British National Party Home      
Andrew Brons MEP

Whites Fleeing Third World Invasion of British Schools

July 10, 2009 - By BNP News

alislahschoolWhite British people are fleeing the Third World invasion of schools in major centres and should be forced to use a ‘lottery system’ of school allocation to force them back into non-white dominated schools, a new report from the taxpayer-funded pro-immigration invasion ‘Institute for Community Cohesion’ (ICoCo) has found.

According to the ICoCo, which is jointly funded by the Coventry and Leicester City Councils and the Improvement and Development Agency for Local Government (IDeA), white parents are pulling their children “out of schools where they are outnumbered by ethnic minority pupils.”

This is, of course, a misnomer: if the majority of pupils are ‘ethnic minorities’ in those areas, that actually makes them ‘ethnic majorities’ – but this obvious fact is always deliberately left out by pro-immigration enthusiasts in an attempt to lull indigenous British people into a sense of ease over their impending dispossession of this country.

The ICoCo study was undertaken at 13 local areas by questioning parents from places such as Bristol, Bolton, Sunderland, Oldham and Blackburn. It found that where schools were “more mono-cultural,” parents of all ethnicities preferred to send their children to the school where pupils were most like them.

The report said that a lottery system of school allocation – such as the one used in Brighton to ensure the best schools are not monopolised by children from middle-class families – should be introduced to force whites back into these Third World dominated schools.

According to Nick Johnson, policy director at the institute: “If you did that in Blackburn or Bolton or Oldham, it would have a dramatic effect on the schools’ composition. White flight is certainly happening in specific areas of England. In the case of one school in Blackburn, once the number of non-white pupils got above 60 percent, white parents started saying they did not want their kids being the odd ones out.”

It suggested that “many” schools and colleges in these areas were “segregated to a greater or lesser extent and the evidence available to us at a local level suggested that this was generally worsening over recent years.”

The study said it reflected both parental choice and residential segregation, with many families of the same ethnic group living in the same area. Most mothers and fathers tended to push sons and daughters “to what they saw as the safe option, where children with similar backgrounds went.”

Researchers cited the case of one unnamed school where 85 percent of pupils were white British at the end of 2005. Over the next six months, pupils from 15 to 20 Somali families were admitted, said the study. “Many white parents reacted negatively, arguing that their children were being disadvantaged by large numbers of non-English speakers. By September 2006, 60 white children had been removed from the school… and the percentage of black and minority ethnic pupils rose to 45 percent.”

Researchers found evidence of pupils of different ethnicities not socialising even when sharing classrooms and playgrounds.

a-nation-of-immigrantsRecommended reading:

A Nation of Immigrants? A Brief Demographic History of Britain

by David Conway.

A must read! Using genetic, archaeological and historical evidence, this book shows that the British people are NOT a “nation of immigrants” as the far left lies, but actually a highly homogenous group of people with roots going back millennia.

Perfect to refute those who try and justify today’s mass Third World immigration.

Softcover, 104 pp.  £7.50 

 Click here to purchase.





Nick Griffin MEP

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Please note before posting comments:-

We receive a large volume of comments and not all will be published. The British National Party reserves the right to reject comments for reasons such as:

a. Encourages illegal activity.
b. Legal risk (libel/defamation/other).
c. Threatening or abusive tone (including personal attacks, racism, sexism, bias against age).
d. Contains or links to copyright material.
e. Foul language.
f. Spamming.
g. Excessive length.
h. Is very off-topic from the original discussion.

Moderation is applied to maintain standards, and the moderators decisons are final.

nb - Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of the British National Party. The British National Party accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy.

Many thanks for your support - Web Team