Current immigration trends into Britain, as outlined on this website yesterday, show that unless reversed, the tidal wave of Third World immigration into Britain will ensure that the indigenous people of this island will be a minority well within the next fifty years.

Over the short term, however, there are a number of more immediate results. The first and most directly felt effect of this massive immigration wave will be simple overcrowding. The population of the UK is already at record levels, and immigration has pushed population density in England to a higher level than any other major country in Europe.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics in 2008 show that there are on average of 395 people in every square kilometre in England.

This is an increase of five per sq km over the previous two years. The increase pushed England’s population density above the previous highest figure set by the Netherlands.

England is already more densely populated than India, and within the European Union, only the island of Malta has a higher population density.

Britain’s population is set to increase by about six million by 2031, of which 5 million (84 percent) will be due to immigration. Eighty percent of net migration is to London and the South East where the population density is one of the highest in Europe.

This overcrowding results in substantial congestion costs. A report by the Downing Street Strategy Unit suggested that the number of commuters to London is expected to increase by 10 to 20 percent by 2010.

Household projections are continuously revised to take account of the ever increasing immigration levels. In the period 1996 – 2021, the number of households is expected to increase by 4.5 million of which about one third will be a result of net inward migration.

Meanwhile, a recent report on London, commissioned for the Mayor, predicted an increase in population of 700,000 over the next fifteen years to 8.15 million, much of this due to international migration.

This will require 400,000 new houses and 130 new schools.

Legal immigration at the present projected rate will lead to a requirement of about 1.5 million houses in the period 2003 – 2026. Over the next twenty years, one in three new households will be the result of immigration.

Since brownfield sites provide two thirds of new homes, net immigration is the main reason for greenfield development. The extra population also adds to the pressure on transport and water supplies, both of which are already facing serious difficulties.

As of mid-2007, some 30 percent of London’s population was of Third World immigrant origin. This has led to children in London schools speaking more than 300 languages. The rapid rate of racial demographic change has meant that the English language is fast becoming a minority language in the capital of Britain, and, unless the process is checked, will become extinct in the foreseeable future.

In the last ten years, at least 600,000 white Londoners have left the city to be replaced by 700,000 non-white immigrants. This is changing the whole nature of London and other major cities. Whites are set to become minorities in Leicester, Birmingham, Bradford and Oldham by 2016. In all of these cases, the extinction of the indigenous English culture will follow as surely as day follows night.

The massive Third World immigration wave is well on the way to destroying the state physical infrastructure, such as the National Health Service.

According to a survey by the Royal College of Midwives issued in 2008, the quality of NHS care has plummeted because ministers failed to predict a massive rise in the birth rate among immigrant mothers.

Four in 10 midwives questioned by the RCM said care was worse as a direct result of the rising birth rate – and it was putting mothers and babies at risk. Almost all – 91 percent – said the birth rate had shot up on their wards over the past few years, putting their units under intolerable pressure.

As a result, several maternity wards at NHS hospitals in areas which serve largely white areas of the country, have been forced to shut their doors for months at a time because staff were needed elsewhere to deliver babies from foreign-born mothers in immigrant-dense areas. The cost of providing maternity services for immigrants has more than doubled in only a decade to £350 million a year.

Official figures from the Justice Ministry in Britain show that at least 11 percent of all prisoners in jail in mid-2008 were Muslim – a striking indication of that community’s grossly disproportionate participation in crime in Britain.

In May 2003, Chris Fox, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) told The Observer that “the mass movement of people around the world had brought new levels of organised crime, with drug dealing, gun offences, prostitution and kidnapping.”

“Mass migration has brought with it a whole new range and a whole new type, from the Nigerian fraudster . . . to the Jamaican concentration in drug dealing . . . if you go into some of the cities, looking at the North, Bradford simmers, Blackburn simmers. It doesn’t take much to disturb the balance, and I think we’ve got to be very careful to make sure that we’re not overwhelming our current infrastructure.”

After the conviction of Danny and Ricky Preddie, the Jamaican murderers of black youth Damilola Taylor, an article by Minette Marrin in The Sunday Times of August 2006 pointed out that: “The government has been either unwilling or unable to control, or even to estimate the vast numbers of new arrivals. Only now is it beginning to wonder whether this influx was an entirely good thing. At the time of Damilola’s death the ethnic composition of north Peckham in Southwark, where the estate (where he died) lies, was 43.4% white, 15.9% black Caribbean, 26.6% black African, 4.1% black other, 7.9% Asian and 2.2% other . . . Southwark today is still considered a high crime area by the Home Office and a high youth crime area . . . Violent crime there has risen from 10,000 incidents in 2000-01 to 12,500 in 2005-06, even though huge sums of money have been thrown at the problem.”

In the second edition of The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (1997), David J. Smith writes: “The rate of imprisonment for drugs offences was 10.8 times as high among blacks as among white men.”

The high crime rate among black immigrants in Britain has traditionally been ‘excused’ by allegations of ‘discrimination and police bias.’ This is, of course, nonsense. David Smith dealt with the topic this way:

“Although some bias against black people has been demonstrated at several stages, and although some apparently neutral criteria have been shown to work to the disadvantage of black people, the magnitude of these effects seems small compared with the stark contrast in rates of arrest and imprisonment between black and white people.”

The Third Edition of the Handbook of Criminology (2002) shows Home Office statistics of the male prison population by ethnic group, 1985-99. In 1999, the number of white males in prisons was 49,961, the number of black males was 7,355, the number of South Asians was 1,895, and the number of Chinese and other was 2,081.

In the same handbook, Coretta Philips and Ben Bowling make the following observation: “Ethnic monitoring data on Britain’s prison population have been available since 1985. The first statistics revealed a marked over-representation of West Indians, Guyanese, and Africans within prisons among both males and females.”

North African, African, and Caribbean youth gangs are responsible for the rising incidence of group rapes. The victims are overwhelmingly white women. Scotland Yard reported: “Suspects of African and Caribbean appearance were identified in 49 percent of attacks. A further 13 percent were committed by men of Indian/Pakistani appearance.”

In England, gang rapes and “jack rolling” (gangs of youths in cars block off streets and rape every woman caught in their net) were introduced into Britain by young blacks from Jamaica and South Africa.

Only a halting, and reversal, of the immigration policies of the past few decades can prevent this problem from threatening the very existence of Britain as a First World nation.

* This article is extracted from chapter three of The Immigration Invasion: How Third World immigration is destroying the First World and What Must be Done to Stop It, by Arthur Kemp. A shocking book detailing the full extent of the Third World immigration wave which is swamping the Western World. Using the latest numbers and projections, it explains why Third World immigration will destroy the First World, with individual chapters on Britain, Europe, Russia, Canada, the USA, Australia and New Zealand.  It shows that, if left unchecked, the First World will be overrun within the next 50 years.

Chapter headings: 1: Immigration: Why Does It Matter?; 2: How the Invasion is Being Carried Out; 3: The United Kingdom Rent Asunder; 4: Europe Under Attack Part I – Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands; 5:Europe Under Attack Part II – Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italy and Greece; 6: Europe under Attack Part III – Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland; 7: The Eastern Outpost -  Russia and the Eastern European States; 8: The Maple Leaf Wilts – Canada; 9: The Republic in Peril – The United States of America; 10: The Island Outposts Face Submersion – Australia and New Zealand; 11: What Must be Done; Appendices. Softcover, 140 pp. Price:  £10.95  Click here to order.