Italy Does What Any Sane Government Would Do: Declares Third World Invasion Illegal

The Italian government has done what any sane government would do to protect itself from invasion and passed a law declaring it a criminal offence to enter Italy without permission or to aid invaders in any way.

In addition, the new law has instituted a policy of immediate deportation of the invaders themselves.

The law, passed yesterday in the Italian senate after earlier ratification by the lower house, states that people caught entering or living in Italy without a permit will not be taken to court but instead given immediate expulsion orders. They will also face fines of up to €10,000.

The law also says that Italians - unless they are doctors or others who will be exempted - will be obliged to report illegal immigrants. Those who knowingly house illegal migrants will face up to three years in prison.

In addition, the law includes tough fines for landlords who rent to illegal immigrants, and orders that no public services be provided to illegals or their offspring in Italy. It also requires parents registering a birth to present documents proving that they are legal residents.

The law will allow private citizens who are former members of the police or armed forces to help the police in crime hotspots.

Italy has also just introduced a policy of returning boatloads of migrants to Libya before they can make their bogus ‘asylum’ claims. More than 36,000 Third World invaders landed in Italy last year after crossing the Mediterranean on boats.

Background to the immigration invasion of Italy:

Italy had, until the late 1990s, one of the lowest reproduction rates in Europe, and the population was projected to go into dramatic decline over the next few decades.

However, a massive spike in Third World immigration - legal and illegal - had seen the population increase to an all-time estimated high of close to 60 million in 2008. This increase was, demographers pointed out, exclusively due to immigration.

Official government figures in 2005 said there were 3.7 million legal immigrants in Italy (an increase of 21.6 percent in one year). That figure represented 6.2 percent of the overall population.

However, the next year, another 700,000 were added to that figure, and the numbers are increasing to the point where, combined with the native natural Italian decline, the foreign-born population is set to be well above 10 million within the next decade.

These figures do not, of course, include illegal immigrants, who, in 2006, were estimated to be “between 670,000 and two million.” Italy’s long and porous coastline makes it an easy target for people smuggling, which has become its single greatest security problem.

The number of illegal immigrants entering Italy in 2008 showed no signs of slowing down, and doubled in the first seven months of that year compared with the same period in 2007. More than 15,000 illegal immigrants entered the EU via Italy between January and July 2008, Italian Interior Minister Roberto Maroni said in August 2008.

Most of the illegal immigrants come across the Mediterranean Sea from North Africa, often in unseaworthy boats. It has now become a familiar site in southern Italy to see packed boats filled with Africans, North Africans and Middle Easterners, arriving on a daily basis at various places along the coast.

These illegals typically pay smugglers in Libya for transit to the Italian island of Lampedusa (not all of them arrive). From there they are transferred to detention camps in mainland Italy and eventually released; their deportation orders are not enforced.

In Padua, the Third World immigrant crime wave forced the centre-left city council to order the building in 2006 of a steel wall around run-down apartment blocks housing an estimated 1500 illegal immigrants (”clandestini”). There is only one way into the complex, through a police checkpoint, where uniformed officers inspect everyone coming and going.

The building of the wall was sparked by an outbreak of street fighting between Nigerian and Moroccan drug gangs, when hundreds clashed with knives and machetes. The socialist mayor of Padua described it as an “enclosure” needed to help tackle the drug dealers.

“When the police tried to arrest the drug dealers in the other part of town they fled to this area here; now that’s no longer possible,” a city councillor told Dutch TV.

“We had to do something,” he continued, “otherwise the problem would be unsolvable. We still remember what happened in the French banlieues, and we don’t want that to happen here in Italy.”

Padua has a population of 205,000, of whom some 70,000 are recent migrants. According to the local authority, one in three of the newborns in the city is now of foreign origin.

In many Italian cities, including Rome, Brescia, Milan, Padua and Prato, Third World immigrants already account for more than 10 percent of the population.

Italy now has well in excess of one million Muslims, drawn from North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Muslim communities in the Balkans.

Bearing in mind that the native Italian population has for all practical purposes stopped reproducing, it is not far-fetched to predict that, unless this situation is reversed, many of the Italian cities will be Islamified within the next three decades.

A study conducted by the Turin-based Centro Federico Peirone in 2001-2002 showed that the family size of arrivals from Arab Muslim countries remained at an average of six - compared to a native Italian average of 1.3 children.

Italy also has what is typically called a ‘Romanian’ immigrant population. In reality, the vast majority of these ‘Romanians’ are Gypsies, or Roma, as the politically correct media likes to call them. Gypsies originated on the subcontinent of India and have been travelling across Eastern Europe for centuries. With the expansion of the EU to include Romania and other former Eastern Bloc European nations, these Gypsies have been allowed free passage to move into Italy in large numbers.

Around 500,000 ‘Romanians’ are officially registered as living in Italy, but unofficial estimates put the actual number at double that figure or perhaps even more. Their exceedingly violent criminality led, in 2008, to an Italian government crackdown on that community, and large numbers were summarily deported or barred from re-entering. ‘Romanians’ represent roughly 15 percent of the prison population in Italy and 5.6 percent of all arrests for murder.

The increased Third World immigration problem has been reflected in Italy’s prison population. In 2006, some 20,000 people out of the 55,000 prisoners serving sentences or awaiting trial in Italian jails were officially described as ‘foreigners’ - overwhelmingly Third World in origin.

* The second part of this article is extracted from the book The Immigration Invasion available for purchase online by clicking here.

Student Loans Frozen — but Government Has Spent 200% of Student Grant on Wars and Foreign Aid

Citing “financial austerity” measures, the Government has frozen all student loans while at the same time announcing that it has spent 200 percent of the total student grant budget on foreign aid and the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The freezing of the student grants was announced by university minister David Lammy, who received his own education courtesy of an Inner London Education Authority choral scholarship. He said that “difficult economic times” had necessitated the step. At the same time, tuition fees will increase by two percent to £3,290 per student, he added.

Mr Lammy’s announcement came on the same day that the House of Commons Defense Committee published figures which for the first time revealed official estimates on the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, both of which have seen extensive British involvement based on a pack of lies supported by both Tory and Labour parties.

According to the report, the annual cost of UK military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan this year alone reached £4.37 billion. The recently announced foreign aid budget for this year topped £6.6 billion - meaning that in the current financial year the Government has spent twice as much on wars and foreign aid than it has helping British kids go to university at home.

Those figures do not include what has been spent on foreign aid and the illegal wars in previous years. The total cost for the Iraq conflict has been £7 billion, while in Afghanistan the total cost of Britain’s involvement is estimated to be some £7.1 billion, boosted by a massive £3.5 billion pounds in the current fiscal year and £2.6 billion last year.

The total foreign aid budget, as detailed on the website of the Department of Foreign Aid and International Development (DFID), for the years 2006 to 2008 totalled £20.126 billion.

In addition to these outlays, the Government has also spent untold billions bailing out its bankster friends following their borderline criminal activities in the American subprime housing market. All of this has added up to generate a government budget deficit projected to top 12.4 percent of gross domestic product this year - a devastating exposé of the utter incompetence and mismanagement of the current ruling regime.

As usual, it is British people who are called upon to shoulder the burden caused by these disasters. Students are an easy target upon which the Government can focus for the first of its major cuts to try and balance its books. Figures from the universities indicate that an additional 60,000 school-leavers face being turned away from university in September due to the decline in funding from central government which has reduced the number of new places available.

The new cuts mark the second time in less than a year that students have been targeted for ’savings’ by the Government. Last October the then Universities Secretary John Denham admitted that he had failed to calculate the costings properly on the family income threshold for receiving a partial grant. As a result, the threshold had to be hurriedly reduced, causing tens of thousands of students to be faced with additional unplanned for debt.

* The British National Party demands an end to these extravagant, unnecessary and wasteful foreign handouts. Not a penny should be spent on anything outside of Britain until the needs and requirements of British people at home have been met.

Amateur Tory Grayling Disgraces His Party with Junk Crime Statistics

The rank amateurishness which characterises the modern Conservative Party has been exposed with the embarrassing claim by Tory Home Affairs frontbencher Chris Grayling that Britain has a higher violent crime rate than South Africa and America.

In reality, both South Africa and America have dramatically higher rates of violent crime than Britain. The Tories are simply lying, and have shown the intellectual shallowness of the people who want to make up this country’s next government.

To make matters worse, evidence from the British police shows that immigrants to Britain are responsible for a majority of the reported murders and related violent crime in Britain - making a mockery of the Tory allegations that British people are violent.

The ridiculous claim was contained in a special ‘report’ issued by the Conservative Party yesterday which was parroted by the controlled media as accurate - when, in fact, it was the most weak, pathetic and obviously false piece of ‘research’ seen since the Labour Party’s lies on Iraq’s ‘WMDs.’

According to the amateurish Tory report, Britain has a worse rate for “all types of violence than the US and even South Africa.”

The basis of this claim was in the definition of ‘violent crime’ as reported by the European Union’s central statistical office, Eurostat in Belgium.

Without bothering to check what makes up the definition of a ‘violent crime’ in South Africa, Britain or America, the Tory liars rushed into print the raw statistics.

In South Africa, a violent crime is defined - and records kept - as a contact crime, involving “physical contact between the victims and perpetrators and such contact is usually of a violent nature.”

What are the actual statistics which the shockingly poor Tory ‘research’ missed? A comparison of murder statistics alone shows the miscalculations of Mr Grayling and his rank amateurs.

According to the official South African Police Services (SAPS) statistics, as reported on their website, there were 18,487 murders in South Africa in 2007. According to the recorded crime statistics issued by the Home Office, there were 784 murders in Britain in 2007.

The total number of murders in South Africa from 2001 to 2007 was just under 120,000, according to the SAPS statistics. This is the equivalent to a larger number of people being murdered than the entire population of Salisbury in Wiltshire - yet the laughable Tories actually expect people to believe that Britain has a higher violent crime rate than South Africa.

Put another way: Some 60,000 British civilians were killed during the five year-long Blitz of World War II. This is half the number of people who have been murdered in South Africa in six years.

According to a report issued by the Global Burden of Armed Violence, the homicide rate per 100,000 population for South Africa is 38.6 compared to Britain’s 2.03.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s annual crime statistics reported that there were 16,929 murders in the United States of America in 2007. The total number of murders from 2001 to 2007 in America numbered 98,703. This figure is less than South Africa even though America has a population at least six times larger.

The homicide rate per 100,000 of the population for America is 5.8, still more than twice the rate for Britain - once again completely contradicting the fake Tory ‘report.’

Even in non-murder statistics, South African and American violent crime statistics are far larger than in Britain, as evidenced by the official reports (links below).

A survey for the period 1998-2000 compiled by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ranked South Africa second for assault and murder (by all means) per capita and first for rapes per capita.

South Africa also has a bad record for car hijackings when compared to industrialised countries especially when the lower rate of car ownership is taken into consideration. One South African insurance company, Hollard Insurance, no longer insures Volkswagen Citi Golfs as they are one of the most frequently hijacked vehicles in South Africa.

The BMW car manufacturer now offers its own insurance to purchasers of its product in South Africa because insurance rates are simply too high as a result of the large number of carjackings.

* Most murders in London in 2007 were committed by foreigners, according to Scotland Yard figures released in November of that year.

Of 47 killings between April and September 2007, where the nationality of the accused was known, 26 of the suspects - 55 percent - were not Britons. At least 23 of the victims were foreign, including Somali, Brazilian, Irish and Vietnamese citizens. The accused in the London sample hail from all corners of the world: Peru, China, Albania, Romania, Lithuania, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

* An interesting fact from published analyses of American crime statistics emerges when the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s “Uniform Crime Report” is cross-referenced with the published crime figures for European nations - and divided according to the racial statistics provided by the FBI.

The FBI classifies Hispanics, Arabs and others as ‘Caucasians’ and therefore the ‘white’ crime rates in America are artificially inflated. Even with that distortion (which must be significant), a comparison of murder and robbery figures expressed per 100,000 population for each country - and then America broken down into the FBI’s classification of ‘white’ and ‘black’ reads as follows:

Murder per 100,000 population: Britain 7.4, France 4.6, Germany 4.2, Italy 6.0, USA 9.3, American whites 5.1, American blacks 43.4.

Robbery per 100,000 population: Britain 62.6, France 90.4, Germany 47.4, Italy 68.6, USA 263.0, American whites 126, American blacks 1,343.  (Sources: FBI Uniform Crime Reports for U.S. data; The Economist for European data.)

As is clear from the separate calculations for American blacks and whites (done by the FBI),  whites in the USA commit fewer murders per capita than do white Britons. The higher robbery rates for ‘whites’ in the America data is attributable to the fact that the FBI includes a large number of non-Europeans, including millions of Mexicans, into its ‘white’ category.

The exceedingly high criminality rate amongst American blacks has led to huge numbers of this racial group being disenfranchised in many states due to laws which prevent convicted felons from voting. According to an Associated Press report of 23 October 1998, 1.4 million black males were debarred from voting in American elections on these grounds. The report went on to point out that in total, 13 percent of black American men could not vote in the 1998 elections.

The survey showed that in the states of Florida and Alabama, the degree of disenfranchisement was at its highest: 33 percent of all black males in those states were legally barred from voting. When all non-white groups in America (blacks, Hispanics and others) are calculated in, then the figure of disenfranchised non-whites for the entire USA in the year 2005 was set at an astonishing 3.1 million individuals - around 10 percent of the entire non-white voting population.

- Official South African Crime statistics can be found by clicking here.

- Official American crime statistics can be found by clicking here.

- The British recorded crime statistics are available from the Home Office by clicking here.

North West BNP Flexes Its New-Found Muscles

The British National Party is hard at work building its organisation in the North West following its electoral success in the region, reports regional organiser Clive Jefferson.

“I have appointed four new organisers this week alone,” Mr Jefferson said. “We have a big regional council meeting approaching and it is becoming very clear that far from being exhausted and in need of rest our activists and officials are chomping at the bit,” he said.

The historic breakthrough in the European elections was a huge leap forward and far greater than the party anticipated, he continued. “We have been viewing property all week and are now in contract negotiations to set up the first BNP offices for our MEP,” Mr Jefferson continued.

“These are exciting times. I can tell you that, far from being problematic, companies are actively competing for our contracts. We intend to have multiple bases in the North West for our constituency work. These bases will revolutionise our operations in the north of England.”

Mr Jefferson said the biggest eye-opener of recent developments had been the realisation of precisely how much a David and Goliath struggle the BNP had engaged in against the old gang parties.

“As we see exactly what goes into setting up one MEP constituency office, we have realised that the old parties had 78 of these MEP support structures and in excess of 600 MP offices and support staff to range against us,” he said.

“In addition, they have council offices and associated staff and all the finance and resources which comes with these posts. In spite of all of that, we have been taking them on. They have been able to put a miniature army of MPs, MEPs their parliamentary secretaries, district and county councillors, bussed in from all over the place to fight us, a group of volunteers driven only by a love of our country.

“In spite of that, the game has changed. Everything was poured into the North West to stop us, and they failed. Now they never will. The battle has been fought and we have won. Minor skirmishes will, of course, take place but never again will the extremist left be able to mount such a sustained and expensive assault on democracy,” Mr Jefferson said.

“Our time has come, and from here, we build. Watch out for exciting news from the North West over the next few weeks.”

South East BNP Regional Council Holds First Planning Meeting for 2010 Elections

The British National Party’s South East Regional Council has completed its first pre-general election planning meeting with key personnel hearing of the planned strategy and aims the party will be using to maximise the Euro election successes in the 2010 elections.

All organisers were informed that candidates for local elections should be in place several months in advance and that all candidates were required to attend the regional training sessions.

Organisers were also informed that the party in the South East is rolling out a comprehensive training programme where qualified computer operators will teach the correct way to use programmes such as Excel and how to do mail merges.

“These will be compulsory to ensure that we are up to the challenges we face with the recent expansion the party has undergone,” regional organiser Andy McBride told the meeting.

“As we move forward and become more mainstream, we have to ensure that we meet the professional standards that our members and the general public expect.”

Mr McBride also reported on his recent visit to the party’s call centre. “This call centre is achieving great things for the BNP,” he said. “It is financially sound and the staff very well trained. I was amazed to see how quickly the staff in the call centre could convert a cold caller into a member, and the terrifically high targets they achieved on a daily basis. I witnessed true commitment to the hard tasks that were set, and was impressed with the level of professionalism within the unit.”

“Now we must move on, prepared for what shall face us in the coming year. Hard work and commitment will bring its rewards, but only if we work as a united team. We shall see victories and defeats, but whatever the outcome, we can hold our heads high in the knowledge that we proud and honest patriots have achieved much because the driving force behind us all is the love of our country,” Mr McBride concluded.

* Hastings organiser Mr Nick Prince was promoted to Regional Delegated Nominating Officer after his outstanding work achieved during the European elections.

Terry Lewin Appointed New BNP Black Country Organiser

Long-time British National Party superactivist Terry Lewin has been appointed new Black Country organiser, replacing the nearly superhuman Ken Griffiths who has stepped down for health and personal reasons, reports correspondent John Salvage.

“As with all walks of life, people bring different personalities and traits with them to the table. Terry Lewin is an activist of merit and calm determination,” Mr Salvage said.

“As a quiet and hard-working man, Mr Lewin has been invaluable in terms of dedicated activism in numerous campaigns.”

The first event under Mr Lewin’s control will be directing a team to help out Councillor Martyn Findley’s campaign in Nuneaton this weekend, topped off by an important regional meeting on Sunday.

Mr Salvage also paid tribute to Mr Griffiths, who stepped down after a recent medical operation and trying personal circumstances.

“He took over the role after a very trying and treasonous time in the Black Country which very nearly derailed the party locally,” Mr Salvage said. “It is due to Mr Griffith’s commitment - personally, financially and otherwise - that the branch was rescued and is now one of the leading activist groups in the West Midlands.

“Handling the inevitable ups and downs of running a lively branch, Mr Griffith’s bubbly and humorous manner ensured he was in demand from Cannock to Birmingham as a guest speaker.

In addition, he directed events brilliantly and took on our political enemies and the media with gusto and the loyal backing of his branch activists.

“We all now wish him the very best of British. We hope to see Mr Griffiths regularly at meetings and certain activities in the coming months, health permitting.”

BNP Launches Antidote to Dumbing Down of Kids’ British History Knowledge

The British National Party has today launched the antidote to the deliberate dumbing down of schoolchildren’s British history knowledge with the launch of a new version of HE Marshall’s classic Our Empire Story.

The reprint of the 1908 classic, suppressed by the politically correct maniacs because of its overtly pro-British sentiments and riveting account of the creation of the British Empire, has just been completed and is available for the very first time today. Its unashamedly pro-British stance and the use of language which would be considered by the leftist extremists as very un-politically correct have prevented its republication until now.

Its launch coincides with a shocking report released by Professor Derek Matthews, an economics lecturer at Cardiff University, which showed that the twisted leftist teaching curriculum of the past few decades had so decimated young peoples’ historical knowledge that over 65 percent of them did not know that Queen Elizabeth I was queen at the time of the Armada.

Professor Matthews’ test was conducted over a three year period using first year university students, who presumably would have been the most read of the younger generation.

Only 15.5 percent of students knew that the Duke of Wellington was in charge of the army at the Battle of Waterloo. 34.5 percent knew who the reigning monarch was when the Spanish Armada attacked Britain and only 11.5 percent could name one British prime minister in the 19th century.

Only 40.5 percent could say what Isambard Kingdom Brunel’s profession was and a shocking 69.4 percent had no idea where the Anglo-Boer War was fought.

Professor Matthews, who lectures in economic history said, in a report on what he called the ‘death’ of school history teaching, that students in a typical tutorial had never heard of the Reformation and did not know what was meant by the term Protestant.

One thought Martin Luther was an American civil rights leader. His students were probably in the top 15 percent of their age group for educational success, he added.

“This implies that, all things being equal, 85 percent of my undergraduates’ age group know even less than they do.

“In other words, we are looking at a whole generation that knows almost nothing about the history of their (or anyone else’s) country. This is an outrage and should be intolerable.”

It is clear that the extremist leftists who run Britain’s educational system have engaged in a deliberate programme to rid British children of any sense of national identity, history or worth.

It is to correct this disgusting state of affairs that a serious amount of behind-the-scenes work was put into producing a new, but faithful to the original, version of Our Empire Story.

Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall (1867-1941) was born in Bo’ness, Scotland, and educated at Laurel Bank School in Melrose. She travelled the world extensively, living in Melbourne, California and China. She is famous for a number of best-selling children’s history books, including her 1905 classic Our Island Story: A History of England for Boys and Girls, which was a bestseller and for fifty years was the standard and much-loved book by which children learned the history of England.

H.E. Marshall also wrote:  Scotland’s Story: A History of Scotland for Boys and Girls (1906); Beowulf: Translations (1908); Our Empire Story (1908); English Literature for Boys and Girls (1909); History of France (1912); History of Germany; The Story of the United States (1919); Kings and Things (1937). Reprints of these classics are also in the pipeline and details will be announced shortly.

Our Empire Story is one of the great classics which emanated from the time when the British Empire was at its height. Spanning four continents, the Empire included Canada, Southern Africa, India, Australia and New Zealand — and this hugely entertaining book covers them all. This epic deals with each individual nation from the time of the first European settlement to the beginning of the twentieth century. Originally designed for children aged 9 to 12 years, the immense readability of Our Empire Story quickly gained it a far wider audience. It became a bestseller of its day.

Written in the colourful style of its time, complete with references which today would be considered very non-pc, Our Empire Story is an unashamedly pro-British book and is filled with stories of high drama, humour and tragedy. Above all, it serves as a lasting testament to one of the most powerful empires in history, 387 pages. Click here to purchase online.

In addition, Excalibur also stocks

H.E. Marshall’s classic Our Island Story: A History of Britain for Boys and Girls from the Romans to Queen Victoria.

First published in 1905, this children’s history of Britain, from the time of the Romans to the death of Queen Victoria, became an instant classic. Beautifully written, with the narrative sweep of the best story-tellers, Our Island Story went through many editions and has remained one of the most popular one-volume histories of Britain.

Leading historians of the present day like Lady Antonia Fraser and Andrew Roberts have testified to the effect that this book had on them by igniting a passionate love of history in young minds through its thrilling narrative. Softcover, 520 pp. 

Click here to purchase online.

Daily Mail Attempts to Deceive Its Readers on Forced Marriage Issue

The Tory-supporting Daily Mail newspaper has once again deliberately tried to deceive its readers with a blatant misrepresentation on the horrific 913 percent increase in forced marriages amongst the colonising Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations in Britain.

According to a report issued by the Forced Marriage Unit (FMU) - a joint operation run by the  Home Office and Foreign Office to try and counteract this Third World cultural practice which the colonisers have imported to Britain - there has been a 16 percent increase in cases over last year already.

The FMU, set up after the Third World immigration invasion started and funded by British taxpayers, has already received 770 calls for help this year. Projected forward, this means that in excess of 1,500 forced marriages will have taken place before the end of this year, an increase of more than 913 percent.

Despite the Daily Mail’s article specifically pointing out that the “practice affects mainly young Asian women, with more than a third of cases involving those aged under 18″, the photograph which it used to accompany the article was of a white couple wearing traditional western wedding attire (see above).

Under the photograph of a white bride, the Daily Mail put this caption: “Coerced: By the end of this year there could be 1,540 Britons who have been forced into marriage.”

This is blatant deception on two levels. Firstly, as the FMU report clearly states, the majority of the ‘victims’ of these forced marriages are young Pakistani and Bangladeshi girls, who are most certainly not ‘Britons’ by any stretch of the imagination; and secondly, the use of a white couple to depict a ‘forced marriage’ is obviously an attempt by that paper to create a totally false visual impression of the problem.

According to the FMU, 770 forced marriage cases were reported to the Forced Marriage Unit this year, up from 152 in 2005. The FMU report said that its advisors had spoken to “hundreds of schoolchildren who have confided to teachers that they fear they will be taken abroad in the summer holidays and forced to marry.”

This ties in with earlier reports which have revealed that at least 40 percent of under 20s in London are non-indigenous British, and there are ever increasing numbers of non-white youth across all corners of Britain.

To make matters worse, the Foreign Office minister who has now seen fit to comment on this disaster is Chris Bryant. “There is no culture in which this is acceptable in a modern world,” Mr Bryant said in his reaction.

Mr Bryant, however, is not the best person to comment on such matters. In 2003 he was discovered to have solicited anonymous sex and posed wearing only underpants on a homosexual dating site, Gaydar, while an MP.

* Colonisation occurs when an invading population reaches sufficient numbers and strength to force its culture and way of life upon the indigenous population. This is what is happening in Britain today.

Rapes in London Schools Rise 100% as Third World Population Reaches 40% of Under 20s

Rapes have risen by 100 percent amongst London schoolchildren over the last five years - directly mirroring the Third World colonisation of the capital which has seen at least 40 percent of the under 20 population become non-indigenous in origin.

The shocking sex crime figures were released by the Metropolitan Police yesterday. Of course they failed to link it to the figures in the recent Whitehall’s annual Regional Trends report which revealed that more than 700,000 children and teenagers in Britain are classed as non-white, and make up 40 percent of that age group in London.

Overall, rapes have more than doubled in five years and reported sex assaults have shot up from 165 in 2004/5 to 246 in 2008/9. The figures refer to cases on school grounds.

According to the new Met figures, almost 900 young boys and girls have been subjected to sex assaults including rape in London’s primary and secondary schools in the past five years.

The Met says that children as young as four have made allegations of rape. Commander Mark Simmons said the total of the reported sex assaults in independent and state schools could be as little as 10 percent of the real number occurring.

“We want to encourage young people to come and tell us what has happened to them. We want to assure them action will be taken,” Commander Simmons said, adding that the police have already been forced to assign 180 full-time officers to specific schools in London.

The Met figures show 52 children under the age of 18 were raped in primary and secondary schools since 2004. In that time a further 763 were the victims of other sexual assaults such as “penetration and inappropriate touching.”

Rape convictions rose in one year by 60 percent to 32 in 2008/9, while the number of alleged rapes soared 50 percent, from 10 to 15, in the same period.

Commander Simmons said the “peak age” of victims is 12 to 14, and mainly girls, but there are cases of boys being raped.

The Regional Trends report revealed that it is estimated that a third of all of London’s population is non-white, but this figure is to change dramatically as the predominantly youthful population matures.

Three London boroughs now have majority non-white populations: Newham, Tower Hamlets and Brent. Around 15 percent of young Londoners are classed as Asian and 14 percent as black.

Britain Becomes World’s Laughing Stock as 71% of All New Jobs Go to Foreigners

Britain has become the laughing stock of the world with a new international report which reveals that the percentage of new jobs here which have been taken by those born overseas is the highest of any of the major economies.

More than seven out of ten jobs created in the last ten years from March 1997 to March 2007 have been taken by those born overseas, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) revealed in a report released yesterday.

The OECD said employment in Britain had risen by about two million jobs over that period, but almost 1.5 million of this was accounted for by persons born abroad.

This translates to 71 percent of all jobs having gone to foreigners. In France, it made up less than 20 percent of the total, and in Ireland and Australia less than 30 percent.

Only the tiny country of Luxembourg (population 486,000) saw more of its new jobs taken by migrant workers, the OECD said.

Even the United States of America, which is being invaded by untold millions from Mexico and Latin America, only lost 58 percent of all new jobs to foreign-born.

Around 30 percent of all foreigners arrived in Britain on intra-company transfers, the OECD said. The system allows international companies to transfer their staff to the UK.

The companies did not have to advertise the post in the UK first and staff can stay for up to three years, plus a possible two-year extension after which they can apply for permanent settlement.

Last year it was revealed that one of the biggest importers of such immigrants was the Indian IT industry, with one company in particular bringing in over 11,000 persons per year.

The OECD figures do not include the 151,635 work permits given to non-EU nationals since March 2007 - a figure which has undoubtedly contributed to the rising unemployment rate of British workers. Unemployment rose by 290,000 from 1 December 2007 to 30 November 2008.

So much for Gordon Brown’s “British jobs for British workers” claim which has turned out to be yet another lie.

BNP Sleazebuster Mick Barnbrook Takes another Scalp as Harry Cohen Steps Down

British National Party sleazebuster Mick Barnbrook has taken yet another scalp with the announcement that Labour MP Harry Cohen is to step down at the next election due to allegations of expense fiddling.

Mr Barnbrook, a former Metropolitan police inspector, who is also the BNP’s spokesman on police matters, was the one who first raised the entire issue of expense fiddling with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards when he complained about Tory MP Derek Conway.

It was that complaint which resulted in the first review of MPs’ expenses. Since then, Mr Barnbrook has overseen the downfall of at least two other senior members of the Westminster gang, and has lodged complaints against a further 19 with the commissioner.

Mr Cohen, MP for Wanstead and Leyton, is one of the 19, and has directly attributed his decision to stand down as an MP at the next election to Mr Barnbrook’s complaints.

“A major influence has been recent events around Parliamentary expenses,” Mr Cohen told a newspaper.

“I am still awaiting my name to be cleared both by the Press Complaints Commission and the Commissioner for Parliamentary Standards after a complaint was lodged against me by a BNP member,” Mr Cohen said.

Mr Barnbrook has also requested the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to investigate Mr Cohen because he believes the matter is so clear-cut as to warrant criminal charges.

 ”Members of Parliament are able to claim up to £24,006 a year for a second home in order to be near to the House of Commons to vote,” Mr Barnbrook explained.

“Mr Cohen has nominated a one bedroom house seventy miles from his constituency in Colchester as his main home, rather than a big house he owns in his constituency of Leyton and Wanstead.

“By doing this he is able to claim the full additional costs allowance of £24,006 on the bigger house in Leyton, by nominating it as his second home. If he had nominated the one bedroom house in Colchester as his second home, the amount of money he would have been able to claim in additional costs allowance would have been substantially less.

“Mr Cohen is on record as saying that he lives in Leyton and only visits the house in Colchester on some weekends.

Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Cohen has claimed the full additional costs allowance since 1990. “If this is correct it means he has claimed £310,714 in total.”

One down, 18 to go, concluded a satisfied Mr Barnbrook.

Islamists Call on Muslims to “Take Revenge” on France for Banning the Burka

Al-Qaeda’s North Africa wing has called on Muslims to “take revenge” and retaliate against France for its opposition to the burka, the American monitoring service SITE Intelligence has reported.

Earlier this month, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the burka, which covers the whole face, was not welcome in France.

“Yesterday was the hijab (the Islamic headscarf long banned in French schools) and today, it is the niqab (the full veil),” Abu Musab Abdul Wadud, head of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb was quoted by SITE as saying.

“We will take revenge for the honour of our daughters and sisters against France and against its interests by every means at our disposal.”

The group also called on Muslims to retaliate for what it called French “hostility” against the community and its attempt to obstruct Islam’s practice on its territory.

“For us, the mujahedeen … we will not remain silent to such provocations and injustices,” Abdul Wadud said without elaborating, according to SITE.

“We call upon all Muslims to confront this hostility with greater hostility, and to counter France’s efforts to divide male and female believers from their faith with a greater effort … (by) adherence to the teachings of their Islamic sharia.”

He said Muslims in France, who are estimated at around five million, are “increasingly concerned about the practices of French politicians and leaders and their harassment.”

On 22 June, President Sarkozy said the burka was not a symbol of religious faith but a sign of women’s “subservience,” adding that the head-to-toe veil was “not welcome” in staunchly secular France.

France is home to Europe’s largest Muslim community and faces a dilemma between accommodating Islam and maintaining secularism. In 2004, it passed a law banning headscarves or any other “conspicuous” religious symbols in schools to uphold a separation between church and state.

Al-Qaeda number two Ayman al-Zawahiri criticized the law, saying the decision showed “the grudge the Western crusaders have against Islam.”

German Parliament’s Powers Are Usurped by Lisbon Treaty, Court Rules

The German Constitutional Court has ruled that critical powers of the German parliament are usurped by the Lisbon Treaty and that the country’s constitution must be changed before the treaty is ratified.

The Court ruling today said that the German constitution had to be changed to ensure that both houses of the German parliament, the Bundestag and Bundesrat, were not overridden by the decisions taken in Brussels.

These two legislative bodies had to have a say in the making of laws in Brussels, the court ruled.

The ruling confirms the long held British National Party position on the Lisbon Treaty which is that that agreement undermines national sovereignty and will see legislative power removed from all national parliaments and transferred to the EU.

Although the media are attempting to put a positive spin on the court’s ruling by highlighting the fact that the Lisbon Treaty will go ahead once the constitutional changes have been made, the reality is that if the amendment fails in the German parliament, the treaty will be dead.

Germany is one of the EU’s most powerful constituent states and at least 50 members of its parliament are known to be strongly opposed to the treaty.

The court’s ruling specifically called a halt to the ratification process until the German parliament makes the necessary changes. Specifically, the court ruled, the existing law which regulates the German parliament’s involvement in the implementation of European law needs to be strengthened before the ratification process can continue.

“It demands a strengthening of the parliament’s responsibilities on a national level,” said presiding judge Andreas Vosskuhle.

Germany is one of four countries that has still not ratified the Lisbon Treaty, which is in essence identical to an earlier constitution rejected by the voters of France and the Netherlands in 2005.

Ireland rejected the treaty in a referendum last year and euro-sceptic presidents in the Czech Republic and Poland have refused to rubber-stamp approval of the constitution.

One of the strongest critics of the Lisbon Treaty is Mr Peter Gauweiler, a member of Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (CSU) in the German Bundestag. The CSU is the sister party to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling Christian Democratic Party. Mr Gauweiler is also the chairman of the sub-committee on foreign cultural and educational policies of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the German Bundestag, and was one of the principal appellants in the motion which led to the recent German Constitutional Court challenge.

Mrs Merkel is strongly in favour of the Lisbon Treaty, and a falling out with Mr Gauweiler could provoke a parliamentary crisis for the ruling party. The German parliament is to gather for a special sitting on 26 August for a first reading of the new law. The vote in the lower house would then take place on 8 September, just weeks before Germany’s national election.

Hypocrisy: ‘Black Lawyer Society’ Chief Wants Race Laws Tightened against Whites

In a move dripping with the most outrageous irony, the head of the overtly non-whites only ‘Society of Black Lawyers’ has called for race laws to be tightened to prevent the British National Party from distributing leaflets such as the one used by the party in the  Greater London Assembly election last year.

Mr Peter Herbert, the chairman of the Society of Black Lawyers, has already formally complained over the BNP leaflet which showed how white British people have been ethnically cleansed from the streets of many parts of London.

Not too surprisingly, his complaint went nowhere, and in a childish outburst he has now called on the Government to change the law to outlaw any expression of indigenous aspirations - while, of course, ignoring the fact that he heads up an organisation whose membership is exclusively aimed at looking after the interests of non-white, non-indigenous people.

According to the blacks-only lawyer, the threshold for securing a conviction is so high that it is currently impossible to persuade the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to prosecute the BNP.

Of course, what he actually means is that he wants the law changed to prevent anybody pointing out that Britain is being colonised.

Furthermore, the ‘offence’ of incitement to racial hatred was created under the Public Order Act and therefore only applies to acts that take place or are witnessed in public. Leaflets pushed through a letter box do not qualify under this act, and it is this point in particular that has the blacks-only lawyer boss unhappy.

Astonishingly, Mr Herbert admitted to the extremist leftist Guardian newspaper that the only reason why he was now raising it as an issue was because of the rise in support for the BNP. “It is essential we are given the tools to deal effectively with this threat,” Mr Herbert told that paper.

This is not the first time that leftist cranks have tried to prosecute the BNP for telling the truth. Currently there are four people on police bail in Lancashire who were arrested after they distributed a leaflet pointing out the dominance of Muslim gangs in the heroin trade.

Ironically, the men are out on bail while the police still wait to hear from the CPS if there is even a case to answer.

Mr Herbert, who despite his penchant for black-only organisations, is the former chair of the Metropolitan police race hate crime forum, said he would push for a change in the law to try and prevent the BNP from continuing to exist.

The Mass Media Is Our Main Enemy, Cllr Paul Golding Tells Crawley BNP

The mass media is the British National Party’s main enemy and it is the party’s aim to immunise the public against their vicious lies, Councillor Paul Golding said.

Speaking at the latest BNP Crawley branch meeting, attended by an enthusiastic crowd of over 40 people, Cllr Golding announced a new campaign to achieve the immunisation goal.

“We need to get to the point where enough people in this country don’t believe a word the media states,” Cllr Golding, the South East’s first elected councillor, said.

“We need to immunise our people against media smears by saturating the country with strident anti-media material. We have to destroy the trust that people still have in the media. Although it will take a long time and much hard work, we have to start now,” he said.

“From now on, we are going to make the mass media our main opponent. We need to get out there and tell everyone the truth about the media, which in reality is a propaganda machine, not a news service.”

Cllr Golding then outlined the past successes of Operation Fightback in fighting back against the lying media and of how this was going to be turned into a long-term campaign against the mass media.

The meeting, chaired by local BNP stalwart and organiser Richard Trower, drew an enthusiastic response when recent election results were detailed during the first half of the meeting.

BNP Will Fight Glasgow NE Westminster By-Election

The British National Party in Scotland will be fighting the Glasgow North East by-election with candidate Charlie Baillie (pictured), announced the party’s leader in Scotland, Gary Raikes.

“Glasgow NE is a solidly white working class area, formerly supported by the worldwide export of the steam locomotive industry, having its roots in Springburn,” said Mr Raikes.

“Due to the demise of this era there is currently deprivation and unemployment of a high level. This has been aggravated by the influx of immigrants from the Third World and the EU adversely affecting housing allocation and job prospects for the native Glaswegian residents.

“Indeed, Glasgow has been described as the ‘asylum capital of Britain’ due to the destructive dispersal policy embraced by the Labour Council,” he said.

Mr Raikes said the BNP in Glasgow was starting from a small base but that this would not deter the party from going forward. “We have to start somewhere, and we will be looking to build on the 3,258 votes we polled there the last time we stood.”

The BNP’s candidate, Mr Charlie Baillie, was born and spent his childhood in the constituency. He has been a party member since 2005 and stood in the Holyrood 2007 Campaign and in two council by-elections. He was also the BNP’s number two candidate on the Scottish Euro list.

North West regional organiser Clive Jefferson will be managing the campaign.

* A large number of people attended the recent BNP officials’ meeting in Perth, Mr Raikes said.

“I was happy to report to the meeting that the second phase of our restructuring process had seen a new surge of interest in the party. We are now processing a huge number of enquiries and have the highest number of paid up members in the party’s history in Scotland.”

Mr Raikes also revealed the new Scottish local organisers pack and the new quarterly Scottish newsletter, The Bugle.

The Bugle will go out to all members and around 1000 enquirers along with a copy of the latest Voice of Freedom, a membership form and standing order form.

“All agreed this was a professional undertaking that would hopefully produce the number of officials needed to ensure an official BNP presence in every local Authority area in Scotland, with the aim of having target wards being worked in each by the 2011 elections,” Mr Raikes said.

Muslims in Britain Have Religious Duty to “Fight the British and Americans” says New Sharia Court Exposé

Muslims living in Britain are under orders from Sharia courts to regard “fighting with Britons and Americans as a religious duty” a shocking new report on Sharia courts in Britain has claimed.

Issued by independent think tank Civitas, the new report, called “Sharia Law or ‘One Law for All’?” and authored by Islamic specialist Denis MacEoin, also says that there are now around 85 Sharia courts in Britain.

The open declaration of war - Jihad - against ordinary British and American people by Islamic law courts is a damning indictment of the treason committed by the Tory and Labour parties in allowing millions of Muslims to settle in Britain.

In addition to the horrifying declaration of holy war against British and American people, the Sharia courts operating in Britain have also ordered that:

- Sharia law must override the judgements of British courts;

- Muslims living in this country are under orders to disobey Britain’s laws when it contradicts Islamic values;

- Muslims are forbidden to take out insurance, even if required by (UK) law.

- There is no requirement to register a marriage according to the law of the country;

- Polygamous marriage (that is, two to four wives) is legal; and

- A Muslim lawyer has to act contrary to UK law where it contradicts Sharia.

According to a press release issued today by Civitas, the courts operate inside the rapidly spreading network of mosques throughout Britain.

In the press release, Mr MacEoin wrote that it is extremely difficult to find out what goes on in these 85 courts, so he has relied on a range of fatwas issued by popular online fatwa sites, run out of or accessed through mosques in the UK as an indication of the sort of rulings these Sharia courts are making.

Only five of the Sharia law courts are publicly known and run by the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal, a body whose rulings are enforced through the state courts under the 1996 Arbitration Act.

However, Mr MacEoin said that “Sharia courts should not be recognised under the Arbitration Act.

“Sharia courts operating in Britain may be handing down rulings that are inappropriate to this country because they are linked to elements in Islamic law that are seriously out of step with trends in Western legislation,” Mr MacEoin wrote.

The revelation that Sharia rulings or fatwas are being enforced through state courts by the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) has alarmed many, especially as the Arbitration Act, under which this takes place, specifically excludes divorce and childcare cases.

“Under most interpretations of Islam a person who leaves the faith is an apostate who can be put to death. While this threat remains, it cannot be accepted that Sharia councils are nothing more than independent arbitrators guided by faith,” the Civitas press release continued.

“The reality is that for many Muslims, Sharia courts are in practice part of an institutionalised atmosphere of intimidation, backed by the ultimate sanction of a death threat. The underlying problem is that Sharia law reflects male-dominated Asian and Arabic cultures. It cannot therefore be accepted as a legally valid basis even for settling private disagreements in a country like ours, where our law embodies the equal legal status of everyone, regardless of race, gender or religion.”

Mr MacEoin wrote in his conclusion that the “introduction of Sharia law into this country is a recipe for a dichotomous legal system that holds Muslims and non-Muslims to different standards.

“This is not a matter of eating halal meat or seeking God’s blessing on one’s marriage. It is a challenge to what we believe to be the rights and freedoms of the individual, to our concept of a legal system based on what Parliament enacts, and to the right of all of us to live in a society as free as possible from ethnic-religious division or communal claims to superiority and a special status that puts them in some respects above the law to which we are all bound.”

* In their coverage of the Civitas press release, all of the mainstream media deliberately suppressed the part dealing with the Sharia courts’ declaration of Jihad against British and American people.

Get your sensational copy of  Sharia Law or ‘One Law For All’?  from Excalibur now!

Sharia courts are operating in Britain, handing down rulings that may be inappropriate to this country, being linked to elements in Islamic law that are seriously out of step with trends in Western legislation that derive from the values of the Enlightenment and are inherent in modern codes of human rights. Sharia rulings contain great potential for controversy and may involve acts contrary to UK legal norms and human rights legislation. Denis MacEoin argues against the wider use of sharia law.
About the Author: Dr Denis MacEoin holds degrees from Trinity College, Dublin, Edinburgh University and Cambridge (King’s College). From 1979 80, he taught at Mohammed V University in Fez, Morocco, before taking up a post as lecturer in Arabic and Islamic Studies at Newcastle. In 1986, he was made Honorary Fellow in the Centre for Islamic and Middle East Studies at Durham University. 
Price:  £7.50

Click here to purchase online

Government Admits Its Housing Policy Is Anti-British

The Government has admitted that its housing policy has always been anti-British and hence the sudden change in direction announced today, said the British National Party’s deputy press officer John Walker.

Speaking to BNP News, Mr Walker, who is also a councillor in North Wales, said that the announcement by Gordon Brown today that British-born people will now get priority in the housing queue over immigrants and ‘asylum seekers’ was “proof positive that British people are put last.”

“Why else would there now be a change in policy if the old one was not anti-British?” Mr Walker asked.

“For years the BNP has said that British people are put last in the council housing queue, and for years the Government and Tories alike have said we were lying.

“But now we have an official announcement from the Prime Minister that a new policy is to be introduced which will ban immigrants and asylum seekers from jumping the housing queue. Mr Brown is in effect saying that prior to this, immigrants and asylum seekers were jumping the queue - just as the BNP said.”

The policy shift was a transparent attempt to try and win back support which the Labour Party has lost to the BNP, Mr Walker continued.

“This is of course hopeless, and merely shows how out of touch Mr Brown and his party are with the electorate.

“People are upset over the fact they have been put last on the housing queue. But they are also upset over the selling off of all the public utilities, the bailing out of the bankster criminals, the flooding of our country with mass Third World immigration, the criminal foreign wars into which Labour and Tories alike have plunged our soldiers, the destruction of our educational system and so much more,” he said.

“To think that people are going to go back to the Labour Party just because the Prime Minister has admitted that his party’s housing policies are indeed anti-British is a delusion.

“Those who have seen through the Labour Party and have switched to the BNP are well aware that almost everything that comes out of Westminster these days is a pack of lies,” Mr Walker said.

“People know that the BNP was the only party which raised the issue of the anti-British housing policies, and that we were berated for doing so. Now that we have been proven right yet again, we are going to take the credit, and the other parties better accept it.”

Cultural and Religious Pluralism in Britain Has Killed the Church of England, Says Bishop

Cultural and religious pluralism has meant the end of the Church of England and the decline of Britain as a Christian nation, Anglican Bishop the Rt Rev Paul Richardson has warned.

In a move which confirms the British National Party’s warnings of the effects of mass Third World immigration, Bishop Richardson said that the rise in multiculturalism means that “Christian Britain is dead.”

Predicting that at current rates of non-attendance, the church would die out within a generation, Bishop Richardson said that declining baptisms and church weddings were a sign that the Church of England was on its way out.

The number of babies being baptised has fallen from 609 in every 1,000 at the turn of the twentieth century to only 128 in 2006/7 and church marriages have also dropped.

Of course, Bishop Richardson did not point out the obvious, namely that government statistics and anecdotal evidence show that nearly 50 percent of all live births in Britain are to Third World colonisers, and that this alone would have massively impacted the number of church baptisms and weddings.

The mass Islamic colonisation of Britain has meant the creation of a Muslim parallel society which will ultimately physically destroy all vestiges of the CoE and the falling baptism rate is but the precursor to this process.

Writing in the The Sunday Telegraph, Bishop Richardson said: “Many bishops prefer to turn their heads, to carry on as if nothing has changed, rather than face the reality that Britain is no longer a Christian nation.”

Instead of facing up to the reality of their own extinction at the hands of the colonising swarms from the Third World, the church leadership has rather spent its time spreading poison and lies about the British National Party.

The Church is now reaping what it has helped sow: The General Synod, the Church’s parliament, will next month consider proposals to cut the number of bishops and senior clergy amid fears over the Church’s finances.

Bishop Richardson said, “The church is being hit by a double whammy: on the one hand it confronts the challenge of institutional decline but on the other hand it has to face the rise of cultural and religious pluralism in Britain.”

He says that the way the Church responds to this will be “crucial in determining whether it will be able to survive as a viable organisation and make a contribution to national life.”

Foreign Criminals Find Safe Haven in Open Door Britain

Foreign criminals of the worst sort are deliberately entering Britain because of the open doors policy which effectively prevents them from ever being deported.

Albania’s police chief has warned that Britain has become “the favourite sanctuary for fugitives” including the most sought after murderers from his country.

According to new figures released by the Home Office, in the year to April, British authorities received more than 3,500 requests from foreign countries for the return of their criminals, a figure which had increased by 24 percent since the previous twelve months.

Of that number, more than 150 were suspected or convicted murderers. The astonishing total was up by a quarter on the previous 12 months.

Detective Chief Inspector Murray Duffin of the Scotland Yard Extradition and Intelligence Unit was quoted in media reports as warning that “Britain is becoming a magnet for increasing numbers of criminals from the former Eastern bloc countries which are now members of the EU.”

The number of criminals being sought by Poland has soared 14-fold since 2004 when that country joined the EU and its citizens were allowed to travel to and live freely in Britain.

The situation is now so bad that the Warsaw police actually send a charter plane to Britain every month to bring back criminals who have fled Poland for Britain, accused of crimes ranging from murder, rape and robbery to burglary, drugs and theft.

The Albanian police chief said that Britain is currently harbouring at least 80 Albanian murderers and 20 other serious offenders. Many are already British citizens after having claimed asylum by pretending to be from war-torn Kosovo.

According to British police figures, 20 percent of all offences in London are committed by those born overseas. This figure rises to 33 percent in the case of sex attacks, and 50 percent of all frauds.

To make matters worse, only a small number of those accused of crimes in their home country are ever extradited. 

Of the 3,526 foreigners for whom extradition requests were made by European Union countries in the past year, 683 were arrested and only one in seven - 516 - returned, according to the latest figures issued by the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

The wanted criminals avoid extradition by using easily exploitable legislation such as the Human Rights Act which forbids the breakup of families. In addition, they can also avoid deportation in cases where they might face an unfair trial, abuse of their human rights or the death penalty back home.

In this way, a criminal can merely claim that he or she might not get a fair trial in order to avoid deportation. Furthermore, if they claim asylum, then that process first has to be finalised - meaning that years can elapse before an extradition hearing can even start.

Recent high profile cases where these excuses have been used to keep criminals in Britain - at taxpayers’ expense for both benefits and legal costs - include:

- Estonian Fred Undrits, wanted in Estonia for arson. He was brought to the extradition hearing from prison, where he is serving a 56-day sentence for shoplifting. He has been in Britain since 2006 and his case will take years to decide.

- Albanian Shkelzen Gradica who has been convicted in Italy of attempted murder. His defence team has argued that deportation will breach his human rights because the trial under which he was convicted was based on an ‘unreliable witness.’ The possibility of a British court being able to decide whether or not that is true is almost impossible, hence the case hangs in limbo.

- Pole Maciej Blaszko has been accused in Warsaw of attempted robbery and driving without a licence. He has fought extradition with lawyers funded by the British taxpayer, arguing that the police case against him was prepared when he had already fled to Britain.

- Czech paedophile Julius Horvath was convicted in 1996 of the sexual assault and rape of a child in his home country. He came to Britain in 2000 and successfully claimed asylum, getting benefits and a council flat in Leeds. He has been arrested here for affray, being drunk and disorderly, serious assault and shoplifting. He cannot be deported because he has family in Britain and extradition would infringe his right to ‘family life’ under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act

Next Page »