The “climate change” theory has taken a hammering with new revelations that a Government-funded research body deliberately falsified data and tried to suppress the news that the earth’s temperature has actually been stable for the past ten years.

The latest revelations — released after an illegal email and data hack into computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (known as Hadley CRU) —  indicates that scientists involved in propagating the “climate change” theory have resorted to lies, distortions, cover-ups and smears of opponents, to “prove” their theory.

The “climate change” theory has been used as a political tool against industrialised nations to increase taxes and subsidies to the Third World as “compensation.”

For example, as recently as last week, one Suneeta Mukherjee, country representative of the United Nations Food Population Fund (UNFPA), claimed that “climate change” was responsible for women in the Philippines turning to prostitution.

“The effects of climate change have driven women in communities in coastal areas in poor countries like the Philippines into dangerous work, and sometimes even the flesh trade,” Ms Mukherjee said.

The leaked emails, from some of the most prominent scientists pushing the “climate change” theory, indicate how they have used “tricks” to cover up holes in their data.

One of the leaked emails reads (verbatim, including typos):

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Another email reveals that the scientists are aware of the fact that the earth has not been heating up as their projections have always claimed. The emails lament this fact, calling it a “travesty”:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

Another email details how evidence has been suppressed:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment  – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

Another email discusses how they should hide the fact that there have been periods of warming before, specifically in a period known as the “Medieval Warm Period” (MWP). This warming, which occurred during a non-industrialised era, mirrors current alleged global warming and is therefore an obvious problem for today’s theorists:

…Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back…

Yet other emails discuss how to smear those scientists who are sceptical of the “climate change” theory by ensuring that their papers are not “peer reviewed” so that they can be dismissed as cranks in the media:

This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?

Only last week, the German magazine Der Spiegel reported that “global warming appears to have stalled.”

In an in-depth article on the topic, Der Spiegel said that “climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years.

“The earth’s average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year,” the magazine said, quoting a large number of scientists and specialists in the field.

“At present, however, the warming is taking a break,” meteorologist Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences told Der Speigel. “There can be no argument about that,” he says. “We have to face that fact.”

“It cannot be denied that this is one of the hottest issues in the scientific community,” Jochem Marotzke, director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg added. “We don’t really know why this stagnation is taking place at this point.”

Allegations over “climate change” have been used in recent years to make all manner of outrageous demands for compensation from the West’s taxpayers. It has even been used as an excuse why Europe should be obliged to accept “climate change refugees” from the Third World.

The latest revelations will add fuel to the fire of those who consider the entire theory to be bogus and politically motivated.