Comments on: Lessons from Black History Month

By: smoking barrel

smoking barrel — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:39:51 +0000

Do the taxpayers in Trowbridge know they paid for celebrations for black history month? Sounds very much like another pc event to me – really not necessary when the money could and should be used for a more needy cause!

In answer too this I would first ask what is a more worthy cause erm let me think, giving white paedophiles a new identity and re-housed and set up in new areas at the tax payers expense or errrrrrm white serial killers held in max security prison when it would be better to just kill em and save money.
Or the rehabilitation of white parents incapable of bringing up children and brutally murdering them or dreaming up dumb ass kidnap plots in order to fleece more money from tax payers after sitting on their lazy arses claiming every benefit going… if thats what im up against then i really have nothing to fear!

By: pauljames

pauljames — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:40:24 +0000

Well said,and lots of our commonwealth forces gave their lives to continue that dream!

By: 130770CK5

130770CK5 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:41:50 +0000

There is no need to say what colour we are. Why do black people need to tell us that they are black, is it their way of saying that they are somehow better that anyone else because of their skin colour, to challenge everyone else for some obscure reason. I do not know why they do this, but it has become confrontational and I am not going to be drawn into this. There is no need for me to tell anyone that I am white, I have no particular pride in being white, as this is how I was born. I was born English and I shall remain English, something that no black person can be! They claim to be British, well civically yes, this being the case I should always call myself English, you really do have to be English (Scots, Irish, Welsh) to claim to be this, British now means something else? As for white, well it’s not my fault that we real British are white, accident of birth I think.

So when I say I’m English, you may assume that I am ‘white’ (pink even).

By: mike

mike — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:21:35 +0000

During the 1960's when I was at school in Christchurch, New Zealand, we were taught to be proud of ourselves and that we were 'Children of The Empire" all our teachers were English and had been through the war and told us facinating stories, made you real proud to be white. No-one DARED laid a finger on us kids back then, not like what our children have to put up with now. How did this come?
Growing up there I guess was like looking at one of your old movies from the 1940's, slightly behind the times, (I can still remember men tipping their fedora hats in appreciation to my attractive mother) everyone dressed nicely, white swans floating majestically on the Avon and Heathcote river, big old federation houses to live in, large backyards and the usual vegie patch and fruit trees, Saturdays were usually spent rowing on the Avon with our families, or watching cricket or rugby on the large parks that had dafidills growing wiledly everywhere. Yes looking back, it was like watching a period drama and unfortuneatly it will never be the same again.
And you felt you BELONGED.

By: Goodsense

Goodsense — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:18:57 +0000

Some blacks are cleverer than whites. Black culture has it's heroes and heroines and achievements. I would not dream of denying it. But really all this rubbish that we are all Africans and they have been here in great numbers for centuries, responsible for any and every invention. The only response is laughter. Are black people so unsure of themselves, their history and heritage that they must invent their own past. What is it that will not allow them to acknowledge the heroes, heroines and achievements of whites and the white world. Would doing that force them to acknowledge their own flaws.

By: Goodsense

Goodsense — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:41:19 +0000

Nice one.

By: Goodsense

Goodsense — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:37:04 +0000

Stupid people who think they are insulting us. Dogs are loyal loving creatures. For long have they served our kind as workers, helpers and companions. They are colour blind. Let them think of me as a dog. That they have no judgement or common sense in these matters is their problem not mine. To me it means only that I stand comparison with a noble creature.

By: Armand

Armand — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:00:29 +0000

My brother said a very similar thing quite a few years back, and it made me crease up! He said: "What use is Black History when you can only fit it in into 1 month?" lol

By: pauljames

pauljames — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:19:34 +0000

Funny havent heard from T Phillips since last Thursday,afterall he did say that "multiculturism dosn`t work"

By: matt1992

matt1992 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:06:26 +0000

That my friend is a common misconception, I’m an A level student living in Cornwall, and have over the past six years studied various subjects ranging fro the Normans to the cold war. We don’t do slavery, or the civil rights movement in America. You should get your facts right! The courses are broad and very inclusive, last year my A's level module was on 16th century England.

Vote BNP!

By: willp

willp — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:35:25 +0000

I would really like to know what is being taught in black history month. is it taught to all students or is aparteid being introduced to brithish schools?

By: cigpapers

cigpapers — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:22:24 +0000

How about setting up a charity for Indigenous British victims of multiculturalism?

By: SheriffofNottingham

SheriffofNottingham — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:08:16 +0000

The name Africa is usually connected with Phoenician afar, "dust", but another theory asserts that it stems from a Berber word ifri or Ifran meaning "cave", in reference to cave-dwellers. Under Roman rule, Carthage became the capital of Africa Province, which also included the coastal part of modern Libya. The Roman suffix "-ca" denotes "country or land", so the name meant literally the land of dust or the land of the cave-dwellers. The 1st century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus claimed that it was named for Epher, grandson of Abraham whose descendants, he claimed, had invaded Libya. I suppose with so many conquerors and invaders, the poor Africans cannot claim to be indigenous now. What a shame.

By: JeromePeter_

JeromePeter_ — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:01:24 +0000

The Equal Pay Act of 1970 was the beginning of the end of discrimination in the workplace regarding women's pay. Then in 1975 The Sex Discrimination Act was brought in to supplement this legislation along with the Equal Opportunities Commission, which was supposed to oversee and implement the law.

Unfortunately the EOC was little more than a sexist feminist pressure group and was infiltrated very quickly by sexist hypocrites. Women have been brainwashed from ear to ear about equal pay, by the same media that lies about the BNP. There is no company in this country that pays women less for the same work. It's a myth. Take all factors into consideration, hours worked, jobs applied for, time out for children when men receive promotions etc, there is no bias. Many academics (including some feminists) have looked into this and concluded this but their work is never published by the man hating media.

By: littlenan

littlenan — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:37:46 +0000

They just ignore that.

In fact, long before whites took blacks as slaves, blacks were capturing white people from the south coast of England to sell as slaves in Africa. There is even a white tribe in Africa which they believe is descended from these white slaves.

I think the Africans owe us whites an apology for this slavery.

By: littlenan

littlenan — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:33:31 +0000

Pigs isn't it…

By: littlenan

littlenan — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:30:01 +0000

You really do dont you ……..

By: ChingfordLoyal

ChingfordLoyal — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:20:49 +0000

… and if we went to the South Pole we would make a success of it and the muslims would all want to go there and after they had invaded (wearing warm clothing supplied by us) they would tell us to go back to Europe!!!!

By: siaka

siaka — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:52:24 +0000

well yours flew over ours centuries ago so let ours and we didnt even complain..apart from asking you to leave briefly. fly tit for tat…we even nowadays allows you to fly ur flags in our countries just diplomaticaaly…DUMMY

By: shaunantijihad

shaunantijihad — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:22:00 +0000

The “one race” theory, that there was one developing human race in Africa, has these two options to explain the White race and the Oriental/Mongoloid race:
a) That Blacks ventured North and gradually changed colour as the lighter skinned among them procreated more as they lived longer due to their lighter skin in the colder climate. (This conveniently ignores the fact that Blacks easily out-reproduce Whites or Orientals.)
b) That Blacks had albino children who gradually clanned together and formed tribes, who then went further North to escape the sun of sub-Saharan Africa.

All this is supposed to have happened in just a few thousand years. What is not stated is that there are other differences that are more than skin deep. There are major skeletal differences between the Black race and the other races. Cranial size is substantially smaller in the Black race, and this corresponds with narrower hips in Black females. Major physical differences like this do not evolve over a few thousand years, but rather millions of years. The most likely explanation is that proto-humans like Homo Erectus or similar were widely distributed and subsequently evolved along separate lines until 3 distinct human species evolved, like lions and tigers. Yes they can interbreed but are nevertheless different species.

As the Oriental race is actually the most intelligent race, an admixture of, say, Japanese genes into the gene pool would actually shift the average IQ upwards slightly.

The main problem is that whilst the IQ gap between Whites and Orientals is very small, the gap with Blacks is enormous. Allowing a substantial amount of the population to interbreed with the Black race has the potential to “de-evolve” us, as it were, reducing the average IQ of the nation until the general intelligence level is insufficient to maintain and industrialised, technical society. One only has to look at Rhodesia to see the result of removing White genes, and one can make a subsequent prediction about South Africa.

I bet they don’t celebrate this in Black history month, but Koko the Gorilla has a tested IQ score of between 70 and 95, which is embarrassingly larger than sub-Saharan Homo Africanus, which has an average IQ of 85.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution_and_...
http://koko.org/world/