If by this they mean white, British people who don’t advocate invading other countries and slaughtering their people by the million, who don’t believe in sending our young lads to fight and die in other people’s wars on the basis of a pack of lies. Who don’t agree with giving away our own land culture and wealth to a load of ungrateful foreigners and are willing to say so, then that we must be?!

In which case the answer is obvious: Since both the Englandophobic council, and the weak knee’d politically correct parade organisers will not do it, then how about the so-called ‘right wing extremists’ organising a jolly good St. George’s day? The so-called ‘extremists’ might as well get some practice in for when the old, failed parties are voted out and long gone- which, by the looks of things won’t be long in coming.

Isn’t it time the native English demanded an end to all forms of blatant racism and Anti-AngloSaxonism?

It’s funny how no-one would dare ban a Muslim procession, nor the extremely violent and often anti white racist Notting Hill carnival, for fear of violence. Yet, the law abiding, poor bloody English, have their one little parade banned and are expected to meekly comply and walk away. Possibly if Brit’s, and more specifically the English were more ‘tribal’ as the councillor called them, and demanding, then the councillors would not be so ready to treat them like dirt? So come on you English tribesmen, (sorry ‘tribespersons’) let’s ‘get tribal’, break out the tribal flags and celebrate the patron of our tribe- St. George and help these folk out.

J. Bayldon.
(English tribal elder)

If you have young children it cannot escape your notice just how blatantly the BBC constantly push and promote multiculturalism to our receptive young.

With this in mind imagine my surprise when I sat down with my Son a few evenings ago to watch some of “The Bedtime Hour” on Cbeebies only to see two white presenters, one male and one female. The huge overrepresentation of Blacks and Asians on Children’s BBC programmes is already well documented so I was even more surprised that the lack of an “ethnic” presenter was not compensated for in another way as neither of the presenters was obviously homosexual.

This evening I noticed that the female presenter only has one arm. They can’t help themselves.

Yours faithfully
J.Davis
Portsmouth

Yes, trade with other countries brings economic benefits and should be as relaxed as possible. But these Free Trade fanatics are extremists. A more moderate postion as adopted by the BNP is far more sensible and humane. There are tremendous negatives associated with untrammelled Free Trade which outweigh any benefits. Amongst them are:-

1) The national and area specialisations associated with Free Trade have made us terribly vulnerable to what happens abroad as the Credit Crunch, which was sparked off by events and policies in the USA, has shown. Will areas abroad suffering from food shortages and on which we also rely for our food supplies continue to export to us? Hardly. Exporting in times of famine is what leftists like to condemn the British for at the time of the Irish Potato famine in the 19th Century. There have already been food riots across the world as food-producing areas have declined due to global warming and having been given over to producing bio-fuels. Prices have also risen because of demand from the inceasingly wealthy and vast nations in the East; China and India.

2) Increasing Globalisation can only be short term. Unending expansion and global trade must peter out and begin to contract when oil energy and other raw materials such as metal ores (including Nuclear Power resources), water and supplies of productive land start running out along with increased world-wide demand. This will be exacerbated by Global Warming. Everyday life, including economic life, is going to become far, far more localised and poorer. All this is already beginning to happen – people cut out journeys by car and overseas holidays as petrol and aviation fuel became scarcer and more expensive recently, a situation which is due to return in the near future regardless of a recovering economy.

3) Free Trade including the movement of labour (ie foreign workers) tramples over long-settled communities, civilisations and ways of life (almost exclusively that of the West, however) in an anti-human way which is plain evil. These are the costs of globalisation, paid for by the people. There can be few things more evil than New Labour’s announcement on coming into office that there was no limit to the numbers of immigrants. These New Labour fanatics were saying that in the interests of Free Trade, (their tool for the destruction fo Britain) as far as they were concerned, our country could be plastered from Lands End to John o’Groats with concrete, and to hell with the environment, the quality of life of the native British, their community or anything else about them and the country their forefathers built and fought and died for. If Britain had been conquered by an enemy which hated and wished to desroy us, they could scarcely have done worse. But of course, we have been conquered: by subterfuge by just such an enemy – the one within.

4) The end of Globalisation brought on by resource scarcity and nationalist political action will leave a toxic residue of political and social mayhem as groups struggle for power and the means of life in an era of scarcity. There have been recent wars over oil and water supplies as well as land. As resources dwindle, disputes will get more localised, frequent and bitter. The wildcat strikes are just a taster of this development.

A much better policy than untrammelled Free Trade is that of the BNP – to husband our resources and to limit our population to ensure that we can support ourselves and our childen and their children in terms of food and the means and quality of life in the era of shortages which lie ahead, and to ensure that the culture and way of life of the British in the homeland of our ancestors flourishes in those times. Without a national ethnic identity, there will be little appetite for a collective endeavour to shoulder the burdens of what lies ahead in the straightened future.

Harvey Harris.

One of them is a presenter on the show, Adrian Chiles. The other is – wait for it – the ‘alternative’, ie seriously unfunny, obscene and right-on stand-up comic, Jo Brand. It is not revealed – so far- which of them it was who ran telling tales to the bosses of the BBC, but it doesn’t really matter, because he is as much a liberal – left creep as she is, ie a typical BBC person if, as the betting at the moment that it was Chiles, turns out to be correct. He is said to be ‘upset’ by Thatcher’s remarks.

Brand, you will recall, is the very same individual who thought it amusing to suggest that excrement should be sent to BNP members, and has been investigated by the police for this offence. Isn’t it absolutely predictable that there is no suggestion that Chiles is upset by her remarks, or that she should be banned from this show?

Chiles has recently left his wife and chldren. It is rumoured that he has been having an affair with his co-presenter on the show. The pair have denied it, but the truth of it certainly seems to be accepted by the lady’s ‘partner’ who is reported to have dumped her in the last few days, citing the lady’s denied relationship with Chiles as the reason.

A BBC apparatchik who was interviewed in connection with the Thatcher incident said that they (the BBC) took it ‘very seriously.’ They are very selective about what they take ’seriously’ aren’t they? Not Jonathan Ross (he’s back), not Jo Brand….the list of liberal – left offensiveness in public is endless. And if private behaviour is to be the subject of disapproval, why is the betrayal of one’s children and partners apparently acceptable, while jokes about golliwogs are a serious matter?

This country is turning in to a deeply unpleasant place to live in. An essentially one – party state where people are spied on and lose their jobs if they don’t have the right political views or say the right things. This is the reality of the Politically Correct, liberal-left, multicultural, multiracial nirvana. East Germany resurrected.

Richard Hallbrook

I am delighted that I received one of your leaflets through my letterbox.

I live in Harrogate and I did not know that the BNP was active in this district. I am nearly 77 years old caring for my disabled wife. If I were not so tied up I would be actively supporting the BNP because your policies are what I believe in.

We are existing on state pension so I can’t send a donation but anytime you have a candidate in this area I will vote for them.

I hope that I live long enough to see a BNP government to give some hope to this country.

Wishing you all the best,

David Wood

The Battle For Britain Has To Be Fought and Won, Again !

With reference to the letter from Paul Whalley, Whitehaven News 8th January, I wish to state that I object to all of his content. The British National Party was just over a handful of votes within scoring an historic victory in the Kells Ward. New Labour had a 1000+ vote majority whittled down to just 16 votes. Guarding the ballot boxes paid off this time. Well done BNP!

No matter how much Mr Whalley may protest, the Kells voters have sent a message. It is people like him and our current Government that are NOT listening. The people have had enough.

Check out the BNP website for their policies. It has the highest number of visitors than all of the other political parties put together. Why? As a legitimate political party they are being denied a public platform in our so called democratic society. If you were an islamic terror organisation you would have a voice.. But if you support Britain against all others you are treated as sub-human.. This is NOT democracy.

We want to trade with Europe but NOT be ruled by Europe. We want to be able to elect our politicians who will act on our behalf, unlike the Labour & Conservative politicians. They are so keen to get rid of our right to self rule.

We want to see child murderers hung. We want to end the European Human Rights Act because there are many that are hiding behind it.. I mean of course terrorists, muderers and thieves who cannot be sent back to their country of origin in case harm befalls them. I don’t care about them. Our UK laws were the model for the rest of the world before Euro Laws took over.. Why ?

The safety of British citizens MUST come before the welfare of foreign offenders. Why is that concept so hard for Mr Whalley to understand? The ‘Marxist’ and ‘Common Purpose’ (look these up on the internet) mob must be challenged. We in the UK don’t want a world without borders.

How bad are things in the UK? British donated organs are being given away to the highest foreign bidder at the expense of UK waiting lists. Our pension funds are being robbed of £5 billion pounds a year. We hardly manufacture anything, compared to the fifties and sixties. Aldermaston has been sold to the Americans… We haven’t got a clue how many illegal immigrants are in the UK and Brian Simpson (Euro MP) thinks Labour have got immigration ‘just right’.. Eh?? .. The list is endless.

The majority of UK ex servicemen support the BNP. Take the time to ask their views. Our soldiers fought fascism in WW2, yet we have ‘islamofascists’ (a George Bush word) in our midst, many of whom want to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ are here in the UK.

None of us voted for the multicultural utopia you think exists. Get down to Dewsbury and Bradford and listen to the amplified call to prayer several times each day then try and find signs you are still in Britain, not some middle eastern country. You’ll get a shock. We don’t want that to happen to Whitehaven.

When I saw the Countryside Alliance men and women demonstrators, protesting to keep their farming and country jobs, being beaten to the ground by police with riot sticks, and then those from that death cult being safely escorted through London chanting ‘Behead those who offend islam”, I was ashamed, and I knew which party needed to be in Government. And guess what ? It wasn’t New Labour or the Tories..

Yes we, the people, will vote for change. We have a big job on our hands, the Battle for Britain has to be fought (again) and won. Come the next election it WILL be time to vote with your heart, rather than for those who have betrayed us and our poor country for so long.

Jan Fialkowski.

We have never been in a situation like this before. Manufacturing jobs will not be replaced and the sector could even die out completely unless the workforce is prepared to match the low pay and conditions of China or Eastern Europe. Once Africa catches up with the rest of the industrial world the prospects will be even bleaker for the British worker who will have to take severe pay cuts and fit in with the global market rate for what the job is worth.

What is needed is a Nationalist approach to industry as advocated by the British National Party whereby we trade with British based manufacturers as much as possible, only importing goods which we can’t grow or make to an acceptable standard ourselves.

The alternative is high unemployment, insecurity, repossessions, and low paid work.

Shipyards, coal mines, railway and steelworks need to be re-opened and invested in.

However this won’t be easy because thirty years of neglect by the Tories and New Labour has seen a lot of the skills needed for these vital jobs become few and far between.

Trevor Agnew.

The three main parties are playing games with our futures and those of our children’s children, for the sake of power; for the chance to sit in that great place The Palace of Westminster, the Mother of Parliaments and live a care free life on expense accounts paid for by the tax payer. They pay no heed to the suffering of the people and care not that we are drowning in poverty, taxation, regulation and unregulated immigration.

A call must go out across the country for change and for freedom; freedom from endless taxation and freedom from tyrannical government.

The BNP must unite the people in the cause of democracy and regardless of the outcome be proud of its stand in the name of all that is precious to the people of this great island; of all that our forefathers fought and died for; for all that we want for future generations.

This is not the time for political squabbling amongst the suits in the corridors of power; It is the time of the people.

Legislation has been passed in the last two weeks that allows the Bank of England to print money as it sees fit without any need to report its actions to anyone. The number of notes in circulation will now rise to a level that will bring Britain down to the same place as Zimbabwe.

Legislation has been passed that allows each and every dustbin to be micro chipped in order to levy a new tax on the people.

Of the two items that Labour has passed the later is the most sinister. The creation of a new tax without proper Parliamentary consultation and approval is a breach of our constitution and an overt act of aggressive oppression against the people of this fair land.

In breaking the constitution the Labour government has set this nation on a path that could lead to civil unrest and a break down in law and order. This must not be allowed to happen.

There is only one course of action left to the people of Britain in order to prevent our beloved land becoming a strife torn third world nation of rampant inflation and oppressive government supported by a politically motivated police force.

As loyal Englishmen we have no choice but to stand before Buckingham Palace in our many hundreds of thousands and request the dissolution of parliament in the name of democracy.  We must call on our friends, relatives and work colleagues, regardless of their political thoughts and persuasions to stand up for something greater than Cameron or Brown, for something worth saving; our country.

We must beseech the Crown to intervene on behalf of the people.

One day, that is all it will take to bring real and lasting change to this land. One day in the Mall and all the evil apparatus of the police state can be dismantled. One day and the bankers can be called to account for the countless billions they have demanded from us causing the suffering of the working British people. One day and the possibility of freedom from the EU is within the grasp of the people.

We have before us a task of the most difficult and serious kind. We have before us hard work and struggle to end our nations suffering. We must call for action against a tyranny, only surpassed in the darkest days of the Third Reich and the Soviet Union.

Use all avenues of media to which you have access to get the call out to the nation, use all your energies to gather those that care about the future to answer the cause of democracy.

The BNP is the only party to see through the selfish political ambitions of the big three and speak for the people. Nick griffin is the only party leader that can unite the country in the name of democracy.

I call upon the National Executive of the BNP and upon the membership to mount a campaign by media to meet in the Mall and request action from the Crown. To call British people together for the sake of our children and our country.

It is only one day for us but it is all the days of our children’s lives that is at stake.–Tony Major

I often wonder about this government’s policy of allowing mass immigration – not about why, but what drives their apparent desire to eliminate Britishness, race and creed by heaping everybody under the same “British” or “European” label.

This country’s largest parties – Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberals – all ascribe to the same fundamental assumption that there is no such thing as Britishness, British culture or British values to defend. In fact, for politicians of the Lib-Lab-Con, being British is the same as being Pakistani, Somalian or Congolese. Race, culture and creed, we are told, make no difference because we are “all the same”. Apparently, we are all equally “British”, equally “European” just as we are “equally human” – and so, they tell us, we should all stick together and support each other.

This, perhaps, explains why the Labour government is so accommodating to Brussels’ constant demands to hand over British national interest, power and sovereignty. Amazingly, mainstream politicians no longer believe Britain has any national interests outside its European interests. But this European identity is also an illusion.

The European Union, like Britain, is dedicated to unprecedented levels of mass immigration; particularly from Muslim states. It (through your generous EU contributions) has funded massive programmes, like EuroMed, designed to increase “cooperation and interdependence” between Europe and the Muslim nations of North Africa and the Mediterranean. The result is unprecedented levels of immigration and Islamization that will bury European identity as quickly and surely as our patriotic Labour, Conservative and Liberal politicians are burying British identity and culture.

Overall, the trend is towards globalization, world government and universalism – a world without borders, nations and races where everyone is part of the proletariat and everyone is a neigbour and a comrade. Although the Labour, Conservative and Liberal parties would never admit to thinking this way, they don’t need to: universalism, multi-culturalism and globalization are the very assumptions upon which all of their strategies, policies and decision making-processes are based.

Given these facts, it is little wonder that “mainstream” parties despise and attack nationalists with such venom. The fact is race, culture and creed does matter – particularly in times when we come under personal threat or are subject to attack – yet they all deny this.

One thing nobody can deny, however, is that Muslims and Islam will never agree to blend and integrate into this universal, Neo-Marxist utopia. Indeed, rather than submitting and blending-in with other cultures and influences, Islam rejects anything non-Islamic and has a strength of identity sorely lacking in British and European cultures. Muslims will never be loyal to anything other than Islam and other Muslims. In short, Islam is a form of cultural identity which openly rejects universal identity, multi-culturalism and cultural integration. And as nationalists, so do we.

Russians, Poles, Koreans, Thais, Japanese and the majority of self-respecting nations (including Muslim ones) value their identity, culture and the things which make them different. Yet what we are being told by our (British and Euro) politicians is that such ideas belong in the past!

British people are being told we should “embrace” diversity. But why should we? Muslims never will, so why should we? Furthermore, we never asked for, voted for or consented to diversity, mass immigration or the utter destruction of our culture, values and heritage. Who should we listen to: The voice of our grandfathers who fought and died to preserve our freedoms, customs and way of life? Or should we listen to corrupt career politicians who spend their lives claiming expenses, handing power to Brussels and have contempt for the very citizens who voted them in?

All in all, we are fed up with politicians from Britain, unelected bureaucrats from Europe and diplomats from the UN telling us what we should think or what level of diversity, race and religion is acceptable to us.

I believe that now is the time to stand up and say something that should have been said a long time ago: we reject this diversity, we reject the Islamization of our country and we reject, as multicultural cowardice, the notion that we have to change our views to suit the sensibilities of cowardly politicians who, rather than condemning nationalists, should have protected their constituents from this head-long slide into a worthless, multi-cultural cesspool.

In today’s news, I read this: “Halal subway celebrates 1st birthday” (http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/1089599_halal_subway_celebrates_1st_birthday_). This is just one in a long series of assaults on British (and European) culture, identity and very way of life which have been increasing in pace all year.

Halal, sharia, Islamic finance and the growing infestation of Islamization is not something to celebrate; it is a direct assault on British and European culture, tradition and values. Not only should we fight it, we should also consider anyone who accepts, embraces or celebrates the replacement of British culture with Islamic culture an enemy of this nation and Europe.

In short, we will never accept Islamic culture, nor do we ever wish to enter into the Lib-Lab-Con’s insane kingdom of universal comradeship. Race, culture and creed do matter – and now is the time for us to fight for our right to express them. We will never feel attached to Islam, nor will we feel stirred by phoney concepts like “human sameness” – and yet, if you are a patriot, you surely know instinctively what it is to be British.

The European elections will soon be underway – so let’s show them we mean business. Let’s show them we want our country back!

Stefcho.

The fraudster in charge got away with it for years by managing to appear totally trustworthy all the time he was manipulating the books so that they passed superficial inspection, allowing him to stay ahead of the game. Many very astute people were taken in by his restrained manner and well-honed image as a careful and successful investor of their money.The fraudster did this by mixing with the right people and saying the right things to his gullible audiences.

Things went well for the fraudster for a long time while the benefits paid for by the inflows of new cash kept coming, But as tends to happen, his ability to keep up appearances collapsed when the inflows of new money disappeared when some people became nervous. They had begun to realise that the fraudster had been buying a good lifestyle and popularity for himself his family and his friends and their friends and relations from abroad with his clients’ money, and very little else. He was well and truly exposed for what he was – an arrogant incompetent, but a polished liar. Everyone with money in the scheme lost a lot of it.

But amazingly, many of his clients still think that the fraudster is wonderful! They believe his claim that the collapse of his scheme had nothing to do with him, It was all the fault of foreign banks which let him down by not going on lending him all the money he needed. And he is still at the head of his failed organisation because he has the chutzpah to say ( and these fools who believe him) that he is the only one with the experience to get his clients out of the mess! Also, he has arranged things so that favoured clients and their friends and their foreign relations continue to get the benefits they enjoyed at other people’s expense, even though it might mean that if he cannot borrow the required amounts (which everyone will have to pay back sooner or later), he might actually have to resort to printing money to do it. These favoured clients and their friends, friends of friends and relations are numerous enough to keep him as Managing Director at the General Meeting, or so it seems.

Yes! its Gordon Brown and the New Labour government. The greatest scam in history – buying popularity, votes and a good lifestyle for your favoured clientele with other people’s money. A wrecked economy with no wealth -producing assets except the family silver (most of it already sold off to pay pressing creditors), real estate and discredited financial services. And this man swans along in the opinion polls as if nothing had happened. A lengthy jail sentence awaits a big – time fraudster. If there was any justice, Brown should be behind bars , But is he? Who was it who said, if you tell a lie, make it a big one?….

D. Henshall

Political Correctness was started by a Marxist think tank, known as ‘The Frankfurt School’, in Frankfurt in the 1920s. It was also a term used by the Communist Leader Mao Tse Tung in his little red book. Mao was the murderer of about 78 million people; a great deal more than the 23 million people killed by Stalin. Political Correctness is the Communist dialectic tool which Marxists use to condition the masses, local authorities, the civil service, the police etc, into accepting Marxist philosophy, which at the end of the day is oppressive and totalitarian.

They take the long view, of little steps at a time with the repeated use of catch phrases, slogans and clichés over a period of many years to get people into accepting these beliefs as being folk wisdom. Political Correctness, like the Communism it springs from, talks about equality and fairness, in order to appeal to peoples’ sense of fair play, while in fact practicing the exact opposite; i.e. do as I say not as I do.

There is very little difference, if any, between extreme right wing and left wing totalitarian oppression and make no mistake, Political Correctness is oppressive; anyone who doesn’t agree with them is called racist, fascist, xenophobic, bigoted, and dismissed as being stupid or uneducated, and, horror of horrors, not progressive.

Political Correctness is being used by the Bilderberg Group and the Transnational Progressives, to promote Globalisation and create a New World Order with themselves in control as a dictatorial Global Oligarchy.

Here in Britain as well as in the EU the secretive organization tasked with spreading this Marxist gospel is called Common Purpose (Communist Purpose). While it is registered as a charity, no one has so far been allowed to obtain any records of its finances.

However, up to the beginning of 2008 some 35,000 people; among them civil servants, teachers, medical professionals, clerics, business people, police officers, etc., had graduated from courses and seminars run by Common Purpose.

Most of these expensive courses are paid for by local authorities from the tax payers’ money. In CP’s own words, the courses are designed to produce leaders for a post-democratic era. Apart from siphoning off money from local authorities, CP are also funded by the German Bundesbank. I’m sure most people can see the danger to our democracy here, irrespective of what their political beliefs may be.

PS: Gordon Brown has repeatedly used the words ‘Common Purpose’ and ‘New World Order’ in several of his speeches.

By Richard Wood.

In an article in the Daily Mail, the historian Dominic Sandbrook tells us that ‘these were years ..when the trains ran on time, children played on street corners without fear of being stabbed, and TV sought to uplift and inform its audience.’

It was also an age of ‘unashamed patriotism, in which both left and right believed in Britain.’ As well they should because Britain had just fought and helped to win a world war and had stood alone against the Nazis. It had led the world towards modernity and parliamentary democracy, and it had ruled the greatest Empire the world has ever seen with a degree of decency and sense of duty towards its subjects unprecedented in World History. As Robert Mugabe remarked about his own country, ‘We had the good fortune to be colonised by the British, with all that entails.’

Unfortunately, Dominic Sandbrook does not make the necessary connections. A traveller from the 1950s would, he tells us, be astonished at how tolerant we are today. Although they were law-abiding, people then ‘hated immigration and were frightened of newcomers.’ But the ‘ unashamed patriotism’ of the British was due to their pride in the achievements of their race and nation. The British behaved better than people elsewhere because they were a genuine, close island community of people of shared race, history, attitudes and beliefs. They felt a family concern for and duty towards others and the need to live up to the standards set by their nation in war and peace, the achievements of their ancestors and the Christian religion.

Now, that sense of community has disappeared with mass immigration, people no longer feel the constraints of Christianity as they did and their history and traditions have been trampled on, sneered and elbowed out of the way in the interests of multiculturalism. Because after the 1950s of course, came the 1960s, the era from which so many of our present troubles spring. The 1960s saw the youth-rebellion inspired by neo-marxism and nihilism which proceeded to spit on the values of the 1950s and the beliefs and attitudes of the generation that had fought the second world war. Its backers decided to destroy Britain. We are living with the effects of all that now,

One can have too much tolerance. Too much tolerance goes hand in hand with moral collapse. It stops being tolerance and becomes indifference. And with indifference comes social disintegration and collapse.

What a pity Dominic Sandbrook did not realise this, or perhaps lacked the courage to say it. And for his information, most people still do hate immigration. As for fearing newcomers; it is their numbers that they fear, and with good reason.

Tim Heydon

The migrants come in to work for 10 months of the year, then like the Irish used to on the “lump schemes” they go home and claim back all the taxes they paid all year. They then come back often with a different name and passport, because many borrowed heavily on credit cards, and claimed for non existent children. (Norfolk police bulletins).

Those of us who work in Social Security, see the effects on our own people, who are left on one side while they bring in cheap labour, that often turns out to be not so cheap.

College students who would work in the fields in droves during the summer break now run up huge amounts of debt, they may never repay, because the jobs they were trained for, are just not there, many single mums who would do a few weeks in the fine weather cant get the work either, and some places have a “no English rule”. Bernard Matthews of turkey cruelty fame, advertises for workers, not in Cambridgeshire or Norfolk, but in Poland, Portugal Eastern Europe, and even in Sierra Leone.

One Russian millionaire friend of Tony Blair and Gorgeous Gordon is also a gang-master who supplies labour to East Anglian farms and factories. He puts 30 people to a house, they pay rent, for food, utilities, overalls, insurance, and transport to work, and finish up with around 30 quid each week, while this gang-master now owns 80 houses. Not bad for a man who came here 7 years ago, and he is just one, I could name five. The cockle pickers who died drew attention to something the government tries to hide.

The “illegals” and the fact that over the last 7 years the true population figures have doubled, this means hospitals cant cope, welfare cant cope, police cant cope, and the infrastructure cant cope, meaning the drains and sewers overfilled during the floods and many homes were destroyed.

Operation Radium, the recent police initiative over 3 counties, closed 119 brothels staffed in the main by women and young boys, who thought they were coming to Britain to work in hotels and hospitals, and were forced into this awful trade. (see police gazette). The freedom of information act means much that our government would hide from us, we can now see, and the sheer numbers of our own people on benefits, is hidden from us with phrases like; “ the British don’t want these jobs”

When the Kings Lynn hospital cried out for more nurses, the Fairstead Young Mothers Association who are 500 yards down the road, said they could supply 75 trainees if a crèche was supplied, they were refused in favour of nurses from Africa, some of whom tested AIDs positive. Russian T B is highly contagious and an incurable killer, we are seeing it now in our hospitals across the area, and the government scared of the truth blames it on badgers. (Dr Harrison, February speech to thoracic unit Norwich hospital).

The government claims massive benefit fraud occurs each year, yet most theft is committed by the government. They make the forms so difficult that 5 billion pounds go unclaimed by British citizens, and over the winter many die of hypothermia, yet foreign nationals have solicitors paid by government to see they get all they can, and even the C.A.B. have paid advisers to help them claim.

This is Government racism at its worst, and this exact scenario was predicted by a British politician who was due to be our next prime minister, but Edward Heath demoted him to the back benches and gave him the kiss of death: A Northern Ireland post. He died in obscurity some time later. (House of Commons internal papers).

Nawab Patel.

For too many years I have sat by and done nothing. Far too long have I neglected my calling to the only party that offers the British people any hope of freedom, and keeping the rights of free-born Englishmen. Years ago I was an activist within the right wing of British politics, and my style of writing maybe familiar to many older members, but like so many I drifted into a political apathy. This apathy has allowed the Union to become the country in which we now live. Apathetic I may have been, but a flame burns in my heart for this country–a flame that reminds me ever more often of the pain that I see this once-great country suffering.

The sight of the British lion struggling to break free of the chains placed on it by the most malevolent government in British history brings a tear to my eye and a twinge of guilt at my inaction. But there comes a time when a man must stand up and be counted, and it is time to call enough is enough and stand firm for the values that made this country the greatest place on earth. So once again I take up the pen and write from the heart–from that place that was forged from two thousand years of history–and condemn this government and its policies of destruction of all that is British

For make no mistake: the coming fight for power is the final fight to save the United Kingdom from the abyss of the new Dark Age of rampant socialism. I correct that it is not socialism that threatens our country–it is Communism, let us call it what it is. This evil concept of corrupt power eats at the souls of men and countries like a cancer, and like a cancer it must be cut out.

This is not the country into which I was born; it is not the dream of the future that I sold as a child, and it is not the country that I love so dearly, not the country that I want to pass on to my children. This England is not the brave new world of the sunlit uplands for which our forefathers fought and died. Great Britain today has seen the rabies of Socialism savage her history, her traditions, and her peoples’ freedoms.

Under this government we have seen a fear grip the nation; not just the fear of the feral youth that roam our streets, but a fear of being old or of being poor or ill, a fear of believing in our history and our rights as freeborn men and women; a fear born of knowing that Magna Carta was torn up and thrown into the gutter by the government that now sits in Parliament–a fear made more real by the arrests in recent weeks of any who dare speak the truth; a genuine fear that we will not be British any more, that we will not have a nation to call our own, not be allowed to acknowledge the great history of these isles; a fear that we will become some strange amorphous European person forced to live in a world of laws and edicts dictated by a faceless, all-powerful bureaucracy in a foreign land.

Many will say that no government would dare to treat the British people with such contempt. But the liberal press and state-controlled broadcasting media seek to dumb down the people and hide the truth from them. With every passing day we see our freedoms and rights evaporating under the guise of being for our own good, to protect us from the evils of the world.

Not only was the arrest of party activists a shock to many but, as was warned at the time, it was just a prelude to the arrest of members of the main opposition party. There are those who are now asking themselves how long before the knock on the door in the middle of the night, how long before people start to disappear, how long before it is me for whom they come. They ask the right questions, but with the wrong tense: it has happened and we did nothing. It happened to a man who questioned this government, and who was made to pay the highest price: his name was Doctor Kelly.

The mask that New Labour has worn to hide its Communist features is now removed. The political war that the government declared this week upon those who oppose them, and upon those of the population who  dare to question them has to been seen as a battle for the survival of the United Kingdom. The outcome of this battle will decide not only the fate of our Christian country, but our very way of life and the continuation of our traditions and of the Crown itself.

It will be a time for action and struggle, a time to pay the price for apathy and neglect. Now is not a time for the faint-hearted. It is a time for men and women of conviction, and for a man of vision–a man like Nick Griffin who stands for the values in which we believe, and for the values we want to protect for future generations.

John Bull.

FROM ONE ANGRY ENGLISHMAN

The recent leak of British National Party members’ details to the Internet has sparked much publicity for the Party which it would otherwise not have received. In turn, this has apparently caused a very great many people to visit the Party’s website for more information and, so we learn, vastly increased application for membership.

That the Party exists at all is wholly attributable to the deceitful and ruinous way in which our country has been run for many years now and the continuing connivance displayed by successive Governments since even before the days of Edward Heath’s claim that Britain’s sovereignty would never be at stake. Well let me tell you, it certainly is.

From what I see, our multicultural society continues to live in segregation as many foreign nationals refuse to adopt our native culture but insist on bringing their own with them which polarises communities, gives rise to racial and religious conflict and many of the crimes we see throughout our once treasured country. A large proportion of criminals here are of non-British origin and our prisons are now subject to a wide Islamification plan from within. We have people trafficking, drugs and sex trafficking, illegal immigrants and inter-race hostility not to mention gun and knife-wielding gangs mostly (if not all) non-British who roam our streets in pitched battle. Deep resentment is clear wherever Government puts asylum centres and but for immigration, the need for Government’s ‘inspired’ scheme of housing on our cherished greenbelt would evaporate. Bitter unrest and resentment are evident where foreign nationals move to British communities just as whites are unwelcome in the spreading black neighbourhoods.

Our 2000 mosques – more than any other country in Europe – and the 12,000 seat mega-mosque planned for London by 2012 are not really in preparation for the Olympic Games to be held here. Terrorists who attempt and sometimes succeed in killing us in our own country were once only from abroad where we could at least exercise a degree of control over their ingress. Now, they are home-grown. In number.

Our borders are wide open to very nearly all-comers. Large numbers leave their own countries to come here even though as asylum seekers, Britain is far from the first safe haven that they reach. Not only do we manage to lose a large proportion into the ether, but we fail dismally to send very many of them back. That they prefer Britain above their home lands then succeed in reconstructing their native way of life here not only defeats the purpose of their supposed ‘asylum’ but degrades our once noble country to the level of theirs – which they fled. And in their coming and (some) going, those that earn money here get their taxes repaid when they leave. In time, Britain will have become a new Third World nation because the British people had no say in these matters. Our successive Governments will have achieved that radical transformation all by themselves and against our will.

The indigenous British are thus at grave risk of demographic dispossession. Our already over-populated island is predicted to become home to 80 million by the middle of this century (the EU, particularly French President Nicolas Sarkozy, appears to want even more here) while history shows that colonisation by Islam is still very much alive. Unlike the 1300 years of war waged to conquer other peoples and their land, the sword and the bullet have given way to an historically 5 to 1 higher birth rate than the declining indigenous British. Within very few years then, Britons will no longer have the majority vote and the burgeoning non-white population will inevitably vote in a government, culture, religion, way of life and system of law fundamentally different from ours.

Government is intent on signing us over to control from Brussels while refusing us any say in the matter. In any case, the view among many Britons is that were we asked and to have said “ No”, a re-run would be ordered until we gave the correct answer. Britain is destined therefore, to become a seriously crowded but mere insignificant province of Brussels no matter what the British people actually want. Rather strangely, our democratic society more often than not, leaves us without any say whatsoever. Yet we are the taxpayers who provide all of the funding for Government, it’s deceit and for whatever it sees fit to do.

Our English traditions and years-old customs are being progressively expunged and our English freedoms steadily eroded. Multiculturalism, the European institution and political correctness are forced upon us against our will so that we align with the super-state shortly to consume us by stealth and so that we do not offend anybody for fear they feel upset. Well, I can tell you that there are a very great many indigenous British who are intensely upset. But unlike the foreign nationals whom we do not ask to come here but arrive of their own volition, it does not matter that we British are offended as we are dismissed as irrelevant, apparently do not count and have no say anyway. We are fast becoming Britain’s second class citizens.

Many firmly believe that criminals, rapists, paedophiles, extremist preachers of hate and terrorists (many of these non-British) have more rights than ordinary citizens who suffer at their hands and were we British to exercise our historic right of free speech, we’d be criminalised – even imprisoned – for being racist, religiously hateful, fascist, anti-social, extreme far right, intolerant or anarchistic. And we are the British in our own country with every right to feel aggrieved. We forgotten and discarded electorate are not extreme far right, we are ordinary everyday British people who want our own country back.

NONE OF THIS is the Britain whose 1.3 million men and women gave their lives in two World Wars to keep Britain British, yet Hitler’s and Speers’ European domination dream is still set to come true. Not by force this time, but by the back door – our own Government. We have a multicultural experiment put upon us that has failed abysmally but which if allowed to continue, will see Christianity put to death and our heritage churches and graveyards destroyed in favour of mosques; all in the name of “cultural correction”. Our way of life will change radically. How long will it be before the Battle of Britain, one of our finest hours, becomes a strenuously denied historic fact for fear of upsetting some foreign minority or other ?

Not one of the three major Parties stands for anything like what the real Britain was or should be – or could be. Indeed, we now learn that they may well be plotting to ban the British National Party altogether as it would seem they have something to deeply fear in the Party’s continuance. What would that be ? Is it likely that they fear being exposed for what they really are ? And we are now faced with the prospect of evermore punitive taxes for the lifetimes of our children and their children to repay the colossal debt that our present Government has led us into through rank mismanagement of our country. This is far from the country of honesty and mutual trust that I grew up in. It is a place of utter distrust, cynicism, underhand dealing and connivance and but for circumstance, I would join the hundreds of thousands in their white flight to another country of my choosing. But it’s funny you know, how some of the countries that send so many immigrants here, absolutely do not accept immigrants themselves.

That the British National Party comes in for such vitriolic hatred, scorn and revulsion from Government, other political parties and the media beggars belief when one considers the blind acceptance and warm approval offered to others of racial intent or having connections to armed political aggression and the goal to kill us in our own country. That the police and teaching organisations, let alone so many other professions, regard British National Party supporters with utter contempt and aversion when they readily favour and accept far more dangerously motivated political and racial bodies in their ranks is absolutely beyond credulity. Our children are taught by these people. Surely to goodness, it is these organisations who are the intolerant fascists.

In so many ways then, I am deeply indebted to the Establishment for it’s vociferous torrent of scorn for the BNP. It has caused me and many others, I am sure, to go to http://www.bnp.org.uk/ and to attend BNP meetings to question just why it is that so much bitter hatred is poured upon them. More crucially, the recent adverse publicity about the Party has caused many other people to do the same. So many in fact, that the Party’s website normally attracting more interest than all other political websites together, has at times apparently experienced nearly 1700 visits per second – such is the effect of the Establishment’s vilification and contempt.

I have not found any of the thugs, fascists, racists, skin-heads, jack boots or black shirts that the media portray but I have found ordinary everyday British men and women – people like you and me, your parents and mine – many of whom have loyally served their country in Britain’s Armed Forces and many more who are British business people. Still others are housewives, clergy, doctors, nurses, solicitors. You’ll have seen the range of their occupations in the press. In fact, a number of main stream MPs have jumped ship to join, in recent months. These people cannot all be wrong in their judgement and are decent, often professional, hard working, indigenous British who are sick to the back teeth with the connivance, deceit and conspiracy fed them over the years by our “democratic” Governments busily taxing us to death, handing us over to the EU, the immigrants and the foreign cultures whose boldly and proudly stated aim is to make Britain a Muslim state. If you don’t presently worship Allah, you will soon be obliged to.

And so I and many others will be forever grateful to the current Establishment for inspiring us all to find out the truth about the British National Party and it’s policies. You see, I am one of the millions in this country whose aim is purely to return Britain to the British, under British rule – for our children and their children’s sake.

Yours faithfully,

There though the similarities end. When Damian Green was arrested, there was an immediate uproar in sections of the Media, condemning the infringement of Parliamentary rights, the assault on the democratic process, the Stasi-like methods of a government with totalitarian instincts, and so on. But when the BNP members were arrested, there was no noticeable mention of the event whatsoever in those same sections of the Media.

It can be argued that the treatment of the BNP members is even more sinister than that of a Shadow Cabinet minister. For while anger should rightly be shown in both cases at the police-state methods indulged in by the police and this government, Parliament is nowadays regarded with a contempt which it has brought on itself. It is treated by the Political Class as its personal possession. It has allowed its power and prestige to be given away to Europe and is nowadays little better than a rubber stamp for Brussels. Who respects a rubber stamp or a tool of the political class? Why should a rubber stamp claim any special consideration? And who respects the self-interested greed and careerism of MPs and their lack of interest in the concerns of ordinary people which it is their duty to represent? If MPs and Parliament are despised, they have only themselves to blame.

The heart of our democracy is not Parliament any more, if it ever was; it is now with the ordinary people of this country. When the government authorised the arrest of those BNP supporters, it arrested ordinary people exercising their hard -won democratic rights. To strike at that, now our Parliament is a despised nothing which has sold us out to foreigners, really is a blow at the heart of our democracy.

Bob McConnell

I am sure you are receving hundreds – if not thousands – of letters regarding this, however I felt it necessary to put down my thoughts to share with you.

I am a proud member of the BNP, and am outraged at the despicable crime which has been committed here. Fortunately for me however, I was not a member at the time so don’t live in fear of being exposed (the fear which the government has instilled upon our peers in society). I have been following the event closely through both the British National Party website and also using Google Alerts to see whenever any new pages, news and blog entries are posted on the internet. I particulary found the post titled ‘The BNP – disappointingly ordinary’ to be a good read.

Anyhow, the main thing which I have been wondering is if any of the people who have admitted to ‘trawling through the leaked list’ are actually breaking the law themselves in doing so? Surely, our caring police service would see that anyone who now is in posession of this list (particularly all of the newspapers, journalists, MPs, the police service etc) are handling stolen goods? Imagine facing the full force of the law if you were in possession of one of the countless laptops, CDs, memory sticks and other media which our careless government have allowed to get into the hands of any Tom, Dick or Harry (or even copies thereof for that matter).

For example, is it me or is this news article not a confession to being in possession of the list, knowing it had been stolen? Evidently this list is now in wide circulation and every single person who passes this on should face the same action as I would if I was giving out copies of one of the lists which were carelessly left on busses, trains etc (which I would assume by definition are also not stolen).

Regards,

Steve Browett.

It is true that a serving police officer may not join the BNP but this is not the complete truth.

The reason an offficer may not join is not due to alleged BNP racism which is being rampantly flouted by press and public and political figures but simply because no serving officer may join a political party, BNP, labour, tory or anything else and this is for reasons of impartiality ‘to be able to perform their duties without fear or favour’.

In my opinion the duty of the media is to report facts, full facts, not just the half truth that suits them and their motive to support the party of their affiliation.

I wonder, however, how much of an outcry there would have been if mr plod had been found to be a member of the labour or tory parties.

I find myself being in full agreement with and support of BNP policies and have done for some time but due to economic reasons of unemployment of myself and mrs, and non entitlement to full benefits I am unable to join at the moment, but will carry your card with pride when funds permit.

John Williams, Chesterfield.

I have just watched in absolute disgust as Chris Yeates, general secretary of the NASUWT teachers’ union, whilst being interviewed on Channel 4 News a short while ago over the consideration as to whether teachers should be allowed to be (even secretly) a member of the BNP and still be allowed to teach, saying that the BNP “promotes racial intolerance and hatred”, and the “BNP promotes racism”.

The news article itself highlighted that the ‘leaked list’ had, amongst other professions, Nurses as BNP members. So What?!

I am a Nurse, I am not racist AND I’m a BNP member. Indirectly she has labeled me and every other member of the BNP and has done so with absolute prejudice and in total ignorance.

People can air their views privately, but to utter such damaging statements publicly: surely action could be taken against her. Anyone watching this news article and knowing little of the BNP may now erringly believe that the BNP is racist.

Is there anything that can be done and moreover will something be done?

S. Moorcroft
(Member)

The campaign, of course, was no test for Conservative principles. Did anyone, other than Chuck Baldwin (Constitution Party) even urge traditional American values; even seek to identify with the remarkably clear & timeless vision that went into the Constitution, the other candidates chose to ignore. Of course, probably less than 1% of the electorate had ever heard of Baldwin, while the major party candidates were spending hundreds of millions of dollars a month, trading slogans and promises, only more notable for their lack of Constitutional awareness than for their abysmal ignorance of the actual dynamics that drive markets, or of what are actually in play in American education.

Had Senator McCain actually drawn on his own family’s involvement with the continuity of America, he might have had the sense to anticipate the number of false “guilt-driven” middle-class Whites who were almost orgasmic, yesterday, in getting America over her history. If any of you have the slightest doubt how to address that phenomenon in ways that will reduce the incidence, feel free to call me. But McCain seemed to suffer from a milder case of the same neurosis. He obviously had no clue as to how to gain the initiative from the Obamaists. And yet, he could have completely turned the tables on Obama, in the final debate, if he had really understood why the true Conservative position on Federal involvement in education is actually better for every element in the population. (Fawning over the false premises of a skilled demagogue is not the way to unhorse him.)

The Left, since the Fabian movement in Britain in the 1890s has made tremendous use of a class of pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-altruistic, neurotics, of the ilk that Lenin described as “Useful idiots.” For over three generations, we have treated this type with contempt, hostility and ridicule–if not outright hatred. The time has come to analyze the neurosis more closely. With a little different approach, we could actually turn some of these people back to reality. It involves being able to look at what on the Left hooks them; what the factors can be broken down into, in order to alter perspectives, to help even “Parlor Pinks” to understand that their wish lists really are counter-productive, if they actually care for the well being of other peoples–i.e., not set out to denounce them as meddlers, simply estrange them from believing the Marxist and/or Fabian meddling can accomplish anything for those their compulsions lead them to patronize.

A Friend.