Comments on: DEMOCRACY

By: Macky

Macky — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:26:15 +0000

this is the bit I like "We will remove legal curbs on freedom of speech imposed by successive Governments over the last 40 years." and about time too, we live in a crazy straightjacket of PC rubbish, most of which ordinary people hate like a plague. Damn the elites.

By: gary

gary — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:22:54 +0000

what would be the point of a bill of rights, when goverment is sovereign. and no future goverment would be binding to the bill

By: colonial

colonial — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:47:50 +0000

Thanks for the link Mark.
I signed it and in the space marked 'address' I wrote the following :

"England, you know, the place where not too long ago the right of free speech was considered sacred."

Maybe that will make my vote null and void, who knows ?
But at least someone, somewhere in the current government will have to read it and maybe it will jog their memory back to better days.

By: TDH

TDH — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:26:12 +0000

This is one of the biggest reasons I'm voting BNP. I'm a proud Yorkshireman and I'm feeling very oppressed by the establishment. We want a regional assembly and more autonomy!

By: KBO

KBO — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:24:15 +0000

For me democracy will start anew when Prime Minister Griffin tears up the 'treaty of rome' in front of the globalist media the same day we are elected into power.

By: shaunantijihad

shaunantijihad — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:44:44 +0000

Islam is not primarily a personal religion. Islam has no morality except what is good for Islam is good, and what is bad for Islam is bad. So for e.g, any atrocity against infidels, even children, is defined as good if it advances the interests of Islam. 2009 saw for eg, the crucifixion of an entire village of male Christians in Egypt. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lItoLNSPucE Islam is primarily a political theocratic rule through Sharia Law which establishes Muslim male supremacy. The Muslim male is supreme owner and ruler of his females and children. All Muslims are supreme rulers of non-Muslims, who are either dhimmis with few human rights, or slaves with no human rights. Islam does not view non-Muslims as human, but as Allah's most vile creation, especially Jews and Christians. http://www.jihadwatch.org/ In 1914 about 25% of Turkey was Muslim and previously lived in relative peace with non-Muslims. However, at 25% their numbers were sufficient to sieze power and began the rule of Muslim supremacy. Today there survive only 1% non-Muslims in Turkey. VOTE BNP

By: Martin

Martin — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:25:15 +0000

It would seem to me that the biggest problem with integration between people of differing nationalities is religion. I notice in the press a story of a primary school headmistress that was awarded over £400.000 compensation for the lack of Council and Education Authority support after she suffered a breakdown following the school Parent Governors Body being infiltrated by Islamics. Their intent was to turn the school into an Islamic religious school. I think that it is fair to say that most British Nationals who read this article would have been outraged by its content. I also think that it is fair to say that when a child has been indoctrinated by psychological religious beliefs from a very early age, that their inner set of rules of what is right and wrong, or what should and shouldn't be is governed by that implant (usually for life). I therefore suggest that to be fair across the board and to give all future generations an equal freedom of choice, that ALL religious teachings and ceremonies should be wiped out of the school curriculum. I understand that in this country there are many religious schools that would raise strong objection of this idea. However, I would like to point out that they are guilty of priming young impressionable minds, with similar psychological horrors of consequence for breaking their said religious rules, in the same way as Islam. I might add that religious based schools in this country used to enforce breeches of their religious teachings with beatings and it is only since the European Court of Human Rights outlawed corporal punishment that this has ceased. I assume now that they are now enforced with other forms of punishment. Religious beliefs are not freedom of choice for the majority, it is forced opinion that is so deep rooted that they believe it to be their own and should have no place in school education. Religion has caused wars throughout centuries and the worst of the problems we suffer with this countries immigrants are religious based. If religion were removed, maybe the human race would advance and true integration and democracy would be possible.

By: Colin Brown

Colin Brown — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:39:36 +0000

(1). Catholics are Christians. (2) The B.N.P are a pro-life party. (3). The B.N.P neither promote nor discriminate against Gay people. We're far nor tolerant and easy to get along with than the media would have you believe CAZMAZ.

By: Colin Brown

Colin Brown — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:16:24 +0000

Dave. I don't think its just the B.N.P who are against the Islamification of Britain – the people don't seem particularly enthralled by the prospect of being ruled by Sharia law (public hanging's of Gay people – stoning/floggings and so on, aren't really something one would classify as traditional British pastimes.

Geert Wilders is his own man. His take on Islam was regarded by western establishments as bigoted and racists. Yet, his video simply asked for the Muslims to consider removing the pages of hatred towards those that weren't of the same faith as Islam. Does that classify Wilders as an extremist? Or are the people who instruct Muslims to kill infidels where they stand the extremists? I think we can make up our own minds on this topic.

By: Collin Brown

Collin Brown — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:06:40 +0000

Part 3, of the History of polictical correctness backs up what you say cazmac. [youtube _lM1bNyZRG8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lM1bNyZRG8 youtube]

By: Collin Brown

Collin Brown — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:54:38 +0000

You are quite correct Dung. Ignore your instincts to comply with Political Correctness. Here is part 2 of the history of political correctness which the tool used to cow tail the people into doing and saying nothing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_uFuYC4ak [youtube NS_uFuYC4ak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_uFuYC4ak youtube]

By: Collin Brown

Collin Brown — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:05:25 +0000

[youtube THJPz4BLFxk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THJPz4BLFxk youtube]

By: Collin Brown

Collin Brown — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:38:14 +0000

Until the B.N.P govern the UK, true democracy is but a dream. [youtube qQiV_nna5m8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQiV_nna5m8 youtube]

By: Dung

Dung — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:35:10 +0000

There is only one group of people in the UK (religious or otherwise) that thinks suicide bombs are an appropriate lever of power. That group is the Muslim population. I know some Muslims are decent people but my country comes first. Remove the Muslims and remove the threat and I dont if that is politically incorrect.

By: GIW2008

GIW2008 — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:13:34 +0000

The Queen does have more power than you possibly think Nigel. She does meet with the head of the govt on a regular basis. She also meets the military leaders. Furthermore, as head of state, when a foreign leader visits they are taken to see her before the PM. The common belief that she is some 'fluffy' lady who simply gives a speech once in a while is mistaken.
Neither the monarch nor our current PM have been elected by the public. We can and should change the PM. To change from a sovereign country to a Republic would have to be put to a referendum. That referendum would probably be put through the house of Lords for approval and be rejected.
Essentially Nigel, we are not a 'true' democracy anyway and never have been. However, the house of commons (those whom we elect) have betrayed us for some time in favour of immigrants. I think you'll find that this issue is of more importance to the average BNP supporter… not whether we should get rid of the Queen or not.
The current system of governent we have ie the monarch, the house of lords, and the house of representatives (or house of commons) is the oldest form of govt in the world today (i mean to say the longest lasting without a revolution) AND it has served us greatly . We developed an empire and indeed the world with this govt set-up.
THE PROBLEM Nigel, is that the current house of commons is full of weak men with a polictical agenda OF A REPUBLIC. Only not a british one but a european one. Look where Blair is nowadays after selling his country short…. in a european govt position.
I'm sorry Nigel, BUT, although I agree with your right to an opinion and indeed a referendum of the current set-up. I don't believe a republic is the way forward. The set up is broken in one place…… Whitehall.

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:56:42 +0000

I would encourage anyone interested in defending freedom of speech in the UK to sign this petition: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/UNreligion/ against voting for a UN resolution that renders the criticism of religion illegal. Thanks.

By: cazmac

cazmac — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:24:40 +0000

What is the BNPs position on Catholics and homosexuals,do your policies condemn this religion and do they also condemn homosexuals-I have been asked by people to ask these questions because they support the majority of your policies but are afraid of being brutalised by other supporters-I am a catholic,albeit lapsed and I am asking that if the BNP came to power would democracy extend to catholics and homosexuals and no I am not gay but I have friends who are.

By: RickTB

RickTB — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:06:49 +0000

Totally agree. There has been too much social engineering and tinkering with traditional values, by New Labour and the "Liberal Metropolitan Elite", these undemocratic dictators have had their way far too long. Only the BNP can and will stop the rot and restore my country.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:16:27 +0000

How come lorrys from Portugal drive all around our country taking jobs from our workers , then one of them kills a complete British family and then as good as gets away with it!

By: Nigel, Canterbury

Nigel, Canterbury — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:05:11 +0000

What is the BNP's position on the monarchy?

As a native Briton I don't believe having a constitutional monarchy is democratic. In this day and age the monarchy is an anachronistic institution and I would therefore favour a British Republic. Sorry, not very traditional of me, but it we're going to have a monarch then he/she should have some teeth and actually lead Britain with the authority and power that monarchs had in the past. Were this the case today we wouldn't have the sorry excuse for a parliament we have today and Britain would be in a much better state of affairs. As this won't happen in this day and age, a republic is a better option.

I refuse to take any oath of allegiance to the Crown, thus barring me from entry into the Forces. As a patriotic Briton I would however take an oath to the British nation.