book puts the current crisis into historical perspective, showing that instead of being a “religion of peace,” violent Islam has, in fact, been waging war on all its self-appointed opponents since its inception.

Finally, this book dares to say what must be done if Europe is to avoid succumbing to the new invasion. The choice is hard, but is one which will determine whether Western Civilisation lives or dies.

Chapter headings: 1: The Mindset Which Gives Rise to Islam; 2: Born in Conflict – Muhammad and the Rise of Islam; 3: The Muslim Invasion of the Middle East; 4: The Muslim Invasion of North Africa; 5: The Muslim Invasion of Western Europe; 6: The Muslims Invade the Eastern Roman Empire; 7: Europe Attempts to Fight Back – The Crusades; 8: The Muslim Destruction of Constantinople; 9: The Muslim Invasion of Southeastern Europe;  10: The Muslim Invasion of Italy; 11: Reconquista – The Muslims Driven out of Iberia; 12: The Muslims Driven out of the Balkans; 13: The Modern Muslim Invasion; 14: What Must Be Done if the West is to Survive.

Softcover, 72 pp.  £7.95  Click here to order.

Britain is paying the price for decades of Tory and Labour-backed mass Third World immigration. Nowhere is this better illustrated than with the conversion of Christian churches — some of them hundreds of years old — into mosques the length and breadth of this country.

The Central Mosque of Brent was previously a church built around the 18th century but it is now used exclusively for Muslim ceremonies.

The Forest Gate Church, now a mosque, was built by Henry Wright in 1886 and was a Christian church for over 120 years.

St Mark’s Cathedral in Peckham is now called the New Peckham Mosque.

The Brick Lane Church is more than 250 years old, being built in 1743 as a French Protestant Church. By 1819 it had became a Methodist Chapel and in 1898 it was converted into the Spitalfields Great Synagogue. It now serves the local community as a mosque.

The Albert Park Methodist Chapel on Burton Road, West Didsbury, in Manchester, was opened for worship in 1883. It is now the Didsbury Mosque and Islamic Centre and has an attendance of around 1,000 people a day.

The Wembley Central Mosque in Middlesex near west London is yet another church which has been converted into a mosque.

The Glodwick Baptist Church in Oldham was opened in 1927, but is now the Glodwick Jamia Mosque, Dar-Ul-Aloom Nasqshbandia and Muslim “Community Welfare Centre.”

The Green Lane Mosque is based in Birmingham and is one of the biggest and well known mosques in the United Kingdom. It was first used as a church in 1890.

These churches are but a few examples of how traditional Christianity is being swept aside by the Islamic invasion – yet church leaders spend all their time campaigning against the British National Party, deliberately ignoring the colonisation of this country by a creed which will see their religion utterly destroyed.

Only the BNP is unconditionally opposed to the Islamification of Britain, and all the other parties – and church leaders – are active participants in the bloodless genocide of this nation.

Could anyone in the world imagine Saudi Arabia or any Muslim country appointing a Christian or a Jew – or any other religion – as head of its public broadcasting for religious services?

In Britain, which is steadily being colonised by mass immigration from Muslim countries, the British Broadcasting Corporation has appointed Mr Aaqil Ahmed its first Muslim head of religious programming.

He will join the state-funded broadcaster from privately run Channel 4 television and take up a new joint role of Head of Religion and Ethics and Commissioning Editor for Religion TV, the BBC has announced.

This is merely one indicator of the fast changing demographic shift in Britain.

Until recently, the Conservative Party’s Conservative Muslim Forum (CFM) linked their website to Ta-Ha publishing, which sells one of Ahmad Thomson’s conspiracy theories about Jews and Freemasons, as well as books on sharia law.

The Quilliam foundation has reported that the Scottish National Party (SNP) is about to endorse Osama Saeed as their prospective parliamentary candidate for Glasgow Central. The foundation says that, “If elected to Westminster, Saeed, a former spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain (a front-group for the Muslim Brotherhood, the world’s largest Islamist movement), will be the UK’s first ever openly Islamist MP.”

More than half of all births in some towns and cities, including London (54%), Slough (56%) and Luton (51%), were to non-UK born mothers. This figure peaks at 75 percent in the London borough of Newham.

The ONS population report states that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

The number of babies born to British mothers is also rising, but lags far behind immigrants at an average of 1.7 children each. From this it is possible to deduce that white British mothers are only producing 1.5 children at a maximum, against a required replacement level of 2.1.

The ONS has also predicted that the British population could reach 71 million by 2031, with migrants and their UK-born children accounting for 70 percent of that growth.

This fast-moving trend means that babies born to immigrant mothers are set to become the main driver of Britain’s population growth within the next few years, taking over from immigration itself.

The ONS also released official immigration figures in August 2008 which revealed that 69 people – mostly Third Worlders – entered the UK every hour.

According to the ONS, in the 2006/7 year period, a record 605,000 people moved to Britain – the equivalent of 1,650 a day. The number of foreigners living in Britain has increased by 1.1 million in three years – enough to fill a city the size of Birmingham.

In addition, more than 10 percent of all people living in Britain in 2008 were foreign born. Their rising birth rate has fuelled an increase in Britain’s population to nearly 61 million in 2007 – an increase over 12 months of 388,000, equivalent to a city the size of Bournemouth.

The Annual Population Survey shows the number of foreign-born residents stands at 6.3 million, more than a tenth of the total population, up from 5.2 million in 2004.

In 2004 the number of people who became British citizens rose to a record 140,795 – a rise of 12 percent on the previous year. This number had risen dramatically since 2000. The overwhelming majority of new citizens come from Africa (32%) and Asia (40%), with the largest three groups being people from Pakistan, India and Somalia – with two of those three being overwhelmingly Muslim countries.

The British National Party is the only political party to voice its objection to this bloodless genocide and ethnic cleansing of the British people in their own country.

A vote for the BNP on June 4th will send a clear message to the ruling elite that the British people do not want to subjected to foreign rule and Islamified. The public cannot say that they have not been warned.

The definition of colonisation is when a foreign people settle in a nation and force the locals to take on the ways, norms and customs of the invading force. History is replete with examples, and the end result has always been the extinction of the indigenous culture and very often of the indigenous people themselves.

Britain is being colonised by the Third World. All over the country, large areas have been turned into mini-Bangladeshes, mini-Nigerias, mini-Indias and mini-Afro-Caribbean outposts. Street signs in many major centres are now often in Cantonese, Urdu and other foreign languages.

Over 100 languages are spoken in London schools, and huge areas have been completely ethnically cleansed of native indigenous British people.

Fifty percent of all live births are now from Third World immigrant origin stock.  Britain stands at the point of no return. Left unchecked, this process will see the complete replacement, through immigration colonisation, of Britain and British culture well within the next fifty years.

Anyone looking for a practical example of how British culture is being crushed under the wave of immigrant colonisation need look no further than the announcement this week that Kentucky Fried Chicken is to launch a halal-only menu in eight of its London stores. The company has announced this as a “trial” which will be extended to other areas of the UK.

The menu will see the stores selling chicken products which have been fully approved by the Halal Food Authority. KFC said the new menu was being introduced following a demand for halal products in parts of the UK.

The move follows a similar decision made by Dominos Pizza, which launched a halal-only menu in its Hall Green store in Birmingham earlier this year.

The new menu will be available in areas of London with large Muslim populations including East End districts Forest Gate, Beckton, West Ham and Bethnal Green. The eight outlets, which also include stores in Tottenham, nearby Edmonton, Leyton and Hounslow, will run the scheme as a trial throughout the summer.

The trial will be assessed after a few months and if sales figures are high could take place in other stores in the UK where large numbers of Muslim customers are based and where there is demand.

Halal means any item on the menu which may contain bacon, ham or pork must be removed and all the chicken must by halal-approved. Under the rules, the animal must be killed by having its throat cut by a Muslim and any flowing blood of the carcass should be completely drained. All this must be done while the animal is still alive and without any pre-stunning, as is the civilised norm in the Western world.

* The British National Party has undertaken to outlaw halal ritual slaughter completely on the grounds of animal cruelty.

Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson has announced that Scotland Yard will “scale down” its stop-and-search anti-terrorism powers over fears that it is offending Muslims. The move was ordered after Sir Stephenson had talks with the Muslim Safety Forum and Liberty organisations.

The 2007 attempted car bombing of Tiger Tiger nightclub in central London, pictured, sparked an increase in the use of stop-and-search powers. The tactic will now be scaled back over fears it disproportionately targeted ethnic minorities,” Sir Stephenson said, ignoring the fact that these “ethnic minorities” are the “ethnic majorities” in large areas of London.

Government figures released last week showed that members of “minority communities” were more likely to be searched than whites. This led to the usual liberal handwringing, which refuses to acknowledge that such police tactics are based purely on who is more likely to commit a certain type of offence.

As one anonymous commentator on a major newspaper website remarked, “If nuns started robbing banks, it would not be unusual to see more nuns stopped and searched.”

* The impartiality of the police will soon be tested again after yet another allowance scandal involving a senior Muslim peer. Baroness Uddin, already exposed as claiming a housing subsidy for an empty flat in Maidstone – although she lives in London, has been plunged into a deeper scandal by the revelation that her London residence is rent-controlled social housing. This means that it is also subsidised by the taxpayers.

The average rent for properties such as Baroness Uddin’s three-bedroomed home in Wapping, which belongs to the Spitalfields Housing Association, is £104 a week, a sixth of the market rate.

Baroness Uddin was earlier revealed to have claimed £100,000 in allowances for her unlived-in flat in Maidstone, which she declared as her main home. By saying she lives outside the capital, she is allowed to collect up to £174 a day for overnight accommodation. In 2007-08 she claimed a total of £29,675 in this way.

She actually lives just a short distance from Westminster in social housing in Wapping. Bangladesh-born “Baroness” Uddin was a Labour councillor before being elevated to the House of Lords by the Labour Party as part of its programme to Islamify Britain as quickly as possible.

She has a number of well-paid directorships at key companies and is therefore far too wealthy to qualify for social housing. Doubtless this fact will be of interest to the police, unless they have been too cowed to act against a leading member of the Labour Party hierarchy – and a Muslim one to boot.

The increasing Islamification of Britain, which if left unchecked will see this country utterly overrun within a matter of decades, has been re-emphasised with the news that Manchester schools will be able to close for Islamic holidays under new plans to “reduce high absence rates.”

Many Muslim children already miss school to celebrate religious festivals such as Eid. Chiefs at Manchester City Council are considering allowing schools with large numbers of Muslims to close during Islamic holidays.

Under the current system schools close for Christian holidays, but parents are allowed to take children out of lessons for other religious festivals.

This particularly affects Manchester which has the third worst school attendance rates in the country.

Almost one in ten of all absence days in the city’s schools are noted as religious observance.

In an attempt to improve these figures, schools will be allowed to opt to close if 40 percent of pupils are likely to take time off.

Schools will be encouraged to use these extra holidays to facilitate teacher training days while traditional school holidays will remain unchanged.

Some east London schools where the majority of pupils are from Muslim families already close for two days over Eid.

The local authority states: “Tower Hamlets policy is that schools should close for Eid (these dates have been advised by the East London Mosque).

“It is important to ensure that all Muslim pupils and staff can participate in religious observance without being absent from school. This is consistent with the council’s attendance policy that “every day matters.”

Douglas Murray, director of think tank the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “Either people are British and go to British schools and have a particular holiday system, or we decide to carve the country up into areas that are Muslim and non-Muslim, and I think that’s what this does.”

* The process of colonisation occurs when foreigners come to a country and by sheer numbers force their ways upon the indigenous population.

What is happening in Britain today is nothing else but colonisation, aided and abetted by the Tory and Labour Party.

The British National Party is the only party dedicated to halting and reversing this process.

Child marriages, legalised rape, medieval punishments, amputations and stoning — these are the results of sharia law in action right now in Islamic countries, and are the sort of thing to which this country can look forward unless the Islamification process is halted.

In Saudi Arabia, sharia law holds sway. There, a judge delighting in the name Sheikh Habib Habib has just declared that an eight-year-old girl’s marriage to a 47-year-old man is legal.

The judge has ruled that the girl’s marriage to a friend of her father’s is legal and binding because it was made under sharia law. The girl’s father arranged the marriage with his “close friend” to pay off a monetary debt.

In Afghanistan, which is the recipient of billions of pounds of British taxpayer funded foreign aid, that country’s elected government recently approved a version of a law which compels a woman to submit sexually to her husband even if she does not want to. Critics have labelled the law as “legalised rape.”

The bill was pushed through the Afghani parliament in hopes of appeasing Islamic fundamentalists ahead of August elections.

Sharia Law is also very specific with regard to homosexuality. That activity is today punishable by a death sentence in the following countries: Iran, Mauritania, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Yemen.

Sharia law also disallows freedom of speech if that speech in any way contradicts the Koran. Such speech is considered blasphemy against Mohammad.

Leading Islamic cleric Qadi ‘Iyad ibn Musa al-Yahsubi has written that “The Qur’an says that Allah curses the one who harms the Prophet in this world and He connects harm of Himself to harm of the Prophet. There is no dispute that anyone who curses Allah is killed and that his curse demands that he be categorized as an unbeliever. The Judgment of the unbeliever is that he is killed. There is a difference between harming Allah and His Messenger and harming the believers. Injuring the believers, short of murder, incurs beating and exemplary punishment. The judgment against those who harm Allah and His Prophet is more severe — the death penalty.” (”The proof of the necessity of killing anyone who curses the Prophet or finds fault with him,” UK-based Islamic website.)

In instances of rape, sharia law requires an allegation to be validated by four Muslim male witnesses to the crime — or else the victim risks being charged with fornication or adultery. (”Afghan children raped with ‘impunity,’ U.N. official says,” CNN report.)

In Yemen, sharia law required compensation to be paid to the husband in the case of a ten-year-old child bride who requested a divorce after rape and abuse.

Sunni Islamic law allows husbands to divorce their wives by just saying talaq (”I divorce you”) three times. In 2003 a Malaysian court ruled that, under sharia law, a man may divorce his wife via text messaging as long as the message was clear and unequivocal.

In accordance with the Qur’an and several hadith, theft is punished by imprisonment or amputation of hands or feet, depending on the number of times it was committed and depending on the item of theft.

Witnesses must be either two men, or, if only one man can be found, one man and two women.

In accordance with hadith, stoning to death is the penalty for married men and women who commit adultery. In addition, there are several conditions related to the person who commits it that must be met.

One of the difficult ones is that the punishment cannot be enforced unless there is a confession of the person, or four male eyewitnesses who each saw the act being committed.

For unmarried men and women, the punishment prescribed in the Qur’an and hadith is 100 lashes.

The “four witness” standard comes from the Qur’an itself, a revelation Muhammad announced in response to accusations of adultery levelled at his wife, Aisha: “Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah.” [Qur'an 24:13]

In most interpretations of sharia, conversion by Muslims to other religions is strictly forbidden and is termed apostasy. Muslim theology equates apostasy to treason, and in most interpretations of sharia, the penalty for apostasy is death. During the time of the Prophet, treason and apostasy were considered one and the same.

There are many different opinions, however, as to whether the veil or headscarf is a real Quranic obligation. Reputable scholars such as Yusuf Al-Qaradawi claim that it is.

One of the garments women wear is the hijab (of which the headscarf is one component). The word hijab is derived from the Arabic word hajaba which means “to hide from sight or view,” or to “conceal.”

This has been brought to you as a public service by the British National Party to prepare you for the Islamification of Britain under the Tory, Labour and Lib-Dem parties.

If, of course, you do not like the idea of living in an Islamified Britain, you could always vote BNP.

The rapid Islamification of Britain under the Tory/Labour open doors immigration policy continues unabated. The growth of the Middle Eastern Muslim community in Scotland has led to the creation of a Sharia Law mortgage service in that region.

The Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB), which is based in Birmingham, announced at the International Islamic Finance Conference in Edinburgh that it is to launch its “Home Purchase Plan” in Scotland.

It is understood the launch is just the beginning of a wider push into Scotland — which is likely to include the opening of a physical branch and back office operations as well as the introduction of online retail banking for customers.

Sultan Choudhury, commercial director at IBB, said: “We are really excited at the prospect of IBB’s entry into Scotland, which we see as making a significant contribution to the region.

“The region is an important financial centre and is currently working hard to establish itself in the global Islamic Finance market, steered by the Islamic Finance Council UK. IBB has collaborated closely with the IFC as part of its impending launch in Scotland with the shared objective of putting Scotland on the map.”

Owen Kelly, chief executive of Scottish Financial Enterprise, which co-hosted yesterday’s conference, said: “IBB’s entry to the market adds another option for bank customers in Scotland and widens the range of organisations operating in the industry.”

Tariq Masood, chairman of the Glasgow-based Islamic Finance Council, added: “IBB’s entry into Scotland is a key growth indicator for the UK’s Islamic finance industry and a huge step forward for Scotland’s ethical retail community.”

The Scottish National Party has endorsed the Islamification and colonisation of Scotland by Muslims, and has several people of that ilk as its public representatives.

The increasing Islamification of Britain has seen nativity plays banned or pushed aside for Eid festivals – and now a south Yorkshire school with a large Muslim student population has banned its traditional Easter Bonnet parades outright.

The Meersbrook Bank Primary School in Sheffield, more famous for the forced resignation of a former headteacher after a backlash from Muslim parents objecting to her plans to scrap separate assemblies for Muslim pupils has axed its Easter bonnet parade.

Although claiming that the decision is not related to the large number of Muslim pupils, indigenous British parents have not been fooled, with one remarking to a local newspaper, “I believe it’s all connected with what’s been going on earlier in the year. Never in my life did I ever think I would be having this conversation.”

In December last year, Greenwood Junior School in Nottingham cancelled its traditional Christmas nativity play to make way for the Muslim festival of Eid.

A letter sent to parents advised them that “It is with much regret that we have had to cancel this year’s Christmas performances. This is due to the Eid celebrations that take place next week and its effect on our performers.” The school has also sent out a timetable of events to mark Eid ul-Adha, or ‘greater Eid’, which is the second of the two Eid festivals.

An earlier survey showed that only one in five schools now perform traditional nativity plays and that they are outnumbered by schools which either put on a non-religious play, such as Scrooge or Snow White, or give no performance at all.

Several of the schools surveyed said the nativity tableau was no longer a feature because the intake was ethnically mixed and staff had to be aware of “not offending anyone.”

A teacher from Albion Primary School in Southwark, south London, where 50 percent of children are from ethnic minorities, said the school had not performed a nativity play for at least five years and that it had to take account of all faiths.

One school in Birmingham, where 96 percent of children are Muslim, said: “We’re reluctant to have a lot of music and acting because it goes against the religion of a lot of our pupils.”

In other words, Britain is being colonised by Islam and the indigenous population is being forced to take on the ways of the colonisers.

All the signs are there: it will be up to the voters to decide if they will accept the colonisation and extinction of Britain, or if they will fight back and vote for the British National Party.

The Islamist invaders responsible for the insulting anti-British demonstration in Luton town centre have vowed to hold more protests against homecoming troop parades.

The group, called Ahle Sunnah al Jamah, which is obviously a front organisation for the previously banned al-Muhajiroun Islamist movement, has announced through its spokesman, the Pakistani origin Anjem Choudary, that “Whenever the troops come we will be demonstrating.”

Previously, Mr Choudary has urged Muslims to not cooperate with the police in fighting terrorism and has called for the assassination of the Pope. He was a solicitor and chairman of the Society of Muslim Lawyers, and doubles up as Judge of the Shari’ah Court of the UK.

Mr Choudary defended the Luton protests by saying that if “The British are going to be engaging in torture, killing women and children, that needs to be condemned.”

The BNP is grateful that Mr Choudary was very clear in his choice of words to the media, as he made it clear that he was talking about the “British” people – thereby distancing himself from those “British” people.

In this regard the BNP agrees entirely with Mr Choudary – he is not British, and under a BNP government would not be welcome in this country.

* Luton has a Muslim population of at least 20,000 and is one of the most heavily Third World colonised areas of Britain. According to the 2005 Office for National Statistics estimate, less than 65 percent of greater Luton was indigenous native British and at least fifteen percent of the population was Muslim.

The figures are likely to be much higher than those four year old estimates, and do not take into account illegal immigration, which would easily push the indigenous population level well below sixty percent.

Some Islamic-only schools in Britain are promoting fundamentalist views and encouraging children to despise Western society, a new report from the Civitas social policy think tank has warned.

The report found that websites of some of the UK’s 166 Muslim schools are spreading extreme teachings, while a handful had links to sites promoting jihad, or holy war.

Examples include web forums forbidding Muslims from reading Harry Potter books, playing chess or cricket and listening to Western music.

The Civitas report, entitled “Music, Chess and Other Sins”, claims Ofsted inspectors are incapable of scrutinising Muslim faith schools properly, and demands an inquiry by MPs.

Many of the websites featured in the report were shut down or edited in the hours before it was published.

Islamic schools educate thousands of Muslim children. Most operate in the private sector although increasing numbers are seeking state funding.

The study, overseen by Dr Denis MacEoin, a university lecturer in Islamic studies, looked at material found on Islamic schools’ websites, either content or via links.

Examples include the website of the Madani Girls’ School in East London which stated: “Our children are exposed to a culture that is in opposition with almost everything Islam stands for.

“If we oppose the lifestyle of the West then it does not seem sensible that the teachers and the system which represents that lifestyle should educate our children.”

The website comments have since been edited and parts deleted.

Dr MacEoin stressed that the problems were not found in all Muslim schools, but said some were instilling a disturbing “ghetto mentality.”

Some Muslim schools are threatening the social cohesion of Britain by promoting a fundamentalist version of Islam that encourages children to despise the British society in which they live and to confine themselves to enclaves. In “Music, Chess and Other Sins”, Denis MacEoin presents the findings of his study of websites belonging to Muslim schools in Britain and their links.

The Civitas report asks how society is supposed to respond to the following instances of education of Islamic schools:

- When a fatwa bank linked from a school tells a boy that dreaming of playing cricket for Pakistan is forbidden because it is a sacrilegious waste of time;

- When it is stipulated that reading Harry Potter books is prohibited;

- When it is stipulated that pupils must not read fiction books;

- When Ludo, Monopoly, draughts and chess are forbidden because “the Holy Prophet stated the person who plays chess, is like the one who dips his hands in the blood of a swine;”

- When the “evil system of the Western culture” is rejected in guidelines for Muslims;

- When a site run by an educational institution writes an article stating “One should abstain from evil audacities such as listening to music” and when a graduate of that institution speaks of the “evils of music,” calls the Royal College of Music “satanic,” and claims that music is the way in which Jews spread “the Satanic web” to corrupt young Muslims.

“Nor is it only the artistic culture of the country that some schools are criticising, continues the Civitas report.

“On the website of the Madani Secondary Girls’ School, East London, we read: ‘Our children are exposed to a culture [i.e. British culture] that is in opposition with almost everything Islam stands for.’”

This should be taken seriously in light of the 7/7 bombings, where hatred of what non-Muslims stand for was adduced as an excuse for massacre, said the Civitas report.

In a small number of cases, the report found evidence of links between Muslim schools and those advocating jihad, for example in the case of Feversham College, Bradford, of which the website links to islamworld.net, which contains a section of papers on jihad.

In one of these papers, Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, writes: “Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim… [Jihad] involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam including beating them, plundering their wealth, destroying their places of worship and smashing their idols… Today, my brother, the Muslims as you know are forced to be subservient before others and are ruled by disbelievers… Hence in this situation it becomes the duty of each and every Muslim to make jihad… Therefore prepare for jihad and be the lovers of death.”

Themina Ahmed, the creator of the history curriculum for the two Islamic Shaksiyah Foundation schools, in Slough and Haringey, North London, has written: “The world will witness the death of the criminal capitalist nation of America and all other [infidel] states when the army of jihad is unleashed upon them,” according to the report.

The report also deals with Muslim attitudes towards women. “A worrying concern is about the relatively low status that is ascribed to women by a number of those associated with fundamentalist Muslim schools, which may not prepare girls and young women for life in mainstream British society in which women are regarded as the equals of men,” says the report.

“Ask-Imam is an online site providing authoritative rulings on all matters pertaining to Islam which can be accessed through the website of al-Jamiah al-Islamiyyah Darul Uloom, Bolton (which has now closed down its website following queries relating to this report). It carried extensive rulings on women, such as:

* Women may not attend mixed-gender universities. Men should try to avoid them.

* Rather than study, women should remain at home unless forced to go outside.

* A woman who has been raped is jointly responsible for the crime with the man who raped her if she “does not cover properly and wears revealing clothing, which seduces men.”

* Men have authority over women. A woman is not permitted to serve as the head of any organisation.

* A Muslim woman may not marry a non-Muslim man.

* Men are more intelligent than women.

The entire Civitas report can be downloaded here.

Don’t forget to check out Excalibur’s large range of books on Islam by clicking here.

The Islamification of Britain continues apace, with that religion’s adherents having successfully lobbied Britain’s libraries to have the Christian Bible moved to the top shelf to avoid giving offence to followers of Islam.

The move follows complaints by Muslims of finding the Koran on lower shelves. They have argued that it should be “put above commonplace things,” according to media reports. Official guidance published by the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, a quango answering to Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, has now ordered libraries to agree to this demand and treat “all holy books equally and go on the top shelf together.”

This means that Christian works, which also have immense historical and literary value, will be kept out of the reach and sight of many readers. The guidelines said Muslims in Leicester had moved copies of the Koran to the top shelves of libraries, in keeping with the belief that the Koran is the all-important word of God.

The report said the city’s librarians consulted the Federation of Muslim Organisations and were advised that all religious texts should be kept on the top shelf.

The implications of the move are not just symbolic, they are a reflection of the fact that Islamic groups are now in a position to start enforcing religious doctrines upon how society orders itself — the first step towards the creation of a theocratic state.

When this development is considered in conjunction with the introduction of Sharia-law courts and financial institutions, there can be little denying that Britain is steadily being colonised by Islam.

The move has shocked many observers who might not have before been aware of the full extent of the Islamification of this country, with some saying that the move implied religious works should be treated as objects of veneration rather than as books to be read.

Robert Whelan of the Civitas think tank was quoted as saying that “Libraries and museums are not places of worship. They should not be run in accordance with particular religious beliefs. This is violating the principles of librarianship and it is part of an insidious trend.”

He said the principle that books should be available to everyone was established in Europe in the Middle Ages. “One of the central planks of the Protestant Reformation was that everybody should have access to the Bible,” he added.

Simon Calvert of the Christian Institute said: “It is disappointing if the policy of libraries is dictated by the practices of one group. It is particularly disappointing if this is done to put the scriptures beyond reach. I hope there will be a rethink. I understand that Muslims revere their own text, but in public libraries there should not be a policy of putting religious texts out of reach.”

Canon Chris Sugden, of the Anglican Mainstream movement, said: “This does appear to be a reversion to medieval times, when the Bible could be read only by priests in Latin and was not to be defiled by ordinary people reading it. The principle to be challenged is that there is a certain way in which one must treat all holy books.

“The Bible is readily available, and it would not be difficult to have more than one copy, with some on display within the reach of children.”

*In a further slap in the public’s face, the quango guidelines also make it clear that pornography can be offered by libraries.

The guidelines said that some have stocked the Black Lace series of erotic stories aimed at women, and that others bought and lent Madonna’s Sex. Librarians faced a “difficult balance” but should try to “reflect changing fashion and opinion,” the guidance said.

* See Excalibur’s collection of books on the Islamist threat by clicking here.

The increasing use of sharia Law in Britain, as warned about on this website and recently repeated by a leading newspaper columnist – has been vindicated with the news that Pakistan has been forced to allow that legal system to become official law in parts of that country to “make peace” with their large Islamist population.

In a desperate attempt to staunch a raging insurgency, the Pakistani government announced that it would impose Islamic law in a part of its wild North West as it suspended its faltering military campaign against Taliban militants in the area.

Faced with the prospect of the scenic Swat valley falling to Taliban militants loyal to Maulana Fazlullah, the government has yielded to what it says are old local demands for sharia law in the hope of achieving two aims: isolating the militants and restoring peace. Muslim Khan, Mr Fazlullah’s spokesman, told a Pakistani news channel on Sunday that it remains his group’s ambition to impose sharia law across the world.

Amir Haider Khan Hoti, the chief minister of the North West Frontier Province, said sharia law would be introduced throughout the Malakand division, which includes the Swat Valley. There was jubilation in Swat and nearby areas. Local television showed people cheering in the streets, filled with hope that a conflict that has cost 1,500 lives and left more than 100,000 people homeless was coming to an end. Under the agreement, “all non-sharia laws” have been abrogated in Malakand.

Critics say it is a capitulation that endangers the rule of law and women’s rights. “We condemn it,” said Iqbal Haider, chairman of the Pakistan Human Rights Commission and a former law minister. “It is an illegal, unconstitutional, and discriminatory act to further promote religious fanaticism in Pakistan. The constitution does not allow a parallel legal system. And there is no guarantee of peace: the militants are not party to it.”

The reality is that sharia law has become official in that region because enough of the local population support its introduction. This is the lesson to be learned: once a population which adheres to a particular culture becomes large enough to demand that their culture become dominant in society, there is nothing that can be done to stop it.

As Britain is increasingly colonised by the Third World and its Muslim population increases, its dominating culture will also change to reflect that of the changing population. This is already being reflected in the increasing number of financial institutions offering sharia law services and the already acknowledged existence of five sharia law courts operating independently of the British legal system.

* Meanwhile, a leading member of the Church of England in Wales has warned that the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, could spark violence against Christians after repeating his claim that elements of sharia law could be incorporated into British justice.

Dr Williams revisited the issue on the first anniversary of the day he originally made the claim. Now the Welsh head of the Church of England also insists public opinion is increasingly in favour of it.

But Dr Tudor Griffiths, rector of Hawarden, said if Dr Williams believes there is public enthusiasm for sharia law, he is desperately out of touch. Dr Griffiths, who is also canon chancellor of St Asaph, warned that when Dr Williams first made his comments it led to an outburst of violence against Christians in Nigeria.

“Many will simply hear that the Archbishop has reiterated his support for sharia law and it will be used as propaganda and will feed violence in some areas of the world,” Dr Griffiths said. “His comments were used in northern Nigeria last year against Christians. To me it simply feeds the belief that he doesn’t have his feet on the ground.”

As Britain slides from Multiculturalism into the even darker pit of Dhimmitude, the endemic appeasement of Islam is starting to affect every aspect of ordinary life.

In the latest reported example of Islamo-pandering, a Domino’s Pizza outlet has infuriated customers by becoming the first in the country to take pork off the menu and offer only halal food. The takeaway has told customers in the heavily ‘enriched’ area of Hall Green, Birmingham, that if they want ham or pork on their pizza they will have to go elsewhere.

According to the Daily Telegraph, Chris Yates, 29, a hospital worker, was told he could not have a ‘Meteor’ pizza, topped with pepperoni, sausage, meatballs, ground beef and smoky bacon.

He said: “It’s a disgrace, I can appreciate them having it as an option but to have it completely halal is just not on,” said Mr Yates.

“I’m all for racial and religious tolerance but if anything this is intolerant to my beliefs and discriminatory against me.

“Instead I had to travel two miles out of my way to another branch – I was appalled.  Hall Green is a mixed race area and should therefore cater to its multicultural make-up.

“In a society that promotes racial and religious integration, this sort of things only isolates people.”

Halal items on the Domino’s menu include halal spicy beef sausage, roast and tandoori chicken, halal pepperoni and halal cured turkey – all produced according to the Halal Food Authorities guidelines.

Masood Khawaja, President of the Halal Food Authority, said: “It’s good news for Muslims, with changing pallets, who want a bit of variety in their diet. This is only the beginning”, promised Mr Khawaja rather disturbingly, “we are delighted that Domino’s is participating in this trend.”

Of course, Mr Khawaja is speaking the truth; this is indeed “only the beginning”.  As the influence of militant Islam grows ever stronger under Labour’s tutelage, the very consumption of pork will soon become almost an act of British national defiance.   So we urge all proud Britons to do their patriotic duty: eat Great British pork with enthusiasm, enjoy sausage and smoky bacon and avoid Domino’s halal pizzas at all costs!

Britain is being Islamised and now has more Sharia banks than Pakistan, a leading conservative writer for the Daily Mail newspaper has finally admitted.

Columinist Melanie Phillips, who also is a panelist on the BBC Radio 4 programme, The Moral Maze and on BBC One’s Question Time, has in the past attacked the British National Party for warning of the consequences of mass Third World immigration. The reality of the situation now appears to have hit home with Ms Phillips.

Writing in the Daily Mail, Ms Phillips points out that a report by International Financial Services London reveals that Britain’s Islamic banking sector is now bigger than that of Pakistan.

The study says that the UK has by far the largest number of banks for Muslims of any western country, Ms Phillips writes. There are five fully sharia-compliant banks while another 17 leading institutions including Barclays, RBS and Lloyds Banking Group have set up special branches or subsidiary firms for Muslim clients.

“The £12 billion in assets of Britain’s Islamic banks are said to dwarf those of Muslim states such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey and Egypt,” Ms Phillips says.

“There are also 55 colleges and professional institutions offering education in Islamic finance in Britain — more than anywhere else in the world.

“You can obviously see the attraction, especially in these straightened times. But the only thing our politicians and bankers appear to see is the seductive prospect of trillions of pound and dollar signs dancing before their bedazzled eyes.

“What they refuse to acknowledge is the real price that is to be paid for this. They don’t understand that the spread of sharia banking in Britain and America is a significant part of the attempt to Islamise Britain and America.”

Ms Phillips points out that the acceptance of sharia finance “furthers the Islamist objective of gradually legitimising Islamic sharia law more generally in the West. The point which is being missed is that all who use it must conform to the dictates of sharia law.

“Sharia financial institutions may not be making this clear now — they don’t want to frighten people away — but at some point that IOU of sharia-compliance will be called in. This is how sharia-compliance will be spread to both the Muslim and non-Muslim population.

“Any Western institution that endorses sharia-compliant products therefore effectively endorses the extremist ideology behind it of conquering the West for Islam, whether it knows it or not. The most important point to grasp is that Islam recognises no authority superior to sharia. Sharia banks will therefore not recognise the superior authority of the law of the land. When trillions of pounds and dollars are locked into them, who will argue with them?

“Even more troubling is the potential cover provided by sharia finance for the financing of terrorism. Sharia requires Muslims to tithe a percentage of their money to charity, called ‘zakat’. But charity in Islam is more like solidarity. So some of this money donated to Islamic charities may well find its way to organisations promoting jihad and supporting suicide bombing including Hamas, Hezbollah, the families of Palestinian suicide bombers and Islamist madrassas in places like Pakistan,” she writes.

“What has to be understood is that sharia finance is simply a modern jihadi strategy to help Islamise Britain’s institutions and society. It was devised in the mid-20th century by the ideologues who promoted the radical Islamism that threatens us today.

“They advocated sharia finance as element of a separate, self-sustained Islamic order with its own Islamic ideology, Islamic politics and Islamic economics that taken together would guarantee an Islamic way of life and ultimately the Islamic state as the first step toward establishing Muslim rule worldwide.

“As Britain’s government and banks congratulate themselves on the stunning growth of sharia banking in the UK, do any of them have the slightest understanding of what they are doing?” Ms Phillips concludes.

* Excalibur Books now stocks in excess of a dozen books dealing with the historical and present Islamist threat. The books list can be found by clicking here or on the image below.

The courageous Dutch MP Geert Wilders has been refused entry to the United Kingdom to broadcast his film Fitna in the House of Lords. Mr Wilders has apparently been told that in the interests of public order he will not be allowed to enter Britain.  A spokesman for the Lords said that the invitation to show his film remained open.

Mr Wilders has received numerous Muslim death threats since the film exposing the evils of Islam appeared on the internet in 2008. 

The film demonstrates how Islam’s holy text is linked to violence and ends with a call to Muslims to remove ‘hate-preaching’ verses from the Koran.

The Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen has formally protested to British foreign secretary David Miliband about the decision to exclude Mr Wilders.  He said: “It is disgraceful that a Dutch parliamentarian should be refused entrance to an EU country.”  Mr Wilders himself said “Great Britain is sacrificing freedom of speech. You would expect something like this to happen in countries like Saudi Arabia, but not in Great Britain. This cowardly act by the British government is a disgrace. I was invited by a British member of parliament.”

Home Office sources have confirmed Mr Wilders had been refused entry to the UK saying “The Government opposes extremism in all its forms.  It will stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country.”

Labour’s move to ban the pro-free speech Dutch MP gives the lie to Labour’s hypocritical claim that it is not possible to prevent EU citizens entering Britain.   It seems that Labour cannot prevent Latvian strawberry pickers or Italian construction workers entering Britain and taking British jobs, but Labour can intervene with startling alacrity to turn away a Dutch MP at the border in order to appease Muslim extremist sentiment.

Geert Wilders may not succeed in airing his film at the House of Lords.   But he has at least succeeded in nailing yet another Labour lie.

“It is ridiculous that the Church of England is concerned with persecuting Christian BNP members while church buildings are being turned into mosques as Britain is colonised by Islam,” said BNP leader Nick Griffin in his reaction to the CoE decision to bar clergy from joining the party.

“Up and down the country, CoE churches are being turned into mosques,” he said. “Instead of concerning themselves with their empty pews, the leftist clergymen worry about a party which is dedicated to preventing the displacement of Christianity by Islam in this country.

“These political priests need to be reminded that the church and state were separated at the time of the Reformation. It is best for them to keep their noses out of politics, and rather concentrate on trying to explain why their churches are so empty.”

Mr Griffin said the church leaders – being led by the nose by clerical Marxists and Ugandan or Pakistan-born bishops – should not bother trying to interfere with the democratic rights of British people.

“If they think that an Islamic-dominated Britain will look kindly upon Christianity, they are seriously deluded and should consider the experience of Christianity in other Islamic countries before being so foolish as to rant against anti-immigration parties, as their motion does,” he said.

Mr Griffin confirmed that the BNP has been flooded with messages of support from angry CoE members following the decision today. “The church leaders are clearly out of touch with the rank and file of their flock. It is no coincidence that the BNP is this country’s fastest growing political party at the same time that the CoE’s pews are emptying.”

The Third World colonisation of Britain proceeds apace with the news that the official police uniform has now been adapted to allow for the wearing of the Muslim hijab.

The police hijab is plain black and apparently made of a flame-retardant material. Officers will be able to wear a standard police hat on top of it if they wish.

A number of forces around the country have already introduced the hijab, including Thames Valley and the Metropolitan police.

The police’s annual report for 2007/08 showed women made up about 23 percent of the force’s officers. The number of officers from black and Asian communities stood at about six percent — short of the official fifteen percent target. The intention of introducing the hijab is to encourage Muslim women to consider joining the police force.

It would be unthinkable for any Islamic nation to adapt its official uniforms to allow Christian or any other religious artefacts to be incorporated into its emblems.

This sort of thing only happens to a nation which is being occupied and colonised by foreigners. This is the very definition of colonisation: the forcing of an alien and foreign way of life upon another people.

A further example of this process was seen recently at the announcement that the world-famous William Gladstone Library in Hawarden, North Wales, is to open a Muslim Reading Room and library.

Readers will however be glad to hear that John Walker, BNP Hawarden Community Councillor, is actively on the case. “It is absolutely impossible to even consider a library in any Muslim state opening a Christian Reading Room and Library,” Mr Walker said.

“In fact, it is actually illegal in many Muslim countries, including that religion’s homeland, Saudi Arabia. The mere propagation of Christianity in those countries is a criminal act.

“Britain however, is being colonised by the Third World, and the Labour and Tories expect the British people to meekly accept it. Well, I have news for them: watch this space, and see what happens in Hawarden in the near future!” Mr Walker said.

Christian families are such a rarity in some inner-city communities that two Church of England schools now cater exclusively for Muslim pupils, according to a report in The Times.

In many church primary schools in English cities, more than half of the pupils are Muslim. In at least a dozen such schools, more than 80 percent are from Islamic homes.

Five church schools, in Blackburn, Birmingham, Bradford, Oldham and London, have become 99 percent Muslim and in two — another school in Blackburn and one in Dewsbury — every pupil is Muslim.

The Church has defended its continuing educational role in such areas and is putting £750,000 towards the construction of a new primary school in Blackburn whose intake will be almost 100 percent Muslim.

It is also understood that at least one Church school no longer observes the requirement to have an act of daily collective worship that is “consistently and recognisably Christian.”

A former school governor in Bradford has warned that some Christians in her city have chosen to send their children to secular schools, fearing they would be isolated at their local, Muslim-dominated church school.

In 1998 the General Synod resolved that church schools should “stand at the centre of the Church’s mission to the nation.” Three years later, the Dearing Commission recommended that “all church schools must be distinctively . . . Christian institutions.”

It said the four-part mission of the Church was to proclaim the gospel, to “nourish Christians in their faith”, to “bring others into the faith” and “to nurture and maintain the dignity of human beings through service.”

For four years Ruth Weston was a governor at a church school in the Girlington area of Bradford, where 96 percent of pupils were Muslim, many still learning to speak English.

Mrs Weston, a Christian theologian, said she enrolled her daughter at the school because she wanted to support multiculturalism, but “after much soul-searching” withdrew her after three terms.

“When push came to shove, my daughter’s welfare came first. She was not thriving socially or educationally in an environment where she was the only girl of her religion, culture and first language,” she said.

Most of her white neighbours sent their offspring to a secular school 15 minutes’ walk away, across a busy main road, rather than to their local, almost exclusively Muslim, church school.

The Ven Peter Ballard, Archdeacon of Lancaster and director of education for the Blackburn diocese, said that when the proportion of pupils from one particular ethnic minority background reached 70 percent at any school, white flight tended to follow.

He maintained, however, that the ethnic make-up of most church schools in Blackburn was a close reflection of the surrounding community.

The decision to spend money on a new church school, knowing that almost every pupil would be Muslim, had been taken because “we’re here for the long term. Demographics change. There was certainly a Christian population there at one time, and, who knows, 20 years from now the Christians might be back. This is not the time for us to pull out.”