Tories vs Bob Quick: The Implications for Democratic Nationalists

It may be tempting to assume that the ongoing argument between the Conservative Party and Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bob Quick is a private fight, with no broader implications for the general public.  Such an assumption would be quite wrong; this furious row is hugely significant for everyone involved in opposition politics, and for BNP activists in particular. 

Assistant Commissioner Quick, the head of Britain’s counter-terror command has now apologised “unreservedly” to the Conservative Party for his earlier claim that the party had mobilised the press against him following the leaks inquiry which led Quick’s officers to arrest Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green.  In response to a story in the Mail on Sunday, Assistant Commissioner Quick said: “The Tory machinery and their press friends are mobilised against this investigation.  I think it is a very spiteful act, possibly to intimidate me away from investigating Mr Green, and I feel it has put my family at risk.”

The whole Green-Quick affair deserves to be considered in the broader context of the growing politicisation of the police under Labour. A quite remarkable feature of the Blair-Brown Labour regime has been their extraordinary success in recruiting senior police officers to both their general and specific political objectives.  

For many years, our police forces had remained mercifully free of the politically-correct soft Marxism which infected so many other traditional British institutions. The turning point for the police was the Macpherson report into the death of Stephen Lawrence, which conjured up the bogus concept of “institutional racism” as a tool to break the back of traditional policing and constrain police forces to submit to Labour’s political agenda.   Since Macpherson, the new breed of police chiefs inserted into almost all senior positions have adopted Labour’s socio-political aims so zealously that many of them now seem to regard themselves almost as an integral part of the corporate Labour movement.

It has been extensively reported elsewhere on this website, that senior police officers are now consistently interfering in the affairs of the British National Party, by ordering the arrest of activists merely for distributing leaflets, by bugging legitimate political meetings, and even by using undercover subversion to compromise key activists.   There is little doubt that most of these political “policing” operations against the BNP are being co-ordinated by SO15, the Counter Terrorism Command of the Metropolitan police, which took over the roles and responsibilities of the Anti-Terrorist Branch and Special Branch on 2 October 2006.   The head of SO15 is none other than Assistant Commissioner Bob Quick.

Of course, the British National Party is a democratically-constituted political party which has nothing whatever to do with terrorism, any more than Damian Green or the Conservative Party have.  But the “anti-terrorism” brand has a powerful public propaganda effect which can be used to conceal all manner of dubious attempts to interfere with free speech and democracy. 

According to the Metropolitan Police website, the aims of the Anti-Terrorism Command SO15 include “gathering and exploiting intelligence on terrorism and extremism in London”.  The use of the term “extremism” is highly significant.   Years ago, police officers concerned themselves with those who broke the law.  Under Labour, the police seem much more interested in investigating and disrupting those whose values and views are categorised by their political masters as “extremist”, even when those views are shared by a large proportion of the British public and are expressed through entirely lawful and democratic means.  

The word “extremist” in this policing definition is most assuredly intended to apply to peaceful BNP politicians every bit as much as it applies to Muslim suicide bombers.  The adoption of the umbrella term “extremist”, and the elision of the distinction between law-abiding, democratic Nationalists on the one hand, and violent Muslim terrorists on the other, is quite deliberate and is a perversion of language which could have come from the imagination of George Orwell himself.   So Labour’s police investigate “extremists”, and these “extremists” will be anyone so-defined by the Labour government.   Such is the mechanism by which the rule of law is being progressively undermined and the police state is being incrementally built up.

It now appears that by extending their political “policing” to the Conservative party, senior police officers have overreached themselves.  Nationalists understandably have little political sympathy for Tories of any stripe.  We should, however, acknowledge that in the matter of the arrest of Damian Green, it is the Conservatives, and not Labour’s political policemen, who have been in the right throughout.  

It is quite unacceptable for a police force to bug lawful BNP political meetings, or recruit paid informers in the BNP.  Equally, it is intolerable that a senior police officer such as Assistant Police Commissioner Quick should launch an intemperate public attack on any political party.   An apology is not enough.  He should resign.

 

Share

Pensioner’s Beheading Passes Unremarked

Our ‘vibrant’ multicultural society is so desensitised to depravity that it no longer seems perturbed by acts of horror which would have shocked the dull old homogeneous Britain of yesteryear to the core.  For example, there has been very little national press coverage of the news that a British pensioner was cold-bloodedly beheaded in the heavily “enriched” Crumpsall District of Manchester.  The severed head of the murder victim was found dumped in a wheelie bin.

The victim has been named by police as 63-year-old Patrick McGee, who lived alone at a house on Parkhill Avenue.  Senior sources in Greater Manchester Police have confirmed that they were investigating theories that Mr. McGee had been involved in a fracas over anti-social levels of noise at a nearby house in Crumpsall.

Detective Chief Inspector Howard Millington, who is leading the investigation, said: “This is the shocking murder of a man and our thoughts are with his family at this terrible time.

“We know people must be stunned by what has happened, and the very distressing details that have come out about Patrick’s death.

“We want to reassure people that we are working hard to find out exactly what happened to him, and that even more local officers will be patrolling the area than usual tonight.

The Daily Mail website initially reported that a 31-year old man “thought to be of Filipino origin” had been arrested in connection with the murder, but the Daily Mail’s report was later censored to remove any reference to the ethnic origin of the suspected assailant.  The truth will no doubt emerge in due course.

Share

Glasgow Bomb Doctor Convicted of Conspiracy to Murder

An NHS Muslim doctor who notoriously plotted to kill hundreds of people in London and Glasgow with nail bombs has been found guilty of conspiracy to murder.

Iraqi Dr Bilal Abdulla and fellow members of his Islamist cell established a bomb-making factory on British soil and attempted to detonate their devices in two Mercedes cars packed with gas canisters, petrol and hundreds of nails outside Tiger Tiger, a West End night club in London, on 29 June last year.

When the bombs failed to detonate, Dr Abdulla attempted a suicide attack on Glasgow airport the following day. The Iraqi junior doctor and his colleague Kafeel Ahmed rammed a 4×4 Cherokee Jeep packed with fuel canisters into the terminal building and threw petrol bombs at holidaymakers.

Woolwich Crown court was told that Dr Abdulla and Ahmed made various reconnaissance trips before driving two Mercedes cars to London, where one was parked in Haymarket, outside the Tiger Tiger club, in the early morning of June 29.  At the time, there were more than 500 intended British victims inside the nightclub, and the street outside was thronged with people making their way home after visiting clubs, bars and restaurants. A second car bomb was parked near a bus stop at Cockspur Street, where a large crowd was waiting for night buses.

Dr Abdulla and Ahmed repeatedly tried to detonate their bombs by calling mobile phones attached to detonators. Happily, the bombs failed to explode and the two Muslim extremists fled the scene and made their way to Glasgow to launch their suicide attack there. 

The jury of five men and seven women who convicted Dr Abdulla had earlier heard that Abdulla met Ahmed in Cambridge through the Islamic Academy, a charity in the city that rents rooms to young Muslim students.  Dr Abdulla had developed a hatred of the West and had accumulated a collection of Muslim extremist literature which was later recovered by police.

Dr. Mohammed Asha, a 28-year-old Jordanian neurologist and friend of Dr Abdulla, was cleared of conspiracy to murder.

Labour politicians and their acolytes have recently been very vocal in their strident demands that members of the BNP, a legal and democratic political party, should be hounded from their public sector jobs.  The same Labour types have so far been strangely quiet about the obvious risks to patients posed by murderous extremists like Dr. Bilal Abdulla. 

If Dr Abdulla so hated British people that he was prepared to launch a random suicide bomb attack, it is reasonable to assume that British NHS patients under Dr Abdulla’s tender care were also in grave danger.  The public is surely entitled to ask, are there other aspiring mass-murderers like Dr Abdulla still working in NHS posts, and what are the NHS authorities and the General Medical Council doing to find out?

Share

BNP Membership Calibre Shocks Head-in-Sand Liberals

It has been noteworthy that in all the continuing controversy about the leaked BNP membership list, much of the focus in the Left-Liberal media has been on the calibre of some of the well-educated, professional people “shockingly exposed” as BNP members.  There is indeed a very particular reason why Left-Liberals are so shocked about this.

The archetypal Hampstead Left-Liberal Guardian reader takes great comfort from nurturing his conception of the typical BNP member as an embittered nostalgic who, through social disadvantage or lack of intellect, simply cannot make the mental adjustment necessary to appreciate Diversity and Multiculturalism in the correct way. 

Left-Liberal opinion formers find this BNP stereotype reassuring, because it allows them to dream that their own outlook is somehow more enlightened, more sophisticated, or more insightful than ours.  So it naturally comes as a profound shock to Mr & Mrs Hampstead Liberal when it is revealed that BNP members can be well-educated professionals, university graduates with first-class degrees, and deep thinkers who are perhaps better read than they are themselves. 

The truth is, most people join the BNP, not because they are nostalgic for a better past, but because their solid commonsense and intuitive grasp of history tell them, both that there is good cause for deep concern about the future and that organised British Nationalism offers the only ray of hope.

While Nationalists respect the past and understand what moulds the future, Left-Liberals seem to dwell exclusively in the present moment. The essential decency of their middle-class ethnic friends falsely reassures Left-Liberals that they have nothing to fear from Multiculturalism, and the jumble of ethnic restaurants on their street provides a frisson of culinary excitement, which makes their narrow metropolitan snapshot of today’s Britain seem vibrant, even full of promise.  

Left-Liberals fail to understand that the Multicultural Britain of today, with its spice restaurants and rap music, is merely a transient interregnum between the British past, and the future prospect of a white-minority Britain dominated by Islam. For example, how many Left-Liberals are aware that North Africa and Asia Minor were once part of western Christendom, before they fell to Islam by the self-same processes which are working in over-drive here in Britain today? 

It is not that Left-Liberals especially admire the cruel and alien creeds whose adherents they so dutifully appease.  If they did, presumably Hampstead and Highgate would be depopulated by a stampede of Left-Liberal cultural emigrants to Hyderabad and Herat.  No, the problem is that our elite opinion-formers have no grasp of the sweep of history, no insight into what triggers the rise and fall of civilisations, and no vision to warn them of what Britain is certain to become - if their naive notions prevail. 

Left-Liberals seem to lack the cognitive capacity to understand that their own habits of excessive tolerance, and deference to the alien-other are not universal, as they believe, but are all quintessentially products of British culture, which are expressly not shared by many of those who are busy colonising our land.   In particular, Left-Liberals have not grasped that when a nation dies, that nation’s culture and institutions always perish with it.   When British people finally become an ethnic minority in this land sometime around 2070, and our grip is prised from the levers of power through sheer weight of demography, the values of the Left-Liberal elite will be swept away by the monster they have themselves created.

In recent years, an especially sinister trend has developed.  Since 2001, Left-Liberals seem to have lost confidence in many of the core Western values they once shared with Nationalists; a belief in political freedom and free speech, for example, and in the importance of police impartiality.   Left-Liberals have been prepared to dispense with these as the price they must pay to shore up Diversity and Multiculturalism, to the extent that Left-Liberalism is now strangely mutating into Left-Fascism.   There is more than a suspicion that the sheer vehemence and intolerance of the Left-Liberal Establishment crusade against the BNP is stoked by Left-Liberals’ own deep-seated and unacknowledged fear that perhaps our Nationalist analysis has been right all along. 

So Left-Liberals will continue to be “shocked” whenever Nationalists fail to conform to their stereotype and they will surely continue to revile the BNP, even as our well-grounded predictions turn into reality one-by-one. We must not blame Left-Liberals too much for this.  After all, nothing is more shocking than being woken from a dream and no-one is more reviled than he who dares tell the inconvenient truth.

Any Left-Liberals waking up with a self-improving urge can start their education by purchasing a copy of Arthur Kemp’s book “The Immigration Invasion” from here: https://excalibur.bnp.org.uk/

Share

“Gracious Speech” Offers No Succour in Our National Crisis

The Queen’s Speech at the State Opening of Parliament, which is of course simply a reading of Labour’s legislative programme, was quite remarkable for the complete absence of any radical proposals to tackle the crisis which threatens to overwhelm the nation.   As a result, the empty Queen’s Speech was entirely overshadowed by a row over who was to blame for allowing Labour’s political police to search the Parliamentary office of Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green.

British Nationalists should be proud of the tradition which attends the State Opening of Parliament.  However much we may justifiably hold our present-day legislators in utter contempt, Parliament is a Great British institution and the rituals of the State Opening reflect the age-old freedom struggles of the British people that continue to this very day. 

Last Wednesday, as the door of the House of Commons was ceremonially slammed against the Queen’s messenger, Black Rod, to commemorate Speaker Lenthall’s defiance of Charles I in 1642, none present could fail to note the ironic contrast between the noble courage of Speaker Lenthall and the craven supineness of his modern successor.  The current speaker, “Gorbals Mick” Martin not only failed to prevent Labour’s political police ransacking an opposition MP’s office; he even contrived to divert the blame onto a more junior official, the Serjeant at Arms.  As the heroic past forged its own heroes, so our own debased and decadent age throws up ciphers worthy of it.

The economy is in free-fall and the immigration invasion proceeds apace, but the Labour Queen’s Speech was an exhibition of complacent fiddling worthy of Emperor Nero himself.   The only substantive measures of any note reflected Labour’s perennial obsession with injecting Political Correctness into every nook and cranny of the British way of life. 

So we can all look forward with unbridled joy to an Equality Bill, which both legalises anti-white discrimination, and compels councils to consider how their “spending decisions, employment practices and service delivery” can affect people according to “sexual orientation, gender reassignment, age and religion or belief”.  We kid you not!

Poor Labour seem bereft of inspiration, so here are some helpful suggestions for radical Nationalist bills to fend off the gathering crisis and fill the yawning chasm in Labour’s Parliamentary timetable.

• British Identity Bill - a bill to define Great Britain as a non-immigration nation, and the permanent national homeland of the British peoples.

• British Sovereignty Bill - to establish Parliament and the British People as the formal seat of national sovereignty, repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and require the Secretary of State to conclude negotiations for final British withdrawal from the European Union within 4 years.

• Bill of Rights - a bill to declare the fundamental freedoms and rights guaranteed to every British citizen, including inter alia; Freedom of Speech, Freedom from State Surveillance, Freedom from Arbitrary Detention, the Right to a Jury Trial, and the Right to Fair Democracy.  The bill should also repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Race Relations Acts.

• Criminal Justice Reform Bill - to place a statutory obligation of political impartiality on the police and judiciary, reinstate the House of Lords as the highest court of appeal, abolish the British jurisdictions of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights and reinstate the death penalty as an option for judges in the most serious murder cases.

• Housing Bill - to give priority to British citizens in the allocation of public housing.

• Health Services Bill - to guarantee high-quality NHS medical and dental care to all British citizens, free at the point of delivery, while compelling all others seeking treatment in British hospitals to pay the cost in advance and in full.

• Industrial Regeneration Bill - to create a new proactive Ministry of Finance and empower the Secretary of State to regulate the affairs of major corporations operating in the UK, to provide for the imposition of tariffs on the import of foreign manufactured goods, and for government grants to rebuild manufacturing industries and to promote research and development.

• Financial Services Regulation Bill - to establish a new National Reconstruction Bank, implement a statutory framework of financial services regulation and outlaw certain defined financial instruments and dealing practices, including short-selling, and complex derivatives.

• Children and Families Bill - recognising that the traditional family unit of a married man and wife with children is the foundation block of British society, and implementing specific statutory measures to reinforce it.

 

 

Share

Nottingham School Cancels Christmas to Make Way for Islam

A Nottingham School has cancelled Christmas festivities to make way for commemoration of the Muslim Eid festival, according to the Nottingham Evening Post.

In a decision so offensive that it would scarcely have been believed only a few years ago, a letter was sent to parents of children at Greenwood Junior School, Sneinton, to explain why the school had cancelled Christmas.

The letter from “The staff at Greenwood Junior School”, said: “It is with much regret that we have had to cancel this year’s Christmas performances. This is due to the Eid celebrations that take place next week and its effect on our performers.”

The school has not revealed what the performance involved, but parents described it as a nativity play.

According to the Evening Post, the Head Teacher, one Amber Latif, and the Chair of Governors, responded to complaints from parents by sending a second letter which apologised, but also compounded the original offence by explaining that the Christmas performances would be staged in the New Year.  The letter continued in the following terms:

“We are a very inclusive school and fully respect the cultures and religions of all the children. We are upset to know that some of our parents/carers have been offended by the letter. The Christmas performance has not been cancelled outright but has been postponed until the New Year.”

This unprecedented event speaks for itself and any further comment from us is largely superfluous, save for the single observation that such outrages will inevitably progress from the exception to the norm, if Britain fails to embrace the BNP and continues its present headlong plunge into the abyss.

Does your child attend ‘The School that Cancelled Christmas?’  Did you receive the Scrooge letter?  Please contact the BNP National Enquiry Line and we will do everything we can to help you fight for your children’s British culture and heritage.

Share

Liverpool – Personal Reflections on a Day of Triumph

When the annals of British nationalism come to be written, the events of November 29th will surely merit their own page in that history.

Every one of the hundred and fifty BNP men and women who set out for Liverpool in the pre-dawn fog of freezing morning knew full-well that they faced arrest and ill-treatment at the hands of a British police force out of control. 

These were one hundred and fifty people with families, jobs and mortgages, who said tearful goodbyes to their loved-ones that morning in the expectation that they would not return in the evening, and that their homes might be invaded and searched, just as Tory Damian Green’s home was violated, by Labour’s political police. 

There are other political parties, for sure, who could turn out one hundred and fifty activists, even on a chill wintery day. But perhaps only the British National Party boasts one hundred and fifty stout hearts willing to risk all they hold dear in the cause of freedom.

Thankfully, all our dark fears proved ill-founded.  As we arrived in Liverpool, the jubilant “Liverpool 13″ greeted us with news that the police and Crown Prosecution Service had backed down, the triumph was won and the enemy had already fled the field.  The mood changed abruptly from silent and grim-faced determination, to celebratory smiles and back-slapping congratulations.

Few doubted that if the authorities had persisted with their pretence that the “Racism Cuts Both Ways” leaflets were illegal, then Nick Griffin and his followers would all be arrested for distributing them that day. The media would undoubtedly have linked Nick’s arrest to that of Tory Damian Green and drawn adverse conclusions about the malevolence of Labour.   But ultimately, Labour’s nerve failed them and they clearly decided that political martyrdom was a gift to the BNP which they could not afford to give.

So the one hundred and fifty carried their flags proudly to the appointed place and made their stand, armed with the truth and with BNP leaflets by the thousand.  And the fine reception they received from the warm-hearted people of Liverpool was just reward in itself for their efforts.

The BNP activists at Liverpool seemed a distillation of all that is still Great about Britain.  The public saw ex-servicemen with medals worn proudly on their chests. There were professional men in suits, accountants and businessmen, whose briefcases bulged with BNP leaflets.  There were middle-class ladies with the accents of Somerset and Surrey, and working-class lads from the Lancashire mill towns.  Here stood fashion-conscious young girls in their high-heeled boots, and frail grey-haired old men, who fought for their country long ago and were prepared to do so again, just one last time.

All of them conducted themselves with exemplary restraint and good-humour, ignoring the distant moronic chants of the Labour mob, and they stuck to their purpose of handing out leaflets with quiet British resolution.  The BNP is proud of them all, and one day soon, our nation will be proud of them too.

On this day of triumph, even Merseyside police seemed utterly transformed.   The courteous and impartial police officers of yesteryear, who inspired and deserved our respect, unexpectedly reappeared.  Smart and professional officers committed to protecting the peaceful and innocent, and arresting the violent and guilty, seem so rare these days that, in truth, the transformation came as a shock.  Our thanks and “three cheers” for the ordinary Merseyside police officers who did their duty so creditably that day were both genuine and well-deserved.

There are many lessons of Liverpool, but the greatest of all is this: men and women of stout heart can still prevail against the powers-that-be.  We may face an Establishment enemy of daunting might, but he is an enemy too with a nervous twitch in his cheek, a quaver in his voice and sweat on his brow. 

With the “Liverpool 13″ now happily free to enjoy an untroubled Christmas with their families, we may look back on our remarkable day out in Liverpool as the moment the tide of fortune turned in our favour.

Share

Defiance and Fervour at Bury BNP

Bury BNP’s last formal meeting of the year was also its largest and most successful, with several fine speeches and a record-breaking £500 collection.

There was a palpable sense of anger in the room about the leaked membership list, and Labour’s other assorted attacks on the Party over the previous week, but also a clear-sighted determination to carry on the political fight with defiance and resolution.   If there were any in Bury BNP who were cowed, or whose courage was waning, then there was certainly no evidence of it here!   In fact, a number of members suffering from heavy colds and flu had even made the extra effort to attend the meeting, simply as a demonstration of solidarity.

The meeting was treated to fine speeches from North West Regional Secretary Duncan Warner and guest of honour Arthur Kemp.

In his speech, Mr Warner briefed the audience with a witty and factual account of the events of this most bizarre ‘week in politics’, featuring the stolen Membership List, the demonstration in support of arrested Lancashire activists, and plans for a protest rally in Merseyside in support of the ‘Liverpool 13’.  The Bury group members sincerely appreciated his consideration in taking the trouble to travel to Bury and keep them apprised of all these startling developments.

Mr Kemp’s eagerly awaited speech rapidly developed into an oratorical tour de force, probably the best ever delivered to Bury BNP.  Arthur reminded the meeting that the burden of saving the British nation fell on the people in that room; the task could not be left to our descendants, for within just two and a half short generations, white British people would already have become an ethnic minority in their own land. 

His remarkable performance engendered a rare fervour among the normally rather reserved Bury BNP members, certainly this was the first time anyone could remember a prolonged and rapturous standing ovation for a speaker in Bury.  The announcement of the extraordinary £500 collection, sufficient in itself to fund the deposit of a General Election candidate in the Borough of Bury, also elicited an enthusiastic round of applause.

As the meeting broke up, news broke of Labour’s politically-motivated arrest of Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green and several more Bury BNP members came forward as volunteers to stand up against Labour’s scandalous political repression by attending the “Liverpool 13” Freedom Demonstration in Merseyside.

Share

280 Guilty Men: How Members of the Association of Chief Police Officers are Becoming a Threat to Democracy

The appalling arrest of Tory frontbench immigration spokesman Damian Green for the heinous crime of sincerely trying - however inadequately - to do his job, has highlighted the growing threat from politicised senior police officers, who are willing to attack opposition political parties at Labour’s behest.

The protestations of Labour ministers that they were not informed about Mr Green’s arrest in advance, and that the Metropolitan police acted autonomously, can of course be discounted; Labour’s claims are no more convincing than any of the other rank falsehoods Labour have peddled over the past eleven years.

Free speech and democracy can thrive only when the police are scrupulous in maintaining a rigorous political non-alignment, both in appearance and in reality.  Tragically, there is every indication that we are now moving back into the era of the 1930s Mussolini-style corporate state, where the police, the unions, the press and a whole slew of non-governmental organisations act as the thinly-disguised puppets of the ruling Party.

The 280 men and women who comprise the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) seem increasingly to be turning away from their traditional role of upholding the law and fighting serious crime, in favour of increasingly blatant attempts to curry favour with Labour by aligning themselves firmly with the Government’s political agenda.  A cynic might deem it no coincidence that these attacks on opposition political parties are taking place just as ACPO members are jostling to replace Sir Ian Blair as Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Britain’s most lucrative policing role.

While ACPO senior police officers confined themselves to harassing, intimidating and, in one case, torturing members of the British National Party, the media stood by and said nothing.   Now that Labour’s political police have extended their attack to another major opposition party, it is surely high time the British media and the British public sat bolt-upright and took cognisance of the grave significance of what is going on.

Fortunately, there is little prospect of the Tories’ Damian Green being charged, far less convicted, of any offence.  As we saw with the triumphant acquittal of Nick Griffin in 2006, few English juries are prepared to convict a freeborn Englishman, simply for unmasking the abuses of our rulers.  As with the recent detention of BNP activists in Burnley and Liverpool, the intent of senior police officers is to merely to instil a sense of fear and trepidation in anyone who might seek to expose Labour misdeeds in general, and their policies of Mass Immigration and Multiculturalism in particular.  

British Nationalists now find themselves in the unprecedented position of agreeing with Tony Benn that the arrest of Damian Green is nothing less than a police attack on Parliament itself.  It is high time that everyone who believes in British parliamentary democracy, takes a firm stand against Labour and their ACPO puppets. We must resolutely say no, this shall not stand!

The British National Party believes that the likes of Mr Damian Green should be free to fulfil their role on the opposition front bench, holding the British government - preferably a future BNP Government - democratically to account.  It is the dysfunctional and politicised Labour senior police officers of our day who richly deserve to find themselves in the cells.

 

Share

Seven Years of Economic Famine – the Price of New Labour’s Failure

Alistair Darling’s Pre-Budget Report this week was the ultimate indictment of a decade of economic miscalculation and misrepresentation.   It was nothing less than the epitaph of New Labour and the grand unveiling of their gross falsehoods.  Labour have now been stripped of their mantle of economic prudence, which long fooled the public and cloaked Labour’s corrupt profligacy. Their pledge to abolish “boom and bust” has proven to be worthless.  Their limp assurances about Britain’s fundamental economic strength have been exposed as bald lies. 

So now we do need strong fiscal medicine to ease the pending crisis, but Labour’s prescription is just another dose of economic quackery. 

Not content with allowing the British people to be buried under a mountain of personal debt, Labour now plans to drop a heavy millstone of public debt around the necks of taxpayers too.   Public borrowing is destined to reach a staggering £118 billion - more than 8% of annual Gross Domestic Product. 

Alistair Darling’s bright idea is to cut VAT for just 13 short months, and then desperately try to rein in his wild public borrowing by imposing swingeing tax increases and devastating spending cuts from next year onwards.  

Those deferred tax hikes will not just soak the rich: ordinary people will be savagely hit by Labour’s planned increase in national insurance and excise duties.  Year after year, under Darling’s plan, the cruel tax screw will tighten on working people and, even at best; it will still take seven long years of hardship to restore the public finances.

Labour’s temporary 2.5% cut in the standard rate of VAT is simply foolhardy. It would have been far better to stimulate the economy over the medium term by wise infrastructural investment.  But if the situation is really so very desperate now that only prompt tax cuts can avert immediate catastrophe, then Darling should simply have raised personal tax allowances to help low earners.  

The VAT rate cut will not create a “feel-good” factor and Labour has clearly given no thought at all to the enormous costs and disruption for tens of thousands of small businesses across Britain forced to re-programme their computer systems and reprint their price lists, with just one week’s notice of a major change in VAT rates.  How typical of a Labour government dominated by failed social workers, failed lecturers and failed “professional” politicians who have never run a business, or indeed done a real day’s work of any kind in their whole lives!

It is now starkly clear that, far from weathering the storm better than other major economies as Gordon Brown so risibly claimed, Britain is in fact certain to suffer much more than comparable countries.  The international Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has predicted that output in the UK will fall by 1.1% next year, more than in any other major economy.  Even Alistair Darling has been forced to revise his forecast for economic performance for 2009 down from 2.5% growth, to a contraction of at least 0.75%, the largest downward revision ever in UK economic history.   

According to the OECD, unemployment in the UK will now rocket to over 8% of the workforce by the end of 2009 and, of course, an increasing proportion of the dwindling jobs that persist will be taken by cheap foreign immigrant workers brought in by Labour. 

Labour should have invested the tax-take from the years of plenty, in British industry, in technology and worthwhile training, and in rebuilding the infrastructure of a once-great nation.  Instead, they lavished it all on political pet projects, with a legion of expensive public sector managers to oversee all their rank nonsense.

Labour squandered our wealth harvest while the economic sun shone and condemned us to seven years of famine with the cupboard left bare.   May God forgive them, for the British people will not.

 

Share

Opposition Party Activist Tortured at Police Station

This is no quote from some Amnesty International report about Turkey or Egypt, nor a snippet from an asylum-seeker’s application form.   It is no less than an unprecedented allegation that a British citizen was brutally tortured at a British police station, by British policemen acting in the name of politics. 

A tapestry of shame is now being woven before our incredulous eyes.  2008 may well be remembered by the historians of a future age as the year when, for the first time in living memory, a British ruling party endorsed the use of extra-legal violence and physical torture against democratic political opponents on the British mainland. 

There is no doubt that these various assaults on the members and organisation of the British National Party are all manifestations of a cold and calculated Labour government plan to destroy the BNP.   It is quite inconceivable that the Chief Constable of Merseyside would have ordered the mass detention of peaceful BNP activists without first seeking and receiving the formal backing of Labour Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

Smith is no Julius Caesar, but she has indeed crossed a political Rubicon.  Britain long ago began a journey of infamy on the road to Zimbabwe, but surely no one could have predicted just how far down that baleful track our rulers would be prepared to drive us? 

Just a few short weeks ago, it was inconceivable that the British State would ever publish the home addresses of an opposition party’s members and their families on the internet, in flagrant breach of the law.  It was unimaginable that even a Neanderthal Labour tabloid like the Daily Mirror would stoop to inciting black racist violence against twelve thousand British citizens. No one would have believed that busy call centres could be used with impunity to threaten frail old ladies and cowering, tearful children. And, above all, it would have been impossible to credit that British policemen might resort to torture at the behest of their political masters.   And yet, Labour’s boundless and demonic spite has conjured every one of these nightmares into hideous reality.

There will be more lionhearted BNP men like Andrew Tierney, arrested on trumped up charges, who will stand fast and staunchly refuse to surrender their DNA for Labour’s wicked database.  So there will be more torture, and yes, more cuts and bruises to be photographed as badges of honour, published on the websites of the world, and disseminated in leaflets by the thousand throughout our own land.  Labour will soon regret the gift of political martyrdom they have given us; a gift we will gratefully use against them in defence of liberty. 

Ninety years ago, our forefathers grappled in the stinking mud of Flanders to defend our British freedoms; do Labour’s floppy fascists truly imagine we will yield up those freedoms cheaply to them now?  No, we will hold our courage and stand fast together through these dark days of winter, for our bright, confident spring will soon follow close behind.

MERSEYSIDE NATIONAL DAY OF ACTION:  SATURDAY 29 NOVEMBER, 11 A.M.

Share

Do Our War Dead Count for Nothing to Labour’s Political Police?

By Derek Adams - It seems that the police do not find theft from a war memorial as tasteless and despicable as the majority of the decent population.

On Sunday 9 November, BNP activists attended the memorial Remembrance service in Manchester’s St Peter’s Square and solemnly laid a wreath on behalf of the British National Party in memory of all those who died keeping our country free from foreign invasion.

Less than one week had passed, when an alert passer-by noticed that the poignant tribute had been stolen.  On being notified of this disgraceful act of sacrilege, Manchester Organiser Derek Adams immediately reported the disgusting crime at Bootle Street police station in Manchester, which is just one hundred yards from the crime scene.

Evidence was supplied to the police in the form of a photograph of the wreath in position at the Cenotaph and a crime number was duly issued (268518A/08).

The site of the Cenotaph is covered by several large police CCTV cameras and many privately-owned commercial monitoring devices, yet just twenty-four hours after the crime was reported, Derek Adams received a cursory letter from Greater Manchester Police (GMP), informing him that “all existing lines of enquiry regarding the crime were concluded”.  In other words, GMP neither knew nor cared what had happened to the wreath.

Compare this perfunctory approach to the theft of the wreath, with the major resources GMP threw into trawling through illegal, stolen documents; namely the outdated and criminally-altered BNP members’ list.

Labour’s Greater Manchester Police political Gestapo have apparently been scouring the illegally-acquired list of BNP members and comparing it with their employment database, in order to cleanse the force of any opposition to the left-wing mafia who are in charge at present.

Other recent cases, for which GMP made unlimited resources available, included the Roy West debacle, whereby a BNP council candidate allegedly told his German neighbour to “Remember Dunkirk.”  Roy was promptly arrested, fully investigated and duly charged.  In yet another incident, a BNP supporter who applied stickers to his outgoing mail requesting ‘No More Mosques’ was hauled before the courts, because a Muslim postal worker found the statement ‘offensive‘. Then there was the sacking of a police officer with an excellent record of service, all for the dastardly crime of wearing a BNP badge whilst off duty!

This is the British police force in its present form; a mere shadow of the former non-political force that we grew up with.  There was a time when the police both inspired and received respect from the general public and in return, they served without fear or favour.

Sadly, those halcyon days are long gone, and the police are now riddled with left-wing extremists, whose only concerns seem to be confined to their own career promotion, and the enforcement of the Labour Party’s Marxist agenda.

 

 

Share

BNP Defies Hypocrisy and Double-Standards to Defeat the State’s Attack

Quite the most remarkable feature of the controversy over the stolen BNP membership list has been the sheer hypocrisy displayed by a spectrum of Establishment institutions as they manoeuvred to attack the British National Party.

From police forces threatening to break the law, through Labour ministers plotting repression in the name of tolerance, to BBC executives executing clumsy policy u-turns, the whole affair has provided an ugly spectacle of the corrupt ruling elite at their worst.  And their worst really is very bad indeed.

Let us consider the police.  The Guardian newspaper has reported that every police force in the UK is scouring the stolen British National Party membership list for the names of serving officers.  In law, any employer who downloads stolen, criminally-manipulated and out of date sensitive personal data from an internet blog, formats it and then cross-references that data to their own employee database is guilty of processing personal data unlawfully under the Data Protection Act.   You might expect senior police officers to have a basic working knowledge of the law, but apparently not.   Membership of the British National Party is not a criminal offence, even for police officers, so Chief Constables have no right to use the criminal justice exemption to the Data Protection Act, or otherwise to ride roughshod over the law.  It seems that Labour dictats carry more weight with certain police forces than the law of the land.

The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester, Peter Fahy, who is never slow to leap on any bandwagon in his efforts to attack the BNP, has said “Membership or promotion of the BNP by any member of the police service, whether police officer or police staff, is prohibited……Whilst the policy may have been controversial at the time it was enacted, in 2004, it has since been accepted by all staff and staff associations and remains unchallenged thus far.” 

This is simply wrong; the policy of institutional police discrimination against BNP members remains very controversial indeed.  It has passed unchallenged to date, only because Fahy and his comrades have so far managed to maintain a climate of fear, whereby no serving officer has dared to challenge the prohibition in court.  Legal advice indicates that the police policy of institutional discrimination against BNP members is in fact likely to contravene the Human Rights Act.  In administrative common law, it is also an arbitrary policy which is being applied rigorously to the BNP, but not to other ethnically-defined organisations such as the Black Police Association, and it is not based on objective assessment criteria, applied uniformly.  The absurdity of this situation is illustrated by recent media reports about the number of Islamic extremists, and indeed convicted criminals, who continue to serve as police officers.

The Labour Government too, is guilty of the sin of rank hypocrisy on an industrial scale and should be held to account for it.  For all their bogus blather about Human Rights, nobody should harbour any doubt that persons allied to the Labour party have facilitated, planned and coordinated this gross breach of Labour’s own Human Rights and Data Protection legislation. For years, Labour have systematically and deliberately whipped up intense hatred against BNP members. It follows that moral responsibility for the ongoing harassment of BNP members and their families can firmly be laid at the door of Labour and their various anti-BNP front organisations, such as “Searchlight” and “UAF”.  

There are now ominous signs that Labour is plotting to use the release of the stolen BNP membership data as a pretext to broaden their anti-BNP discrimination policy to encompass the whole public sector.  That is what Trevor Philips, chairman of the absurdly mis-named “Equality and Human Rights Commission”, has stridently and repeatedly demanded.   But let Labour heed this warning: we will draw a line and make our stand here. Any extension of this discrimination will generate a far larger pool of people who have no choice but to challenge this repression in court and it will take just one fair-minded judge to bring Labour’s whole edifice of political repression finally crashing down.

The BBC also ranks highly in the roll-call of organisations which have disgraced themselves with hypocrisy and double-standards over the past week. The BBC long ago ceased to honour in practice the principle of political impartiality to which it still pays lingering lip-service.  So it was no surprise that the BBC did not deem the BNP important enough to warrant fair representation on a recent edition of ‘Question Time’ from Stoke, where the British National Party has 9 councillors and would certainly have won the mayoral election, had not Labour cynically abolished the Stoke mayoralty in the nick of time.   In contrast, when the BNP membership list was stolen, the BBC suddenly decided it was sufficiently important to report as the lead item on their main BBC1 10 o’clock news.  

This inconsistency is very simply explained.  BBC executives are desperate to prevent the tremendously popular policies of the British National Party receiving any uncontrolled airing, but they do want as many people as possible to seek out and misuse the names, private addresses and personal telephone numbers