All the original data upon which the world’s leading “climate change” proponents drew their conclusions has been “thrown away” and is unable to be checked.

This shocking revelation has emerged on the eve of the Copenhagen “Climate Change Summit.” That meeting is likely to be little more than an anti-Western, and specifically anti-white, guilt hatefest which will see billions more taxpayers’ cash poured into the Third World.

According to reports, scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) have admitted that they have “thrown away” much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures and has provided a large amount of the “scientific” underpinning of the climate change theory which essentially blames industrialised nations for what is claimed to be rising global temperatures.

The disposal of the data means that other scientists will not be able to check basic calculations which allegedly prove a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The data was gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of certain variables. The “revised” data was kept, but the originals, which were stored on magnetic tape and in paper reports, were dumped.

This is the second serious blow to the CRU following last week’s leaking of thousands of emails and electronic notes from that institution which revealed in detail how figures had been falsified to promote the climate change theory.

The dumped data scandal was discovered when Professor Roger Pielke from the department of environmental studies at Colorado University asked for the originals to do his own calculations.

“The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us.’ So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science,” Professor Peilke was quoted as saying.

The data was used to justify the CRU’s claim that the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years. The CRU said this rise is “unequivocally” linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans and this finding is one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Polygamous Muslim marriages — recognised as legal under British immigration law — cost the taxpayer a minimum of £5 million every year. Even that figure is two years out of date.

The outrageous costs are calculated on the estimated 1,000 polygamous Muslim marriages which were in existence in Britain in 2007. Given the massive increase in “legal” Third World immigration — amounting to over half a million every year — this figure is likely to have dramatically increased.

Although polygamy is illegal for the indigenous population, the insane immigration policies pursued by successive Tory and Labour administrations have made an exception for Muslims.

Polygamous marriages are officially recognised in Britain provided the weddings were “legal in the countries where they took place.”

This means that a Muslim male can marry up to the four wives he is allowed under Islamic law in a Muslim country such as Pakistan. He is then able to legally bring them all to Britain.

Here, the wives are all able to claim income support benefit at a special rate of £36.65 a week. In addition to this, they are able to claim child support for each baby  produced, the one-off maternity benefit payment for each child and other benefits including housing, utilities payments and so on.

The true cost is therefore probably way in excess of the official estimate. According to the last official figures on the numbers of polygamous Muslim marriages in Britain, released in 2007, there were a thousand Muslims living legally with multiple wives in our country.

Reports said Ministers had deliberately ignored the practice which had “become commonplace in some Muslim communities.”

Under Islamic law, these marriages can be arranged without the bride and groom ever meeting and officiated over the telephone. Once married to a Muslim holding a UK passport, the wife/wives then have automatic entrance into Britain and the wonderland of benefits it offers.

Countries in which polygamous marriages take place which are recognised as legal by British law include Pakistan, Nigeria and India.

A husband may claim housing benefit for each wife even if she is abroad, for up to 52 weeks, as long as the absence is temporary and for pressing reasons.

The practise is said to have become commonplace, at least among Kashmiris, a group that accounts for most Pakistanis in Britain. Muslims believe that the Prophet Muhammad practised polygamy.

This scandalous situation is further evidence — if it was needed – - that the British people are paying to be dispossessed of their country through systematic ethnic cleansing.

Tony Blair lied blatantly to the British public in April 2005 when he told the BBC that the Attorney General had advised him the war was legal — when in fact, the Attorney General had advised him in writing that the war was illegal.

The written memo from the then Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, has now been unearthed and handed in to the Chilcot Inquiry into the war and will form a major part of the former Prime Minister’s cross questioning in the new year.

In April 2005, Mr Blair was asked on the BBC by Jeremy Paxman if he had seen confidential Foreign Office advice that the Iraq war was illegal.

Mr Blair replied: “No. I had the Attorney General’s advice to guide me.”

In reality, Lord Goldsmith had submitted a memo to 10 Downing Street in July 2002, explicitly warning Mr Blair that invading Iraq was a blatant breach of international law.

The memo was written eight months before the combined British and American invasion which not only killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, but also thousands of Allied soldiers.

In the letter, Lord Goldsmith responded to a cabinet meeting of 23 July 2002 at which he had been present where attendees were told in confidence that the invasion of Iraq was going to proceed.

After the meeting, Lord Goldsmith wrote to Mr Blair on a headed notepaper, addressed to “Dear Tony,” and signed “Yours, Peter.”

In the letter, Lord Goldsmith said:

- The war could not be justified purely on the grounds of “regime change.”

- The United Nations’ rules on military intervention “on the basis of self-defence” did not apply because Britain was not under threat from Iraq.

- The United Nations’ rules on intervention on “humanitarian” grounds were not applicable to Iraq.

- It was not possible to rely on earlier UN resolutions in the 1990s approving the use of force against Saddam.

Once Mr Blair saw the letter, be barred Lord Goldsmith from attending any further cabinet meetings and ordered a cover-up to stop news of the letter leaking out.

According to Lord Goldsmith, he offered to resign but was bullied by Mr Blair into backing down.

Lord Goldsmith is set to appear before the Chilcot Inquiry and will, according to reports, defend his memo.

This evidence will clinch the case for Mr Blair’s prosecution for war crimes, as the British National Party has long maintained should occur.

Apart from Mr Blair, all the other politicians, civil servants and Tory toady generals who participated in this international outrage should also be arrested and put on trial.

The blood of our soldiers who died in that needless conflict, and the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, demands it.

The British National Party has launched a new car sticker with the words “Bring Our Troops Home” with all proceeds going directly to the Selly Oak Burns Unit in Birmingham.

The sticker is designed to heighten public awareness about the disastrous, illegal and immoral foreign wars into which the Labour and Tory parties have plunged this country, and the human cost it has taken upon our brave soldiers.

All the proceeds will be sent as a donation to help the Selly Oak Burns Unit to help our brave and injured soldiers. The cost per sticker is £1.50 and they can be purchased by clicking here.

The British National Party’s North West regional organiser, Clive Jefferson, has been nominated as the party’s parliamentary candidate in its key Cumbria target seat of Copeland.

The announcement was made in a press release issued by the BNP in Cumbria. “The first-ever entrance of the BNP in a general election in Copeland will be the most explosive issue in next year’s campaign,” the press release said.

“In the June County Council elections, the BNP stood a full slate of candidates in Copeland in our first-ever outing and came a clear third place with just under 17 percent of the vote. This translated to 3,250 BNP votes on a 30 percent turnout.

“Clive Jefferson was the highest-polling county council candidate in Cumbria, with a healthy 29 percent of the vote in the Frizington and Cleator Moor ward. His confirmation as parliamentary candidate for Copeland was confirmed at a group meeting last Thursday during which a further £200 was raised to add to the growing war chest,” the BNP group said.

“We intend to make Copeland the target seat for Cumbria next year and manpower and money will be focused there. The Labour Party have abandoned 20 seats due to lack of finance. Copeland is one of these seats which has been thrown to the wolves by Labour head office and the BNP is determined to stage its best fight ever.”

By Tom Gower — The Labour Government has announced that it will introduce  “Gender Equality Lessons” to children from the age of five as a means of tackling “domestic violence, homophobia and transphobia” — but will steer clear of mentioning honour based killings.

In terms of the plan, “personal, social and health education” will also become a compulsory part of the curriculum by 2011. This is little more than a mind-warping subject designed to expose young children to an array of inappropriate adult subjects. The Labour Party has been aiming at this objective for the past decade, and now seems on the brink of achieving their goal.

Schools minister Vernon Coaker said that the lessons would be age appropriate: “The appropriateness of what you do with someone who is five years old is totally different in terms of content and how you will be taught to someone who is 15 or 16,” he said. So here are some of the so-called “age appropriate” subjects:

Age 5-7 — puberty, relationships and how to keep safe;

Age 7-11 — puberty, relationships including marriage, divorce, separation, same sex and civil partnerships, managing emotions and dealing with negative pressures;

Age 11-14 — Sexual activity, human reproduction, contraception, pregnancy, STDs including HIV/Aids and high risk behaviours, relationships, including those between old, young, girls, boys and same sex;

Age 14-16 — Body image and health, choices relating to sexual activity and substance misuse, emotional well-being, reducing risk and minimising harm, parenting skills and family life, separation, divorce and bereavements, prejudice and bullying.

Just what is the perverted Labour government aiming to do by turning our children into adults before their time? Why do they allow pornographic publications to be sold alongside Winnie the Pooh magazines in shops?  If you don’t believe me, just look around you while doing your Christmas shopping and you will see it unashamedly on sale in most retail outlets.

Just listen to singles being released in the charts, again promoted to young children, all with lyrics which glamorise sex. Then the Government wonders why we have so many teenage pregnancies.

Last year, Reverend Tim Jones bravely threw over a display of Playboy merchandise and announced to the media that “The long-term intention of their strategy is to encourage children to see the Playboy bunny as a friendly brand appropriate for children, preparing them for early commercial acceptance of Playboy pornographic merchandise.

“This constitutes a kind of institutional grooming of children for their commercial exploitation by the powerful sex industry. It is indirect but not accidental. It is deliberate, intentional, cynical and wicked and must be resisted,” he said.

While trying to turn our children into small adults, these above-mentioned “lessons” are being used to teach children about “gender equality” — which can only confuse children about their gender. While many children at the age of five will only just be starting to identify gender appropriate toys, the Labour Government is trying to warp children’s minds by introducing books like Mum and Mom Are Getting Married! by Ken Setterington and Boy Meets Boy by David Levithan to the curriculum.

As British National Party leader Nick Griffin rightly said on Question Time, the teaching of homosexuality to young school children is perverse.

If re-elected, 2011 is set to be the year when Labour launches an all-out attempt to corrupt children’s innocent minds into their liberal ways of thinking. It’s the way Marxists work, by preaching equality for everyone, while ignoring the qualities different genders have, all in order to mould people into their ways of thinking.

Labour, with militant ultra-feminist liberals like Hariett Harman at the helm, seek to indoctrinate young children with their politically-correct Marxist theories of equality over individuality. Their hope is to embed politically-correct thinking in future generations.

These regular ultra-Marxist attacks on social norms and the nuclear family must be stopped now. Children should be allowed to remain children, innocent and free of corrupt thoughts.

Personal, social and health education lessons will be a further waste of children’s more important academic time.

* Tom Gower is the organiser for Coventry BNP and full-time member of staff for the party, where he works in administration and distribution at central office. He has been involved in nationalism for nearly nine years and has interests in Indo-European culture and traditions as well as nature and philosophy.

The voters of Switzerland have taken a daring and dramatic stand against the Islamic colonisation of their country by supporting a ban on the further building of minarets.

A national referendum completed today in Switzerland produced a 57 percent yes vote in favour of the ban, proposed by the Swiss People’s Party (SVP), the largest party in the Swiss parliament.

The poll result is a massive embarrassment for the Swiss coalition government which firmly opposed the ban.

The SVP claimed that allowing minarets would encourage the growth of “an ideology and a legal system — Sharia law — which are incompatible with Swiss democracy.”

SVP member of parliament Ulrich Schluer said the “minaret is a symbol of conquest and power which marks the will to introduce Sharia law as has happened in some other European cities. We will not accept that.”

He added that “Forced marriages and other things like cemeteries separating the pure and impure — we don’t have that in Switzerland, and we do not want to introduce it.”

The outcome of the referendum proved an upset to the pollsters, who, only two weeks ago, claimed that the ban would be defeated by a 53 percent margin.

The SVP campaign drew international attention by using billboards with dramatic images showing missile shaped black minarets piercing a Swiss flag.

Other posters (illustrated alongside) called for an end to the “political Islamisation” of Switzerland.

Muslims currently make up in excess of six percent of Switzerland’s population, up from 0.9 percent in 1980. This dramatic increase shows no sign of halting as official figures show that the fertility rate for recent immigrants is more than twice as high as for native-born Swiss.

According to official Swiss government figures, more than 24 percent of the resident population are non-Swiss nationals, although that figure includes many from European countries. The actual Third World origin section of the population is less easy to quantify, but estimates range between 10 and 15 percent.

It was no surprise at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) when 48 Third World nations enthusiastically agreed to the First World paying them out billions for so-called “climate change” damage.

The $10 billion fund — taken directly from taxpayers in First World nations — is supposed to allow these Third World nations to “build defences against flooding” and to “reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.”

The CHOGM also unanimously agreed to seek a legally binding international agreement for this ongoing swindle and called for what they described as the “strongest possible outcome” at next month’s climate change summit in Copenhagen.

It was announced at the CHOGM meeting that the quite-mistakenly called “global fund” (it is not “global,” but First World only) fund is aimed at distributing “money from rich countries to the developing countries to help them adapt and pay for low-carbon alternatives.”

In other words, it is little more than yet another First World guilt trip, this time imposed by interest groups whose scientific premise is increasingly being challenged by large numbers of dissenting scientists and specialists from across the globe.

A partial list of these scientists and their conclusions follows:

* Timothy F. Ball, former Professor of Geography, University of Winnipeg, has produced research which says that “[The world's climate] warmed from 1680 up to 1940, but since 1940 it’s been cooling down. The evidence for warming is because of distorted records. The satellite data, for example, shows cooling.

“Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970’s global cooling became the consensus. … By the 1990’s temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I’ll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global temperature trends now indicate a cooling.”

* Robert M. Carter, geologist, researcher at the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia: “the accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998 … there is every doubt whether any global warming at all is occurring at the moment, let alone human-caused warming.”

* Vincent R. Gray, coal chemist, founder of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition: “The two main ’scientific’ claims of the IPCC are the claim that ‘the globe is warming’ and ‘Increases in carbon dioxide emissions are responsible’. Evidence for both of these claims is fatally flawed.”

* Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists: “Models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are incoherent and invalid from a scientific point of view”. He has also said, “It is not possible to exclude that the observed phenomena may have natural causes. It may be that man has little or nothing to do with it.”

* Khabibullo Abdusamatov, mathematician and astronomer at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences: “Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but from an unusually high level of solar radiation and a lengthy – almost throughout the last century – growth in its intensity. Ascribing ’greenhouse’ effect properties to the Earth’s atmosphere is not scientifically substantiated…Heated greenhouse gases, which become lighter as a result of expansion, ascend to the atmosphere only to give the absorbed heat away.”

* Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics: “[T]he recent warming trend in the surface temperature record cannot be caused by the increase of human-made greenhouse gases in the air.”

* George V. Chilingar, Professor of Civil and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Southern California: “The authors identify and describe the following global forces of nature driving the Earth’s climate: (1) solar radiation …, (2) outgassing as a major supplier of gases to the World Ocean and the atmosphere, and, possibly, (3) microbial activities … . The writers provide quantitative estimates of the scope and extent of their corresponding effects on the Earth’s climate [and] show that the human-induced climatic changes are negligible.”

* Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa: “That portion of the scientific community that attributes climate warming to CO2 relies on the hypothesis that increasing CO2, which is in fact a minor greenhouse gas, triggers a much larger water vapour response to warm the atmosphere. This mechanism has never been tested scientifically beyond the mathematical models that predict extensive warming, and are confounded by the complexity of cloud formation – which has a cooling effect. … We know that [the sun] was responsible for climate change in the past, and so is clearly going to play the lead role in present and future climate change. And interestingly… solar activity has recently begun a downward cycle.”

* David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester: “The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.”

* William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus and head of The Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University: “This small warming is likely a result of the natural alterations in global ocean currents which are driven by ocean salinity variations. Ocean circulation variations are as yet little understood. Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature changes. We are not that influential.

“I am of the opinion that [global warming] is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people. So many people have a vested interest in this global-warming thing—all these big labs and research and stuff. The idea is to frighten the public, to get money to study it more.”

These and a range of additional referenced comments and conclusions can be seen here.

Despite this, and the recent leaking of a large number of documents which show that climate change proponents in Britain falsified data to prove their case, the great handout of taxpayers’ cash to the Third World seems set to continue at the Copenhagen Summit next month.

Fortunately, there will be at least one voice of sanity at the Copenhagen Conference: British National Party leader Nick Griffin will be attending as part of the EU delegation.

“Those who warn of the consequences of climate change had reached an Orwellian consensus not based on scientific agreement, but on bullying, censorship and fraudulent statistics,” Mr Griffin said in a speech in the EU parliament last week.

“The anti-western intellectual cranks of the left suffered a collective breakdown when communism collapsed. Climate change is their new theology… But the heretics will have a voice in Copenhagen and the truth will out. Climate change is being used to impose an anti-human utopia as deadly as anything conceived by Stalin or Mao.”

*The full list of Commonwealth countries who welcomed the cash handouts are as follows:

Antigua and Barbuda; Bahamas; Bangladesh; Barbados; Belize; Botswana; Brunei; Cameroon; Dominica; Gambia; Ghana; Grenada; Guyana; India; Jamaica; Kenya;

Kiribati; Lesotho; Malawi; Malaysia; Maldives; Malta; Mauritius; Mozambique; Namibia; Nauru; Nigeria; Pakistan; Papua New Guinea; Rwanda; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; Samoa; Seychelles; Sierra Leone; Singapore; Solomon Islands; South Africa; Sri Lanka; Swaziland; Tanzania;

Tonga; Trinidad and Tobago; Tuvalu; Uganda; Vanuatu; and Zambia.

* It will be noted that Mozambique is also a Commonwealth nation member, despite never having been a British colony.

By David Morris — The ruling elite have different approaches towards white Britons and immigrants on a number of issues, but the most disturbing of all is the psychological warfare waged against indigenous British people. Their main tactic consists of trying to generate a sense of guilt and a feeling of “having wronged others” amongst our people — while at the same time ensuring that we are blamed for all ills affecting any other ethnic group.

For example, the recent Channel 4 show, The Event: How Racist Are You? presented only white people as the “racists” and blacks and Asians as victims. It really does seem that the ruling elite will not be happy until all white people have been cleansed from Britain or savagely murdered, as is happening in Zimbabwe and South Africa.

Why do the media and MPs like Barry Gardiner get so hysterical about truthful people (such as South Wales’ Roger Phillips in his excellent video “BNP: The True Face of Immigration”)?

The Mr Gardiners of the world get so hysterical because videos like that expose clearly how they have lied to their own people. Indigenous British people have been pushed out of their communities by force of numbers. Young British people have had to face unfair competition for jobs from imported cheap labour.

Such videos show the ruling elite for what they are — cheats and liars.  They have cowed critics with accusations of “racism” and in that way have ensured that whole areas have been taken over by aliens. All the while, the elites continue to live in “good” areas and send their children to the best schools.

As the popular clamour for fair play grows, the establishment has become more oppressive. In Italy, for example, a court recently reduced an African-origin murderer’s prison sentence because he had a genetic strand called MAOA which made him “genetically predisposed to violence.” Critics have pointed out that this could be used to argue that genes determine behaviour. This allegation did not deter the liberal judges — it seems that they believe in race when it is to the advantage of immigrants, but when “our” people mention the topic we are met with vilification.

In Britain, newspapers announced earlier this year that a new security strategy to “tackle extremists is to focus on White racists.” This followed an order to the police to “go easy” on Muslim terrorists. Scotland Yard claimed that “far right” groups could be planning a terrorist “spectacular” to stoke up racial tensions. I wouldn’t put it past security services to do one and blame the “far-right.”

Met Commander Shaun Sawyer signalled the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists when he told the Muslim Safety Forum at the beginning of July this year that security services would focus on “whites.” He knew that in January 2009, the head of domestic security service MI-5 had revealed that 2,000 people in Britain were involved with to Islamist terrorist plots and many more support terrorism through fundraising and propaganda. From September 11, 2001 to the end of March 2008, British authorities arrested 1,471 Muslims for terrorism-related offences.

In spite of all of this, the police have increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring “rightwing extremists.” Facts and figures aside, they appear to genuinely regard a lone crank as more important than the thousands and thousands of Islamistis running free in Britain.

In 2007, a newspaper reported on how identified al-Qaeda supporters had been employed  by the police. “Eight Al Qaeda fanatics working for the police (but they don’t dare sack them),” read the headline.

Incredibly, it is official police policy to alert “Muslim community leaders” before they raid premises in the search for explosives and terrorists. They even put little booties on explosive-sniffing dogs so as “not to offend” the suspected terrorists. One has to wonder on whose side the security services and the police are?

The New Local Government Network report, titled Reassessing Prevent, adds to the creation of a climate of persecution of patriots. It shifts the terrorist threat to the BNP because of their election success in the European elections as well as their 55 local councillors.

Apparently this “underlines the fact that racial hatred and extremist ideology is not limited to any one faith or community.”

Comparing a defence of your children and communities with terrorism shows the corrupt minds of establishment propagandists like Anna Turley, author of the report.  She said: “While Islamist extremism remains a very serious threat to our security, this kind of extremism is not the only threat to the stability and security of our communities.”

Why do the security services and police cover up Muslim extremism?  Here is a clue: former Italian President Francesco Cossiga admitted in the Italian paper Corriere della Sera in 2008, that in the 1970s, the Italian government allowed Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks.

The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a “secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups.”  It was Moro who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists, Cossiga said.

“The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were ‘handled’ by the secret services.”

As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. “The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country.”

Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and did not need to answer questions or to show papers. This began under Thatcher who herself lived safely in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. Few have legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses.

This was after the London bombing of 7/7 and without it al-Qeeda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. The authorities know what they are doing.

During the protests in Luton when Muslim extremists shouted abuse at the homecoming parade of the Royal Anglian Regiment, the police arrested a white protester but allowed the Muslims to abuse the soldiers.

Eight young Muslim terrorists on active service from Birmingham, London and Luton, were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps. Do we believe them?

As far back as 1999, it was reported that around 2,000 British Muslims were being trained in British terror camps, mainly in London and Birmingham. As well as studying holy war, the trainees were taught hand-to-hand combat, survival skills for guerrilla warfare and advised to get real military training in war zones like the Yemen and Afghanistan. Many do, because Birmingham accents have been picked up there by RAF Nimrod aircraft.

British-based Muslim terrorists operate abroad but still the authorities bring them here. For example, in December 2001, Richard Reid a supporter of al-Qaeda tried to detonate a shoe-bomb on a Paris to Miami aeroplane.  In 2002, Ahmed Sheik, organised the kidnap and murder of Daniel Pearl in Pakistan.

Mohammed Hanif and Omar Shariff were involved in a suicide bomb attack in Tel Aiv.  Abu Qatada ran the Spanish, Milan and German al-Qaeda cells from London.

British-based terrorists have carried out operations in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kenya, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Israel, Morocco, Russia, Spain, and America. Many governments such as Jordanian, Egyptian, Moroccan, Spanish, French, and American have protested against our elites allowing the Islamist terrorist infrastructure in this country and refusing to extradite wanted operatives.

The American Heritage Foundation regards Britain as a terrorist danger. How have we allowed our establishment to drag us down to that level?

The Muslim community shelters extremists and illegal immigrants as they did the murderers of Kriss Donald and the media aid and abet them by covering up the facts of such cases.

Palestinian mores glorify suicide bombers as ‘ Shahid ‘ or martyrs and terrorism is part of the Palestinian mentality. Many British Muslims hero worship them. In Britain they are bombers because of ideology, not social conditions, and are usually middle class Muslims born and educated in Britain. This is an “enemy within” that does not have to invade because it was imported by the elites who pour taxpayers’ money into their communities such as Bradford, Burnley, Oldham and Keighley.

At Shehzad Tanweer’s memorial funeral in his home village in Pakistan, an estimated 10,000 mourners chanted Jihad, Jihad, Jihad and eulogised the suicide bomber.

On 27 July 2005, BBC reporter Phil Mackie admitted on Radio 5 Brian Hayes 10 pm programme that the BBC censors the truth about Muslims and that the BBC is selective in its broadcasting of Muslim statements. The function of the media is to prepare the public for whatever measures the establishment plan to further the Muslim extremists’ interests.

The elites treat us as enemy and scapegoat us when the multi-racial dream falters. The hysterical reports blaming Ulster people for the disputes with Roma gypsies is a classic example. The media never told us what caused the dispute but just accused local people of “racist attacks.” Well, I don’t believe them. I think these people were defending their communities.

The default position is anti-British and what was normal, healthy patriotism is now demonised as “far-right” and patriots are subject to slander and discrimination. To put things in perspective, there are about 200 investigations into Muslim terror plots being conducted by security services and the courts.

Even though the BNP have proscribed the EDL the media treat them as interchangeable as they try to slot the BNP into their ideology as “thugs” and “knuckle draggers.”

The police violence against the EDL anti-Muslim extremist demo in Leeds is a warning of what the establishment really want to do to the BNP. One of the police tricks seems to be based on the Hillsborough tragedy — that of “funnelling” the protesters into tight groups and chasing them while they fall over and get trampled as you will see in the video from Leeds.

The Government advertise in terrorist countries like Pakistan for immigrants to come here. In November 2006 a Foreign Office pamphlet advertised: “Multicultural Britain — A Land of Immigrants.” It stated that immigrants should immigrate here because of the Human Rights Act would protect them and well-paid jobs were available for them.

The Foreign Office put the document “Ethnic Diversity” in British embassies across the world.

Of convicted terrorists in Britain about 27 of 87 were trained or sought training in Pakistan or Afghanistan, Eighteen had terrorist training in Britain. Despite this, Labour’s “open door” immigration policy knowingly risked allowing dangerous people to settle in Britain unchecked, The Sunday Times reported on 8 November after secret documents were leaked. The evidence had been illegally withheld by the Home Office for four years.

A European Union initiative The Barcelona Agreement, which comes into force on 1  January,  give rights of settlement to millions of Muslims from North Africa and grant them legal preference over indigenous as well as increasing attacks on Jewish communities. The Maastricht Treaty took control of our borders off us and John Major lied when he said it didn’t.

The new Chief of the Armed forces, General Sir David Richards, launched a support network for Muslims in the armed forces The Armed Forces Muslim Association. He said it “reflects the growing numbers, importance and relevance of their service and superb contribution they are making to the armed forces in the UK.” It will help “forge closer relationships with Islamic communities across the UK.”  How many al-Qaeda  supporters are in the British military?

As well as linking with Muslims, the military are preparing to shoot us if we protest against being dispossessed. Military personnel are being selected to form regiments prepared to shoot their own people.

In the “England Expects” blog, under the title “Scared Yet,” Libertarian Party leader Ian Parker-Joseph revealed that the M.O.D. were asking military personnel: “Will you open fire on UK citizens?… In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to ‘open fire’ on UK citizens during civil disturbances.”

This was also revealed by the mother of a serving soldier on the net but she quickly removed it. This is corroborated by Dr. Richard North who learnt that the M.O.D. was buying up “unusually large quantities of tear gas and other riot equipment.”

The warning signs point towards military action against people who try to resist the displacement of our communities and destroying our children’s and grandchildren’s  future by encouraging cheap labour by giving them extra state benefits that are denied to us.  I urge readers with friends and relations in the military to keep us informed of this evil plan.

A seven man team distributed more than 2,000 new glossy British National Party leaflets in Princes End yesterday morning, reports Black Country super activist Councillor Russ Green.

“The team, accompanied by new activist Pete, braved the freezing cold morning and simply pounded the streets until the job was done,” Cllr Green said.

“In the new year, Team Black Country BNP will undertake the mammoth task of getting more people elected in Sandwell and Dudley,” Cllr Green continued.

“Help will certainly be required. If a seven-man team can produce a leaflet drop of 2,000 in under two hours, just imagine the impact on the run up to the local and general elections in May or June 2010. With your help, it’s all there for the taking,” he said.

The decision to continue activism right through the winter period was taken after a friendly opposition Sandwell councillor told Team Black country that the other parties would be ganging up on every BNP ward in the near future.

“This Councillor intimated that the BNP will be targeted in every key ward, particularly those with sitting BNP councillors, in a coordinated attempt to undermine the party,” Cllr Green said.

“I’ve seen a marked difference in the attitude of the other parties’ councillors,” he added. “There is a growing respect for the BNP’s ability to stand its ground and not retreat one inch under fire,” Cllr Green said.

Former organiser John Salvage added that with the “media and assembled enemies now panic stricken over the BNP’s double win in the EU, it is easy to see why an all-out effort by the three-headed monster is imminent.”

Cllr Green also announced that the Black Country’s BNP Christmas Lectures are now over half-way subscribed. Anyone still wanting to book a place on this unique event should email Cllr Green at rgreen13 @ btinternet.com.

Visit the Team Black Country BNP blog by clicking here.

The British National Party has launched its latest full-colour leaflet designed to provide an overview of party policies for voters.

The boldly designed leaflet starts out with a no to crime, immigration, EU rule and high taxes message, and a yes to “bringing our troops home” message on the front page.

Inside, it details six bullet points of BNP policy and trumpets the BNP’s electoral successes, while the reverse shows BNP councillors’ contributions to their communities.

The fabulous leaflets are available at £15 per 1000 from the national despatch manager Alywn Deacon at 077 0934 6012 or email despatch @ bnp.org.uk. Postage depends on quantity.

Retired British Army General Sir Michael Rose has echoed the demand first made by the British National Party for Tony Blair to be prosecuted for war crimes trials following the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq.

Writing in a daily newspaper today, Sir Michael used the language that the BNP has already been using for several years by calling for Mr Blair to stand trial and “face charges for war crimes.”

Referring to the Chilcot inquiry into the war, Sir Michael wrote that it should be the “first step in a judicial process that brings those responsible for the disasters of the Iraq war before the courts  -  and could, as I shall explain, ultimately result in Tony Blair being indicted for war crimes.”

Sir Michael then reviewed the past week’s evidence to the Chilcot inquiry which proved that Mr Blair lied blatantly to the House of Commons and the public about Iraq’s alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

The evidence spelled out how Mr Blair and other senior government figures had been specifically told that there were no WMDs, no missiles, no atom bombs and that there was no legal basis to pursue a war against Iraq.

“Despite these compelling accounts of what happened, the truth is that we already know the main lessons of Iraq: Britain was taken unprepared into war on false grounds, and the inevitable result was the destruction of Iraq, enormous loss of life and continuing political turmoil in the Middle East. Worse, the war has radicalised Muslim opinion against the West throughout the world, even spawning terrorism on the streets of London,” Sir Michael said, echoing almost word for word what the BNP has been saying all along.

The BNP has warned for years that the main source of terrorism in Britain is British foreign policy which incites the Muslim world against us, and mass Third World immigration which creates a huge pool from which radicalised Muslims can recruit.

Sir Michael also pointed out the “horrific” human cost to this war generated on “false grounds.”  He wrote that “over 100,000 Iraqi civilians and more than 4,500 soldiers from coalition forces have been killed during almost seven years of the occupation — and probably ten times that number have been injured. Two million Iraqis have fled their country and another two million have been internally displaced.”

Sir Michael then repeated another BNP point by writing that the decision to go to war was one “in which the majority of MPs . . . were complicit.”

He goes on to write that if “one of my military students at the British Army Command and Staff College had produced such a sloppy and weak case for war as did Tony Blair before Parliament, I would have sacked him.”

He added that Britain has a tradition of holding its leaders to account when they lead the country to disaster. He points out that when the British Army was defeated at Yorktown in 1781 at the end of the American War of Independence, the entire British Cabinet resigned.

“When Winston Churchill, who as First Sea Lord had been the main architect of the Empire’s Gallipoli campaign against the Turks, saw the scale of the disaster that happened there in 1915, he immediately volunteered for the trenches in France — where, no doubt, he hoped to find death or redeem his honour.

“In contrast, Blair today swans about the world making millions from business contracts and lectures. And, to make matters still more distasteful, much of these earnings are only made possible because of the American and Middle Eastern contacts he made as a result of his unconditional support for Bush during the Iraq war,” Sir Michael wrote.

“That is why I believe that, if justice is to prevail, and faith in democracy is to be restored in this country, Tony Blair and those officials responsible for the disasters of the Iraq war should appear in a court of law which could lead to them being indicted for war crimes.

“We owe this much at least to those many brave and courageous people who have died or been injured in Iraq as well as to their families,” Sir Michael concluded.

Exactly what the BNP has been saying all along, long before it was fashionable to do so. The BNP would also seek the prosecution of those reckless media owners and editors who played a role in encouraging the deception, and of those civil servants who helped compile the tissue of lies for which so many have now needlessly died.

The utterly fake UKIP party offered to disband completely, thereby betraying its supporters, if the Conservative Party agreed to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, that party’s new leader has announced.

According to reports, new UKIP leader Lord Pearson, made the offer to the Tories immediately after the European elections in June this year.

Lord Pearson said that he had approached Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader in the Lords, six months ago and asked him to tell David Cameron that if he guaranteed a referendum and gave the Conservative Party a free vote, “then UKIP would disband and its members stand down.”

He said he was acting on behalf of his predecessor, Nigel Farage, when the offer was made.

BNP Councillor Chris Beverley, who is the constituency Office Manager in Yorkshire and the Humber and PA to Andrew Bron MEP, said that the “proposed deal is nothing spectacular in itself and could actually be regarded as a good strategic move by UKIP.

“It is highly unlikely that they will win seats at the general election, perceived as they are by most people (very rightly) to be a single-issue party with no relevance whatsoever in local or parliamentary elections,” Cllr Beverley said.

“Were the Tories to accept this deal, UKIP could save themselves the embarrassment of performing poorly in the general election and claim full credit for any ensuing referendum and its consequences,” he continued.

“It is fairly unthinkable that Cameron’s Tory party would accept such a deal of course, so UKIP can now claim that their selfless offer shows a genuine desire to put the interests of the country first, ahead of party political consideration, and its rejection by the Tories shows them to be utterly out of touch and unsympathetic to people’s genuine concerns about the rise of the EU-superstate.

“What is of greater relevance is the statement by the UKIP leader that, ‘…when we had the referendum – which we believed we would win – we would then be out of the European Union and then at that point UKIP…would probably have disbanded because its major point would no longer be in existence.’

“In other words, despite pretending to be more than just a single-issue pressure group, UKIP’s leader has admitted quite openly that the party that claims to have a manifesto on a wide range of issues would actually disband should there be a referendum on one particular EU Treaty,” Cllr Beverley said.

“We therefore have proof that the party that is cynically wheeled out at election time by the Establishment to parasitically feed on votes otherwise destined for the British National Party, could not care less about the many issues facing our people that have nothing to do with our membership of the EU, such as mass immigration from the Third World, the disastrous war of aggression being fought in Afghanistan and the one being planned against Iran, the deliberate erosion of law and order in this country and its replacement by a system in which the rights of criminals are elevated above the rights of its citizens, or any of the other various problems that our nation continues to face.

“UKIP are not interested in lifting a finger, for example, to address the scandal of the UK taxpayer having to pay for new identities for the vile individuals who tortured to death Baby P, in order to save them from receiving the justice that the British state is unwilling to serve on them itself,” he said.

“UKIP has nothing to say about any of these things and the above statement by its new leader shows just what a shallow and worthless party it is. It is the duty of all patriots to oppose this establishment pressure-valve party and vote it out of existence.”#

The Morley Patriot blog from which this article was taken can be found by clicking here.

Councillor John Walker, who is also the British National Party’s deputy press officer, has been appointed new North Wales secretary, it was announced at a re-launch meeting of the party in that region last night.

Mr Walker told the crowd that he had also reformed the Alyn & Deeside group and had appointed old hand Colin Goodgroves as fundholder.

In addition, Mr Walker said, Sarah Hynes had been appointed as new organiser for Llandudno where she will be assisted by fundholder John Barrclough-Allen.

Guest speakers at the meeting were Wales regional organiser Brian Mahoney and South Wales Secretary Clive Bennett.

Mr Mahoney spoke on how Britain is changing beyond all recognition due to the sustained immigration invasion and European federalisation. Mr Mahoney pointed out that the British people were never consulted about these changes.

He also outlined the party’s plans for the next general election which include an unprecedented number of BNP candidates in Wales.

Mr Bennett then provided a very informative speech on the sacrifices made by the soldiers of the First World War and of the example these men and women had set.

The meeting ended with a buffet and a social gathering which allowed guests and members to enjoy the rest of the evening in a relaxed atmosphere.

The British National Party’s Alan Hewitt will be contesting the parliamentary seat of Burton at the next election, it was announced at a packed meeting held this week in the town.

“I intend to mount a full scale challenge to the Labour Party at the next election,” Mr Hewitt said. “It is about time that the voters of Burton had an alternative and we are going to give it to them.”

The meeting was chaired by West Midlands regional organiser Alwyn Deacon, who explained that the gathering as to “kick start the general election” for that part of the country.

The first speaker was Burton BNP secretary Andy Vernon who updated the meeting with details of the BNP’s growth in the constituency.

Next speaker was BNP deputy leader Simon Darby who provided a number of amusing anecdotes about Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time and how this had greatly benefitted the party in terms of publicity and appeal.

Mr Darby also announced that he had taken up a leftist challenge to himself to get a DNA test and he was proud to announce that he had no ancestors outside of Europe.

The last speaker was BNP foreign affairs spokesman Arthur Kemp who discussed the foreign aid scandal and how taxpayers’ money was given away while there was real need inside Britain.

A collection was held which raised £213 for the election campaign.

Manchester British National Party super activist Derek Adams has released a new video which details the city council’s hypocrisy in closing down his business while leaving Muslim-owned eyesores in the immediate vicinity untouched.

The British taxpayer will be forced to hand over an additional £800 million to the Third World for “climate change” if Gordon Brown and his allies have their way.

Mr Brown called today for the creation of a $10 billion a year fund to “help developing countries battle climate change.”

Mr Brown’s proposal comes in the week that strong evidence emerged that the case for climate change has either been vastly overstated or even forged.

Nonetheless, the momentum amongst the establishment politicians in favour of the “climate change theory” is now so overwhelming that they have simply ignored recent developments and have pushed through with their pre-planned agenda.

According to this anti-Western guilt trip scenario, industrialised nations are responsible for “climate change” and therefore morally obliged to pay off “poorer” nations (read the Third World) as “compensation.”

Mr Brown’s proposal was made at a Commonwealth leaders’ summit in Trinidad today. If it is accepted by other nations, the money will be handed out to the Third World as early as next year.

British taxpayers will doubtless be ecstatic to hear that despite a massive deficit and imminent cutbacks in services at home, Mr Brown has already set aside the £800 million in Britain’s budget for this fund.

“What I feel the developing countries need to know is that we are absolutely serious that we would start now,” Mr Brown said.

“What I’m proposing today is a Copenhagen launch fund. It would start in 2010. It would be $10 billion per annum by 2012,” he said.

Last month, the European Union said that “developing countries” will need €100 billion every by 2020 to “battle climate change.”

Acording to Mr Brown, half of the money would go to “financing stronger sea and flood defences” in the Third, while the rest would help those countries deal with “deforestation and building new, cleaner energy sources.”

Deforestation is of course, a phenomena which is purely local and cannot in any way be “blamed” on the West.

* At the same conference, Mr Brown announced his intention to bring the nation of Zimbabwe back into the Commonwealth, despite its appalling human rights record. In 2001, at the height of the anti-white farm evictions, the then Zimbabwe vice president, Joseph Msika, justified the murder of white farmers by telling the BBC that “whites were not human.”

By Jonathan B

It has been discovered that a programme currently being distributed in schools to combat violent extremism is in fact government propaganda designed to whitewash the effects of immigration, a YBNP investigation has revealed.

The programme,  ‘Where’s The Line’,  has so far cost the taxpayer £20,000 and will be shown in Religious Education and Citizenship classes in the form of printouts and slideshows.

After hearing about the new programme I decided to take a look. So I signed up under a schools name in order to access the documents which contain anti-white, pro-Islam, extreme left-wing propaganda, which will be force fed to pupils in Primary and Secondary schools.

After viewing the slideshow, I found rather secretive ‘Teachers Notes’, which took an hour or so to get through. It contained 5 PDF Documents. To my dismay, it contained further anti-white and pro-Islam propaganda for the teacher to preach to children.

The programme claims that there have been no criminal, economic or educational effects of immigration, despite official figures showing that the majority of new jobs in Britain over the past 5 years have gone to immigrants.

Listing some of the stuff I have found in those documents would make for a rather cluttered article, so here are some screenshots of the madness:

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/6031/article1.gif

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6893/article2.gif

On the same document, a large table is shown stating ‘Myths’ and ‘Facts’ and a source of the information, often linking to the Islam Awareness Week website ‘iaw.org.uk’. The table, consisting of 20 rows, contains what the government call ‘Myths’ and ‘Facts’ as shown on the images below:

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/8982/article3.gif

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/4738/article4.gif

There are 20 rows of Pro-Islam material shown on this document, and the final 2 rows show just how the government try to make immigrants look innocent as well as showing how they more likely to get more qualifications, as shown below:

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/278/article5.gif

At no point does it actually talk about extremism, as all of the documents are filled with Pro-Islamic statements.

As I moved onto another PDF, I found material for teachers to choose from in the form of articles about violent extremism. These articles are not shown on the material given to the pupils. Out of the 5 Articles in the Teachers Notes, one of them is from 2007, about Mr Cottage, a BNP member at the time, stocking up on things such as a Bow and Arrow, and 2 Radiation Suits. The editors of the programme seem to think this is more important than terrorist bombings and the current threat from Islamic extremism.

Then I uncover ever more shocking things that pupils are told to do, which is as follows:

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/8606/article6y.gif

Yes! Pupils are being told to debate FOR Multiculturalism, and AGAINST historic British culture. Further proof that in this ‘state’ there is a serious underpinned conspiracy to force us into a multi-cultural society and to concrete over our culture with a Marxist fist.

Pupils are then shown images such as Cricket, Cathedrals, and Fish and Chips, alongside images of Chinese families, China Town, a town containing all Muslim orientated shops, and an image of a black family.

The final blow in this report comes in the 5^th PDF at the very end; pupils are given a list of phone numbers to call if they need help.  The list, shown on the PDF is as follows:

http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/249/article7.gif

The National Youth Muslim Support Group. Clearly, this shows how it really is, they get to have everything, yet we get nothing.

How is this psychological propaganda allowed to circulate through schools in Britain?

The ‘Where’s The Line’ programme will enter schools across the country soon after being tested in Greater Manchester.

LINKS

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk/Pdf/resource1.pdf

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk/Pdf/resource2.pdf

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk/Pdf/resource3.pdf

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk/Pdf/resource4.pdf

http://www.wherestheline.co.uk/Pdf/resource5.pdf

PDF does not require any login when visited directly, but the student resources do require a log in (you can register to view them).

In what can only be described as one of the most bizarre examples of “New Tory” thought, the House of Commons Speaker wants to force parties to publicly reveal how many ethnic minority members they reject as parliamentary candidates.

Apart from ethnic “minorities,” parties will also be forced to state how many women and disabled people apply to be candidates and who are rejected, if the proposal by John Bercow becomes law.

In something which could only otherwise have come out of the reverse speak of George Orwell’s 1984, Mr Bercow said the rule would “help encourage people from different backgrounds to apply to become MPs.”

Mr Bercow added that the proposal was likely to become law after it had received support from the Tories, Labour and Liberal-Democrats.

Apparently previous attempts to “increase diversity have been uneven” and that the “Commons was not representative enough of people who were not white, middle-class, middle-aged and able-bodied.”

According to Mr Bercow, it is not enough that parties publicly provide updates on candidate selection. His proposal takes it a step further and says that future reports need to include who had applied and been rejected.

This would “exert pressure on the parties to drive for greater equality. To monitor progress properly requires data from all stages of the selection process, from the initial call for applicants to the final outcome,” the cross parliamentary committee headed by Mr Bercow on the issue, declared. “Otherwise we will only ever know about the individuals who are successful.”

Mr Bercow’s proposal will now be submitted as an amendment to the upcoming Equality Bill. It will require parties to declare every six months how many “non-selected candidates’ applications” it had received.

Mr Bercow’s proposal takes the earlier call by Tory leader David Cameron for anti-white male selection lists a step further. Previously, Mr Cameron had called for “A-lists” of minority candidates to be pushed in over the heads of local Conservative Party associations.

Now, it seems that the Tories have taken their anti-white mania to new heights and have fully endorsed the principles underlying the Labour Party’s proposed Equality Act.

At least now there can be no doubt in the public’s mind that there is indeed no difference between Tory, Labour and Liberal-Democrat when it comes to putting the indigenous British people last.

Popular demand has seen Excalibur, the merchandising arm of the British National Party, to once again stock the famous “Santa over Stonehenge” and “Green Santa” Xmas cards.

The two designs come with envelopes and are available in packs of ten from the Excalibur website by clicking here.

Other Christmassy items include a new set of Tudor educational colouring postcards and Celtic educational colouring posters for the kids.

The Tudor postcard set contains 4 colouring postcards with Tudor images on the front and a postcard design on the reverse with educational information. Each pack is supplied with 6 pencils.

The Celtic poster set contains 4 A3 colouring posters with Celtic images on, supplied with 6 pencils. The pack also contains an activity sheet with crossword puzzle.

They are part of a range of educational children’s gifts which can be found by clicking here.

Finally, don’t forget to stock up on the new “Best of British” bulldog mugs, which can be found by clicking here.