From the Land and People website — The recent admission by a former senior Labour Party advisor that immigration into Britain isn’t an economic necessity as previously claimed by our lying and utterly corrupt government regime, but a means of shoring up a collapsing Labour vote, comes as no surprise.

For years, British nationalists have pointed out that the “we need them to pay our pensions” excuse is ludicrous as it ignores the obvious fact that every wave of migration would require a further wave to pay the pensions of that preceding it, and so on, ad infinitum.

We could make much of the fact that Armistice Day is rapidly approaching which underlines the blood sacrifice made by our people to prevent this island home from being invaded and colonised by foreigners.

Let us, just for a moment, consider the ecological damage that mass immigration is doing.

If it were not for immigration, it is likely that our population would be falling. This is not a bad thing for the most overpopulated (in terms of people per square mile) country in Europe.

This means that there would have been no reason to bury tens of thousands of acres of formerly good agricultural land, woodland, pastures, meadows and even allotments, beneath asphalt and concrete.

It also means that the road building programme of the last 30 years would not have been justified to the extent it has, simply because there would be several million less vehicles needing roads. Just think of the money that would have saved.

We could also add the impact on water and landfill requirements arising directly from an artificially inflated population.

Furthermore, the Government’s intention to despoil our countryside even further, for no other reason than to provide hundreds of thousands of new homes for the migrant waves yet to arrive, would be wholly negated.

As it is, we have a massive and growing population. It far outstrips the capacity of the land to maintain it. It is foisted upon us, against our will, for little other reason than to bolster a failing political-criminal party’s electoral support.

Not only are we suffering the environmental consequences in terms of pollution, overcrowding and environmental depreciation, but it is clear that it will be our increasingly dispossessed children who will reap the full impact of Labour’s criminality.

Meanwhile, strange is it not, that a party laughingly calling itself the “Green Party” declines to criticise — far less condemn — Labour’s environmental wrecking immigration “policy.”