Anti-BNP Court Cases: Does Anyone Really Believe They’re Accidental?
Special report by Nick Griffin MEP—Does anyone really believe that the slew of anti-BNP court cases are accidental? The truth is that they are part of a co-ordinated plan to break the party, says British National Party leader Nick Griffin, MEP.
Nick Griffin MEPMost BNP Internet users will be aware by now of the huge and co-ordinated campaign of disinformation and black propaganda directed against the British National Party and its leadership.
This operation clearly originates with the extremely well-funded far-left/Zionist front group Searchlight.
As large numbers of decent people have worked out, it involves lies and innuendo libel on a massive scale.
Its aim is to break the BNP, almost certainly to clear the way for the false flag English Defence League operation to mutate into a political party, thereby corralling nationalism in the UK into a safely controlled multi-cultural dead end.
While we expect to be viciously attacked from outside, some of our people are less able to recognise black propaganda and misinformation when it appears to come from within our own ranks. But that is what we are now facing, so it is time for people to learn the real facts.
The far-left’s concerted campaign of lies and false rumours is also being promoted by a clique of superficially ‘internal’ knockers (generally motivated by personal grudges or a liberal agenda, but no doubt also including the treacherous paid ‘moles’ who provide the detailed accounts of all significant BNP events to Searchlight and various well-informed Marxist blogs).
One of these people’s lines of attack at present is the allegation that I have recklessly involved the party in a string of ‘unnecessary’ court cases.
If this was true, it would be a matter for genuine concern. But, as is the case with all this black propaganda aimed at the naive and ill-informed, the truth is really very different, as a review of the cases involved quickly proves:
EQUALITY COMMISSION V NICK GRIFFIN, SIMON DARBY & TANYA LUMBY
This case was brought by the Marxist-led Commission and rushed into court even though we clearly signalled our willingness to discuss the issues they had raised in their pre-action letter and to seek a negotiated settlement.
In the face of this blatant bias and unreasonableness we changed our Constitution to remove the grounds they had for their direct discrimination claim.
Had this been done any way other than at legal gunpoint, if we had simply surrendered, the issue would have split the party. But I steered a course which took things to the wire but preserved our unity.
The response from Trevor Phillips and his seventy taxpayer-funded lawyers was shocking but not unexpected. Denied the opportunity to use direct discrimination as a club with which to bash us into the ground, they switched to the claim that our Statement of Principles stand against immigration (part of our Constitution since 1982) is indirectly discriminatory, because large numbers of people of immigrant descent are likely to disagree with it.
This attempt to claim the right to determine a party’s political stance is an outrageous attack on the freedom of every voter and every political party in Britain. And it is one that was not seen coming by any of those now trying to advance their own secret agenda by calling this case ‘unnecessary’.
This second round attack would have been thrown at the BNP whoever was in charge no matter how we might have responded to the Commission bullies’ original attack.
Far from being badly handled as the wreckers claim, the good news is that the specialist indigenous civil rights solicitors firm we employed to draft our new Constitution saw the attack coming – as did the members who voted virtually unanimously at last year’s EGM to approve the new draft and thereby give me the power “to turn on a sixpence” and change the Constitution again if and when forced to do so.
This flexibility maximises our chances of fighting off Trevor Phillips’ latest undemocratic, anti-British attack on our freedom and indeed on our very existence as a party.
Fortunately, our lawyers have worked tirelessly to become experts in race relations laws currently and pending, as well as in matters relating to injunctions and alleged contempt of court.
So the next hearing will see us counter-attack by applying to the court to have the orders declared irregularly obtained and unfairly oppressive and struck down accordingly.
Of course we would rather not be in court with these overpaid leftists, but they keep coming for us because we are a threat, and thanks to our handling of the case and a very skilfully drafted Constitution, we’re in with a fighting chance of beating them off.
This top-level professional defence has cost a large amount of money, but we had no choice. When the Establishment starts to use the full weight of its anti-British laws to try to crush an opponent, to respond as DIY amateurs as the knockers have recommended would be suicidal folly.
And, whatever happens, every time we’re dragged back into court, we get a further wave of publicity in which the public see us as the victim of politically correct establishment bullying. Long-term, that is publicity and positioning that no amount of money could ever buy.
BNP V SADIE GRAHAM, MATT SINGLE AND OTHERS
At the start of 2008, a small clique of former employees twice used the BNP’s membership list to send bogus Bulletins to our entire membership. Great efforts were made to negotiate a ‘deal’ with the clique. I made a whole string of very reasonable offers and sent Eddy Butler to try to settle them down and obtain their assurance that they would stop abusing our members’ right to privacy.
These efforts came to nothing. As a result, acting on behalf of our members, I sought and obtained an injunction to prevent them illicitly using our membership list. What else could have been done?
Surely no one seriously thinks that we should allow our members’ personal details to be used and abused by wreckers or people trying to raise funds under false pretences?
At any time up until the injunction was granted, the clique could have given an undertaking not to use the list and it would never have got to court.
We have made repeated efforts since to settle the matter with both sides paying their own costs, but all have been rebuffed.
As everyone knows, two of the defendants, Sadie Graham and Matt Single, went on not only to use the list for their own gain but, even worse, leaked it on the Internet causing huge suffering to BNP members and supporters.
This goes to show that I was right to fear that they would badly misuse the list, and was right therefore to try to stop them.
The actions of these traitors led to elderly members being terrified by threatening phone calls, to people losing their jobs and even to physical attacks on members’ property.
Yet, disgracefully, part of the stated programme of the latest generation of would-be wreckers is to let these people and their allies back into the BNP. Most normal people would rather see them hounded through the courts for their treachery.
UNILEVER/MARMITE
More drivel has been written about this one than all the others put together.
The first thing to make clear is that it has not even been a “court case” in the traditional sense.
In the run-up to the election, Marmite ran a series of adverts showing the ‘Hate Marmite’ Party, which was a carbon copy of the BNP.
These adverts steadily piled on the pressure with the idea that we are ‘haters’, and went so far as to glorify the use of violence against our members.
This huge campaign posed a clear and present danger to us, both politically and physically, and all attempts to stop it through normal channels came to nothing.
The biggest part of the danger was that, for most of the public, the anti-BNP message would sink in at a sub-conscious level. It was an example of dangerous interference in the democratic process which the regulatory authorities should have stopped.
We decided it was essential that we get out into the open the fact that the adverts were an attack on the BNP, so both we and several freelance sympathisers responded in various ways which Marmite would be unable to ignore.
Unilever’s consequent legal threats produced a gargantuan wave of national and international publicity, shortly before the election, which we could never have dreamt of buying, or of being able to afford to buy.
Publicity that keeps us in the public eye is invaluable to us. Sometimes we get it by standing in a parliamentary by-election in which we know we don’t stand a chance. That costs money, but it achieves its goal.
Far more publicity was obtained by this calculated brush with the legal department of a multi-national company, and we also stopped a subtle but very dangerous anti-PR campaign against us. Perhaps the knockers would rather we’d sat on our backsides and done nothing?
Fortunately we did act, and it paid off. With our growing ability to access proper legal resources we were able to resolve the dispute professionally and satisfactorily. The following is the statement agreed with Unilever as to how both parties regard the resolution of this dispute:
“Unilever and the BNP have agreed confidential terms of settlement to the satisfaction of both parties, so no further comment can be made”.
So the knockers pushing their own or their masters’ agendas by spouting crazy talk of enormous payments are not only lying as ever, they are cynically exploiting the fact we made a proper and confidential legal agreement.
For us to breach this formal agreement – as troublemakers are trying to force us to do by spreading utterly false and alarmist rumours - would be improper and would indeed lead to us being dragged into court.
I must make it clear that the malicious lies of £170,000 in costs are utterly untrue and that the true costs are not even the tiniest fraction of this amount.
THE MICHAELA MACKENZIE CASE
Michaela Mackenzie was an efficient clerical worker for the BNP from home, but when put in charge of an office she turned out to be a disaster.
To give just one example, around six thousand European Election inquiry packs were dumped on the pavement outside a Post Office depot without the correct mailing dockets being obtained, and were lost and destroyed as a direct result.
Other people who have worked for the party before and since, but who have been found not be up to scratch have been sacked, and surely that’s the right thing to do rather than waste members’ money on sub-standard staff.
Others have accepted the position and done the decent thing, and have been willing to reach a sensible parting settlement. In the Mackenzie case, we made a real effort to reach a deal, sending Eddy Butler down to negotiate with her, as Simon Darby did successfully with two other staff members we let go at the same time.
For some reason or other, in this case the negotiations came to nothing.
Unfortunately, we found out too late that Michaela Mackenzie has a very long track record of suing for ‘wrongful dismissal’, and knew how to manipulate things to exploit our lack of experience in such matters.
Hence we had no choice but to reach a settlement. That, however, is now the subject of a counter-claim, hence our refusal to pay it.
Sacking any staff, even badly performing ones, is unpleasant and difficult. But strangely, the knockers who are backing a staff member who failed and who is trying to take money off the party, are also proposing that we sack good staff working from our highly efficient and profit-making Belfast administration and call centre (all of whom are BNP members and employees, contrary to the knockers’ black propaganda).
To break our lease and other contracts involved in this successful operation, and to sack efficient and loyal staff just because their faces or names don’t fit (even though they are BNP members), really would open up several legal cans of worms.
All of which shows how talk about ‘unnecessary court cases’ isn’t a genuine concern, but just another weapon in the armoury of the external opposition and their internal ‘useful idiots’.
We, however, have learned from this case, which is one reason we have now created a dedicated Human Resources/Staff Management team to ensure that from now on everything is done by the book by people who know all the ropes.
MARK CROUCHER v NICK GRIFFIN
Mark Croucher is a former UKIP Press Officer with known links to Searchlight.
During the European Election, he tried to get bailiffs to seize the Truth Truck in order to enforce a judgement he had got on the sly over the use of a photo of Nigel Farage for which he claimed copyright.
Ironically, this photo was posted on our website, against clear instructions, by one Andrew Edwards, a non-member who was doing volunteer work for us at the time but who now spends most of his time attacking the current BNP leadership over, among other things, ‘unnecessary court cases’. Pot, kettle, black!
We have since won a counter-claim and Croucher now owes us £1,000, but has managed to get the case continued.
Many in the Eurorealist movement look at Mark Croucher’ relentless attacks on both UKIP and the BNP and ask whose side he is really on? He poses as a Eurosceptic, but does nothing except attack parties opposed to Britain’s membership of the EU.
He was clearly desperate to drag us into court, and the ‘mistake’ by Andrew Edwards would have given him the opportunity regardless of who was in charge.
GREENWICH COUNCIL
Following the appearance of BNP advertising boards on lamp posts in South East London during the European Election, the Borough of Greenwich launched a legal action and a claim for £2,500 plus costs of up to £15,000 against the party.
This is just typical of the kind of low to medium level harassment to which we are subjected by leftwing council officials, in circumstances when no action would ever be taken against any other party.
Fortunately, Lee Barnes took up the case on our behalf, undertook an extensive study of the relevant laws, and has now forced the council to drop the case. Thanks to Mr. Barnes it hasn’t cost us a penny.
So there’s one that we won completely, but it could have gone the other way. Cases like these are an unavoidable side effect of being involved in the struggle at all.
The ones that have actually got as far as litigation are in fact only the tip of the iceberg; over the last few years we have successfully fought off several dozen of these vexatious attempts to grind us down.
This has partly been because I have a law degree and huge experience in working with legal experts. It takes time, money and mental energy, but it has to be done.
The Establishment don’t like us, so why should anyone be surprised when they take every possible opportunity to try to bleed us through the legal system? It comes with the territory.
Let’s face it, if they weren’t attacking us, we wouldn’t be doing our job.
|
Sign Up to BNP e-News
Equalities Commission Fund
Search
Official BNP Facebook Page
BNP Crusaders (ages 18-30)
Excalibur Shop
Comments
They are on an urgent timetable.
Of course it's not accidental. The CRE is working as an agency of the Establishment, and they are under orders to kill the BNP before any more elections are held under proportional representation. Labour wants back those two MEP seats held by Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons. Off course, the Tories and LibDems will be only too glad to let their fellow pro-multiculti rainbow, pro-EU, pro-international capitalist pals have them. And why not? After all, they all stand together in favour of the same society. Many of us are not fooled by their apparant 'differences'.
Welcome to Great Britain, where democracy is a sham under the single-party dictatorship.
The thing about these court
The thing about these court cases that launched against the BNP is lack of intelligence and legal savvy that they presume on behalf the BNP. These people still clearly that the BNP is made up of illiterate skinheaded thugs. Only someone who only reads Searchlight and UAF websites still holds this view. I wonder what these people think when they come up against an articulated BNP argument. I wonder what the exact amount of degrees and post-graduate qualifications are held within the party membership. It would be interesting to see the public response.
Media..
This is the first time I have read about these court cases and it seems to me to be such a waste of time and pointless..
I saw the news coverage of the garden party and wonder if the TV interview with GMTV was also part of a subtle set up......seems a lot of that going on. I also heard some of the other attenders commented it would be nice to talk to Mr Griffin, although the media says horrible press against the BNP,nowever the people in the street think otherwise.
One of my thoughts is we are supposed to live in a tolerant and democratic society yet the BNP don't get hardly any time on TV speaking like the other partys and it would be good for Mr Griffin to go on Question again and this time the BBC do a proper job of controlling the people, it was shameful the way that went on, at no time was Mr Griffin allowed reasonable time to discuss policies of any kind...
Seems like the party needs eyes all around from being atacked from all sides..
Linda
Stand up for the white minority
Of course they are trying to destroy the BNP they are fearful.
All the more reason NOT to jump to the bait. We have free speech let them say what they like.
By getting involved in a lot of “he said, she said” spitefulness and nit picking about your constitution you are fiddling while Rome burns. Get everything sorted so that you do what you say on the tin. Then get on with the action that speaks louder than words so rise above all this and bury the hatchet preferably not in their backs.
Trevor Phillips is discriminating against us.
What are your latest policies on how you are going to tackle unemployment and immigration?
What are your latest findings about the Islamisation of our Islands? .
What is the BNP's standing on the Burkha?
What all these court cases don't do is connect with the people. They take you away from us.
I would like to see a few BNP members in the house of commons as there needs to be a balance to all this left liberalism that is ruining our country. Someone has to stand up to them not merge and become like them which is what all these discrimination and racism accusation is about
The BNP always has been a white party and should always remain so, you are heading the way the country is if you change your original constitution and blur your boundaries. Someone has to represent the white soon to be minority.
Trev
Keep it up Trevor as you are personally pushing people to join the BNP, can you get us to 20,000 please, that would be nice.....ha ha ha
Zionism
Gerry Gable, the boss of far-left group Searchlight, had a son in the Israeli Defence Force who fought against Palestinian terrorists. This accounts for Searchlight falling out with UAF, which like most far-left groups is anti-semitic, under the guise of anti-zionism.
That Searchlight is opposed to islamic terrorism is the only good thing about it. In every other way it is corrupt and dangerous, infiltrating both nationalist AND far-left groups on behalf of MI5, obviously for money. Many far-left groups hate them for this as much as they hate us for what WE stand for.
(Why the MI5 connection? MI5 are just as worried about the far-left as they are worried about the BNP. The BNP, because it threatens the old gang parties. The far-left, because some of them are associated with islamic terrorist networks, which want to blow Britain up.)
Let's not go back to the old days of seeing "zionism" as being at the root of the world's problems. It was only through modernising the party that we started to win popular support, after all. Look what happened to the National Front, which is still stuck in the Tyndall/Webster/Bean mindset.
money for the bnp
As I was watching newsnight a thought crossed my mind, this evening. The ex boss of the telegraph newspaper who has been released from prison Mr Black(rather aptly named) may have a very large axe that he would like to grind, having spent two years behind bars. It would be a rather good idea, if he were to come on board the BNP club, perhaps throw a few hundred quid to the bnp, just to throw a hammer into the EHRC works. Does anybody have any connections with him?
Globalist/Marxist Establishment sabotaging BNP
Let no-one be under any illusion that the Globalist/Marxist Establishment is not using all its vast government, media and other resources to infiltrate & sabotage the nationalist BNP, the UK's only hope against this totalitarian criminal gang. Anyone in the BNP must see that we are under a severe attack from the State & it's criminal associates in the Lib/Lab/Con one-party-with-three-names and their moles - does anyone really believe that the Establishment with its limitless resources has not infiltrated the BNP to at least some degree? I'm 100% behind Nick Griffin and his efforts to halt the EHRC & the black racist Marxist Trevor Phillips in his attempts to destroy the BNP & ultimately the UK nation-state & force the indigenous British people to become powerless pawns of the multicultural EU Federal Superstate.
British values
I note that clever Trevor is Ugandan, yet is allowed to tell the British how to run their politics. I also note that Pakistani newspapers were very keen to tell Pakistanis living in the UK how to vote. I also note that people from 3rd world countries were given postal votes despite having never even visited this island. I also see that Syria has banned the burkha and the tories are telling us that it “empowers women”.
Welcome to 3rd world Britistan, where welfare is king and foreign aid is ring fenced.
Reply to Mandala...
Mandala, you mention the idiotic statement made by the brain-dead Environment Secretary Caroline Spellman, who is not only a traitor to Britain, but also a traitor to all womenkind. I read about it in the Daily Mail, and was rather hoping this website would make an issue of it, but alas nothing appeared here.
However, since you mention her, here is a personal message for the benefit of Environment Secretary Caroline Spellman and anyone who may be mental enough to take her seriously.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that chains empower slaves.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that collars with name tags empower dogs.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that dictatorships empower freedom.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that ignorance empowers learning.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that prison empowers long-distance runners.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that Adolf Hitler empowered the German Jews.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that cholera empowers water.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that drought empowers crops.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that honesty empowers politicians.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that Islam empowers Women’s Lib.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that censorship empowers freedom of expression.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that staircases empower wheelchair-users.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that the atomic bomb empowered the citizens of Hiroshima.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that superstition empowers scientific advancement.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that the Inquisition empowers Protestants.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that stupidity, lack of thought and a big mouth empowers Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman.
Burkas empower women in the identical way that Lib-Lab-Con politicians empower the indigenous British people.
The single advantage of a burka will only come if the whole world throws a fancy-dress party for women only and everyone who comes dressed in a penguin costume gets a prize. In all other circumstances, the burka is a death shroud for women’s empowerment.
I invite Environment Secretary Caroline Spellman to reply - if she can find a brain somewhere that can reconnect with her mouth.
Reply to a reply
Caroline Spellman will never reply. New tory is good at making sweeping statements, not answering to logical questioning.
Reply to a Reply to a Reply...
"Caroline Spellman will never reply. New tory is good at making sweeping statements, not answering to logical questioning."
Very true, Mandala, but we should still never miss an opportunity to rub their noses in it!
I joined BNP
It was all the negative publicity that was printed in the paper about changing the BNP constitution and freedom of speech etc that made me look at the BNP website and join up. I read the BNP policies and agreed with them.
Never Mind The Court Cases, There's Something Much Worse!
I cannot believe nobody in BNP management has made a headline item of the certain doom that is approaching this Party - and it has nothing to do with the court cases or the EHRC.
The following quote is from the BBC website yesterday: "Earlier in the month the coalition government announced that the referendum on introducing the alternative vote (AV) system for elections to the House of Commons would be held on 5 May next year."
NOTICE HOW THE TERM "PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION" HAS BEEN QUIETY DROPPED FROM THE REFERENDUM!
If the Alternative Vote System is adopted (and I am cynical enough to believe the referendum is already being "managed" so that the result is inevitable), then no candidate from any political party except Tory, New Labour and Lib-Dem can possibly be elected to parliament in England, and the same 3 plus Welsh and Scottish Nationalists in those countries.
The Alternative Vote uses a voting slip in which a voter places choices, 1st, 2nd and 3rd etc. Quite obviously, on a national level, Labour, Tory and Lib-Dem will always be 1st, 2nd or 3rd. No other party will be able to elbow their way in anywhere.
The Welsh and Scottish Nationalists, who today seem to have a general public approval rating greater than the British Nationalists, will also be on the way out. At present, they do not have sufficient immigrants in their countries to sway the balance, but one day the scams like "Operation Black Vote" will take over there, too.
WE ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR POLITICAL EXISTENCE - BUT THE GREAT ENEMY IS NOT THE EHRC, WHO ARE SIMPLY A POISON GAS CLOUD - THE GREAT ENEMY IS THE FORTHCOMING CHANGE IN THE VOTING SYSTEM WHICH DENIES PROPER PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION. BE WARNED!
phillips...
As OUR Statement of Principles stand against immigration(since 1982) is seen to be indirectly discriminatory.Where Mr. phillips do you start the illegal immigrants discriminatory,against the civil people of Great Britain ? Surely as your title says EQUALITY in quite large letters',it is the Great British people that should have you in the DOCK for your lack of control over illegal people entering this Great Britain,that IS INDIRECTLY DISCRIMINATORY by yourself and your quango masters WASTING BRITISH TAX PAYERS MONEY TO THEN ATTACK THE VERY TAX-PAYERS.I think a court room should be full of tax-payers with you in the dock,as you are Definately Indirectly Discriminatory against each and every one of us(you know,the people who's money YOU WASTE.)....Hope you see this Nick.
and we want it back!
http://rugfish.blogspot.com/2010/07/this-is-our-land.html
-
The liblabcontricked are waking up.
Statesman-like
I make a point, in conversation, of referring to our Chairman, Nick Griffin as, Statesman-like; because that is exactly what he is in comparison to the less-than-mediocre so-called Leaders of the other Parties! He and we together, will rise above the relentless but mis-guided puppets of the UAF and Searchlight and drive the BNP forward to victory over socio-economic fascism; for the indefatigable English, Welsh, Scots and Irish. et al!
Courage
Law can be more frightening than armed force - a lot more frightening. It takes a lot of courage to stand your ground when enemies harass you in court. You tend to get PTSD - or rather TSD - there is nothing "Post" about it, it is current and shows no sign of stopping.
I get mad just reading about it so to cheer myself up, I have taken to reading the news reports about the Bangladesh National Party which come up every time you put "BNP" into a search engine, after our website of course! They are going through hell just like us, they are nationalist, they are anti the government selling out to foreign powers, etc. Because of our past Empire, their English is superb and at times even better than ours, in a really cute and funny way. So I find their reports in English a real tonic. Here's an example:
"The strike programme had been taken as part of BNP's continuous campaign to pressurise the government to accept various demands including withdrawal of false charges against its leaders and their immediate release from detention, information on the whereabouts of missing ward commissioner Chowdhury Alam, proper supply of electricity, gas and water, stopping extortion, tender manipulation, and grabbing lands by the ruling party cadres, bringing down price-hike of essentials, scrapping anti-national agreement signed with India during the Prime Minister's visit to India and stopping politicisation of administration and interference in judiciary.
Delwar said despite various opposition programmes, government was yet to be concerned in resolving the problems of the people. People were protesting to get their demands accepted, he added. He said, 'The ruling party used police to foil our peaceful hartal and human chain. They have taken stance against the people by putting restrictions in our programmes in this manner.'
Referring to the government activities, the BNP secretary general said the key-role players were busy in keeping their promises to foreigners. Their actions proved that they were not running a democratic government, he said."
"Busy keeping their promises to foreigners", "grabbing lands by ruling-party cadres", "false charges against BNP leaders", "tender manipulation", "price hike of essentials", "proper supply of electricity, gas and water" - sound familiar? My favourite is "busy keeping their promises to foreigners" - it is funny and quite polite, but at the same time quite devastating.
More seriously, this is what Bangladeshis over here should be doing, and where they should be. Back home, defending their land from those who have "taken stance against the people".
Anti-BNP Court Cases
To quote Kenneth Williams form Carry On Clio; "Infamy, Infamy, they've all got it infamy!"
won't grind you down
Nick Griffin is doing a great job and I am sure that he won't let the traitors and the small-minded grind him down.
Shoulder to shoulder we stand
Churchill Fan:
I am an avid reader of all of your postings Sir and I salute you. You are a patriot and what is essential is that we all stand together shoulder to shoulder. It is our unity which will enable us to prevail against the forces of darkness ranged against us.
Thank You, Mr Chairman
I would like to join the many others, both in this column and in our party generally, who have expressed support for our Chairman, Nick Griffin.
Mr Chairman, the greatest respect is due to you for your selfless devotion to our party and our people, the English, Irish Scots and Welsh.
I trust that the debt we all owe you will be expressed in a landslide victory of loyalty that will see you still as the honest and talented hand on the tiller of the good ship BNP.
Every good wish to you and yours personally, sir.
Mr. Griffin.
I support Mr. Griffin unequivically. If he has conflicting personal considerations that is his business.I would like him to continue as leader.
Have no fear, the party will prevail. Our cause is just, our cause is right, our cause will overcome all obstacles.
Onwards and upwards.
good old nick
if we let the traitors of this country walk all over us there will be no stopping them we must fight back with all the will and determination of the british lion.if the bnp sued all the tritors who have lied and tried to discredit the bnp we would be worth millions but this would cost us millions to persue through the courts money which the bnp cannot afford at this present moment in time but patience has its vertue and lest we not forget,once a traitor always a traitor and one day your time will come when the british people pull together and take our country back,god bless nick griffin MEP and the bnp.
No the ELITE seem to be at work
All walks of life seem to be controlled by an unelected ELITE!
Be it targeting the BNP by use of their media or infiltration,
What is going on TOTAL CONTROL FREAKS !
Divine Intervention
Is it possible that when one considers the struggle the BNP is fighting that throught these court cases there was divine intervention.
Pointless Emails
Over the past few weeks I have had my fair share of emails proclaiming dissent in the party. But here's the rub: I couldn't care less! The rumours may be true in full or in part, or they may be completely false. Show me a political party that's completely free of rivalry and dissatisfaction and I'll show you a one-man band talking to himself. The fact is that I, like all other nationalists fighting for this country, have nowhere else to go anyway. It's the BNP or bust! So if there are people out there deliberately trying to cause a split in British nationalism, here's a tip: wait until there is an alternative place for nationalists to go, because at the moment we're all staying put regardless. We'll be voting BNP come hell or high water because there's no other party we can vote for. So stop wasting everybody's time with these pointless emails!
Support from true Brits
You have my whole families support Mr Griffin, ever since my awakening I have come across untold discrimination, although this doesn't bother me personally, it just fans the flames. Politics has always been a dirty business, but it is intensely dirty when directed at the BNP, we are the only party that has it's country in it's name, that should mean something, yet people villify us. We must weather these storms and come out of them stronger, we have many new areas to flood with BNP material and these court cases do nothing but slow down the inevitable rise of the BNP, but continue to rise it does, continue your good work Mr Griffin it's a honour to know men of your calibre.
I'll second that Robert
I'll second that Robert Weale, well said, my sentiments exactly!
Mr Chairman.
Kindest regards Mr Chairman, I read your post with great interest, and let me say in my opinion what you said needed saying.
There is undoubtedly disquiet in some parts of our party and to simply ignore it I believe, is asking for trouble.
Mr chairman I never again want to see my party put through the mill again as seems it has been of late, i want to be able to donate to my party secure in the knowledge that my money is going someway to bringing about a significant change in our country's fortunes, and to bring to book the people that would deny my, and my children's birthright. FORWARD MR CHAIRMAN FOR ALL YOU`RE WORTH.