The Church of England General Synod’s campaign against BNP members has claimed its first martyr in the form of an elderly churchwarden, who has been bullied into resigning after church leaders deemed that his membership of the BNP was “incompatible” with Christianity!  David North from Frisby-on-the-Wreake near Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire resigned three weeks ago.

Mr. North said, “For 60 years I have worked hard for Frisby Church. When I was 8 years old my job was to pump the organ in church services and help lay out the carpets before each service. Over the years I have helped raise thousands of pounds for the church in different projects. I have been the churchwarden for over 15 years in two stints and I find it deeply hurtful to be asked to resign having done nothing illegal – it hurts”.

Mr. North’s son James, a local councillor for the BNP said, “I feel very upset by this decision. The church was a big part of my father’s life and I feel let down by this decision, my family have always lived in Frisby and supported the church but sadly history always has a way of repeating itself. My grandmother when she was a child was not allowed to attend Sunday school and her parents were told they were not welcome in the village church due to the fact that they were not married at a time when this was deemed “incompatible” with Christianity. They were forced to become Methodists because of this but as attitudes changed they did finally return to the church. I believe we will see a similar story here.”

A spokeswoman for the Diocese of Leicester said, “It was pointed out to Mr. North that membership of the BNP is incompatible with being a practising Christian [sic]. This is the Bishop’s complete stance on it. The pastor is not able to kick out a churchwarden but it can be pointed out that he must make a choice between the BNP and the Church. Members of the congregation can be a member of the BNP but he held an office in the church and was representing us both legally and professionally.”

Now British Nationalists do not presume to claim that Jesus Christ would necessarily endorse their political cause, or indeed, that of any other modern political movement or party.   But we do assert most vigorously that Jesus Christ would have set his face resolutely against the political hounding of individual BNP members, and firmly believe that He would have condemned the Church of England’s active participation in that persecution.

Not even the most bigoted and benighted bishop can surely delude himself that he does Christ’s work when he allows his church to bully and hound an elderly fellow Christian from his beloved occupation?  Recent court judgements almost certainly mean that the Diocese of Leicester’s actions were unlawful; they were unquestionably reprehensible, immoral and un-Christian.

Few Church of England bishops retain any vestige of Christian faith these days, but most have now adopted instead an unshakeable belief in the new creed of political correctness.   In all their self-righteous moral rectitude, in their lack of humble self-doubt, in their smug intolerance, these bishops are surely the Levites and Pharisees of our day, walking by with their noses in the air, while the battered British people lie in the gutter.  In this apt parable, it is BNP activists who are the new Samaritans, reviled and persecuted outsiders who are prepared to roll their sleeves up and risk everything for a selfless good cause.

Irrepressibly vocal in eulogising the delights of Sharia, or fulminating against the BNP, the leaders of the Church of England maintain a strange trappist silence while Christian congregations are ethnically cleansed away and Christian graves are grubbed up in the grounds of churches converted to mosques.

It was no surprise then, that last month a group of clergy announced that they were contemplating a move to Rome on the grounds that, “The Church of England is, in the view of many of us, ceasing to be the church of Jesus Christ and becoming the church of political correctness.”

There are few situations which call for the language of harsh condemnation, but the persecution of Christian nationalists by supposedly Christian bishops is one such case.   As a corporate body, the Church of England Bishops are a disgrace to their country, their faith and their pious flock. They have betrayed all the Christian values their predecessors held dear. They have carelessly resigned their privilege of moral leadership. And worst of all, by persecuting Christian nationalists in flagrant breach of Christian principles, the bishops have self-consciously reincarnated the evil spirit of the Inquisition.  

Those bishops who still believe in the Christian God would do well to fear His judgement.

In a flagrant breach of the principles laid down in the Macpherson report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence, West Yorkshire Police have steadfastly refused, in spite of overwhelming evidence, to accept that an attack by 15 “youths” on a British teenager might be racist.

In the latest example of what amounts to an intensive campaign of ethnic cleansing in Dewsbury, 14 year-old Joseph Haigh was savagely beaten by the gang in Thornhill, near Savile Town last Friday night.

Even though young Joseph’s attackers referred repeatedly to Joseph’s British ethnicity as they beat him senseless, West Yorkshire police officers have doggedly refused to classify the attack as racially-motivated.

Joseph’s father Mr Jonathan Haigh said: “It was a racist attack. They were calling him ‘white trash’ and white this, that and the other. This is why people are angry about what is happening in this country. 

“If it had been an attack by whites on an Asian lad it would have been a definite race attack. When it’s the other way round they don’t want to know.”

Joseph was out with his friends at around 9pm on Friday near Thornhill’s Rectory Park when the gang attacked him and smashed him over the head with half a brick, knocking the boy unconscious. 

Another youth lunged at Joseph with a screwdriver, while others kicked and punched him.  Joseph’s teeth were badly damaged and he may lose a tooth. His teeth were wired and he needed specialist treatment at the trauma unit at Leeds General Infirmary.

“It’s shocking what’s happened,” Mr Haigh told the local papers. “I have lived in Thornhill all my life and there were fights between whites and Asians 20 years ago. But this wasn’t braying someone and giving them a black eye, it was a vicious attack.”

A police spokesman said the initial police report had not classified the attack as racially-motivated but inquiries were continuing.

Meanwhile, West Yorkshire Police, who appear to be more familiar with life on Mars than in Dewsbury, have insisted that Savile Town is not a “no-go area” for white people, despite more reported attacks over the weekend.

On Saturday night, a white teenage boy was attacked and beaten by a “gang”, some wearing masks. That attack happened at 9 pm on Saturday and at 4 pm on Sunday, police were called to reports of Muslim youths throwing stones at passing cars in Savile Road.

Andy Cutler, 36, of Thornhill, told how his car was targeted. He pulled up and phoned police.  While he did so another driver, also white, stopped and said the same had happened to him.  “They were just targeting white drivers,” said Mr Cutler. “As far as I’m concerned it’s racist and it needs to be reported.”

Our old friend, Inspector Jenny Thompson, who certainly seems to be no Sherlock Holmes when it comes to spotting subtle patterns of criminal behaviour, said: “Each of the incidents which have occurred recently in Savile Town are currently being dealt with in isolation.” [Our emphasis]

The West Yorkshire Police policy of refusing to treat attacks on British people as being racially motivated is, of course, completely contrary to the recommendations of the Macpherson report which stated that an attack should be treated as racially motivated if it is perceived to be so by the victim, or any other person.

Local police seem to be in ostrich-like denial about what is actually happening in Dewsbury. Their stubborn unwillingness to treat all sections of the community even-handedly can only be attributed, either to a craven desire to manipulate race crime statistics for political purposes, or perhaps more likely, to institutional anti-white racism within the force.

Whichever of these two equally contemptible motives applies, West Yorkshire Police should be ashamed of themselves.  Ham-fisted attempts to conceal the fact that a vigorous and escalating campaign of ethnic cleansing is being waged against the indigenous British community in Dewsbury are a desperately poor substitute for proper policing.

Anyone with information about this avalanche of racist attacks happening “in isolation” can contact Dewsbury CID on 01924 431085.  Just don’t expect West Yorkshire Police to do anything about it.

Home Secretary Alan Johnson’s speech to the Royal Society for Arts yesterday, in which he lamely conceded that successive governments have made mistakes in handling immigration, is perhaps the most cynical public statement ever made by a government minister, even a Labour one.

“Whilst I accept that governments of both persuasions, including this one, have been maladroit in their handling of this issue”, blustered Johnson, “I do believe that the UK is now far more successful at tackling migration than most of its European and North American neighbours.”

“I want to talk about immigration today, tomorrow, next week and on any occasion I can.”  The “moderate majority” had not had their views heard on the issue, claimed Johnson.

Johnson’s weasel words ring hollow.   Only four months ago, in a statement to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee,  Johnson claimed that a cap on immigration would harm the economy, and that Britons should “welcome” immigrants who come to live and work here, adding that he personally was “happy” to live in a multicultural society.

“I do not lie awake at night worrying about a population of 70 million”, said Johnson in July 2009.  “I’m happy to live in a multicultural society. I’m happy to live in a society where we not only welcome those coming to live and work in this country, but also where we can go and live and work in other countries.”

For the last twelve years, even the Labour government’s own contrived and bogus statistics conceded that more than 250 thousand immigrants were arriving in Britain every single year.   Even the most incompetent and myopic administration could scarcely have failed to notice what was happening, or take some moderately effective action, however desultory and half-hearted, to prevent it.

The truth is that Johnson has admitted “maladroit” handling of immigration now, in order to distract attention from growing evidence that this demographic catastrophe is not a mere mistake, not just a monumental cock-up, but rather the intended outcome of a sinister, black-hearted conspiracy.

The admission by Labour apparatchik Andrew Neather in the Evening Standard that mass immigration was a premeditated Labour plot to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity” has forever closed off the conspirators’ defence of diminished responsibility for the manslaughter of the British nation.

It is clear for all to see that the high crime of mass immigration has not been a case of “maladroit” omission, but a deliberate attempt to murder an indigenous people with malice aforethought, nothing less than an act of malevolent, politically-motivated genocide.

Of the Establishment’s many and various efforts to undermine rising electoral support for the British National Party, perhaps the most reprehensible tactic of all is the persistent attempt to cultivate baseless fears in the hearts of members of vulnerable minority groups, by cynically and dishonestly misrepresenting BNP policies and intentions.

So it is, that week after week, the Jewish Chronicle sows the seeds of terror among its readers and fulminates against the BNP, as though the growth of our party is some sort of threat to the Jewish community.

While the Jewish Chronicle is seemingly oblivious to the rise of Islamic extremism, which underpins almost all anti-semitic incidents these days, it prefers to focus its energies on a cynical anti-BNP campaign instead.

The Jewish Chronicle is not deterred in its campaign by rather inconvenient facts such as the BNP’s oft-repeated solid support for Israel’s right of national self determination and self defence, nor by the incidence of Jewish members within the British National Party, including at least one prominent local councillor.

In a similar vein, the editor of Disability Now has blogged about the notoriously slanted recent edition of BBC “Question Time” featuring Nick Griffin.   Referring to the disgusting actions of the evil German Nazi regime towards disabled people, the editor of Disability Now bizarrely claimed that “Clearly there will be members of Griffin’s party who would laud such action against our community.  Fear the day when a BNP government might take the chance to institute a similar programme.”

Hopefully, the readers of Disability Now are sensible enough to see through such arrant nonsense and not lose any sleep over it.   It is, however, deeply concerning that the editor of Disability Now prefers to pursue his political vendetta against the BNP, rather than concentrate on calmly reassuring his terrified readers about the British National Party’s true policies.

For the truth is, the advent of a BNP government would certainly herald a new golden age for disabled people.   Freed from the heavy economic burden of EU membership, the fortune wasted on foreign aid and billions spent on supporting transparently bogus asylum seekers, a democratic nationalist government could afford to be extraordinarily generous to those of our fellow Britons who are genuinely disabled and unable to work.

Disabled people are entitled to expect a decent standard of living, with income support and state benefits that inflate in proportion to the growth of the overall economy.

Perhaps that is why the British National Party already has many disabled members and expects to recruit countless more in the years to come, in spite of cynical scaremongering by those whose political spite exceeds their concern for the peace of mind of the vulnerable people they purport to represent.

In August, we reported on the rash of anti-white racist attacks which had broken out in Savile Town, Dewsbury, West Yorkshire.

The latest in an escalating series of incidents took place last Friday when a 45-year old Labourer, Mr Dyson, was set upon by two Muslim youths, who were with another Muslim man and two white girls.  According to local newspapers, Mr Dyson suffered nasty cuts to his nose and left ear which needed 27 stitches.  He will be scarred for life.

In August, three white boys, one aged 12 and the others 14, were attacked by “youths” who demanded to know why they were walking through Savile Town.

Two weeks later “youths” ambushed a bus, smashing windows on both sides, leaving one man bleeding.  When he got off the bus to chase the yobs, he was asked why he was going about shouting in ‘their area.’

In the latest incident, Mr Dyson told the local papers that as he approached the playground on Savile Road, he saw the group, and one of the “Asians” [sic] shouted: “What are you looking at?”

“One of them then hit me from the side and I was about to turn round when another grabbed my T-shirt and spun me round. I lost my balance and fell over.”

He was then kicked about the head as he lay on the ground. The attackers were stopped by the two white girls who saw blood oozing from his ear.

Mr Dyson, who may need plastic surgery and was off work for a few days, said: “It was completely unprovoked. If it hadn’t been for those girls I don’t know what they would have done.”

Mr Dyson’s mother Anne urged the girls to shop those responsible.  “There have been quite a few incidents like this and it has to be stopped,” she said. “There can’t be any no-go areas.”

Coun Khizar Iqbal (Ind, Dewsbury South) urged police to investigate the attacks and said: “If this accelerates it could seriously harm community relations.”

Of course, the authorities, both locally and nationally, are adhering to their accustomed policy of studied denial about the scale and prevalence of anti-white racist attacks.  Inspector Jenny Thompson, of Dewsbury police, described the attack on Mr Dyson as “nasty” and appealed for witnesses.  She said she did not believe Savile Town was a “no-go” area at night, despite the extraordinary number of “unrelated” incidents recently.

The sinister incidents in Savile Town have coincided with a series of similar attacks (here, here, here and here) in nearby Bradford and other parts of West Yorkshire in recent months, which police either chose not to classify as racially motivated, or refused to comment on “whether or not the attack was being treated as racially-motivated”. In one case, the victim’s mother was quoted as saying “I get the impression that the police, if they could, would just like to forget about it because it’s a headache for them.”

Of course, the vast majority of Muslims in areas such as Savile Town are respectable and law-abiding people who only wish to lead their lives in peace.  But there is also a critical mass of feral youths who have effectively been given carte blanche by the politically correct Establishment to mount a campaign of ethnic cleansing.   It is therefore contemptible appeasement by self-loathing white people in authority, which is principally to blame for this sinister pattern of attacks, rather than the Muslim community itself.

As the evil harvest of Labour’s self-confessed mass immigration conspiracy comes to fruition, the incidence of ‘no-go areas’ for white British people is surely set to increase exponentially.

At national level, the usual Establishment coterie of Sharia apologist bishops, multi-cultural zealots, amoral press barons and Labour conspirators, continue to spread their bald lies about the “benefits” of immigration and diversity.

But they don’t have to walk through Savile Town, do they?

If there were any justice in the world, discredited former Prime Minister Tony Blair would now be serving a lengthy prison sentence for (alleged) crimes of waging illegal wars of aggression, and it now seems, of treasonous conspiracy too.  

But such is the way of things in the Alice in Wonderland world of the European Union, that Mr Blair is much more likely to be appointed President of the European Council, the de facto unelected Chancellor of the brave new European Republic.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who recently cited a Communist terror bomber as his political hero, emphasised Labour’s support for Blair to become the first president of the EU, arguing that it was “hugely” in Britain’s national interest.  Bizarrely, Miliband went on to argue that Blair should be chosen because he warranted a large motorcade.

“My own view”, warbled Miliband pompously, “is that we need somebody who can do more than simply run through the agenda.   We need someone who, when he or she lands in Washington, Beijing or Moscow, the traffic does need to stop [sic] and talks do need to begin at a very, very high level.”

The imperious motorcade has been the hallmark of every totalitarian regime of the past century, and it seems that the new European Reich is to be no exception.

So we eagerly await the thrilling spectacle of the Blair motorcade sweeping through our freshly scrubbed and traffic-cleared streets, with sirens wailing and the star-spangled pennants of the European Fourth Reich proudly fluttering.  A fortunate few may even catch a privileged glimpse of Herr Reichskanzler Blair himself, as he speeds by on his unknown and unknowable business.

For years the British National Party has argued that the tidal wave of migration into Britain over the last decade could only have been engineered by a deliberate conspiracy at the heart of the Establishment.

But in the absence of any direct evidence of a plot by Labour ministers to destroy the British way of life, many of those who oppose mass immigration continued to subscribe to the “cock-up” theory that the Labour Government had merely failed to control immigration effectively.

Now evidence of a dark conspiracy has emerged in the form of a confession from Andrew Neather, a former advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

Neather has been quoted in the Evening Standard as admitting that the policy of mass immigration was designed as part a “politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country” and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”.

This plot to “open up the UK to mass migration” was, according to Neather, kept secret because Labour ministers feared that any publicity would alienate white working-class voters.

Apparently the “major shift” in immigration policy followed the publication of a 2001 policy paper from the “Performance and Innovation Unit”, a Downing Street think tank.

The final published version of the report promoted only the labour market “case” for immigration, but unpublished versions contained additional reasons.

Neather wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK “truly multicultural.”

“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”, said Mr Neather.

The intent of the “deliberate policy”, which lasted from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

“Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.

“But ministers wouldn’t talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.”

Speaking in Essex yesterday, BNP Chairman Nick Griffin drew attention to the wholesale ethnic cleansing of indigenous white British people from their own national capital.   In a crime which far exceeds the Guy Fawkes conspiracy as one of the most heinous in the entire history of these islands, it is now apparent that Labour engineered and facilitated this national catastrophe purely for its own narrow political purposes.  In short, Labour gerrymandered London, and large parts of the rest of Britain, in a cynical attempt to undermine traditional British values and replace British voters.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank was quick to appreciate the significance of Mr Neather’s confession.

“Now at least the truth is out, and it’s dynamite.  Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right. This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.”

Dame Shirley Porter, the Conservative leader of Westminster Council was once fined more than £27 million for gerrymandering her borough by seeking to change its demographic composition to benefit her party politically.  For gerrymandering an entire country, there is a much more appropriate legal remedy.

The Treason Felony Act 1848, which is still in force, provides that “It is treason felony to “compass, imagine, invent, devise”, or intend to “move or stir” any foreigner to invade the United Kingdom or any other country belonging to the Queen.”

Any Labour minister or advisor, and any civil servant, who collaborated in a secret criminal conspiracy against the indigenous British peoples, richly deserves justice under this statute.

On the day when news of the Tory Generals’ Plot against the BNP dominated the headlines, almost no media coverage was given to a scathing attack on David Cameron’s new model Tory Party by one of its own leading activists.

John Stafford, the Director of the Campaign for Conservative Democracy, went on the BBC Radio 4 PM Programme to accuse Conservative Central Office of “pure hypocrisy” and acting like the “politburo of the Soviet Union”  where a “small elite were now choosing candidates”.  Going further, Mr Stafford accused David Cameron of being “a dictator without any bloody revolution”.

Mr Stafford was expressing his acute concerns about the Conservative Party’s sudden adoption of the idea of all-women shortlists.   In passing, it is worthwhile noting the supreme irony that members of the democratically-constituted British National Party are often bizarrely accused of “Fascism” and ethnic exclusivity by supporters of a Tory Party which is both profoundly undemocratic and now practises systematic gender discrimination.

Meanwhile, the Tory Generals’ Plot has continued to unravel.  The amateurish attempts by the Tory boys in the “Nothing British” group to conceal the origins of their flimsy front organisation quickly prompted a great snort of derision, but it later transpired also that most of the military conspirators have a well-documented connection with the Conservative party.

This affair has grievously damaged the reputations of a swathe of retired ex-military officers and called their personal integrity seriously into question.  All the conspirators disingenuously maintained a bogus pretence that they were somehow acting spontaneously out of moral principle.  On Tuesday morning, General Sir Michael Jackson unconvincingly proclaimed in a cosy interview on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that his campaign was “not in any sense party political”.  As he spoke, keen-eared listeners could almost hear the Tory boys at Central Office jerking the general’s puppet strings.  So inept was Sir Michael’s halting performance that the solicitous BBC interviewer had to prompt the forgetful retired general to complete his scripted attack on those frightful “racists”.

There is an emerging consensus among political commentators that the Tory Generals Plot was meticulously planned over a prolonged period by Tory Central Office and, given its scale, certainly signed off by David Cameron himself.   If so, Cameron is guilty of the very charge which his puppet generals have so unjustly levelled at the BNP: cynically besmirching the good name of the British Army in pursuit of narrow party political objectives.

One wonders whether the members of Cameron’s military junta will all receive suitable recompense for their loyal efforts on his behalf.   General Sir Richard Dannatt, of course, is already on a promise of a ministerial post.  Will Cameron reward the other army plotters with the peerages their puppy-dog loyalty surely merits, or will he just discard them like broken marionettes when they are no longer useful weapons in Cameron’s war of aggression against the BNP?

The Bullingdon club clique which runs David Cameron’s New Conservative Party might be better advised to concentrate on putting their own political house in order, and addressing the serious concerns which led John Stafford to denounce them so vehemently.

If they had an ounce of integrity, Cameron and his jolly Bullingdon chums would also cease playing games with the political impartiality of the British Army and desist from entangling the armed forces in the cynical mesh of their party-political scheming.  But such is the blinkered outlook of the privileged Tory sect around Cameron, they probably have no grasp at all of the magnitude of their moral offence.   That may also be why David Cameron chose to round off his forty-eight hours of shame with a friendly hob-knob meeting with Sinn Fein’s Martin McGuinness, the man who almost certainly authorised the cowardly IRA murder of Cameron’s fellow Tory MPs, Ian Gow and Airey Neave.

If a politician as cynical, unprincipled, superficial and amoral as David Cameron is really destined to become Britain’s next Prime Minister, then we all have good cause to fear for the future.

Sunny Handal, the notorious Guardian scribbler, achieved an extraordinary new nadir in today’s edition, with a list of 20 questions which his very select group of readers are advised to ask of Nick Griffin on Thursday’s BBC Question Time programme.  

Mr Handal’s suggested questions are too lame to bear repetition, but he may have pioneered an interesting concept.  

Nationalist readers may wish to devise their own list of questions to fire at Establishment politicians and out of touch Champagne socialist journalists whenever they have the misfortune to encounter these beasts in the wild.

Mr Handal advanced twenty questions in the Guardian, but in order to promote debate, here are just eleven suggestions to get everyone started.

1. Why do Leftists seem to believe that the democratic voice of one million BNP voters should not be heard on the BBC?
2. Why do Leftists promote mass immigration on such a vast scale that it will inevitably result in British people becoming an ethnic minority in their own country within 50 years?
3. Why are Leftists so pleased to act as apologists for Muslim extremists who make no secret of their desire to destroy every facet of Western culture?
4. Why do Leftists make common cause with a government which is hell-bent on eliminating every ancient British freedom, and has waged wars of aggression against several different nations?
5. Why do Leftist journalists turn a blind eye to Fascist political violence by claw hammer and stave-wielding UAF thugs, who are openly sponsored, facilitated and supported by Labour Party and Tory politicians?
6. Why do Establishment Leftists refuse to acknowledge that most victims of racist violence are drawn from the indigenous white British community?
7.  Why do Establishment Leftists think there is nothing wrong with hundreds of separate organisations existing specifically to advance the interests of black & minority ethnic people, but exhibit knee-jerk loathing at the mere concept of an organisation founded to promote the rights of indigenous white British people?
8.  Why do Establishment Leftists believe that Britain should import hundreds of thousands of foreign workers, while nearly three million British people languish on the dole?
9.  Why do Leftist Establishment journalists ceaslessly harangue Nick Griffin about the appalling 1940s Holocaust, but never, ever, challenge a swathe of senior Labour politicians to explain why they were proud Marxists and members of the Communist Party in the 1970s at a time when appalling Communist murder camps still existed in the Soviet Union?
10.  Why do Establishment Leftists find it acceptable for people to be hounded from public sector jobs and livelihoods solely on the basis of their lawful political affiliation?, and
11.  Why do Leftist politicians and journalists have no confidence whatsoever in the resilience of their own arguments during a free, democratic television debate?

Regrettably, only question 11 seems to have a logical and straightforward answer.

Courageous Dutch MP Geert Wilders has addressed a packed press conference at Westminster and announced that he was “proud of the UK asylum and immigration tribunal” for overturning the ban on him visiting Britain imposed by Labour ministers in a sop to Muslim sentiment.

The Freedom Party leader was turned away from Britain in February by Labour ministers who lamely argued that Mr Wilders posed a threat to public security, but that decision was overturned by the immigration tribunal.

The Home Office did not challenge the tribunal decision, but said Mr Wilders’ comments will be closely watched by the authorities.

At his press conference on Friday, Mr Wilders repeated his criticism of Muslim ideology and defended his call for the Koran to be banned in Holland.

Explaining his views on Islam, he said: “I have a problem with the Islamic ideology, the Islamic culture, because I feel that the more Islam that we get in our societies the less freedom that we get. Even in the United States, where they have a first amendment, there is one red line, which is the incitement of violence and this was exactly my point,” Mr Wilders told reporters.

Even as reporters inside the press conference insulted and abused Mr Wilders and labelled him an “extremist”, a gang of genuine extremist Muslims assembled outside Parliament and neatly demonstrated the truth of Mr Wilders’ assertions by uttering a string of blood-curdling incitements to violence and death threats against Mr Wilders.  “If we had an Islamic State today, his head would be on a stake”, said one of the Muslim extremists, who also called repeatedly and stridently for the destruction of the state of Israel.

Needless to say, the craven Metropolitan Police stood passively by and took no action against the demonstrators who threatened Mr Wilders.  For all the evidence which an impartial justice system would need to proceed against the Muslim extremists, watch the following video:

The absurd laxity of Britain’s so-called immigration “controls” has been amply demonstrated by the laughable ease with which a poorly-educated African woman outwitted Border Agency immigration officers and made fools of a string of Leftist politicians and hand-wringing Establishment do-gooders.

Senegalese asylum criminal Fatou Gaye has been jailed for 18 months after admitting lying about her background.

Gaye, 38, and her son Arouna were originally removed from their home in Glasgow during a dawn raid in May.  It was only during Gaye’s deportation to Ivory Coast that it became clear that she actually came from peaceful Senegal, and not from war-torn Ivory Coast at all.

Luton Crown Court was told Gaye had duped sympathetic politicians and cost the taxpayer more than £100,000.

Gaye’s case was very publicly endorsed by Glasgow Scottish National Party MP John Mason in the House of Commons and by MSP Christina McKelvie, who even wrote to the Home Secretary.  Both had claimed that asylum criminal Gaye came from Ivory Coast.

The Scottish Prosecutor, Mrs Elliot, told Luton Crown Court that asylum crook Gaye was given “cash, food tokens and accommodation” and had cost taxpayers “more than £100,000” in taxpayer-funded legal aid.

Mrs Elliott said: “The defendant embarked on a web of deceit which involved members of Parliament and continued for some years.”

This case has many features which are remarkable only because they have been transparently aired and proven in a court of law.    Without doubt, similar events must be  happening  away from the public gaze day-in, day-out,  all over the country.

Firstly, Mrs Gaye was an unsophisticated and ill-educated African, who nevertheless had no difficulty whatsoever in persuading naive immigration officers that she hailed from a country she had never visited, whose languages she did not even speak.  The evidence presented to the court indicated that Gaye was coached in her lies by representatives of the colossal and lucrative bogus asylum seeker industry, which exists only to exploit , at taxpayers’ expense, numerous gaping loopholes in the asylum system.

Secondly, Mrs Gaye’s case epitomised those tiresome cause-celebres, where naive, reedy-voiced churchmen tediously team up with craven Marxist politicians to demand that this, or that, asylum criminal “must stay” in Britain.   Next time we read about one of these cases, it would be wise to assume, until the contrary is proven, that the asylum-seekers concerned are perfidious fraudsters and that those who leap to their defence are either credulous fools, or motivated by sheer anti-British prejudice.

Thirdly, it is striking that Gaye was easily able to secure £100,000 of publicly-funded legal aid, simply by uttering the magic words “asylum seeker”.   Of course, none of the hundreds of BNP teachers, Civil Servants, council workers and nurses targeted for persecution by the Labour Party for their political affiliations can expect to receive a single penny’s worth of legal aid, even if their ancestors have lived in this land for a thousand years, and even if they themselves have dutifully surrendered their taxes to a greedy state throughout their working lives.

Finally, lest anyone take comfort from Gaye’s conviction, it should be noted that she is now back in Britain once again.   Who would place a bet on her ever being rightfully deported?

The late J. Enoch Powell once famously proclaimed that “those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad”, but even the far-sighted Mr Powell could not have predicted that the keys to the Asylum gates would one day be handed over to a parade of lunatics.

Islamification is no longer a phenomenon which manifests itself only in England’s large cities, it is now becoming increasingly evident in rural communities and small market towns too.  A typical example is provided by the Suffolk town of Newmarket, famous for its racecourse and its long connection with the bloodstock industry.

Astonishingly, according to the local Newmarket Journal, the Muslim community in Newmarket is set to treble in size in just two short years.

Ahsan Mohammed, chairman of the Newmarket and District Muslim Cultural and Welfare Association and the town’s Mosque Committee, is quoted as saying that he is working with the town’s police and other agencies to “develop good community relations.”  Quite what was wrong with “community relations” when Newmarket was still an English town is not explained.

“The Muslim community in Newmarket is not temporary and transient but a permanent one,” said Mr Mohammed proudly.

“The work riders and grooms will continue to make a major contribution to the thoroughbred industry as the future generations will in many years to come.

“With the arrival of wives and children I have no doubt that the Muslim community will triple over the next two years as a result of individuals being eligible for indefinite leave to remain”, continued Mr Mohammed, with remarkable frankness.

“My concern is that Newmarket may not have the infrastructure to cope with this development.

According to the Newmarket Journal, one of Mr Mohammed’s first aims is “to find larger premises for the town mosque which currently holds prayers for around 150 people in the mews building at Palace House on Fridays.”

Newmarket police chief, Inspector Simon Clifton, and Sgt Mark Shipton, told the Newmarket Journal that they were guests at the previous week’s Friday prayers, having been invited to talk to members of the Muslim community about some of the issues Muslims had encountered since arriving in Newmarket, including racially motivated incidents.

“The Muslim community is set to grow substantially in the coming years and that is something we have to be prepared for”, enthused Inspector Clifton.

It seems that Newmarket is now embarking on the same road that Oldham, Bradford and Burnley first trod a generation ago.   If the Journal’s report is accurate, the town is exhibiting all the classic symptoms of early stage Islamification, including outbreaks of abject Islamo-pandering by the local PC police, and the promulgation of ambitious plans for the construction of successively larger Mosques.

If there is any consolation from the Islamification of small towns like Newmarket, it is the hope that perhaps suburban and rural Tory voters may at last be jolted out of their cosy and complacent delusion that their own leafy neighbourhoods can somehow escape the fate that has already befallen so many British cities.   They will not, and voting for David Cameron will do nothing to prevent the Islamification of rural England.

Full story HERE.

Any observer resilient enough to stomach the speeches at this year’s Labour Party conference could scarcely fail to be struck by the absence of any coherent vision for Britain’s future.  But the flimsiness of Labour’s vapid policy pledges stood in stark contrast to the vehement outpouring of visceral bile against the British National Party.

For normal people, the moral degeneracy of Labour and their Trade Union fellow travellers will surely come to be epitomised by two indelible images from the last few weeks.

One was the sight of Lord Mandelson flaunting his £22,000 wristwatch on the podium, every wave of his hand betraying the contempt of the Champagne socialist for the legions of working-class British folk, condemned to unemployment and poverty by New Labour’s reckless failure and deliberate malice.

The other sickening spectacle engraved on our memories was the two minutes silence staged a few weeks ago by the TUC comrades at Liverpool.  This was not two minutes’ dignified Remembrance of the brave British soldiers and blameless civilians blown to bits by Labour’s wicked wars of aggression, but rather two minutes of nauseating Stalinist self-parody, a piffling protest against the democratic election of two BNP politicians.

The whole world knows that Brown’s Labour is irrevocably destined for defeat at the General Election.  President Obama and his advisors know it, the Sun ‘newspaper’ knows it, even Gordon Brown himself, cocooned in his fuhrer bunker of denial, knows it in his heart.

Labour’s economic policies are in ruins, their lies about boom and bust are exposed, their principles are betrayed and their demoralised activists are mired in well-founded defeatism. They understand that a terrible reckoning for a dozen years of systematic scheming, hypocrisy and repression is almost at hand.  However the British National Party may fare in 2010, whatever our concerns about Cameron and his cohorts, we are guaranteed a night of rejoicing next May, when the Labour menagerie of Stalinist misfits, masquerading as a democratic political party, finally receives its long overdue punishment.

Labour’s inevitable rendezvous with disaster goes some way to explain the eructation of bigotry at this week’s Brighton hate-fest.  Scarcely one single platform speaker resisted the temptation to fulminate against the BNP in the most florid and blood-curdling terms.

Harman, of course, burnished her reputation as one of the BNP’s best electoral assets by delivering her usual concoction of bile and robotic political correctness.   In a speech which might have been compiled by a computer from a dictionary of Marxist aphorisms, Harman announced proudly that “In the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic meeting we were fighting back against the BNP” and “We continue to fight the poison and racism of the BNP.”    With rhetoric of such incisive quality, it is easy to see why Harman represents the pinnacle of Labour womanhood.

On a more serious note, Childrens Secretary Ed Balls announced an investigation by former Ofsted Chief Inspector Maurice Smith into “racism in schools” and in particular, whether BNP members should be banned from teaching.     The involvement of Smith is a thin smokescreen designed to cloak Labour’s naked political spite in a veneer of bogus civil service impartiality.

When Smith finally troops back into the Balls office next January with his weighty report, you can be quite sure the dutiful monkey will present the grateful organ-grinder with the expected gift, one clear recommendation amongst all the vacuous anti-racist verbiage: those evil BNP teachers must be hunted down and dispatched immediately (or preferably sooner).

Nobody is fooled by the administrative charade of the Smith report.  Labour’s agenda has long been abundantly clear, to extirpate Nationalists from teaching, from nursing, from the whole public sector, from companies who deal with the public sector, and finally to eliminate us from any possible employment whatsoever.

Even dyed-in-the-wool Left-Liberals have recognised the Balls declaration for what it is: an act of pure and unadulterated spite.  Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris, a member of the Human Rights select committee, attacked the Balls decision to set up the BNP repression review in the following terms:

“No form of bigotry has any place in the classroom – this will be a glib, clumsy, and partisan way to try and promote tolerance and mutual respect.”

How would Kier Hardy have judged the corrupt and deformed monster which his high-minded idealism eventually spawned?  Would he have approved of a Labour Party which fetes the terrorist murderers of Sinn Fein, while calling for dedicated teachers, civil servants, nurses and doctors to be hunted down and hounded for their beliefs?

Without doubt, Fascist-Labour’s obsessive malice is now sowing the seeds of future emnities.  People driven from their jobs for daring to join a political party, with lives ruined by the calculated act of a spiteful government, will not forgive their cruel oppressors, nor will their children forget this injustice.  Labour, in all its hate-fuelled bile and bigotry, has set a precedent it may come to regret.

Nothing better illustrates the hypocrisy and intellectual bankruptcy of the Labour Party in general, and Gordon Brown in particular, than their shameless propensity to steal BNP policies and slogans lock, stock and barrel!  

Even as Labour politicians abused the BNP in the most immature and childish terms from their conference platform, they once again paid the most generous possible tribute to the British National Party’s hegemony in the battle of ideas. For today’s Labour conference speech by Gordon Brown contained another truly astonishing example of Labour’s desperate policy plagiarism.  

A draft policy proposal from London BNP to the British National Party’s 2009 annual conference in Blackpool contained the recommendation

“…that there be no council flats and no welfare benefits available to unmarried mothers under the age of 21. Instead they will be placed in ‘mother & baby homes’. Here they will receive academic education as well as parenting classes, plus courses covering all aspects of their social development. The homes will be run by ‘matron’ type figures.”

This draft conference proposal from London BNP triggered a predictable apoplectic reaction in the Leftist media, with The Daily Mirror – in effect, the Labour Party’s house rag for the cerebrally challenged – ranting and raving on 1 September about the BNP policy proposal under the headline “BNP to attack unmarried mothers next”.

Clearly there must have been a strange change of heart in Labour circles before Gordon Brown’s keynote conference speech today, in which the Prime Minister said

“And I do think it’s time to address a problem that for too long has gone unspoken, the number of children having children. For it cannot be right, for a girl of sixteen, to get pregnant, be given the keys to a council flat and be left on her own.

From now on all 16 and 17 year old parents who get support from the taxpayer will be placed in a network of supervised homes. These shared homes will offer not just a roof over their heads, but a new start in life where they learn responsibility and how to raise their children properly. That’s better for them, better for their babies and better for us all in the long run.

We won’t ever shy away from taking difficult decisions on tough social questions.”

So bankrupt Brown has yet again been caught red-handed trying to steal BNP policy proposals in the most blatant possible fashion.   Truly, we live in extraordinary times, where a small nationalist party, reviled by the Left-liberal Establishment, can also act as a fertile policy think tank for a decaying and desperate Left-Liberal Government.  

Of course, the electorate will not be taken in by Brown’s bogus adoption of BNP policy proposals, any more than they were fooled by Brown’s empty sloganising about “British Jobs for British Workers”.   After all, voters who want nationalist policies have the option of voting for nationalist politicians who say what they really believe and really believe what they say.

Labour Communities Secretary John Denham has raised the spectre of a return to 1930s’ Fascism, and in one respect, he is absolutely right. It is perfectly true that a sinister new Fascism is on the march in Britain but, of course, it does not come from the British National Party or the nationalist movement.

In modern European history, there have been two categories of regime which sought to hound dissidents from their jobs, solely on the grounds of their political affiliation.   

The communist regimes of Eastern Europe formed one group, and most notoriously, Nazi Germany and her Fascist allies formed the other.    In Communist Eastern Europe, the tactic of depriving political dissidents of their livelihood and forcing them into menial occupations developed into a finely honed instrument of state policy.

Now, in 21st Century Britain, Fascist-style political job harassment is again back in vogue:  the modish preoccupation of government ministers, Trade Union barons, Establishment journalists and Cabinet Office bureaucrats alike. 

At the TUC’s Liverpool rally this week, a parade of tin pot Trade Union gauleiters marched onto the platform to deliver their shrill demands that BNP members be hounded from public sector jobs, deprived of their livelihoods and herded into ghettos of unemployment and poverty.   The admiring ghosts of Himmler and Goebbels were surely there in the audience at the Liverpool TUC, vigorously applauding the TUC’s latter-day Final Solution to that tiresome BNP problem.

For the TUC have adopted an archaic and wicked stratagem: to construct a baseless lie and then use it to justify a hate-fuelled reign of terror.   The TUC barons have deliberately taken the first steps of a journey along the same road which led Christian martyrs into the Roman arena, Soviet dissidents into the gulag and Jews into Auschwitz.  According to this blood libel for the third millennium, BNP members are “subhuman” and “racist”, anti-democrats who must not be afforded the protection of the law.

Even the most cursory inspection reveals the bright shining lie under the thin crust of their transparent arguments.   Far from being anti-democratic, the British National Party’s policy programme calls for a massive expansion of democracy through credible, locally-elected structures and the roll out of Swiss-style direct democracy to many aspects of government.    Democratic nationalists are true democrats, because unlike Lib-Lab-Con politicians, we wholeheartedly trust the judgement of the people on important questions such as EU membership, capital punishment, traditional education and mass immigration.   Why would we not respect the institution of democracy, when we concur with popular opinion on almost every subject? 

Of course, there is no evidence that Civil Servants, teachers or nurses who join the BNP are any more likely to abuse their public-sector employment than the adherents of any other political belief or religious creed.  Indeed, they are much less likely to do so.   There is abundant evidence of extremist Left-wing teachers indoctrinating their pupils with their anti-democratic revolutionary convictions, yet neither Labour ministers, nor the TUC, have ever advocated a ban on Socialist Worker Party membership among teachers.  Indeed, there are certainly a great many public servants and officials who espouse hard-line Islamist views, but no attempt has ever been made, or ever will be made, to root them out – they are far more likely to be cultivated, glad-handed and appeased.

So our desperate enemies are starting with sophistry and racing towards Fascism through a journey of breathtaking hypocrisy, to which they themselves seem entirely oblivious.   On the very day that the two-faced TUC passed a “composite” motion calling for BNP members to be ejected from their livelihoods, they also approved a statement berating employers who “blacklist” trade union activists.

Still more astonishingly, the Guardian Newspaper reported the following extraordinary quote from a Cabinet Office Civil Service spokesman about the jihad they are apparently planning against BNP members in the Civil Service. The spokesman said: “The civil service also has a diversity strategy with a clear commitment to zero tolerance of discrimination on any grounds.”  Clearly the Cabinet Office has zero tolerance of discrimination (unless it is ordered by the Labour Party, politically motivated, and targeted against a lawful opposition political party supported by one million British voters.)

Have intellectual standards really declined to the point where a senior civil servant can condemn himself by his own words with so little insight into the depth of his own hypocrisy?   There was once a time when well-educated leaders of the British Civil Service, placed in this situation, would have read Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible and recognised themselves in the role of Witchfinder.     Now it appears that insight and erudition have been consigned to history, and that an ability to chant the mystic mantras of the multicult faith is the sole qualification for Civil Service promotion.

Whitehall civil servants, who are currently formulating plans for politically-motivated discrimination, would do well to contemplate the fate of their predecessors in Nazi Germany and Communist Eastern Europe who promulgated similar policies.   When political winds changed, those guilty men were held to account for their misdeeds and were not saved from their fate by limp protestations about being lowly functionaries, only ‘obeying orders’.   The tides of history turn quickly enough and those who run with the bloodthirsty pack today may soon find themselves standing alone in the dock, as those over-zealous American CIA agents who fought Bush’s War on Terror a few short years ago are already finding to their cost.

So if you happen to be a Cabinet Office civil servant plotting a pogrom against members of a lawful, registered political party, you would be wise to consider now how you will justify yourself to a court in 10 or 20 years time, how you will explain to a jury that your political witch-hunts complied with the Civil Service’s “clear commitment to zero tolerance of discrimination on any grounds”.

The BNP has a great many members who work in the public services and many of them will certainly challenge this pogrom through the courts.   It is a savage indictment of the so-called “Human Rights Act” that this political reign of terror is being contemplated at all, even by this wicked and decaying Labour regime and its TUC and Civil Service co-conspirators.  It seems that Labour’s bizarre “Human Rights Act” prevents a convicted transvestite rapist and murderer from being detained in a men’s prison, but does nothing to deter a malign government from victimizing members of a lawful and electorally successful opposition party.  

In the looking-glass world of 21st Century Britain, with a legal system corrupted by decades of perverse legislation, there may perhaps be no legal remedy.   But there certainly will be a rich political harvest for the BNP to reap.  Once again, the British National Party is set to benefit from natural sympathy for the brave and defiant underdog, viciously kicked by a sneering and hated overlord.

The British National Party has survived so far because every last act of bigoted political persecution has eventually backfired against the persecutors, and this resurgence of the Fascist politics of hate at the TUC and the Cabinet Office will be no exception.

For the second successive day, a bus packed full of British people has come under sustained attack from young Muslims in the district of Savile Town, Dewsbury, West Yorkshire.

“Youths” targeted the Thornhill-bound Arriva bus as it pulled away from a stop in Savile Road late on Saturday night.

According to the local ‘Press’ newspaper, a local white businessman told how stones smashed windows on both sides of the bus at 11pm.

The victim rushed off the bus to chase the youths, bleeding from a cut to his face.

“They told me not to come shouting in their area,” he said. “I told them it was my area as well. I was born and bred in Dewsbury.

“There were other Asians around and they said what happened was wrong and it would be sorted.

“I don’t want to scare people but they have to know what is going on.”

The man said there were about a dozen people on the bus including an elderly woman and a father with children.

“It was like a war zone,” said the injured man who was with his wife.

“When the stones hit the windows it was like explosions going off or machine gun fire. Everybody ducked but I wanted to see what was going on.”

Police attended and an ambulance was called before the bus was taken away.

The man said he had been told a bus had been attacked the previous night and police were supposed to have been shadowing the Saturday service.

Two weeks previously, the local newspaper reported that three white boys, one aged 12 and two aged 14, had been set upon by a gang of “youths” nearby.

The English teenagers were confronted and asked why they had the temerity to walk through the formerly-English district of Savile Town, which is now 97% Muslim.  One boy was struck on the side of the head, causing his ear to bleed.

A spokesman for Dewsbury police confirmed that two passengers were hurt and a bus damaged.  Sgt Sarah Baker, of the Dewsbury and Mirfield Neighbourhood Policing Team, said patrols would be stepped up in the area. She added, with almost no discernible trace of irony: “We take these sorts of incidents very seriously and we will thoroughly investigate and bring the people responsible to court.”

Anyone naive enough to imagine that West Yorkshire political police might really be interested in investigating these events could always waste their time by contacting one PC Shanaz Ahmed on 0845 6060606!

It is abundantly clear that Savile Town has tragically joined the long list of towns described by the Bishop of Rochester, Nazir Ali, as “no-go” areas across Britain where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter.

Needless to say, these extraordinary attacks on British people in Dewsbury have been entirely suppressed by the controlled national media, who, as usual, are far too preoccupied with their anti-BNP tirades to report on the horrors of life in multicultural Britain.

Only when the national media have eventually contrived a plausible narrative to blame the BNP for the simmering racial tension in Dewsbury, can we expect the bigoted journalists of ‘Fleet Street’ to report this scandal.

THOMAS Carlyle first coined the term “Fourth Estate” in his 1841 book “On Heroes and Hero Worship” to epitomise the power of the establishment print media. 

For almost 200 years, this power has been unchallenged and has often framed the parameters of British politics.

During the last few months, the full power of the Fourth Estate has been intensely focused on a single objective – namely, to destroy the electoral potential of a small British political party.    Never before in British history have the print media displayed such unified intent or single purpose, and with the triumphant election of two BNP MEP’s, never before have the print media failed so dramatically to achieve their aims. 

As democratic nationalists, British National Party politicians can have no possible objection to rigorous scrutiny, tough questioning and critical comment.   But deliberate, calculated and malicious falsehoods are in a different category.  The increasingly hysterical lies proffered by the despairing print media over recent weeks have included the bizarre and baseless contentions that the BNP is determined to deport all Ghurkhas (The Sun), exclude Jewish people from the party in spite of having Jewish councillors (Daily Mail) and ban Italian restaurants, along with Spanish tapas bars and French bistros!! (The Sun again)

It is a tribute to the force of the BNP’s message that the establishment media dare not criticise the true policies of the party. The media barons are well aware that opposition to mass immigration and Islamification is immensely popular among voters.   Not even the most malevolent left wing rag has the courage to mount a spirited defence of the failed doctrine of multiculturalism, still less to argue that the ongoing programme of giant mosque construction contributes positively to the general welfare of the nation.  

All the media are terrified of any mention of the incontrovertible fact that the British peoples are destined to become an ethnic minority in their own country before 2075, unless there is a radical change in government policy.  The fear that Nick Griffin might speak this unspeakable truth during a live broadcast is what prevents the BNP chairman from being invited onto BBC 1’s Question Time, or Radio 4’s “Any Questions”.

Some of the media smears may even have worked.  Establishment commentators have seized upon the argument that the BNP vote increased by a “mere” 17% on a reduced turnout, from 808,200 in 2004 to 943,598 in 2009.  What torments the denizens of “Fleet Street” and Whitehall is the well-founded fear that the 943 thousand Britons who voted British National Party on June 4th 2009 might represent only the burnished steel core of BNP supporters.  The high priests of the Fourth Estate know full well that the brave 943 thousand are just the determined voters who were prepared to grit their teeth, ignore the avalanche of daily media lies and threats, and defiantly place their ballot cross next to the letters BNP.   There is a vast penumbra of millions more British folk who support BNP policies, but have so far proved vulnerable to dissuasion by contrived lie and carefully engineered social opprobrium.

Unfortunately for the proprietors of the Establishment media, their power is now decisively on the wane, eroded by technological advance.   It is ironic that the Fourth Estate has achieved this degree of unanimity in their opposition to the BNP exactly at the moment when the internet has forever undermined their monopoly of “truth”.  Old fashioned newspapers are shedding employees and closing offices the length and breadth of the country, and the British National Party has only just started to mobilise its internet power against them. 

In the years to come, college academics will no doubt study the newspapers’ united campaign against the BNP during 2009 as a singular phenomenon without historical precedent.   They will surely view the dramatic failure of that anti-BNP campaign as the moment in history when the awesome power of the print media was broken forever. 

Times are indeed changing.   The British National Party has proved well capable of using technology to address its audience directly. And henceforth, newspapers and TV stations who stray beyond fair and rigorous scrutiny to traduce the BNP can expect to be excluded from press conferences and subjected to well-organised boycotts and protest campaigns.

An above-averagely talented Sky News reporter admirably summarised the BNP’s remarkable resilience this week.  “Defiance”, he said, “is part of the BNP brand”.   And he was right.  The lies, smears and distortions of the Establishment’s Fourth Estate can perhaps inhibit and constrain the BNP’s growth.   But in spite of their titanic efforts, as Thursday’s European election triumph proved, they cannot stem the inexorable rise of our party.    The old media and their powerful scheming allies tried their level best – and they failed utterly.

On June 4th, the BNP’s softly spoken truth defeated a banshee chorus of media lies, and there was nothing the Fourth Estate could do about it.

According to Greek myth, the fifth of twelve labours set for the hero Hercules was the stupendous challenge of cleaning out, in a single day, the giant heaps of dung which had accumulated in the stables of Augeas.

The task facing those who would cleanse the stinking mountains of corruption within Britain’s political establishment is of a similar Herculean scale.

It is scarcely possible to overstate the impact of the revelations about MPs’ expenses which are now emerging in the Daily Telegraph.   Here is incontrovertible proof of the BNP’s longstanding contention that the current British political class is institutionally corrupt, dishonest and self-serving.  

It is now abundantly clear that the Parliamentary expenses system has been systematically abused for years by MPs of all the Lib-Lab-Con parties, who have knowingly, repeatedly and dishonestly cheated the taxpayer for their own narrow pecuniary advantage.  

Who dares to deny that the gathering storm of public anger is amply justified?  That those who have perpetrated these venal crimes have masqueraded as selfless public servants and high-handedly lectured us on our own moral conduct further compounds the offence.

It is an outrage that elderly ladies huddled in front of electric fires and honest builders labouring in the rain have had their hard-earned savings stolen away, so that guileful government ministers could over-claim Council Tax on their second homes, or pay for mock-Tudor beams and hanging baskets from the public purse.  

This is not only a great moral betrayal; it ought to be a criminal matter too.   Some of the examples cited in the Daily Telegraph surely fall within the definition of criminal deception under the Theft Acts.  

A private-sector company which uncovered such deliberate abuse of its expense payments system would dismiss the employees concerned and call in the police, and this is the fate that these political fraudsters so richly deserve.

The Metropolitan police have indeed started an investigation, but, almost unbelievably, this will not examine the MPs’ fraudulent conduct, but will focus instead on an attempt to prosecute the upstanding citizen who drew these gross abuses to public attention.   Never have the British police been more out of step with the sentiment of the people they purport to serve.

In the ancient myth, Hercules fulfilled his labour in a single day by diverting a great cleansing river through the stinking Augean stables.  In our own time, June 4th is the day when British voters will have the chance to send a raging torrent of nationalist renewal coursing through Britain’s putrid corridors of power. 

Experienced economists, who have listened to countless budget speeches over coffee and canapés, all knew it.  Ordinary Britons listening at home knew it.  Even Alistair Darling knew it.   This was a budget speech without precedent in living memory, a speech which made history, not for any bold initiative, or innovative announcement, but for the sheer doom-laden impact of the catastrophic statistics which Alistair Darling reeled off in his dour Scottish monotone.

A year ago, Darling predicted that the British economy would grow by a healthy 2.5% in 2009; today he was forced to admit that he expected to preside over the fastest economic collapse since World War 2, a shocking 3.5% fall in Britain’s GDP in the space of a single year.  The International Monetary Fund is still more pessimistic, forecasting a colossal 4.3% contraction in the British economy. These are the grim statistics of financial meltdown, announced by a Labour government which once boasted about the abolition of boom and bust.

The scale of Britain’s economic woes under Labour can scarcely be overstated.  Unemployment has rocketed by more than 171,000 in three months to nearly 2.1 million.   Public borrowing is set to mushroom, and the projected budget deficit of 12% of GDP in 2010 is proportionally larger than in any other major economy – compared with 8.9% in the US, 6.2% in France and 3.2% in China. Total government debt will double in the next few years, and there is a growing consensus that it is unlikely to return to normal levels for more than a generation.

Set against this tsunami of economic woe, Labour’s countermeasures are extraordinarily puny.   In place of the radical budget required to address this huge government deficit, the Chancellor has merely tinkered with the tax system.

For example, Darling has broken his 2005 manifesto promise by introducing a new 50% higher tax band for those with incomes over £150,000.  This is supposed to raise £2.4bn by 2011.  In reality, it is highly unlikely to bring in anywhere near that much, as the rich exploit gaps in the taxation system, which under Labour has accumulated more holes than a Gruyère cheese.

Darling has refused even to contemplate deep cuts in wasteful spending on politically correct nonsense.  So the “overseas development” bonanza will continue, and Britain will be saddled with still more unrepayable public debt, just so that money can be poured into the Indian space programme and the gaping pockets of African despots.    We can also be quite sure that, whatever the level of public borrowing, there will be no shortage of funds for Labour’s race and “diversity” advisers, and their generous final salary pensions. 

Darling’s lame proposals to boost British industry are intellectually bankrupt.   He proposes a scrappage scheme to subsidise motorists buying new cars with a £2,000 discount if they trade in cars over 10 years old.  But thanks to the disastrous – or more precisely, non-existent – industrial policies of successive Tory and Labour governments, most new cars sold in the UK are now manufactured abroad.  In the absence of sound BNP protectionist measures to impose tariff barriers against the import of foreign vehicles, Darling’s scrappage idea is no more than a job creation scheme for German and Japanese car makers.

Paradoxically, the most chilling part of Darling’s shocking budget speech was not the litany of dire statistics cataloguing Britain’s economic implosion.   Those were at least expected.  It was the delusional quality of the Treasury’s growth forecasts which had seasoned economists holding their heads in their hands.  

If Darling is to be believed, the British economy will magically bounce back in 2010 and grow by more than 3.5% every year after that, conveniently mopping up the vast sea of public debt that Labour’s incompetence has created.  That is fantasy, of course, and nobody outside HM Treasury believes a word of it. 

The truth is, Labour have been lying to us for so long that they have utterly lost touch with reality.   It is ordinary British taxpayers, and our children, who will pay the terrible price of Labour’s grand failure for decades, and probably generations, to come.  

Labour’s Home Secretary Jacqui Smith took time out from the ongoing row over her husband’s predilection for publicly-funded pornographic videos, to attend an awards ceremony for “unsung Muslim heroes”.

Among the prize winners, who seemingly exemplify the best and the brightest from Britain’s Muslim community, was Mohammed Ali, a Birmingham-based “graffiti artist” whose so-called “aerosol Arabic” is apparently influenced by both classical Islamic calligraphy and urban street graffiti. 

Other talented “winners” at the event included:

* Mohammed Mujahid Ali, an alternative therapist, for work “improving the wellbeing and mental health of black and minority ethnic people”, and 

* Reverend Gilleasbuig MacMillan, minister at St Giles Cathedral, Edinburgh, for “welcoming Muslims to the cathedral”.

The editor of the Muslim News, Ahmed Versi, proudly said: “We began this event nine years ago because we believed that British Muslims have a lot to offer to British society.”

“The quality of nominations from our 150,000 readers show that British Muslims still have what it takes to be pioneering contributors to the common good.”

Jacqui Smith, who is currently facing a row over expenses claims that included two adult films, took to the stage to present the award and said: “Promoting dialogue and understanding is crucially important at a time when we see those on the extreme fringes of society peddling an empty ideology of isolation, fear and hatred.”

Of course there was a time, long ago, when a Home Secretary, even a Labour Home Secretary, might have been expected to express formal public disapproval of both “graffiti artists” and pornographic videos.   But that was before Jacqui Smith’s New Labour government turned reason on its head and elevated the utterly contemptible for public admiration and approval.