Peruvian Farm Wife: Guinea Pig for dinner, courtesy of the Labour Party

National Lottery funding is dished out to African dance troupes, prisoners’ painting classes and equipment for Peruvian guinea pig farmers — but not a single penny is available for any organisation which pledges to promote and protect English culture.

This shocking fact has emerged after South Wales British National Party superactivist Roger Philips asked the National Lottery Commission under a Freedom of Information (FOI) request about grants made to “good causes.”

The commission was “unable to assist” Mr Phillips, but they did provide a web link to the lottery grants database, which records all payments made since 1995 — and reveals some peculiar Labour government pet projects as the recipients of funding.

A search established that 153 grants amounting to £7,366,692 have been made to Muslim organisations, in comparison with 106 grants worth £3,366,924 made to Christian organisations, amounting to less than half of the total donated to Islamic causes.

There have been 2365 grants awarded to organisations which promote multicultural ideology, amounting to £184,278,549.

Schemes operating out of the heavily Islamified and Labour-controlled Tower Hamlets — with its 15,000 council staff and £1.1 billion budget — have received £207,563,446 in lottery grants since 1995.

The more unusual grants include:

£6,035,976 granted to the Black Photographers’ Association in 2002.

£5,078,472 granted to the British Refugee Council in 2007.

£2,000,000 granted to Pathe Productions for their Bollywood project in 2003.

£1,011,104 granted to Health Unlimited for a radio service broadcasting “in the vicinity of the African Great Lakes.”

£7,040,000 (2003) and £5,050,000 (2000) granted to ‘Rich Mix’ Cultural Foundation “for the promotion of ethnic  minorities’ impact on the London economy and culture.” (The BNP website offers this service free of charge.)

The commission was keen to stress that they do not distribute the funds directly; responsibility is delegated to outside bodies who are selected by parliament, including arts, sports and films councils,  and the Big Lottery Fund: the body responsible for distributing 670 million a year, of which 70 million goes to international projects.

The Big Lottery Fund receives around 14p of every pound paid into the lottery.

It has been heavily criticised in the past, once being compared to a Stealth Tax because the grants from this fund contribute towards projects that are usually, or should be, state-funded.

Labour ministers have been accused of using lottery funding to meet ministerial targets, or to meet Labour’s culturally Marxist ‘social objectives’.

The only indigenous English species the funding bodies seem concerned with are water invertebrates and plants.

Details of Mr Blair’s dealings have emerged after his frantic attempts to keep them secret ended after they were published by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACBA).

The news has dealt another blow to the British people’s confidence in the honesty of their public servants and institutions, as the ACBA had allowed Mr Blair to keep the deal secret for at least 20 months.

The ACBA, set up to vet the jobs of former ministers in order to ease public concerns about their use of contacts made in public service for financial gain, is packed with former politicians from all of the three Westminster political parties and their associates.

It is therefore not surprising that they have never prevented any former politicians from taking lucrative jobs in the private sector. Earlier this month, the Government rejected calls for the appointment of more committee members from outside the world of politics.

Mr Blair is known to have made in excess of £20 million since leaving Westminster in 2007, although many of his business dealings and other ventures are clouded in secrecy, so the true extent of his earnings can only be guessed at.

However, many of his lucrative deals can be traced directly to his actions in involving Britain in the illegal Iraqi war.

Not bad for the leader of a ’socialist’ political party of the champagne variety which managed to bankrupt Britain and ruin the prosperity of the British people.

According to figures released by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), universities will be provided with a fund of £7.3 billion next year, which is some £449 million less than what the institutions expected or needed.

This will cause job losses and thousands of fewer places for British kids at university next year. Scottish and Welsh universities will receive their budgets later, but they are also expected to face cuts.

At the same time, a statement issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) revealed that the “direct spend” budget of the Government’s foreign aid programme for 2010/11 is £7.76 billion — the difference being more than the cut to England’s university funding budget.

As shocking as these figures are, the DFID announcement has deliberately understated the budget spend, hiding the true cost with an administrative trick.

The figures they announced are only the direct aid programme, and not the total cost, which is called the ‘Gross Public Expenditure on Development’ (GPEX), which adds nearly £2 billion each year to total DFID expenditure.

For example, the GPEX in 2007/08 amounted to £6.027 billion, of which £5.2 billion was direct aid. The GPEX for 2006/07 was £7.4 billion, of which £4.9 billion was direct aid, and the GPEX for 2005/06 was £6.6 billion, of which £4.4 billion was direct aid.

Almost all universities have seen funding reduced, with the biggest loser being the London Business School which has had 12 percent taken off its budget. The education budget cuts come at the same time that record numbers of people have applied to go to university.

The Government has claimed that the “deficit” is the cause of the budget cuts.

This does not however explain why the Labour regime can find £9 billion per year for foreign aid and £3 billion per year for the war in Afghanistan.

It seems that the ruling elite would much rather give tax money in “aid” to nuclear powers like Pakistan and India, and fight an illegal and immoral war in Afghanistan, than subsidise British universities.

The Tories are equally complicit in this treason against Britain. The Conservative Party is committed to continuing the conflict in Afghanistan and has announced that they will intensify British involvement in that war.

In addition, the Tories have also promised to increase the foreign aid budget to £13 billion per year.

Only the British National Party demands the immediate withdrawal of Britain from the Afghanistan war which has nothing to do with us.

Only the British National Party says that all foreign aid should be halted and these billions spent on pressing problems — such as education — at home.

Only the British National Party puts the interests of the British people first.

The third-rate Mirror, which runs anti-BNP campaigns in alliance with a well-known Communist Party front crank group, published an article from a “Pete” in the “My Story” section of their paper yesterday called “I was a BNP bigot until I fell for this woman.”

The article claims to be the story of a former BNP “regional organiser” who fell in love with a Jamaican woman.

The hilarious lie is contained within the article:

“If someone had said to me in the 80s that I’d marry a black woman, I’d have said ‘Never in a million years!’

“You see, I dread to think how many years I’d been active with the BNP. I was in my late teens when it all started. I was always looking back to the ‘good old days’ of England. I was worried about immigration and I couldn’t see where it would all end.

“Then I read a BNP magazine called Identity, and I thought, ‘I agree with that all the way.’ That’s when I got active doing leafleting for them, and eventually I progressed to regional organiser.

“I was blinded by it. They said what I wanted to hear. I was involved right through the 80s, when BNP founder John Tyndall was in charge before Nick Griffin, who I also became friendly with.”

Unfortunately for the lying Mirror newspaper, Identity magazine was only launched in 1999 after Mr Griffin became leader of the BNP.

It would therefore have been impossible for “Pete” to have been converted to the BNP by reading a copy of Identity in the “1980s” as this bogus article says.

This claim, like the rest of the article, has simply been fabricated.

The British National Party dismisses with contempt these pathetic lies from the increasingly desperate Marxist weirdoes at the Mirror.

It is a measure of their political bankruptcy that they must resort to such weak and easily disprovable lies instead of tackling the real issues of the day, which are:

- Britain is being colonised by the Third World through mass immigration;

- Britain is being Islamified as a result of that immigration invasion;

- Britain is being economically destroyed after decades of Tory and Labour misrule;

- Britain’s sovereignty and independence are being subverted by membership of the European Union; and

- Britain has been dragged into Labour/Tory-supported foreign wars which have nothing to do with us and which are crippling the country’s finances, not to mention the hundreds of deaths they have caused.

These are the real issues upon which people will vote, not made up lies from gutter scribblers masquerading as ‘journalists’.

The black cabs were made by Coventry-based companyManganese Bronze, which has now been bought by a Chinese company.

Maganese Bronze confirmed in a statement that the  manufacture of its TX4 black cab vehicles’ body panels and chassis will go to China following the change in ownership.

It said the parts for the TX4 vehicles will now be made in Shanghai following the decision of one of its suppliers to cease production of a specialist painting process.

The decision will cost an estimated 60 British workers their jobs and be yet another body blow to what remains of Britain’s once mighty car industry.

Manganese Bronze sells the bulk of its production to London based taxi companies, with the remainder being sold to cab operators in other major British cities.

These companies will soon have to source new vehicles and spares from China or Germany.

The company is reported as having made a pre-tax loss of over £8m last year, which came on top of a £6m loss in 2008.

Manganese Bronze’s takeover by the Chinese follows the sale of Mini and Rolls-Royce to the Germans, Jaguar Land Rover to the Indians and Aston Martin to a Middle East-based concern.

It illustrates the hollowness of Gordon Brown’s aping of the British National Party’s slogan: “British jobs for British workers.”

When we say it — we mean it.

Copies of the CPRE’s publication, described as its “Manifesto for the General Election”, have been received by a number of prospective parliamentary candidates across the country.

The document has much to commend it, and much of what it proposes is fully in agreement with British National Party policy on rural and environmental affairs.

It’s what it doesn’t say that speaks volumes.

Despite accepting the need to control urban sprawl and specifically that caused by the Government’s madcap plan to build at least two million new homes over the next 20 years, it says nothing about overpopulation.

Whereas every rational person willingly concedes the need to eradicate fly-tipping, improve rural transport and protect and extend our national parks, few can be unaware of the threat posed by immigration-fuelled overpopulation to both the environment and countryside.

The CPRE document states that they want “enforcement of national targets for at least 80 percent of new housing and 85 percent of commercial development to be on brownfield land.” This is a sentiment the BNP has already endorsed.

Elsewhere in their document they urge people to “campaign strongly for the Green Belt, resisting pressure to alter Green Belt boundaries to allow urban sprawl, and supporting the case for creating new areas of Green Belt.” This has also long been a BNP campaign issue.

Yet nowhere in the CPRE publication does it mention immigration, which is by far the biggest driver of population growth in Britain.

This is a strange omission; arising, some claim, from the CPRE’s slavish subservience to political correctness.

Whatever the reason, the fact remains that population growth in Britain is being driven by mass immigration, with the astonishing birth rates of some sections of the immigrant community a significant secondary factor.

This has this been confirmed by non-political organisations such as MigrationWatch and also widely reported in the media.

There can be no rational excuse for this omission in a document from an organisation claiming to protect rural England.

Both history and common sense should remind us that the greatest threat to any country’s environment and countryside comes from overpopulation. There are only a finite number of people that any given landmass can sustain from its own resources.

How have unsustainable populations in countries such as India and Bangladesh been protective of their respective natural environments or, for that matter, beneficial to the quality of life of their inhabitants?

If the CPRE wants to be taken seriously over its stated aims in respect of protecting the English countryside, then it has to recognise the undeniable link between immigration, overpopulation and environmental damage.

The BNP recognises this link, which is why its stance on rural and environmental issues is both credible and logical, a position arising in no small way from being untainted by political correctness.

The close ties between the EHRC and the radical Islamist, who has called for a military invasion of Britain by Muslims and arranged demonstrations calling for Queen Elizabeth II to be “cursed by God”, puts a brand new perspective on the recent legal harassment to which the BNP was subjected.

Mr Choudary was most recently in the limelight after he planned to block a Wootton Bassett funeral procession for British soldiers killed in Iraq.

His organisation has also called for the implementation of Sharia law in Britain.

The revelation of his links with the EHRC is contained in a video of a lecture given by Mr Choudary to a closed group of followers which has leaked onto the Internet.

In the lecture, Mr Choudary also calls for a violent Islamic invasion of Britain, which he says would be one of four ways in which Islam will come to dominate Britain.

He also makes some snide and utterly untrue allegations about the BNP, but the important admission in the video comes near the end while  he is discussing how Islam is incompatible with Western society and then admits to having worked for the CRE in the 1990s.

He starts the lecture by detailing the four methods by which Islam is going to overrun Britain.

“The Islamic state my dear Muslims can only come via four means … write them down and remember them. There are only four ways in which the Muslims will take the authority,” Mr Choudary said.

“Number one, if the Islamic state is established somewhere else in the world and they come and they conquer and they take the authority. That is a nice way of doing it, the foreign policy of jihad. They will come and Britain will be under the Sharia.

“The second way that authority can be taken wherever you are in the world is for the people themselves to embrace Islam, and for themselves to rise and take the authority.

“The third way that the authority can be taken is if certain sections of the community overthrow the regime. Like for example in Syria and Pakistan you have military coups.

“Every other year they used to have a military coup in Syria. That is the way in fact the messenger of Mohammed did it in Medina.

“The Fourth way it’s going to happen is if jihad began here like in Kosovo or Bosnia and the people came from another area to support us and the regime was overthrown.

“If you look, in the past it used to be a case of ‘multiculturalism’. They used to say that. Remember that? In the 1970s and 80s the Commission for Racial Equality they used to say “we believe in multiculturalism”.

“I used to work at the CRE at one point in the early 90s.

“Remember with [...?] And, er, he used to be a senior lawyer there in fact. And [...] multiculturalism — everyone has their own culture, you can all practise it together.

“Suddenly the Muslims said ‘hang about — our culture we can’t practice it with you because we believe cutting the hand of the thief. We believe stoning the adulterer. We believe we need to remove you and send the army of jihad.”

This, then, is the type of person who found employment at the EHRC’s predecessor. It is little wonder that this taxpayer-funded political organisation carries out the bidding of those who would see Britain utterly overrun and destroyed.

In a special email newsletter released exclusively to subscribers yesterday, Mr Griffin said: “Trevor Phillips and his twisted band of anti-British bigots will probably have a hysterical fit when they read this, but over 1,000 people have joined the British National Party since the membership ban was lifted on Friday afternoon.”

Mr Griffin then took the opportunity to thank all those supporters who gave generously during the difficult months of the membership ban.

“Without your generosity, determination and quintessential British stubbornness, our party would have been bankrupted long ago,” he said.

The BNP call centre has worked non-stop to cope with the incoming calls and mail-based applications and is putting in extra hours to handle the influx.

“The general election is fast approaching and we cannot afford to lose a single day now,” Mr Griffin continued.

“Thanks to the membership ban being lifted, there are multiple ways in which you can help kick-start our campaign. Everyone can now help our campaign, members and non-members alike,” he said.

The first method Mr Griffin outlined was to “join the British Resistance.”

“The BNP is the only hope for our country, our children and grandchildren. Why not join the British Resistance to political correctness, multiculturalism and the enforced colonisation of our country? Standard membership costs only £30.”

Membership application can be made online by clicking here.

The second method of helping is to become a Life Member.

“Life members are that small elite of British patriots that sign up to the cause of British nationalism for life, not just for one year. Life membership comes with various other attractive benefits,” Mr Griffin said.

Life membership can be purchased by clicking here.

The third method is to become a Gold Member. “Gold members stand out from the crowd due to the unique gold membership badge which tells everybody that you have made the extra commitment,” Mr Griffin said.

Gold membership costs just £60 and can be purchased by clicking here.

“The fourth way in which you can help the party,” Mr Griffin continued, is to upgrade your membership.

“Why not upgrade your existing membership to Gold or even Life? Upgrading your membership shows your commitment to our cause and provides real and substantial benefits to you and the party,” he said.

Upgrades can be purchased by clicking here.

The fifth method of helping the party is to join the Trafalgar Club.

“This is the BNP’s exclusive dining and fundraising club. Members of the Trafalgar Club are not party members, so it is a perfect option for those supporters who wish to help without actually joining the party,” Mr Griffin said.

Trafalgar Club membership may be purchased by clicking here.

The sixth method through which you can help the party is a direct donation to the election campaign.

“Straightforward donations to our general election campaign war chest are needed more than ever,” Mr Griffin said.

“Time is running out fast and unless we all dig deep our campaign won’t get off the ground.” Donations may be made online by clicking here.

“Alternatively call 0207-078-8838 and speak with a member of our team for any of the options above,” Mr Griffin said.

“Above all, we need all members and supporters to swing into furious action, leafleting, canvassing, distributing literature.

“If you are unable for one reason or another to be active in our general election, then please choose from one of the six methods outlined above to give our activists the tools they need to fight this election and win,” he concluded.

* You can sign up automatically for the free Chairman’s Newsletter by clicking here.

This incredible scenario will play itself out after a Saudi lawyer, Faisal Yamani, launched a case in London’s libel courts on behalf of over 90,000 claimed descendants of the Prophet Mohammed who maintain that the Danish cartoon drawings have defamed them and the Islamic faith.

Ebbe Dal, managing director of Danske Dagblades Forening, the Danish national newspaper association, expressed concern that the UK’s libel laws, considered tough by EU standards, will be used to restrict free speech in more liberal countries such as Denmark.

“The Danish courts have decided that the case is not actionable and that we are allowed to print the drawings in Danish newspapers and websites,” he said.

“It would be very odd if a civilised country like Britain could go against that.

“If this succeeded we would have to pay a lot of money to Saudi Arabians misusing the British courts to make it difficult for freedom of speech.”

Last year Mr Yamani demanded that the Danish newspapers remove all cartoon images of Mohammed from their websites and issue prominent front page apologies.

Eleven Danish newspapers refused to comply with this demand. This refusal has now been followed up with the court action.

Denmark’s justice minister, Lars Barfoed, has now formally complained to the European Commission that the EU rules would force Denmark to enact British court rulings.

It would, he said, “damage Denmark’s ancient right to freedom of expression.

“It would be taking it to the extreme if a UK court could rule against the Danish media and then require compensation and court costs to be paid.”

This point appears to have been acknowledged by an EU official who provided a compelling reason why Britain may be the country of choice for the plaintiffs by saying: “We are well aware that there is a problem with libel and defamation tourism involving Britain, where judges can be sympathetic and damages awards are high.”

Welcome to the EU madhouse, where an alleged offence committed in one country (Denmark) can be brought before the courts of a second country (Britain) by wealthy individuals from a third country (Saudi Arabia).

The most shocking part is that the outcome of the court’s deliberations in Britain can be imposed upon Denmark, even if Danish courts have already ruled against that legal action.

Royal Air Force Regiment veteran David Lloyd will stand for the BNP in Lewes.

“My family has served in the Army and the Royal Navy for decades and have earned the right to say how this country is run,” Mr Lloyd said.

“It is my duty to protect their values of honesty, decency, integrity and loyalty. I will not stand by and watch my country being destroyed by the Tory/Labour/Lib Dem Tweedledee and Tweedledum parties who have no concept of the meaning of loyalty to a country or its people,” he said.

Financial consultant Matt Tait will be the party’s candidate in Milton Keynes.

“I will campaign on the serious threat which uncontrolled mass immigration poses to our existence as a nation,” Mr Tait said.

“Current demographic trends show that we are set to be overrun by the Third World invasion well within 30 or 40 years.  This is not the sort of future I want to bequeath to future generations.

“In addition, my campaign will call for an end to the Afghanistan war.”

Architect Peter Phillips will be the party’s candidate in Windsor.

“As a born and bred Londoner, I am saddened by the steady decline of our country,” said Mr Phillips.

“We see all around us the end product of decades of Tory/Labour/Lib Dem misrule: the run-down state of our surroundings, the health service, the education and transport sectors, the erosion of our once cohesive and law-abiding society and the increasing shortage and unaffordable cost of housing. We need to change direction.

“The principal causes of our nation’s decline are relentless uncontrolled immigration, the destructive political correctness which dominates every aspect of our lives, and the transfer of power to the unaccountable European Union,” he said, adding that only the BNP will “stop this madness.”

In Gillingham and Rainham, long-time Medway resident Brian Ravenscroft will carry the party’s flag.

“Mass immigration has changed the face of the constituency and has resulted in British people being put last,” Mr Ravenscroft said.

“I will campaign to end this anti-British discrimination and put the rights of our people first.”

Local businessman Geoff Crompton will contest the Portsmouth South seat on behalf of the BNP.

He will campaign on the principles of putting British people first and on ending the war in Afghanistan.

“The recent outcry over taxi drivers in Southampton using ‘English speaking driver’ stickers shows just how far the madness of anti-English political correctness has gone,” Mr Crompton said.

Electrical engineer Colin McCarthy-Stewart will be the BNP candidate in Chatham & Aylesford.

“I have seen this country change out of all proportion since the 60s and 70s,” Mr McCarthy-Stewart said. “It has been a change for the worse.

“The BNP is the only party that will act in the best interests of the people of Medway and which will provide a better future for all,” he said.

Mr Jackson has had a long career in public service, starting with the Royal Air Force and later in the Customs and Excise office and the Metropolitan Police’s civil staff.

“I joined the BNP because it is the only party capable of dragging this once great country out of the mess it is now in,” Mr Jackson said.

“I am concerned over immigration and asylum which are overwhelming our NHS, housing and schools and undermining law and order. This is making an already difficult employment situation worse.”

Mr Jackson will also be campaigning for an immediate end to Britain’s involvement in unnecessary foreign wars, with particular reference to Afghanistan.

“If elected, I will uphold the highest standards of integrity and undertake to always be receptive to voter concerns,” he said.

The British National Party in Scotland has made yet another breakthrough for the party with the launch of its first ever billboard campaign, reports Scottish party leader Gary Raikes.

“The first billboard has gone up in Aberdeen to support our candidate Susan Ross,” said Mr Raikes.

“This is hot on the heels of our Truth Truck tour which has helped to bring home the BNP’s message to the people of North East Scotland,” he said.

Mr Raikes said two more billboards were planned, one in Gordon and another in Banff Buchan, in support of BNP candidates Elise Jones and Richard Payne respectively.

“It is the largest amount ever raised at a Hastings meeting and is an indication of the growing support for the party,” Mr Prince said.

“Just over £200 was raised in a conventional collection and the rest in a candidate sponsorship ‘Dutch style’ auction,” he said.

The guest speaker for the evening was new Guildford organiser Steve Bolton. “This was the first meeting at which Mr Bolton was our guest speaker. He proved to be an excellent orator and spoke from the heart about personal experiences and national issues,” Mr Prince said.

The activist of the year award was presented to Ken Shotton of Eastbourne, who tirelessly travelled a 30 mile round trip daily to leaflet a County Council Division almost single-handedly during last year’s campaign, he added.

Pictured are Nick Prince, Ken Shotton and Steve Bolton.

“Mr Champneys passed away after a long and hard-fought illness,” reported South East regional organiser Andy McBride.

“He stood in European and local elections for a party that, in his own words, he loved,” Mr McBride said.

“In a letter he wrote just days before he passed away, he said that there ‘is only one party for patriotic Englishmen these days, a party that stands for honesty and integrity and I am proud and honoured to be in it’.”

Mr Champneys had many close personal friends, including Nick and Jackie Griffin. The BNP leader and his wife would often stay over with the Champneys in their rural hide away.

Crawley BNP activist Richard Trower, who was a personal friend of Adam and his wife Jan, said, “We haven’t just lost a comrade who gave everything in spreading the word of British nationalism, but a true friend who supported everyone regardless of position.

“He was one of the most down-to-earth men one could ever wish to meet. I shall miss him dearly,” Mr Trower said.

Mr McBride said that party had “lost a true and honourable friend.

“When I last spoke with Adam, he said he hoped to live to see his friend Nick Griffin elected as MP. Sadly this wasn’t to be granted to him, but one can be sure that he will be looking down on Nick as he takes those first steps into Westminster. Rest in peace dear friend.”

The Heanor, Derbyshire, branch of the British National Party cleaned up a litter site in the town this week after Labour councillors refused to do anything about it, reports Councillor Lewis Allesbrook.

“The public had complained to the council about a car park which had been strewn with dumped rubbish,” said Cllr Allesbrook.

“However, the local Labour councillors were not interested in resolving the problem, despite repeated requests.

“The issue is doubly embarrassing for the Labour Party as the car park in question is adjacent to Heanor Labour Club.”

Fed up with Labour apathy and their obvious lack of community spirit, Cllr Allesbrook organised a team which included local councillors and the party’s prospective parliamentary candidate, Michael Clarke, to do what Labour’s expense-claimants refused to do, and cleaned up the area.

“The BNP team soon filled 14 black bin bags with rubbish and called on the local authority’s Clean-Up Team to remove the bulkier items fly-tipped at the far end of the car park,” Cllr Allesbrook said.

“Why Labour’s elected representatives were disinclined to perform this menial task on behalf of the local community remains a mystery, but it appears to be totally in keeping with their attitude towards serving the community in general.”

Pictured above are members of the BNP’s volunteer “Clean-Up Team”, including, left to right, Michael Clarke, Lewis Allesbrook and Emma and Cliff Roper.

]]> http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/heanor-bnp-cleaning-up-after-labour/feed/ 26 http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/candidate-announced-for-hastings-and-rye-constituency/ http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/candidate-announced-for-hastings-and-rye-constituency/#comments Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:33:36 +0000 News Team http://bnp.org.uk/?p=27923 Hastings organiser Nick Prince has been selected to represent the British National Party in the Sussex constituency of Hastings and Rye, regional organiser Andy McBride has announced.]]> Hastings organiser Nick Prince has been selected to represent the British National Party in the Sussex constituency of Hastings and Rye, regional organiser Andy McBride has announced.

The Hastings branch was created following a flood of new membership applications which took place in the wake of last year’s local elections.  Mr Prince is also the BNP’s East Sussex sub-regional organiser and South East Nominations and Elections Officer.

“I am from a Hastings family and I live in the constituency,” Mr Prince said.

“If elected as MP, I will fight tirelessly to improve the road links to and from the area. This will encourage the local economy, will boost growth and jobs and will increase the number of tourists to this historic and valuable part of England.

“I will also campaign to create a national television museum which will attract visitors from all over the world, and fight to increase the rail service to all parts of the constituency, as demanded by local residents,” he said,

“I will fully support the local fishing industry against the rampages of the European Union and will not let that sector down like the previous Tory MP did.”

Mr Cameron’s shocking display of anti-white racism appeared in an article published today in the far left, extremist Guardian newspaper, titled “We’ll change black Britain.”

In the article, Mr Cameron trotted out all the usual third-rate Marxist claptrap arguments which blame white people for all ills affecting the black community.

According to Mr Cameron, Britain’s black community are “denied” the chance to “escape poverty and build a better life for themselves and their family.”

The reason for this “denial” is, according to Mr Cameron, a “failure to address racial inequality” — in other words, white people’s fault.

Mr Cameron then listed all the problems supposedly caused by evil white people. According to the Tory leader, these problems include:

“Black pupils are permanently excluded from school at more than twice the rate of white pupils.

“Of the 3,000 students who started at Oxford in 2008, only five are black Caribbean in origin.

“This inequality extends to the job market too, with recent research showing almost half of young black people are unemployed, well over twice the rate for young white people,” he said.

If elected, Mr Cameron promised even more affirmative action measures than those already implemented by the Labour Party.

“We’ll introduce concerted action to overcome the racial barriers that exist in Britain today,” Mr Cameron said, and went on to say that a Tory government will institute a “radical plan” which will “include funding for a national mentoring programme for black people who want to start a business.”

Mr Cameron added that the special Tory fund would “provide black entrepreneurs with the targeted support, advice — and, crucially, role models — they need to access finance and work for themselves.”

Finally, Mr Cameron said that his party would provide “role models” which will “inspire a new generation of black people to take on the world.”

The British National Party utterly rejects the Tory (and Labour) obsession with blaming white people for everything that goes wrong in every other community.

The BNP is completely opposed to special set-asides, affirmative action and any policy which puts the interests of the British people last.

The two advertisements juxtaposed adapted extracts from popular nursery rhymes with text that warned about the dangers of “global warning.”

One of the banned adverts claimed: “Rub a dub dub, three men in a tub, a necessary course of action due to flash flooding caused by climate change.”

A second said Jack and Jill could not fetch a pail of water because extreme weather due to climate change had caused a drought.

The ASA ruled that the advertisements went beyond mainstream scientific consensus in asserting that climate change would cause flooding and drought.

These were claims which had been made by the now discredited United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

What the ASA didn’t say, but should have, is that the IPCC claim that “extreme weather events would become more frequent and intense” has been retracted following an in-depth study of weather records by independent scientists that established that the claim lacked credibility.

The ASA went on to say that the banned adverts, created on behalf of the Government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to promote its carbon reduction initiative, made exaggerated claims about the threat posed to Britain through global warming.

This development comes just six weeks after the BNP’s “Operation Fightback” urged supporters to lodge complaints with the ASA over misleading Government claims made in its “man-made” global warming “Action on CO2” television adverts.

These used the words “scientists agree” in connection with disputed and in some cases, retracted, IPCC findings.

Specifically Operation Fightback pointed out that the use of the words “scientists agree” implied that all scientists agreed with the now largely debunked IPCC claims made for “man-made” global warming, something which is manifestly untrue.

In Operation Fightback’s opinion, the Government’s use of this terminology was likely to constitute a breach of the BCAP Television Advertising Code section 5 (5.1.1 and 5.1.2) which requires that “no advertisement may directly or by implication mislead” and “no advertisement may mislead by omission.”

Although the advertising standards watchdog did not uphold the hundreds of complaints made by Operation Fightback supporters, it is now clear that it has put them on the alert as far as Government “man-made” climate change propaganda is concerned.

Once again the BNP has made a difference by helping to expose the EU-collaborating Labour regime’s lies.

The Home Office has given a Muslim police support group 15 times more  taxpayer funded handouts than that given to Christian equivalents — proving once again that the ruling elite puts the interests of British people last.

The Christian Police Association (CPA) has been given £15,000 over the past five years while the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) was paid £90,000 in the past two years alone, according to Home Office figures.

The Home Office claims that the CPA received an average of £3,000 a year while the NAMP received £45,000 a year. Both organisations have about 2000 members.

The NAMP received general funding of £90,000 over the past two years:£45,000 from 2008/9 and another £45,000 from 2009/10.

The CPA was given general funding of £5,000 in 2004/5 and £10,000 in 2009/10.

According to media reports, Don Axcell, executive director of the CPA, said repeated requests for additional funding had been ignored. He also disputed the Home Office figures, saying that his organisation had been paid even less, only receiving £10,000 in 2009.

According to the NAMP website, that organisation was set up to “represent the interest of Muslim officers and staff within the police service” and its mission statement is “Muslims making a Difference to Policing.”

The organisation says that its key objectives are to create a support network (whatever that may be) and “increase trust /confidence and improve community cohesion” while “raising Islamic Awareness and dealing with Equality issues such as Islamophobia.”

The NAMP has, therefore, an overtly political agenda which is designed to “raise Islamic awareness.”

In contrast, the CPA website says that its mission is to “encourage and support Christians in the Police Service; communicate in words and action, the truth, message and hope of the gospel of Jesus Christ to colleagues and the community we serve; (and) build bridges between the Christian community and the police.”

There is, therefore, no overtly political agenda to the CPA, as it should be. This will also explain why the anti-British ruling elite have favoured the NAMP over the CPA — with your tax money.

President Obama has most recently used Spain’s “green initiative” as a blueprint for how the United States should use massive amounts of federal funding to stimulate its economy.

As the ruling elite in modern Britain slavishly follow America in all political trends, it seems inevitable that this type of thinking will spread here as well.

However, a report titled “Study of the effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources”, published by Dr Gabriel Calzada from the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid, has proved that the Spanish green initiative was actually a disaster.

In addition to the net job losses, the study also showed that only one in 10 of the newly created green jobs actually became a permanent job.

Dr Calzada’s study specifically warned that if the US followed Spain down the green jobs route, it should expect similarly disastrous results.

“Spain’s experience (cited by President Obama as a model) reveals with high confidence, by two different methods, that the US should expect a loss of at least 2.2 jobs on average, or about 9 jobs lost for every 4 created, to which we have to add those jobs that non-subsidized investments with the same resources would have created,” the study said.

A few years ago, the Spanish government implemented the European Union decision to invest in green and renewable energy generation.

Funding which would have normally gone into more traditional job creation projects was diverted into the development of hydroelectric, solar and wind electrical generation projects.

The problem with that strategy soon became apparent: the renewable energy sector was far less labour intensive than other energy generation industries. This, Dr Calzada said, showed that jobs had actually been lost and not created.

Yet another problem was that the electricity generated from renewable sources was considerably more expensive than that generated through traditional means and it was the Spanish consumer who bore the increased costs.

This in turn caused high energy use companies, such as iron, steel, chemical and plastic manufacturers, to relocate their factories to other countries outside Spain and the EU where electricity prices were more competitive.

Those companies that could or would not relocate, became uncompetitive and reacted by laying off staff.

The cumulative effect of all these polices was a sharp rise in unemployment in Spain which was exacerbated by severe damage to that nation’s industrial base. The lesson for Britain is self-evident.

Professor Calzada’s study, which is unlikely to be endorsed by either the globalist United Nations or the International Panel on Climate Change, may be read in English here.