Mr Adams has produced a video report of how the Manchester police failed to arrest anybody after being repeatedly called to the scene of a burglary. This was no ordinary burglary — travellers used sledgehammers and jackhammers to smash a hole in the wall of a metal works.

The noise of the break-in was tremendous — but the police officers who attended the repeated reports simply refused to go round to the side of the building where the travellers were smashing down the wall, even though at one point the noise of the jack hammer’s generator was clearly audible.

“Political correctness has paralysed the police,” Mr Adams said. “Not only were the police officers who were sent out physically too small to confront burly criminals — which may have played a role in their reluctance to investigate properly — but once they realised that they were dealing with travellers, the desire to actively police the situation vanished.”

Unfortunately for Manchester Police, Mr Adams captured the charade on film. Watch it below and weep, for this is what decades of Tory and Labour rule has done to our once proud police forces.

In a nutshell, the EU is committed to an emissions reduction target of 20 percent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.  This will rise to 30 percent, provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and that developing countries contribute “adequately according to their responsibilities and respective capabilities.”

The EU also supports the UN backed IPCC findings that developed countries should reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95 percent by 2050. At the same time, developing countries should merely achieve “a substantial deviation beneath the currently predicted emissions growth rate, in the order of 15-30 percent by 2020”.

The leading emitters of CO2, such as China, “will endeavour to lower its CO2 emissions” by 2020 or, as in the case of India, “will endeavour to reduce the emissions intensity” by 2020. As in both cases, “these actions are voluntary in nature” and will not have a legally binding character.

So there we have it: the West is to de-industrialise at its own expense and re-construct its plant, industry, technology and economic capability in the developing countries.

To facilitate the ‘decline of the West’, the Summit agreed to channel $30bn to poorer nations between 2010-12, with an annual sum of $100bn of taxpayers’ money envisaged by 2020.

Various green climate funds and similar such foundations and projects will be established and monitored internationally, thus creating the further mechanics of international governance, which will be overseen by an unelected globalist bureaucracy, in which the EU’s Kommissars will play an active role.

What does this all mean? Answer: the purpose is two-fold; first, in order to promote international forums of governance, various supra-national bodies under the UN will be created and empowered. Second, to render palatable the concept of the ‘New World Order’, living standards are to be raised in the developing world at the expense of the West. Meanwhile, the nations of the West will continue to be debilitated by the continuing process of multiculturalism, balkanisation and massive population movement.

As our website has previously observed, the thesis of ‘Global Warming’ has been constructed on a colossal edifice of fraud, misrepresentation, selection of the facts, deceit, profiteering, racketeering and underhand political machinations (see our article ‘Debunking Global Warming’ Dec 09).

The documented fraud of the so-called experts — all well paid officials, politicians and careerists — has been compounded by the third winter of global cooling. Last year’s winter cooling was bad enough, costing the lives of over 40,000 British pensioners. This year’s cooling is expected to inflict a toll of well over 50,000 lives — a fact well emphasised by Nick Griffin MEP in a recent speech to the European Parliament.

Minister Ed Balls stated that the cost of the Climate Change Act, paid by British energy consumers, would be £18bn per year until 2050. This arises from the need to subsidise inefficient green energy such as wind turbines, which is added to customers’ bills in the form of a premium. Only three British MPs voted against this Act, which will cost each household £720 until 2050.

If that was bad enough, the death toll on our elderly this winter is likely to explode in future years. A recent independent study has predicted that the cost of electricity bills will quadruple during the decade to an average of £5,000 a year, to meet government imposed green targets. This would plunge over half the households in Britain into “fuel poverty”, defined as those forced to spend more than 10 per cent of their income on energy. The cost will result in hundreds of thousands of deaths per annum and cause many of our elderly, quite literally, to freeze to death.

We predict we shall hear very little about these deaths from our politicians, who believe they are entitled to our money to underwrite their globalist ambitions rather than to benefit the voters they purport to represent. Contrast an estimated 50,000 British deaths this year with the 35,000 deaths across the whole of Europe in 2003, arising from that year’s heat wave, which for years afterwards was convenitently paraded as evidence of ‘Global Warming’.

Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to Close British Industry

Under the CDM, Western industry and commerce earn the right to emit beyond their carbon quota by purchasing certificates from companies in the developing world.  The latter, in turn, accumulate ‘carbon credits’ for reducing their output of emissions or by employing renewable energy sources.

A taste of the future for our country was brought into sharp relief by the recent announced closure of the gaint Corus steel plant.

As the Sunday Telegraph recently established, the CDM has enabled Tata to transfer three million tonnes of steel production from its Corus plant in Tyneside to a new plant in Orissa, therby gaining as much as £1.2 billion in ‘carbon credits’, while placing 1,700 British workers on the dole queue.

The Telegraph went on to point out that “more than three-quarters of the world ‘carbon’ market benefits India and China in this way. India alone has 1,455 CDM projects in operation, worth $33 billion (20 billion pounds), many of them facilitated by Tata”.

Tata will more than double its steel production in India over the next three years. Meanwhile, the British government is forbidden to assist the Tyneside plant because this is not permitted under EU laws governing state aid.

As The Telegraph acknowledges, under the EU’s Emissions Trading scheme, by ceasing to emit six millions tonnes of CO2 a year, Corus will benefit from carbon allowances worth up to £600m over three years, before the current allocations expire.

Moreover, Corus’ parent, Tata, by replacing inefficient old plants with new ones which emit only “European levels” of CO2, Tata could claim a further £600 million under the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism, which is operated by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. This arises because in India, Corus’s owner, Tata, plans to increase steel production from 53 million tonnes to 124 million over the same period.

Under this scheme, enterprises in developed countries such as Britain — ranging from electricity supply companies to the NHS — can buy the right to exceed their CO2 allocations from those in developing countries, such as India. The huge but hidden cost of these “carbon permits” will be passed on to all of us through our electricity bills.

As The Telegraph’s Christopher Booker reflects: “Redcar will lose its biggest employer and one of the largest manufacturing plants left in Britain. Tata, having gained up to £1.2 billion from “carbon credits”, will get its new steel plants — while the net amount of CO2 emitted worldwide will not have been reduced.”

The Cost of Carbon Capture

Yet another cost to be borne by the British consumer relates to the capture and storage of carbon emissions.

Those who have read our paper on ‘Global Warming’ last December will appreciate the pointlessness and expense of this exercise.

In brief, to reduce dependence on gas, the government is to approve new coal-fired energy plants to replace those closing under EU regulations by 2015.  The new technology, required by the EU to justify the construction of the plants, is designed to capture and store the carbon emissions at a cost of approximately £9.5bn.

This expense will be met from another levy on electricity bills, calculated by the Dept for Energy and Climate Change, at upwards of £17 per household per year, for at least 15 years.

More Long Term Costs

An opening piece in The Daily Mail business section, in January, noted that the “price heavy industry will have to pay by 2020 is so high that energy-dependent firms could be wiped out, causing thousands of job losses …”

The Mail went on to denote something we rarely see, listing the charges already loaded onto energy bills, telling us that we are “loaded up by five separate charges to help fund the battle to combat climate change and become greener.” They are the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target, the Renewables Obligation, the Community Energy Saving Programme and shortly there will be a levy on investing in clean coal projects.

The projected expense of £5000 annual energy bills per household will feed through into the price of every home-produced commodity and service, while the added costs of benefits paid to redundant workers, the loss of tax income as firms close down, and the fall-off in economic activity will impose their own substantial costs on the electorate.

As another journal opined, in addition to the way we are miss-managing our energy supplies, we are looking at a slow-motion economic catastrophe far greater than the economic crisis we are presently weathering, the overall costs of which are set to exceed the entire tax bill for the average household.

Clearly, there is no difference between money paid directly from the monthly wage packet to cover taxes, and money having to be paid indirectly to meet the government’s EU requirements.

Meanwhile, so inefficient are the green sources of energy that during the recent cold spell some 80% of our power requirements came from coal-fired power stations or from gas. Many of these coal-fired stations are to be closed down under the EU’s anti-pollution directive.

Furthermore, given the dearth of Britain’s manufacturing capacity, many of the jobs generated from the switch to new technology will disappear abroad.

Summary

Clearly, the machinations that surround and derive from the ‘Global Warming’ thesis demonstrate, more than ever, the extent to which Britain has now become a captive nation, subjected to the rule and requirements of the Kommissars who run the EU, along with their agents and hirelings. Not least may this be evidenced by the failure of more than three British MPs to oppose the EU instigated Climate Change Act, which will inflict such a cost on our people.

That this has occurred is because the establishment parties — and their phoney-nationalist equivalents in Scotland and Wales – have become entirely captive to the requirements of the EU. Their purpose, quite demonstably, is to extirpate the British nation and its institutions, economy, sovereignty, culture, heritage and blood line. In its place will emerge the growing supra-national authority of the EU and allied international bodies.

In effect, the collaborators who front the parties in Westminster will be confronted by the British National Party in the forthcoming General Election.   We shall stand unashamedly to protect the interests of our island people.

Yesterday in Strasbourg both Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons were able to make their presence felt in the Chamber with speeches which showed that within the very heart of the European Union there are voices of reality and voices of dissent.

The British National Party’s leader stunned MEPs with a hard hitting speech during a debate on tax co-operation across Member States.

Nick told the European Parliament:
“Discussing tax co-operation during the gathering Euro crisis is rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.

“The southern nations are known in English by the harsh acronym, PIGS, but those being crucified on the Euro are not pigs, but people scourged by Utopian one-size-fits-all dogma.

“Their economies will either die of a thousands cuts, or be bailed out, to the ruin of taxpayers in Britain and elsewhere. There will be very little tax to co-operate over.

“There are two ways out: abolish the Euro and return to the captive nations of this Strawberry Soviet their own currencies; or expel the problem countries from the Euro. That might be the PIGS. More justly it would be Germany and her French collaborator, because running the Euro in the German interest is the root of this shambles.

“This endless crisis will destroy the federal project, tax co-operation and all. The tragedy is that it will grind so many innocent victims into poverty before it does so.”

Four hours later, Andrew Brons had Labour and Conservative Party MEPs squirming in their seats as he once again exposed the sham of Britain’s opt out of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

He closely questioned Mr. Diego Lopez Garrido, the Spanish Secretary for European Affairs – Spain currently holds the Presidency of the Council of the European Union – on the very subject.

“The governments of three member states (including the United Kingdom) told their electorates that they had secured ‘opt-outs’ from the Charter of Fundamental Rights. However, some members of this Committee have argued that these opt-outs are worthless, since the Lisbon Treaty. If these members of the Committee should be right, would you persuade the governments of those countries to tell the truth to their electorates.”

Mr. Lopez did not reply to this question!

Andrew then tackled the Spainish Minister on his opening speech when he declared the European Union being a force for democracy in the world:

“You spoke of democracy as a central principle of the European Union and I agree that it should be. However, democracy cannot exist without freedom of speech but member states of the EU imprison people for non-violent comment and heretical opinion.

Indeed, from November of this year, the European Union plans to extend throughout Europe, the criminalisation, not just of speech and writing, but even of thought – what they call xenophobia – which means fear of foreigners, state of mind. This is a truly Orwellian Thought Crime.

I’m afraid there is an inverse relationship between those who proclaim their belief in democracy and those who practise it. The test of being a true democrat is not whether or not a person defends the rights of himself or somebody with whom he agrees. It is whether or not he is prepared to defend the rights of his opponents.”

Mr. Lopez said he did not agree with the MEP for Yorkshire and North East Lincolnshire.

“The real issue regarding the conviction of the corrupt Mr Dizaei is not his criminal behaviour, but the actions of the Metropolitan Police and the National Black Police Officers Association (NBPA),” Mr Barnes told BNP News.

“For years the police have investigated Dizaei for a string of allegations including threats to kill, fraud, corruption and perverting the course of justice.

“But every time he has managed to play the race card and escape prosecution, both in the courts and in the police service,” Mr Barnes said.

“It appears that whilst the era of ‘The Untouchables’ as regards gangsters is over, there are certain police officers who can act like gangsters and remain as untouchables.”

Mr Barnes said the BNP therefore demand an immediate public inquiry into the extent that political correctness within the police service facilitated the commission of crimes by Mr Dizaei.

In addition, there also needs to be an investigation into the role of the Black Police Officers Association and its support for Mr Dizaei.

“Such an inquiry must focus on whether that group is able to influence the police service through the threat of calling any critic a racist,” Mr Barnes said.

“It seems to observers that the police service were so frightened of attack by the NBPA that they effectively gave Iranian-born Mr Dizaei a license to do as he wished.”

Mr Barnes also called for a separate inquiry into whether “the existence of the NBPA is divisive and is placing the public and other police officers at risk due to its unqualified support for ethnic officers and its ability to terrorise the police service into obeying its demands.

“The true scandal in this case is that the police service have become so cowed by the threat of racism, that it is unable to police itself,” he continued.

“The old saying ‘who polices the police?’ is of paramount importance in a democracy. This is especially so where the legal and lobbying power of ethnic minority groups within society and the police service is such that an entire public service can be held to ransom by playing the race card.

“The pernicious effects of political correctness on our society impacts at many different levels, from the failure of the Equality and Human Rights Commission to investigate anti-white racist attacks and taking legal action to prevent the NBPA having a blacks-only membership policy,” Mr Barnes said.

The BNP was actively pursued by the EHRC but the NBPA was left free to have exactly the same membership criteria.

“The British public support the police, but they are increasingly being seen as the paramilitary wing of the Labour Party who arrest people for thought crimes whilst protecting gangsters within their own ranks,” Mr Barnes said.

“The police must serve the people and our communities, not New Labour, the Tories or political correctness. There is only one law in our country and it must apply equally to all,” Mr Barnes concluded.

Islamist terrorism in Britain will only stop when the twin issues of mass immigration and our Middle East foreign policy are addressed — and not through multi-million pound bribes disguised as “Prevent” strategies aimed at the Muslim community.

This was the reaction of British National Party law and order spokesman and former Metropolitan police inspector Michael Barnbrook to West Yorkshire Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison’s statement that it would take “probably 20 years” for the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy to bear fruit.

“This statement, like all Government policy, is simply devoid of any truth and understanding of the causes of Islamist terrorism,” Mr Barnbrook, who is also the BNP’s candidate in Dagenham and Rainham,  said.

“They actually believe that their taxpayer-funded £140 million per year ‘Prevent’ programme will somehow buy off or persuade Muslims not to be radicalised,” he said.

“It is a lot of nonsense. Islamist terrorism is the product of two distinct causes. Firstly, Islam has, since its founding, been driven by a Koranic injunction to spread itself through violence if necessary. Its whole history shows this to be the case.

“In spite of this, successive Tory and Labour governments have seen fit to deliberately encourage millions of Muslim to immigrate into Britain. As a result, we are now, as the Nigerian UNESCO ambassador so correctly pointed out, a ‘cesspit of Islamism’.

“If this was not bad enough, the same Tory and Labour gang have then generated illegal and unjustifiable wars against Muslim nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan because our nation’s foreign policy does not serve British interests,” Mr Barnbrook continued.

“These wars have now provided the excuse Islamists have used to further justify their radicalisation propaganda amongst the now millions of Muslims resident in Britain. Is it any wonder that the majority of electronic components for roadside bombs in Afghanistan are supplied from Muslims in Britain?”

According to MI5 estimates, there are at least 2,000 Muslims in Britain who are officially classed as posing a potential terrorist threat, in addition to an unknown number who are active sympathisers.

“Sir Norman says the problem will not be solved quickly. I have news for him,” Mr Barnbrook said. “Islamist terrorism will not be solved at all until we reverse the tsunami of Third World immigration and adopt a neutral foreign policy.

“Anything else is simply rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.”

The staggering £830 billion Government debt — caused by the bankster bailout, the £13 billion immigration swindle, the £8 billion foreign aid budget, the £9 billion per year war in Afghanistan and the billions paid over to the EU each year — will now be financed in part by the further sale of the remainder of Britain’s national assets.

The idea of selling off all of Britain’s institutions (starting with the utilities but then quickly moving onto everything else, from trains to nuclear power plants) was invented by the Tories and implemented with great enthusiasm by their clones, the Labour Party.

The huge hole in Government finances, caused by their reckless spending sprees on everything except British interests, has now reached critical proportions. As a result, the Government has been forced to fall back onto selling what remains of its properties to prevent a Greek-style collapse into massive national debt.

The latest institution selected for sale is, according to news reports, Dover docks, which are apparently going to be purchased by the French state. Dover is Europe’s busiest ferry port and could raise £350 million for the British Treasury.

Ironically, the most likely purchaser will be the French regional government of Nord-pas-de-Calais — making a mockery of the claim that it is being passed into “private hands.”

All that is happening is that it will pass from British state control into French state control, much like the EDF electricity supply swindle perpetrated on British consumers.

To make matters worse, the money raised by the sale will not be used to build anything in  Britain, but will instantly vanish into the debt monster created by insane Government policies.

This horrendous waste is aggravated by the fact that the Dover port is highly commercially viable and currently generates around £15.1 million a year profit.

Dover port’s harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month. According to reports, the sale is a formality.

Chief executive of the harbour board, Bob Goldfield, was quoted in the press as justifying the sale because of the need for a £400 million expansion to cope with increased traffic.

“We want to invest around £400 million on a second terminal and need to invest in the existing terminal, but are unable to because of public sector borrowing constraints,” Mr Goldfield was quoted as saying.

The reality is that without the Labour and Tory war in Afghanistan, this funding shortfall could easily have been met from the £9 billion per year spent on that illegal conflict.

Only the British National Party has the vision and political will to halt the wasteful spending of the Tory/Labour cartel and prevent the destruction of Britain’s commonwealth.

The official numbers, released by the Department for Work and Pensions, showed that 1,370,820 immigrants have been given National Insurance numbers over the last two years — which means that legal immigration is now accounting for at least 650,000 individuals per year.

A grand total of 4.1 million National Insurance numbers have been handed out to foreign workers since 2002.

At this rate, Britain’s population will top the much-debated 70 million figure well within ten years, as the immigrant reproduction rate is far higher than the native British birth rate.

The figures also make a mockery of the “balanced migration” nonsense being peddled by the old gang parties, as it will also not “stabilise” the population but in fact encourage the ethnic cleansing of the native British population.

National Insurance numbers are required by anyone wanting to work legally in Britain. They are also necessary for claiming welfare benefits and tax credits.

The latest figures show that just under half of the new NI number claimants are from Eastern Europe, but the majority are from Asia, Africa and the Middle East. According to the statistics, more than 400,000 people from those three regions came to Britain between July 2007 and June last year.

Other figures released earlier showed that one in 13 workers in jobs in Britain are non-UK citizens, a total of around 2.2 million. Employment-related grants of settlement rose by 63 percent to 60,770 in 2008 compared with 2007, and at least ten percent of the current population of Britain was not born in this country.

*Meanwhile, it has emerged that French authorities are playing “pass-the-parcel” with refugees and handing them to the UK, according to a charity worker across the English Channel.

Mr Dan Hodges, from “Refugee Action” said that France was “dodging its obligations” with the flood of asylum seekers.

In an article in a daily newspaper, the liberal Mr Hodges pointed out that under EU rules, asylum seekers should claim residence in the first member state that they come to.

There is therefore no justification for ‘asylum seekers’ to queue up to get into Britain, apart from the massive benefits they are given by the systems created by decades of Tory and Labour regimes.

“The French government are just not facing up to their obligations. At some level, they are unofficially encouraging them to go to the UK or elsewhere,” Mr Hodges said.

“This game of pass-the-parcel with the refugees of Europe is playing into the hands of the people smugglers, who have no interest ultimately in where these people end up. They keep them moving and that’s how they earn their commission.”

He said that Greece and Italy are also culprits in telling asylum seekers to move to other member states.

The figures were released after a Freedom of Information request by private translation company Lingo24.

According to the report, schools across the country are being forced to pay out massive sums to translate standard school reports into foreign languages for the benefit of pupils’ parents.

This expenditure means that money which should be reserved for hiring teachers or buying school equipment is being diverted, Lingo24 said.

One council spent £126,000 in a year on translation, while Hertfordshire County Council spent £11,897 translating 107 reports into 18 languages.

Edinburgh Council spent £126,000 on translation services in 2007/8 and £110,000 last year. Northamptonshire County Council spent £73,000 on translation in 2008/9, up 164 percent on the previous year’s figure.

Some of the languages included Oromo (from East Africa), Yoruba (a West African dialect), Pahari (a Nepalese dialect) and Karen (spoken by the Karen people of Burma).

Figures released earlier have shown that over 250 languages are spoken in London, making the capital the most linguistically diverse city in the world.

The 40 most common languages spoken in London (apart from English) are Igbo (Nigeria), Bengali & Silheti, French-based Creoles, Panjabi, Tagalog (Filipino), Gujerati, Kurdish, Hindi/Urdu, Swahili, Arabic, Lingala (Congo), English-based Creoles, Albanian, Yorubu (Nigeria), Luganda (Uganda), Somali, Ga (Ghana), Cantonese, Tigrinya (Sudan), Akan (Ashanti), Tamil (Sri Lanka), Korean, Farsi (Persian), Pashto (Afghanistan), Amharic (Ethiopia), Vietnamese and Sinhala (Sri Lanka).

An outright majority of people aged 25 and under in London are from non-British ethnic stock, a figure that is soon going to be replicated in almost every other large city across England.

Only the British National Party has the policy and plan which can avert this dispossession of Britain under a wave of Third World colonisation.

According to news reports, a record number of pensioners were plunged into insolvency last year and projections are that the number will rise even higher this year.

Accounting firm RSM Tenon was quoted as reporting that nearly “7,000 British pensioners lost their battle to keep financially afloat in 2009.”

According to the report, “many of Britain’s 11.2 million pensioners are facing a toxic combination of poor or non-existent pensions, no savings, large debts and a struggle to find work to pay the bills.”

According to the RSM Tenon figures, some 4,816 pensioners were declared insolvent in 2008, and in 2009, the number rose to 6,952.

At the same time, however, the British taxpayers have just given $1.1 billion to buy 2 percent of the shareholding of the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

According to the ADB’s website, the purpose of that institution is to “promote economic and social development in Asian and Pacific countries through loans and technical assistance. Its mission is to help its developing member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their citizens.”

A press release posted on the DFID’s website, which was blacked out by the controlled media, said the ADB “is a major lending institution that provides grants and loans to countries across Asia. The bank’s ordinary capital resource allows it to lend money at near-market rates to lower and middle income countries and for private sector operations that focus on poverty reduction.”

In addition, the DFID boasted, the taxpayers’ money it had just spent would be used to “fund schemes such as helping people in Bangladesh to adapt to the effects of climate change by supporting cleaner energy initiatives and opening up mobile phone access in Afghanistan to improve opportunities for trade and business in the region.”

The move to invest the money in the ADB came after “parliamentary approval,” the DFID statement added.

In other words, a cross-parliamentary body consisting of Tory, Labour and Liberal-Democrats approved this expenditure.

What this means is that all of these parties put the interests of people in Asia ahead of British people, especially the elderly, who must struggle to make ends meet on the miserly state pension.

The British National Party is committed to ending the foreign aid swindle.

The only time that foreign aid can even be considered is when there is no need or poverty within our own borders. Until then, it is nothing short of treason to plunge the taxpayers of Britain into even more debt to fund foreign aid.

The decision to charge the four — Elliot Morley, David Chaytor, Jim Devine and Lord Hanningfield — was made after formal complaints against those three (and a number of other MPs) were laid by Mr Barnbrook with the Metropolitan Police Service.

Mr Barnbrook, a former inspector with the Met who is also the BNP’s parliamentary candidate in Dagenham and Rainham, has made it is his business to mercilessly pursue the criminals behind the expenses scandal. Much of his research was done behind the scenes, perusing MPs’ declarations and contrasting them with other publicly available documents and information.

Once he had established inconsistencies or clear breaches of the law, Mr Barnbrook lost no time in laying formal complaints with the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, or, in the more serious cases, with the Met.

The entire Parliamentary expenses scandal was, in fact, first brought into the public domain through Mr Barnbrook’s reporting of Tory MP Derek Conway for paying his two sons a salary whilst they were both in full-time education at university.

It was only after the Conway affair that the courts finally allowed the freedom of information requests into MPs’ expenses. Although a daily newspaper went on to gain access to files which then revealed how widespread the swindle was, nothing more would have happened unless a third party reported the matter to the Police or Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, as both these authorities are reactive, not proactive.

Mr Barnbrook has reported at least 23 MPs and peers since the scandal first broke. Some of his more prominent victims have included Labour MP Harry Cohen and Conservative MP Brian Binley, both of whom were forced to pay back considerable sums and apologise in Parliament.

Mr Morley, MP for Scunthorpe, now faces charges relating to a total of £30,000 of mortgage claims which, it is alleged, were “in excess of that to which he was entitled” and covered a period when there was no mortgage on the property.

Mr Chaytor, MP for Bury North, is accused of “dishonestly claiming” £1,950 for IT services and further sums of £12,925 and £5,425 relating to rent on properties which he and his mother allegedly owned.

Livingston MP Mr Devine is accused of “dishonestly claiming” money for cleaning services and for stationery using false invoices.

Lord Hanningfield — real name Paul White — is a Conservative peer and leader of Essex County Council. He stands accused of dishonestly submitting claims “for expenses to which he knew he was not entitled,” including overnight stays in London. He stepped down as council leader on Friday and as a Tory frontbench spokesman.

If they are found guilty, they could be sentenced to up to seven years in jail.

* Incredibly, the four men are claiming that Parliamentary privilege prevents them from being tried in open court and that they can only be judged by their fellow MPs.

The Liberal Democrat-controlled borough of Brent in London has reached a new low (even for that party) with an announcement that it seeks full British citizenship for the estimated 20,000 illegal immigrant invaders living within its boundaries.

According to the 2001 census, Brent has a population of 263,464, which means that another 20,000 illegals will add 8 percent to the total population.

A motion put to the council — many of whose members from all three parties have surnames that clearly identify them as ethnically not British — last week backed the “Strangers into Citizens” campaign, making Brent the sixth council to support the extremist cause.

According to a local news report, councillors from all parties “backed the principles of the Strangers into Citizens campaign” which calls for the naturalisation of long-term “irregular migrants” in Britain.

The “Strangers into Citizens” campaign was launched in 2006 with the backing of church leaders, trade unions and “migrant support groups.” It wants to legalise all those invaders who have managed to swindle the system and break immigration laws for four years or more.

Lib-Dem councillor James Allie (pictured), responsible for housing in Brent, justified the rewarding of these criminal lawbreakers with citizenship by claiming that “most of these people will never be expelled from the UK.”

It is estimated that up to 950,000 “visa over-stayers” and “failed asylum seekers” are currently resident in Britain. This means fully 5 percent of the current residents of Britain are here illegally.

The full extent of the Third World invasion is revealed by Brent Council figures, which state that more than 69 percent of its residents were born outside the UK. This excludes the 20,000 illegal immigrants, which means that over 75 percent of the population of the borough of Brent were not born in Britain. This figure excludes the children of those immigrants who might have been born here.

These statistics come hard on the heels of a report from Birmingham Council which said that 61 percent of primary school children in that city are of non-British origin.

Other recently released figures claimed that 10 percent of the current population of the entire country was not born in Britain. When this startling figure is added to the estimated 13 percent ethnically non-British immigrant population, plus illegals, asylum seekers and others, the total non-British element of the population is already close to 25 percent.

At these rates, even if immigration were to be halted today and no-one else allowed in, the Third World immigrant population will still outbreed the native British people within the next 30 or 40 years.

The British National Party is the only political party which discusses these issues openly — and which is dedicated to taking measures to ensure that the indigenous people of the British Isles retain their status as the majority population.

The choice before the voters is simple: a vote for ethnic cleansing and bloodless genocide of the British people under the Labour/Tory/Lib-Dem cartel, or survival of the British people under the BNP.

The Durham Union Society had invited Yorkshire and North East Lincolnshire MEP Andrew Brons, and Leeds City Councillor Chris Beverley, to oppose the motion: “This house believes in a multicultural Britain” in the Debating Chamber on the Palace Green in Durham City.

But the Labour Party-funded UAF gang (above) vowed to stop the two British National Party politicians from taking part in the debate and after a series of threatening telephone calls to university staff, along with threats of a violent demonstration outside the venue, the Durham Union Society – one of the world’s oldest student debating societies – reluctantly pulled the plug on the event.

Not only was the news disappointing for Andrew Brons (left) and Chris Beverley, it was also a blow to Kulveer Ranger, an advisor to Boris Johnson, and the Conservative MP Edward Leigh who were due to propose the motion.

Anna Birley, the president of Durham Union Society, told the Northern Echo just two days ago:


“As president, I am responsible for promoting open debate, which means inviting people with opposing points of view.”

While Professor Chris Higgins, the vice-chancellor of Durham University, had backed the society’s stance:

“The university is a strong advocate of freedom of speech, we did not oppose the right of the Durham Union Society to invite British National Party representatives as long as they spoke as part of an open debate.”

But now the enemies of free speech have won the day and the students of Durham University have been denied the opportunity to listen to an important debate and challenge those taking part.

“Labour Party thugs might have won this battle but they are losing the war,” said a BNP spokesman when told of the cancellation.

“Students by their very nature have inquisitive minds and they won’t like the book-burners of the UAF dictating what they can and can not listen too.

“Such actions by Gordon Brown’s bankrupt band of followers only goes to raise the profile of the British National Party as well as helping us to recruit new members.”

In 2008, the French rejected the application of a fully veiled Moroccan woman on the grounds that she was not sufficiently assimilated into French society. French law allows for the rejection of applicants if they fail to respect national values. No equivalent legislation is available to the British Border Agency.

This move follows tough words from the French government over potentially banning the full head-to-foot veils, with French ministers concerned about the corrosion of national identity in a country with a 5 million strong Muslim population and ever-growing areas of inner cities becoming Dar al-Islam – literally Islamic ghettos where the French police fear to tread.

During the application procedure, the Moroccan man had alarmed officials by claiming that his ‘wife will never be able to go out without the full veil.”

He added: “I don’t believe in gender equality; women have inferior status; I will not respect the principles of the secular society.”

The applicant is believed to be a member of the fundamentalist Tablighi Jamaat, 100,000 of whom reside in France. Tablighi Jamaat has recently focussed its resources on the United Kingdom. The organisation has embedded itself into at least 600 of Britain’s 1350 mosques.

President Nicholas Sarkozy has been cornered into defending French national identity having won his election by usurping the Front National’s defensive stance on French culture and simultaneously shoring up the ruling party’s right-flank. The proposal was finally put into action last week, when French Prime Minister François Fillon asked the Council of State to help draft a law banning the Islamic veil.

British ministers were said to be contemplating a ban on the burqa, however, this remains unlikely given the extent of the Islamic colonisation within some of their constituencies and Labour’s dependence upon the Muslim bloc vote, particularly Justice Secretary Jack Straw’s Blackburn seat.

Typically, French women’s rights groups have greeted this latest development with silence, much like their British counterparts.

* The British National Party is committed to banning the burqa from public buildings and schools.

* The full-face veil is not specifically mentioned in any Islamic holy text, but it is said to have a twofold practical use in Islamic tradition; to act as a sand mask; to confuse enemy tribes whilst they are selecting which women to kidnap and rape during a raid – they may well end up with an elderly woman. Europe has a temperate climate and no desert, rendering the Burqa obsolete in that respect. I was about to say that we don’t have marauding tribes raping people on our streets, but then I realised I would be wrong.

In his report, Sir Thomas Legg revealed that more than half of all MPs, 360 in total, had made “wrongful”  (i.e. fraudulent) claims. However, not even this tells the full story, as almost 50 more MPs have made separate repayments. This means that a grand total of 410 MPs have been named as swindlers — fully two thirds of the entire House of Parliament.

In addition, three Labour MPs and one Tory peer will face criminal charges over their expenses, Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer has announced. MPs Elliot Morley, Jim Devine, David Chaytor and Lord Hanningfield will be charged under the Theft Act.

“In four cases, we have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges and that it is in the public interest to charge the individuals concerned,” Mr Starmer was quoted in reports as saying. “Accordingly, summonses in these cases have been obtained from the City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court and will now be served on the individuals in question.”

Sir Thomas’s report showed that the swindle was far more widespread than what was originally thought. The review specifically criticised the old party gang for “putting personal gain before protecting public money.”

Local Government Minister Barbara Follett has the highest single repayment to make, more than £40,000.

Sir Thomas found that almost one third of MPs wrongly claimed for mortgage interest, improperly receiving more than £700,000.

More than a dozen former MPs have failed to meet demands for repayments running into tens of thousands of pounds.

The scandal is likely to run even deeper, as Sir Thomas did not even start to investigate the “house flipping” issue whereby MPs designated first and second homes in a merry-go-round to claim the maximum cash from the taxpayers.

Sir Thomas attacked the entire expenses system, describing the rules as “vague”, with MPs “self-certifying as to the propriety of their use of the allowance.”

“A particular challenge has proved to be the widespread lack of proper evidence on the record from MPs to support substantial payments, especially of mortgage interest, even though this was expressly required by the rules,” he said.

MPs named as not yet having paid back their swindled cash include:

- Employment Minister Jim Knight, £2,185;

- Immigration minister Phil Woolas, £886.16;

- Tory MP Sir Peter “duck island” Viggers, £13,245.80;

- Labour MP Margaret Beckett, £2,539.75;

- Former defence secretary Geoff Hoon, £767.66; and

- Former minister Claire Short, £2,588.80.

Professor Krugman, who is also Professor of Economics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, was commenting after credit default swaps (CDS), which measure bankruptcy risk, roses 16 basis points in Spain and 28 basis points in Portugal.

Professor Krugman was heavily criticised by the pro-EU fanatics in Spain after his comments, which pointed out a truth which they find unwelcome, namely that a common European currency is not viable with such widely differing economic models and engines as found on the Continent.

The problem has been caused by the domino effect created by the single currency — to which the EU is dedicated and to which Britain will inevitably subscribe under the Tory and Labour commitment to the EU.

According to reports, the EMU’s credit bubble has left southern Europe with huge foreign liabilities: Spain at 91 percent of Gross Domestic Product (950 billion euros); Portugal 108 percent (177 billion euros). This compares with 87 percent for Greece (208 billion euros).

As the crisis has spread through those countries which hold the euro currency, frenzied debates within the European Commission’s leading members continue over whether the crippled countries should be bailed out or not.

According to Julian Callow from Barclays Capital, the EU may yet need to invoke emergency treaty powers under Article 122 to halt the contagion, issuing an EU guarantee for Greek debt.

“If not contained, this could result in a ‘Lehman-style’ tsunami spreading across much of the EU,” Mr Callow said. This would imply Britain being called upon to part finance the debts of euro zone members, even though Britain does not currently have the euro as a currency.

It has previously been calculated that British taxpayers might have to stump up £7 billion to help Greece alone, never mind the Iberian nations.

This is, of course, little short of criminal as British taxpayers, already burdened with their own national debt inflicted by decades of Tory and Labour misrule, should not be plunged into further debt to shore up the failed euro experiment’s problems as well.

The group named ‘We Don’t Want a Mosque in Clitheroe’, had attracted almost 1,700 supporters. Heated discussions were listed, detailing the impacts of the mosque upon local traffic levels, falling house prices and noise pollution.  Others questioned why 15,000 non-Muslim residents should suffer from the impacts, whilst the positives are reaped by merely 300 (2% of pop.) members of the town.

In 2003, Clitheroe BNP were called upon to campaign against the upgrading of Medina Islamic Education Centre (MIEC) to a fully functioning mosque. Residents approached the group following pro-mosque propaganda published in the community news bulletin, which featured support from the Reverend Richard Atkinson, minister of Trinity Methodist Church.

“I hope that the Islamic community’s desire for a place of worship be realised in the near future,” said Rev Atkinson. This sentiment was echoed by Lord Adam Patel of Blackburn, also a resident of Ribble Valley.

Despite massive public opposition in the market town and almost 1,000 letters of objection, planning permission was granted by Ribble Valley Borough Council in 2006. This news was greeted with disbelief by local indigenous residents, in stark contrast to the Islamic residents, one of whom, claimed: “This is a victory in our 40-year battle against the council, to establish a mosque.”

Local resident and anti-mosque campaigner Mark Towers explained: “This is a sad day; we’ve been fighting this since 1998. It has taken 12 years but they’ve finally worn us down, and the Tory-controlled borough council just caved in.”

Perhaps one scrap of comfort – should the community leaders decide to Islamicise the existing structure with minarets – is that famous ‘Matchstick Man’ artist L.S. Lowry immortalised the church in one of his works. The Islamic group have already changed the name of the chapel, from Mount Zion to Mount Vale.

Conversion of the Mount Zion Methodist Chapel begins this month.

Speaking in an interview with the homosexual magazine Attitude, Mr Cameron said homosexuals should be allowed to stay in Britain if their life would be in danger if they were sent home. This was an obvious reference to Africa, where in many countries homosexuality is illegal and even punishable by death.

The internationally acclaimed medical journal The Lancet, in its Volume 374, Issue 9687, Pages 416–422, published on 1 August 2009, revealed that male homosexuals in sub-Saharan Africa are “more often than not infected with HIV than the general adult population” on that continent.

The Lancet’s report, in the form of a paper published by researchers from Oxford and entitled “Men who have sex with men and HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa”, examined all available AIDS related studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa to analyze the spread of the HIV virus amongst homosexuals in Africa.

The conclusion was that homosexual Africans are ten times more likely to be affected with HIV/AIDS than the general adult population.

Nonetheless, Mr Cameron told Attitude magazine that “rules should be changed to give further protection to people fleeing persecution because of their sexuality.”

He said: “If you are fleeing persecution and that fear is well-founded, then you should be able to stay. As I understand it, the 1951 Convention [on the rights of refugees] doesn’t mention sexuality, but because it mentions membership of a social group, that phrase is being used by the courts, rightly, to say that if someone has a realistic fear of persecution they should be allowed to stay.”

Mr Cameron also called for an end to the blood services ban on homosexuals giving blood. “Logic would dictate that it’s time to change,” he said.

The astonishing announcement means that the Conservative Party is now dedicated to encouraging a new wave of “asylum seekers” to enter Britain — from a group which is almost guaranteed to bring with them a new influx of that incurable disease.

Quite apart from the additional financial strain this will put on the National Health Service, Mr Cameron has also showed his ignorance of international asylum law, which gives asylum seekers right of refuge in the first safe country neighbouring the one they are fleeing.

Most African homosexuals would therefore have right of refuge in South Africa, which has one of the most pro-homosexual rights constitutions in the world. Such refugees certainly do not have the right to cross 20 safe countries to parasite off the British taxpayer-funded health system.

In addition, Mr Cameron promised Attitude magazine that he would tighten up the Labour Party’s Equality Act to “force faith schools to teach their pupils there was nothing wrong in being gay.”

This would take the form of setting “ground rules” to make sure religious schools “teach equality,” Mr Cameron said.

* The British National Party believes firmly that a person’s sexuality is a private matter and that the state has no right to regulate it.

However, the state is obliged to look after the interests of the community at large, and encouraging hordes of “asylum seekers” who (a) have no legal claim to asylum in Britain; and (b) are from a medically-identified group likely to further spread the AIDS pandemic, is nothing short of insanity.

Mr Cameron could not have made this any clearer.

The revelations are a damning indictment on the privatisation policies pursued by both Tory and Labour parties and their continued insistence of Britain’s membership of the multi-billion swindle known as the European Union.

In a report by Alistair Buchanan, Ofgem’s Chief Executive, Britain’s energy problem was described as a “crisis.” Mr Buchanan said the problem had been compounded by what he called an “unholy trinity” of factors, including the impact of the (bankster-created) recession on energy industry investment, Britain’s growing reliance on imported gas as North Sea supplies are depleted and the closure of nine coal and oil-fired power stations by 2015 in order to meet EU laws.

The closure of those power stations alone will see Britain lose a third of its electricity generating capacity.

In addition, the Ofgem report said, European targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions and developing renewable energy “will create a huge demand for investment over the coming decade. The £200 billion needed to achieve the most ambitious goals for renewable energy would mean doubling the rate of investment seen over the past 10 years,” it said.

The Ofgem report notes that investment in low carbon technology is being hampered by uncertainty over the carbon price. The EU’s emissions trading scheme is supposed to achieve the right price to encourage investment and reduce carbon emissions but Ofgem has suggested that the UK may have to introduce its own minimum price in order to promote the required investment to meet EU renewables targets.

Meanwhile, news reports have quoted Ann Robinson, of the price comparison website uSwitch.com, as saying that energy bills could reach around £5,000 by 2020 in order to cover the investments as demanded by the EU and the “emissions trading scheme.”

What all this means in plain English is that consumers will be forced to pay ever-increasing amounts for their energy to cover renewed investment in a supposedly privatised industry — because that industry’s first obligation is to pay its (largely foreign) shareholders a dividend before reinvesting in infrastructure in Britain.

Take Tory-dominated Surrey Heath Borough Council, located a mere 30 miles or so up the M3 from Southampton where the sticker brouhaha has occurred, our correspondent said.

Last month, the council’s 16-strong planning committee approved an application by the Bengali Welfare Association to tear down a listed Victorian school in a conservation area and to replace it with a traditional domed mosque.

This was done in spite of hundreds of objections from local people and against the recommendation of the council’s own planning experts.

It appears that the controlling Tory group on the council were merely following orders from the Conservative Party’s head office who have launched a desperate effort to wrest as much of the Islamic block vote from Labour as possible.

Unfortunately for the Tory run council, things have not gone to plan. They clearly did not anticipate the indignant and overwhelmingly hostile reaction from local people.

As a result, a decision has been taken to nullify the planning committee’s “final” decision. It is reported that they are to put the planning application before a special gathering of the full council scheduled for February 14th.

Further, it is rumoured that Tory councillors are concerned over the impact their peculiar support for this unpopular project has had on the electorate.

With a general election in the offing, some say they are desperate to dig themselves out of the electoral hole into which they have dug themselves.

One comment, published in the local media, sums up how many local people feel about the mosque proposal:

“If you drive over the railway bridge on the A30 at Blackwater, as I did on Tuesday morning, and because of a sprinkling of snow the whole of the road system was grid locked, I had the opportunity to scan the horizon and feast my eyes on the tall, slim, elegant spire of St Michael’s church, nestling among a wide expanse of trees.

“It is the only thing that dominates that horizon, and rightfully so. Then I imagined what the skyline would be like with the domes and minarets of a mosque directly behind the spire of St Michael’s and facing directly towards it, because that will be its orientation, and believe you me, St Michaels will be blotted out and Eastern architecture will dominate our local landscape. This architecture does not belong in our country, and certainly not in this particular location. It will not be in keeping with the surrounding conservation area.”

The Tories — who are the initiators of the sell-out of British sovereignty to the EU — clearly think nothing of betraying our heritage and culture in return for Muslim votes, concludes our correspondent.

“All of which begs the question, what exactly, are the Conservatives seeking to conserve apart from their place at the trough?”

There would be no chance at all of an indigenous British person being spared jail under similar circumstances “because he was a Christian” or because he was not religious.

The ruling, by none other than Cherie Booth QC (better known as the wife of former Prime Minister Tony Blair) was made in Inner London Crown Court.

Sitting as a judge, Ms Booth spared Muslim Shamso Miah man from prison “because he was religious.” Mr Miah, who lives in Redbridge, East London, was in a bank in East Ham when he began arguing with a fellow Muslim, Mohammed Furcan, over their places in the queue to the teller.

According to reports, Mr Miah, who had just come from the local mosque, punched Mr Furcan twice, once inside the bank and again as the brawl moved outside the building.

In her ruling, Ms Booth told Mr Miah that she would suspend his prison sentence because he was a religious person and “had not been in trouble before.”

She added: “You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour.”

The blatant favouritism has led to the National Secular Society lodging a formal protest with the Office for Judicial Complaints against Ms Booth for giving an “unjust” sentence.

The NSC Society said Ms Booth “acted in an unjust and discriminatory way,” and that the implication of her ruling was that a non-religious person would have been treated less leniently.

Ms Booth is, however, merely the logical end product of decades of the Tory/Labour elite putting British people last and giving priority, special treatment to Third World colonisers from all parts of the globe.

* The NSC is, of course, comprised of liberals caught in the classic dilemma of such people. On the one hand, they espouse open borders and the denial of the right of European ethnic groups to maintain their identities.

On the other hand, liberals are increasingly faced with the reality that mass Third World immigration is resulting in the inversion of the liberal values people such as the NSC claim to hold so dear.