The Chinese government has shown the world how to deal with drug pushers by ignoring liberal bleating and executing convicted drug-smuggler Akmal Shaikh — a punishment which should be mandatory everywhere for that crime.

Mr Shaikh, who the media quite falsely claim to be a “British” man, was born in Pakistan in 1956. He moved to Britain in the 1960s and when he married a Hindu Indian, he insisted she convert to Islam before the marriage could take place.

Mr Shaikh and his family then lived in America during the 1980s (astonishing how Pakistani nationals appear to be able to glibly move between First World countries with no apparent immigration problems) but moved back to Britain when his estate agency went into bankruptcy.

He then started a minicab business in London but this also went insolvent. Mr Shaikh was accused of sexual harassment by a former employee at the company, although it is unknown if this contributed to the insolvency.

He then divorced and moved to Poland, where he was resident before travelling to China from where he was allegedly going on to perform at a nightclub in the neighbouring former Soviet republic of Kyrgyzstan. He was however arrested at Ürümqi Airport in September 2007 after a baggage search revealed he was carrying four kilograms (9 lb) of heroin. The Chinese criminal code provides the death penalty for smuggling heroin in quantities more than 50 grams (2 oz) and he was sentenced to death.

In his reaction, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he was “appalled” by Mr Shaikh’s execution — a position which contrasts strongly with his lack of empathy for the hundreds of British lives lost as a result of his and the Tory-supported illegal and immoral wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In those wars, British servicemen and women have been murdered in the most horrendous ways: by being blown up, shot at with sniper rifles, killed by roadside bombs and in rare occasions, even tortured to death by Islamist fighters, some of whom come from Britain.

Mr Brown and the liberal elite seem more concerned however, about one drug-smuggling Pakistani in China then they do about the hundreds of British soldiers they have sent to die in their dirty wars, or even of the tens of thousands of British pensioners who have already died this winter because they are unable to pay their privatised and dramatically increased heating bills.

Once again, the Tory-Labour-Lib-Dem alliance and their media-cronies have demonstrated their total disregard for the interests of the indigenous population of Britain by placing more value on the life of a Third World criminal than on their own people.  The wheels of justice grind slowly, but grind they will, and one day this liberal elite will be called to account for their crimes against the British people.

A police officer in Newport, Gwent, attempted to halt the filming of an Islamic martyr march led by the Tory Welsh Assembly member Mohammad Asghar.

Mr Asghar led the annual event — as he did last year as a Plaid Assembly member – proving that there is no difference at all between the Tory and Plaid parties (and the Labour Party, of which Mr Asghar was also previously a member). Mr Asghar recently joined the Tories after Plaid refused him permission to employ his daughter at taxpayers’ expense.

Even more disturbing than Mr “suitcase” Asghar’s political Tweedledee Tweedledum manoeuvres, was the instant positive response by a female police officer to a demand from a Muslim marcher that the public demonstration in Newport not be filmed.

As can be seen in the screenshots and video below, the march was nearly at an end when a burqa-wearing Muslim woman called over a nearby white policewoman to complain about the filming of the demonstration.

The slavish politically-correct and Muslim-worshipping programming to which the police are subjected instantly paid dividends. The policewoman immediately ran up to the cameraman and told him he could not film the march.

The cameraman asked under what law he was prohibited from filming. The policewoman was then forced to admit that she had no idea why he could not film the public demonstration.

In other words, this policewoman was quite willing to carry out the orders of a Muslim who hid her face in public, against an indigenous person in the streets of Newport.

This is the inevitable result of the Islamic colonisation of Britain.

Decades of politically correct conditioning by successive Tory and Labour regimes has ingrained anti-white behaviour into the police services so that they are prepared to instantly act against the indigenous population without any legal basis whatsoever.

Furthermore, what type of insanity has created a situation where hordes of Muslims can “celebrate” the martyring of a Shia Muslim from 14 centuries ago (as was the point of the march) in Newport, Gwent?

Would any Muslim country in the world tolerate millions of Welsh people moving into those lands and forcing the public there to endure public Welsh Christian ceremonies?

It would be unthinkable.

Only the British National Party will put a halt to this Tory and Labour-induced madness.

Tory leader David Cameron has confirmed in public what the British National Party has been saying all along, namely that there are no real differences between the three Westminster parties.

In his new year message, the Tory leader said there was “a lot less disagreement than there used to be” between his party, Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

In this light, Mr Cameron continued, he hoped for an election “free from fake political dividing lines. I don’t think we should invent differences where there aren’t differences,” he said.

Mr Cameron’s comments have inadvertently let the cat out of the bag — although the BNP has been planning for a while to expose the three other parties as having identical policies in a series of articles on this website.

For example, the three parties have virtually identical policies with regard to immigration and asylum, even down to almost word-for-word verbatim quotes.

According to the Pocket Guide to Liberal Democrat Policies, compiled and produced by Liberal Democrats Policy & Research Unit, July 2009, the Lib-Dems will “create an integrated border police force bringing back entry and exit controls to monitor movement in and out of Britain.”

According to the Conservative Party’s Where We Stand, Immigration, as outlined on the policy section of their website, that party will create a “A single border force to guard our ports and airports, with new powers and new technology.”

According to Labour’s Policy on Asylum and Immigration as published on the Labour Party website, that party aims to establish “a new border force and high-tech system for counting people in and out of the country are part of a new system fit for the 21st century.”

Not much of a difference there then, as Mr Cameron has so kindly pointed out.

The reality is that Britain faces an immigration crisis, and no amount of fiddling with the already broken system can prevent this nation from being overrun by the Third World.

What is needed is a totally new approach of a halt to immigration and the encouragement of voluntary repatriation — BNP policy.

We are grateful to Mr Cameron for being honest for possibly the first time in his political life.

*Watch this website for further policy comparisons which reveal the identical policies of the Tweedledee and Tweedledum parties.

In the latest example of how Britain’s indigenous culture is being supplanted by imported and alien cultures through the mass immigration invasion, British police have dropped the word “Christmas” from their annual poster campaign.

The shocking development has seen the British Transport Police drop the word “Christmas” from a nationwide poster campaign in order not to “upset people who do not buy into the festival.” This of course means the ever-growing numbers of Muslims who are the only other religious denomination present in Britain which seeks the extinction of all other religions.

The word “Christmas” appeared on the original draft of the poster, as it does every year. The campaign is designed to alert people to the extra number of transport police on duty over the Christmas and New Year period.

The original slogan read “Christmas presence,” which was a clever pun on the phrase “Christmas Presents,” referring to the fact that police would be on duty to protect the public.

The reference to Christmas was however determined by the police’s own “marketing department” to be offensive to “people from other faiths who disliked its Christian connotations.”

The politically-correct madmen then ordered the word “Christmas” dropped and replaced with the word “Holiday” so that it now reads “Holiday Presence” which is of course no pun at all and destroys the original creativity of the poster, never mind being offensive to the indigenous population who do indeed celebrate Christmas.

The decision to remove the word Christmas was apparently made by the Transport Police’s marketing manager, Alison Lock.

The British National Party wishes it placed on record that it is sick and tired of seeing this country’s indigenous people, their culture and their traditions put last each and every time.

No-one would dream of going to a Muslim country and demanding that they stop publicly celebrating or announcing their traditions “for fear of offending Christians” or any other faith.

Britain has a right to celebrate and maintain its traditions in the same way that any other nation or people have — and this includes the right to ensure that its population remains majority ethnically British. This is the only way in which it can be guaranteed that our traditions, culture and civilisation remain British.

The Southend Branch of the British National Party ended 2009 with a function at which preparations were laid for at least two candidate campaigns, reports South East regional organiser Andy McBride.

Over 40 supporters attended the Christmas function where branch organiser Stewart Freeman took the opportunity to thank all his hard-working team members for a good year’s work which brought much success in the area.

Mr Freeman added that the BNP had stood candidates in every ward and had achieved some very good results which had convinced him of the necessity of standing in as many seats in possible in the forthcoming election.

He then announced that he would be a candidate.

Mr McBride then assisted in raising another £850 from the crowd to help finance a second candidate in the area.

The meeting ended with a supper laid on by the owner of the venue and party member, Major Graham Harling.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair costs British taxpayers £6 million a year to protect while he travels the world earning millions for himself, it has been revealed.

The almost continuous overseas travel which Mr Blair undertakes means that more than 20 special officers have to be assigned to protect him on a rotation basis — at a cost of more than £115,000 a week.

Police protection is extended as a matter of course to former Prime Ministers, but Mr Blair has grievously exploited the practice to the point where his personal security now costs the taxpayer more than the budget to protect the incumbent Prime Minister.

According to reports, Mr Blair is abroad most of the time. His daily bill for bodyguards now runs at more than £16,000 a day.

At the same time, Mr Blair has earned more than £18 million since leaving office in June 2007. Most of this money has been made with contracts in the Middle East, where security for someone who was responsible for the war crime which was the Iraq War is at a premium.

Mr Blair also earns about £100,000 a time to give a speech or appear at an event such as a recent booking to open an energy plant in Kazakhstan.

According to reports, senior Whitehall officials are becoming increasingly uneasy with the expenditure. “It does seem fair that he should make a contribution to the costs of his protection while he is on well-paid private assignments,” an official was quoted as saying.

* Meanwhile, a rare flash of honesty from a MP of the usually utterly corrupt, deceitful and lying Labour Party has admitted that Mr Blair and Mr Brown have left “no legacy” for this country.

Labour MP Ken Purchase, who is stepping down at the next election, said that the “superficial, money-obsessed” Mr Blair had had failed to leave a legacy.

By David Morris — The Lord Chief Justice ordered an investigation into political comments by High Court judge Ian Trigger for his attack on Britain’s immigration system. What is Justice Trigger’s crime? He said that “hundreds and hundreds of thousands” of illegal immigrants were abusing the benefits system.

Justice Trigger made the comment as he sentenced a drug dealer to jail. One might have thought that this perfectly sensible passing remark would be supported by any reasonable person, but to the rest of the judiciary who encourage the asylum swindle, remarks such as these are regarded as “inflammatory” and need to be suppressed.

Judges routinely make political decisions not just political statements. This is why the establishment is called an “Ideological Caste.” It is united by central ideas like anti-white racism, internationalism and abstract beliefs like social justice and progress where prejudice and discrimination are transcended.

Their fantasy is inherently flawed because these qualities are ineluctably part of human nature; far from transcending prejudice and discrimination, they have changed the objects of their prejudice and discrimination from outsiders to their own people.

The attack on our people and way of life by the judiciary has two main planks: promoting Muslim extremism and undermining our way of life through legal means.

Lord Bingham expressed support for the totalitarian concept of group rights when he described the Human Rights Convention as existing to protect minorities and as “intrinsically counter-majoritarian . . . (this) should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.”

In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, but now a judge, described nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPS, was largely responsible for turning the police into a totalitarian force which policed opinions instead of crime.

In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racism within their ranks. At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not be investigating “racism” because it was a “given.”

The judge who turned the police into an institutionally anti-white racist organisation was Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. His report contained overtly Soviet techniques to oppress white people:

“12. That the definition should be: “A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person.”

13. That the term “racist incident” must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be reported, recorded and investigated with equal commitment.

14. That this definition should be universally adopted by the police, local government and other relevant agencies.”

This makes crime subjective and gives other ethnic groups legal power over white people.  Further, guilt is determined a priori and not in court.

Recommendation 13 is even more mendacious: investigate “non-crimes.” This totalitarian device criminalises everything and allows the politicised police to investigate any aspect of our lives they choose.

Multi-racialism and totalitarianism are indivisible. As in Yugoslavia under Tito, a multi-racial society can only “work” through totalitarian methods.

Recommendation 38 which requests the “power to permit prosecution after acquittal where fresh and viable evidence is presented” and the citizen loses legal safeguards and the state can prosecute repeatedly until it gets the right verdict.

Recommendation 39 is similar to the extensions to paragraph 10, Article 58 of the 1926 Soviet Criminal Code which ordered “face-to-face conversations between friends or between husband and wife and in a private letter” to be investigated for anti-Soviet thoughts.

The report states: “That consideration should be given to amendment of the law to allow prosecution of offences involving racist language or behaviour, and of offences involving the possession of offensive weapons, where such conduct can be proved to have taken place otherwise than in a public place.”

In other words, judges can pick the cases they hear. Judge Collins likes asylum cases and repeatedly makes decisions prejudiced in favour of ‘asylum seekers’, actively discriminating in their favour. He is so well-known in this regard that The Daily Mail once ran a front page headline asking why does he “hate this country?”

The judiciary-led attack our society also deliberately sets out to undermine the family. Lady Hale, Britain’s first female law lord, announced at a press conference that she supported gay adoption, legally recognised gay partnerships, improved legal rights for cohabiting heterosexuals and the concept of removing fault from divorce law.

This is an ideological statement which revealed that there will be no impartiality in the cultural war against our society. Lady Hale announced before she had even heard a single case what her position on these traditional values was going to be.

In 1999, the Law Lords ruled that homosexual tenants should have the same rights under the Rent Acts as married couples and blood relatives. Promoter of Sharia law, Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss had remarked that homosexual couples should also adopt children.

Lord Slynn in turn has attacked the traditional family unit: “Family need not mean either marriage or blood relationship,” he said.

The Gender Recognition Act brought Britain into line with a ruling by the European Court of Rights which legitimises the preposterous idea that a transsexual can retrospectively say that their gender at birth was what they now say it is.

What this contortion of logic means is that they were not born what they were born but what they now say they were born.

The judiciary also support the interests of outside groups over those who have worked to acquire fixed property. The Court of Appeal has ruled that Gypsy families in Chichester, encamped on land they acquired in contravention of planning laws, must be allowed to stay because human rights law conferred “the right to family life.”

This ruling put Gypsy camps throughout the country above the law which everyone else is expected to obey. In effect, this was a court ruling which legitimised the breaking of the law. Although the ruling was later reversed, it was a significant indicator of the judiciaries’ bias.

As part of the elites’ Islamification programme, many judges campaign for the introduction of Sharia law. In December 2008, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, told the London Muslim Council he was willing to see Sharia law operate in the country as long as it did not conflict with the laws of England and Wales, or lead to the imposition of severe physical punishments. He also suggested Sharia principles should be applied to marriage arrangements.

In December 2008, Lady Butler-Sloss called for ministers to change the law for Muslims so that a decree absolute could not be issued by a civil court until evidence had been obtained of a Sharia divorce.

Under Islam, a woman cannot issue the talaq to end a marriage except in rare circumstances. She can ask a Sharia council to dissolve the marriage but in doing so she would forfeit part of her financial rights.

In November 2008, Stephen Hockman QC, a former chairman of the Bar Council reportedly suggested that a group of MPs and legal figures should be convened to plan how elements of the Muslim religious-legal code could be introduced.

“The position of women is one area where the emphasis is, to the say the least, rather different,” he said, almost as an afterthought.

The European Court of Human Rights widened the parameters of the European Convention on Human Rights to universal legal principles which have subsumed national laws.

Even though Strasbourg is independent of the EU, it is seen as helping political union in Europe and encouraging the move to one-world government. It has acted ideologically and has challenged many national governments’ policies. The court has become a political force and the Labour Party has incorporated the EU’s Human Rights Convention into British law.

During the 1960s, Liberalism changed its focus from individual rights to that of group rights. This is actually cultural Marxism which has translated today into active discrimination against white heterosexual males.

Our nation was always our extended family and the embodiment of our cultural hierarchy. The nation protected individuals as part of our bigger community but this has now been replaced by interest groups which are defined by group identities: race, gender, orientation, and religions other than Christianity. Our homogeneity has been replaced by multi-racialism.

One of the most evil things the judiciary has done is to turn the once-pleasant Britain into a world centre for terrorists. These people use Britain as a base from which to attack other countries.

Human Rights laws prohibit “degrading treatment or torture.” This has been interpreted to mean that illegal immigrants, even suspected terrorists, cannot be deported to their home countries where our judges decide (or pretend) that such practices exist. During 2008, at least two high-profile terrorists were released from detention under these circumstances.

British judges also interpret the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees more “tolerantly” (in other words, with prejudice against the indigenous population) than in other countries. They have changed the definition of a “refugee” from one persecuted by the state to anyone threatened by a group. (Considering the terror attacks and the number of Muslim terrorists in Britain, it is clear that white Britons are threatened by this group.)

International law is not based in national habits, conventions or even democratic jurisdictions — but current political ideology. Many judges in the supranational courts are not even “proper” judges but diplomats and often former Eastern bloc Communist officials.

Through the Human Rights Act, they have given “asylum” to countless people who are a clear danger — but who face “persecution” if they were to be returned to their countries of origin. It goes even further. An “asylum seeker” cannot even be deported to a third country where they might face the possibility of being sent back to their country of origin where they might be in danger.

The granting of asylum to Taliban soldiers in Britain on this basis reveals the true depth of this perversion of our legal system.

Home Office figures released in December 2005 showed that a quarter of terrorist suspects admitted to Britain since the terrorist incidents of 21/7 were asylum seekers.

In reality, the judiciary has breached national security. Two of the failed 21/7 bombers obtained asylum with false passports, names and nationalities.

Some terrorists were even protected by the judiciary. Algerian Rachid Ramda was wanted by the French for financing an attack on Saint Michel station in Paris in 1995. Eight people were killed and 150 wounded in that attack. He was granted asylum in 1992 and was kept here for ten years despite three requests for his extradition.

In 1995, the Home Secretary tried to extradite Saudi Mohammed al-Massari to Yemen — but this attempt was thwarted by the judges. He lived in North London and was allowed to post videos of civilian contractors being beheaded in Iraq and encourage Muslims to join the Jihad.

In 2004, judges wrecked the Government’s attempt to control terrorists by detaining suspects without trial (introduced after 9/11) in what is known as the Belmarsh Judgement. Such a move is customary in war but the judiciary pretend we are not at war.

Lord Hoffman even made the ludicrous statement that Muslim extremism does not imperil the nation: “The real threat to the life of the nation, in the sense of a people living in accordance with its traditional laws and political values, comes from laws such as these.”

Lord Phillips’ speech, at the University of Hertfordshire, in support of the Human Rights Act, is a classic of sloppy, illogical thinking.  “Control orders” were an attempt by the Government to contain foreign terror suspects after the Law Lords ruled detention without trial was illegal under the Human Rights Act.

Phillips acknowledged that the act has limited actions in “response to the outbreak of global terrorism that we have seen over the last decade,” but, he said: “It is essential that (immigrants) and their children and grandchildren should be confident that their adopted country treats them without discrimination and with due respect for their human rights. If they feel that they are not being fairly treated, their consequent resentment will inevitably result in the growth of those who, actively or passively, are prepared to support the terrorists who are bent on destroying the fabric of our society.” There we have it: the law prevents the authorities combating terrorism and so reduces the risk of terrorism!

The alliance between Western elites and Islam is so strong that as well as changing our culture by Islamification, the judiciary are now breaking down the Jewish community.  They promote Sharia Law while making Judaism illegal under the totalitarian Race Relations Act of 1976.

The Jewish Free School in Brent is an Orthodox Jewish school and because it was oversubscribed gave priority to children deemed Jewish by birth. A boy was refused entry because his mother had converted to Judaism rather than being born into the faith.  According to Orthodox rules, Jewishness passes through the female line. M, therefore, was not Jewish, and so did not have the right of admission to the JFS.

The Supreme Court decided by a majority of five to four that the decision to exclude M was in contravention of section one of the Race Relations Act. Supreme Court president Lord Phillips and Supreme Court Justices Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke found that the school directly discriminated on racial grounds against child M and others like him.

Judge Lord Rodger said the decision “…produces such manifest discrimination against Jewish schools in comparison with other faith schools…”

The judges have undermined our way of life, protected terrorists, promoted the Islamification of Britain and have now taken it upon themselves to even decide who is Jewish and who is not.

When the final history of traitors and the subversion of our nation is written up, the judiciary will feature prominently on the roll of shame.

A recent report by the New Economics Foundation called ‘A Bit Rich’ offers the BNP a valuable template for the social model we wish to create once we get into government, says British National Party legal officer Lee Barnes.

The report rated the value produced by different jobs based on how much they help or hinder society through the social, economic and environmental effects of the work, rather than simply the amount of money they earned for themselves.

In effect the report states that the existing social model which classifies the value of work is based on false assumptions. The idea of the Social Value of Work has been minimised in favour of the ideological worth of certain jobs. Whilst the Minimum Wage has been imposed to ensure a subsistence level of existence for most workers, there has been no Maximum Wage cap on those jobs that produce little or no value for our society.

For decades the prevailing orthodoxy, and one wholeheartedly embraced by Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and New Labour, was Thatcherite Economic Neo-Liberalism predicated upon the supremacy of the free market, the validity of Trickledown Theory (where the rich getting richer benefits the poor), the globalisation of national markets and the free movement of capital and workers.

Thatcherism stripped away the British national manufacturing base, which produced goods that could be sold, and replaced it with the banking and services industry which did not produce wealth for the benefit of the mass of the British people.

Since Thatcher, and during the Blair/Brown years poverty has increased, as has the gap between the rich and the poor, resulting in a society where the bankers get paid billions in government welfare cheques but the poor have their welfare benefits and public services cut.

Over the past decade the ratio between the average rate of pay for chief executives and the average earnings of employees has risen from 47:1 to 128:1. Executive pay has risen by 295 per cent in this period, compared with a rise of 44 percent for employees.

Whilst British workers, who undertake the productive labour have been denied a fair share of the profits on their labour, the executives who manage the workers have benefited directly from the success of their workers. This is no way to run a company or a national economy. In order for society to benefit from increases in economic production then the workers must benefit from the products of their labour as well as the bosses.

The wealth that is generated must be shared and Trickledown Theory and the Neo-Liberal Free Market Theory have both failed to do that.

A British Nationalist government will use the power of the State to enact legislation that directly benefits British workers. The Cameron Conservatives on the other hand want to continue the ‘withering away of the state’ and transform our society into a ‘Charityocracy’ where tax payers money is used to fund charities who then build new workhouses and charity housing for people to go to and beg from when they are in trouble. We as British Nationalists find this idea repugnant.

The role of the British state in the 21st century is to claim back the powers that have been devolved to supra-national bodies such as the EU and WTO and to start to pass new laws that are targeted and designed to benefit British workers directly.

It has been the surrender of the powers of the British state to globalism, corporations and supra-national bodies that has caused the economic and social crisis we are gripped by today, and the only answer to this crisis is to re-empower the British state to work once again in the interests of Britain, British companies and the British people.

Under Thatcherism and Blairism the economic system has been predicated upon falsehoods in relation to the value of different types of work, for example that of banking.

In the banking system a massive amount of wealth is earned by a tiny amount of people, e.g. in bonuses but the actual productive value of the work of a banker is actually negative. The research for the New Economic Foundation reveals that for bankers who earn between half a million pounds a year and ten million pounds a year for every £1 in value they produce they actually consume and destroy £7.

Advertising executives who earn between £50,000 and twelve million pounds per year destroy £11.50 worth of value for every pound they create.

Tax accountants who earn between £75,000 per year and £200,000 per year destroy £47 in value for every pound they earn.

Compare this to child care workers who earn between £10,000 and £13,000 per year who produce between £7 and £9.50 for every pound they earn. The value of a child care worker is that they free up other people to go to work and produce value for the national economy.

Hospital cleaners who earn £6.20 per hour produce in value £10 for every pound they earn. The value of a hospital cleaner is that they prevent infections in hospital which add to the expenses of treatment for patients and prevent patients falling ill with infections and thereby allow them to return to work quickly and produce wealth and value for the national economy.

Waste recycling workers who earn £6.10 per hour produce in real value

£12 for every pound they earn. The value of a recycling worker is that they reduce waste, assist in protecting resources and create real value out of what would otherwise be waste.

The whole theory of Trickledown Economics was false and as a result of successive British governments embracing this dysfunctional system of free market economics, this has created the economic crisis we see today, increasing levels of poverty, waste, inefficiency and damage to the British national economy.

The report reveals that a recent breakdown of the taxpaying population in the UK established that the top 10 per cent of adults, those on incomes of £36,000 per year or more, take home a disproportionate 40 percent of UK income. This leaves only 60 percent of the pot for 90 percent of the adult working population to share.

Whilst successive governments have indulged in endless social engineering attempts in relation to race and religion in order to assist ethnic minority groups integrate into British society, those same governments have remained utterly silent and impassive on enacting legislation to assist British workers in obtaining economic fairness and justice in their own country.

The report from the New Economic Foundation calls for a high pay commission to recommend a maximum national pay differential and the introduction of a transaction tax to reduce high risk and unsustainable trading. These of course are just a start.

What we must do is create what I define as a ’Creative Economy’ as opposed to the ‘Destructive Economy’ we have now.

The Destructive Economy is predicated on a society which rewards those jobs that create the most societal, environmental, cultural and economic damage and that also rewards those individuals and corporations who generate profits at the expense of society and the environment.

The Creative Economy is one that rewards those jobs that produce the most social, economic, cultural and environmental benefits for the British nation and British people and that assists in creating a sustainable economy and environment.

For instance we would use a High Pay Commission to establish wage level and bonus limits on bankers and at the same time increase wages for workers such as hospital cleaners in the NHS.

We would also include in our calculations the issue of the promotion of British Culture as an aspect for the British National Economy and encourage the formation of groups, jobs and individuals who promote British culture, for instance a travelling actors group who perform the plays of Shakespeare and Chaucer at schools.

We would reward all those productive jobs in the British National Economy that produces actual commodities and goods, such as increasing the wages of agricultural workers, at the same time as taxing imports of agricultural goods, in order to create a national agricultural system that supplies our own national needs rather than the present system of airlifting in runner beans from Kenya.

Jobs that produce value, such as workers in factories, would gain higher wages whilst those that destroy wealth would have their wages cut.

The opportunity this new system of calculating value in relation to society, environment, culture and economics allows us to establish a whole new social model for British society that will ultimately reward the most productive sectors of British society.

It is the foundation for a truly British Nationalist Revolution.

* This article contains the personal views of Mr Barnes. BNP policy can only be determined by the annual party congress, and these ideas are presented as a discussion point.

The latest terrorist attempt to blow up a trans-Atlantic airliner has once again highlighted the twin causes of Islamist terrorism: mass immigration into the First World and European nations’ biased foreign policy in the Middle East.

The arrested suspected terrorist, a Nigerian Muslim rejoicing in the name Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab is a perfect example of the product of these twin evils.

Firstly, Mutallab was a “student” at a college in London. Police are currently searching a number of premises associated with Mutallab in Britain’s capital city.

The fact that the 23-year old Nigerian could have obtained a “student” visa despite being registered on an international terrorist suspect watch list, reveals the extent of Britain’s “open doors” immigration policy.

Secondly, Mutallab’s African origin would not on the face of it, make him a sympathiser with radical Islamic causes.

Nonetheless, his religious affiliation allowed him to spiritually link to affairs in the Middle East which provides much of the motivation for Islamic terrorist attacks in Europe and America.

It was this link to British, American and other European nations’ biased foreign policy in the Middle East — which favours Israel above all else — which provided the motivation for not only the 9-11 attacks but many of the other major Islamist terrorist incidents since then.

It is this perception of “the West ganging up against Muslim nations” which allowed, for example, an Egyptian, Mohammed Atta, to lead an attack on the World Trade Centre in New York City, and a Nigerian, Mutallab, to try and blow up an airliner travelling from Amsterdam to Detroit.

Mass Third World immigration into European nations allows the creation of large pools of potential terrorist recruits from which radical Islamists can draw supporters — as has obviously happened with Mutallab. Western nations’ biased foreign policies allows Islamists to fan the flames of hatred against European peoples by pointing out to these Muslim colonists how European nations “hate” them.

Until mass Third World immigration into Europe is halted — and reversed — and until Western nations adopt unbiased foreign policies with regard to the Islamic world (and that includes halting all illegal and immoral wars such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan), Islamist terrorism will continue.

The British National Party alone amongst all the political parties understands the real issues and has the willpower to address the root causes of the problem.

The BNP will strike an accord with the Islamic world: in return for a commitment never to interfere in the internal affairs of Muslim nations, the Islamic world will agree to halt its attempts to colonise Europe through immigration and the cradle — and to take back its excess populations.

Only in this way will terrorism from Islamic extremists be halted. It is our moral duty to ensure that this happens.

Just days before Christmas, when politics is on hold for 99.9 percent of politicians, Nick Griffin MEP launched his first ever constituency newsletter in his North West constituency.

This is just one of the hundreds of new tasks to which the constituency team have applied themselves since taking on their new roles.

“Although we are in more familiar territory with this specific work, the magnitude of an MEP’s constituency turns a simple newsletter into a huge task,” North West regional organiser Clive Jefferson told BNP News.

“This high quality literature was designed by Mr Griffin’s Communications Officer, Martin Wingfield,” he continued.

“This is the kind of literature that can be produced when you have an editor of Mr Wingfield’s experience and talent on the team.

“It is now my job, as campaigns manager for our North West MEP, to distribute this newsletter far and wide throughout the constituency,” Mr Jefferson said.

“It is incredible to think that in this first printing alone we have 385,000 of these A3 full colour leaflets, which fill six pallet loads.

“The good news is that we have so many volunteers waiting to deliver them to constituents that we have to limit the number of leaflets given to each area.

“We now have the capacity to put at least twice as many out manually with volunteers in a matter of weeks here in the North West. I can tell our enemies that they ‘ain’t seen nothing yet,’” Mr Jefferson concluded.

Christmas is a time to remember those who we miss. On a cold and frosty Christmas Eve morning in the East End of London, British National Party National Organiser Eddy Butler visited the grave of his old comrade from Tower Hamlets, Albert Mariner.

Albert died back in 1983 after being struck on the head by a brick thrown from a mob of Labour-supporting Communist thugs. His grave is still tended by his old friends.

“Albert was a great activist and his example should inspire the new generation of activists to strive towards our ultimate victory,” Mr Butler said.

“At the going down of the sun and in the morning, we will remember them.”

A big thank you and a very merry Christmas to our generous donors who have made it possible for the British National Party to launch its Barking and Dagenham election campaign with a flourish.

Our eye-catching billboards are proving to be extremely popular. Here is one featuring our prospective leader of Barking and Dagenham Council Richard Barnbrook — with the real Richard Barnbrook in attendance.

BNP National Elections Officer Eddy Butler said that “as soon as the seasonal celebrations are out of the way, Mr Barnbrook will call on activists throughout the land to help in a series of major days of action in Barking and Dagenham.

“We are taking this campaign very seriously and will make sure the party pulls out all the stops,” Mr Butler said.

British National Party activists must take a well-deserved break for a few days and then prepare themselves for an early election by March or April, Nick Griffin MEP has said.

Speaking to BNPtv just prior to the highly successful BNP Black Country “Christmas Lecture” event held in the West Midlands, Mr Griffin said he now expected the Government to call an early election rather than face the electorate after the budget.

“The country’s economy is in such a mess that Gordon Brown is likely to cut and run and hold an election before the budget,” Mr Griffin said. “Facing the public after the budget is likely to see the Labour Party wiped out.”

Mr Griffin said the BNP would be fighting the election on three major issues: the Afghanistan war, the EU and immigration.

“It is vital that all BNP activists now take a breather for a few days and come back ready for the possibility of an early election,” Mr Griffin said.

Mr Griffin’s interview with BNPtv can be viewed in full by clicking here.

* The BNP web team wishes all readers a very Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year.

World leaders attending the Copenhagen summit on climate change and global warming had obviously forgotten to inform Mother Nature as cold weather gripped the Continent and snow-proof clothing was mandatory for the latest leafleting session in the North Durham constituency, reports our North East correspondent.

“Even though it was snowing heavily in Stanley, County Durham, members of the intrepid North Durham Constituency group were out on their general election campaign delivering their No More Loss of British Blood leaflets to the constituents,” our correspondent said.

Group organiser Roland Craggs said, “We’ve been targeting the town of Stanley now for the last two weeks and have received plenty of requests for information packs.”

Leading the leafleting team was the BNP’s Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for North Durham, Pete Molloy, who was glad to meet and talk to some of the constituents.

“It was good to speak to the constituents and they were glad to hear that the BNP was standing in their constituency in the next general election,” Mr Molloy said.

“They told me they have had enough of their Labour MP and the Labour Party and are looking for change. Some of them have applied to join the BNP, but are waiting for the membership to reopen,” he added.

Almost 200 people attended the hugely successful first ever Christmas lectures on Sunday the 20th of December addressed by Nick Griffin MEP, reports our Black Country correspondent, John Salvage.

“Many of those in attendance had never been to a BNP event before and were pleasantly surprised at the professionalism of the event,” said Mr Salvage.

Mr Griffin shocked many with his speech which revealed how the leftists had hijacked the climate change agenda and of the behind-the-scenes involvement of big business in the “carbon trading” scandal.

Mr Griffin pointed out that over £30 billion had been wasted on tackling this “man-made” problem when in reality all the facts were not available to make a final call on the cause of global warming, or even if it was actually taking place.

“A rousing round of applause greeted Mr Griffin as he ended his superb lecture,” Mr Salvage said.

“I had the pleasure of opening the event by thanking those who had attended despite the cold and freezing snow,” Mr Salvage continued. “I also thanked my co-organiser, Councillor Russell Green, for his hard work in helping to ensure that the event was a success.”

The audience was further entertained by comedian “Mad Frankie Waller” (Frank Forte); and Cannock organiser, Bill Vaughan, who provided a superb magic show.

Mr Salvage also thanked the staff and management of the host hotel in the heart of the Black Country in Dudley who put on a first class buffet.

“Mr Griffin was asked to sign a canvass print photograph of himself in front of the Brussels Parliament,” Mr Salvage said. “When this was auctioned, it contributed significantly to the near £2,000 raised in total on the night.”

Two-thirds of all Muslim imams in France are on welfare which means that the French taxpayers are effectively subsidising the propagation of Islam in that country, author Christopher Caldwell has said.

In an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel, Mr Caldwell, a Financial Times journalist and author of the book Reflections on the Revolution in Europe, said that he doubted the French voters were “too happy” about subsidising Islam in this way.

Asked about the recent referendum in Switzerland banning the building of minarets, Mr Caldwell said the most striking thing was the “gap between the clear rejection of the ban in public opinion polls and the clear approval given in the actual vote.

“It means there is an official discussion of Islam and that there is a subterranean discussion. That should worry Europeans,” he said.

“In countries like France there are laws against all sorts of speech. That has a very chilling effect. Many people are frightened about negative consequences if they say how they really feel. Sometimes even to the pollsters, as the Swiss example shows.”

Mr Caldwell pointed out that “Islam poses difficulties that other immigrant groups do not. Part of it is the growth of political Islam in the world in the last half-century. A large minority of European Muslims feel solidarity with the Muslim community abroad, and they feel at the same time that the West is at war with this world.

“That makes the transition into a European identity more difficult. But I think the problems at the cultural level are more important. A lot of overly optimistic people expect Muslims to give up, or to modify, their religion over time. They’re going to change in some way, but we don’t really know how. And attitudes around religion provide a lot of potential for conflict — the attitudes towards women, towards family relations, sexual freedom or gay rights.”

He went on to point out that the Muslim and immigrant population is increasing exponentially. “There are two things that will cause the immigrant descended population in Europe to grow in the coming years,” Mr Caldwell said.

“One is that immigrants are still coming and the other is that birth rates, although they are falling, are still higher.

“Their culture needs to be accommodated within Europe in a way that requires Europe to change its structures. During the past 20 years, mainstream society has accommodated the immigrants on a number of issues. Sometimes the issues are small, like prayer rooms or work spaces. And sometimes the issues are major, as illustrated by the ruling of a court in Lille, France, which in 2008 annulled the marriage of a Muslim woman because the bride was not a virgin.

“As I say in my book: When an insecure, malleable, relativistic culture meets a culture that is anchored, confident and strengthened by common doctrines, it is generally the former that changes to suit the latter.

“Islam is the second biggest religion in Europe. But that is true only if you’re thinking statistically. If you’re thinking culturally and spiritually, it looks like the first religion of Europe.

“There are many, many more articles on the front pages of newspapers about what Islam says about this and what the Koran says about that than there are articles about Christian theology. They are full of debates between Muslims and non-Muslims addressing question about what the Koran says about honour killings and the headscarf.

“What Christianity says is not really a matter of much importance to anyone,” Mr Caldwell said.

Recommended reading: Reflections on the Revolution in Europe – Can Europe be the Same with Different People in it? by Christopher Caldwell.

The title of this amazing book says it all and it deals with immigration, Islam and the West. Here we have, possibly for the first time, a sensible book written by a mainstream journalist (the author is a columnist for the Financial Times) which deals honestly with the origins, conditions and consequences of immigration into Europe. He does face the facts.
The headings to the various chapters give one an idea of the issues. Some of the headings are: The rights and wrongs of Enoch Powell, Civilization and decadence, Diversity is overrated, How postwar immigration came about, Is immigration for natives or immigrants? Welfare and white flight, Asylum and democracy, Fear masquerading as Tolerance. Softcover, 384 pp. £14.99.

Click here to order online.

Immigration from sub-Saharan Africa has become one of the primary drivers of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, a new survey has revealed.

Research conducted by postgraduate student Betselot Mulugeta has revealed that immigrant men and women from the Ethiopian and Eritrean communities in the West Midlands have “serious misconceptions about the nature of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the UK.”

Newly reported cases of HIV in the UK are higher than ever before. Between 1995 and 2006, the rate of HIV infection among black Africans in the West Midlands increased 100-fold, compared to a two-fold increase among white people, a three-fold increase among black Caribbeans and a six-fold increase among other mixed ethnic groups.

All those figures were obtained from the region’s strategic health authority figures.

The new study revealed that the Ethiopian and Eritrean population “are predominantly young and single, tend to live alone and are often sexually active.”

Apparently their “culture and language restrict the information available to them” and this group “therefore represents a reservoir of HIV infection which is both a concern for the immigrant community itself and the host population.”

These “cultural issues” bizarrely include a refusal to discuss sexual issues aimed at “reducing stigma and discrimination of those who are HIV-positive.”

According to the study, Africans in Britain believed the UK was “civilised” and therefore they could not contract HIV/AIDS. They thought that the “problem had been left behind in Africa,” according to the report.

“Some commented that they believed all migrants were screened before being allowed entry and that drugs were available in the UK that would ‘cure’ AIDS,” the report said.

Even more bizarrely, it is “considered unacceptable for either partner in a sexual relationship to ask for a condom to be used, because it’s thought to suggest the woman is promiscuous or a prostitute, or that there is a lack of trust between them.”

Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 67 percent of global cases of HIV/AIDS. Given those figures, it borders on insanity to encourage mass immigration from that continent — yet it remains core Labour, Tory and Lib-Dem policy.

India’s hypocrisy on international travel has been revealed once again with the announcement of an extensive crackdown on visitor visas — just months after complaining bitterly about UK visa control systems.

Earlier this year, the Indian prime minister and other senior government figures berated visiting British officials because of delays in issuing hundreds of thousands of visas to throngs of Indians seeking to enter Britain.

Yesterday, however, India announced a tightening of rules for long-term tourist visas which included the barring of visitors from returning within two months of leaving.

Under previous rules, tourists on long-term visas had to leave the country every 180 days. The moves follow security threats to India which focussed around a Pakistani with American citizenship, David Headley, who travelled to India several times to help identify targets for the Mumbai terrorist attacks.

India’s justification for the crackdown is therefore valid — but its complaints about British attempts to control the number of Indians entering Britain smacks of gross hypocrisy. This is especially evident given the large number of patently bogus “student” visas which are granted annually to Indian and Pakistani nationals and runs into the hundreds of thousands each year.

India’s new regulations also make it much harder for people to use long-term tourist visas to work in the country.

Home Minister P Chidambaram set out the case for tightening regulations on Tuesday.

“The gaps in the visa system have been exposed in a number of cases, the most notable among them being the case of David Headley. The compelling need to create a fool-proof system cannot be overstated,” he said.

In a posting on its website, the US embassy in Delhi said the “new visa and registration regulations are being implemented inconsistently.”

“Travellers have reported being denied re-entry after exiting India for business or family emergencies, or for tourist travel to nearby countries, even if their initial visit to India was for only a few days,” the statement said.

“The US mission has received confirmation that foreign passports are now stamped on exit to indicate that the bearer cannot re-enter India within two months of exit unless special permission is obtained from an Indian embassy, consulate, or high commission abroad, regardless of the validity of visa or length of stay in India.”

The British National Party has selected its prospective candidate for the new Morley and Outwood constituency at the next general election.

Councillor Chris Beverley (Morley South ward, Leeds City Council) has been selected as the prospective candidate for the seat. The BNP beat all the main political parties across this constituency in the last round of local elections, which is an indication of the huge potential that the party has in Morley and Outwood.

Mr Beverley has represented the Morley South ward on Leeds City Council since 2006 and stood as a BNP candidate in the 2005 general election in the Morley and Rothwell constituency.

He said: “I am very proud to have been selected as the prospective candidate for Morley and Outwood in the general election and I look forward to contributing towards the continued electoral growth of the British National Party in this area.

“We have come a long way since the last general election in 2005, making considerable gains at local authority level and more recently getting two MEPs elected to the European Parliament.

“For the first time ever there is a real possibility that we may win seats in a general election, and I believe that the statistics show that Morley and Outwood is potentially a very good constituency for us indeed.

“On a personal note, I would very much welcome the opportunity to take on Ed Balls, as in my opinion Balls and his ilk represent the very worst elements that this country’s political class has to offer.

“Political pundits agree that there is a very real chance that Balls will fail to be elected as Morley and Outwood’s MP, and we in the British National Party will be working tirelessly to ensure that this is indeed the case.”

Article taken from www.morleypatriot.blogspot.com

Wiltshire British National Party members held a Christmas party last week, packing out the venue on Salisbury plain.

Guest speaker at the event was Jonathan Bowden, who delivered an inspiring speech, reports Paul Holt, Salisbury and Wiltshire Sub Regional organiser.

Members of the Salisbury activist steering group have put a great deal of effort into making the event a terrific success, added Harry McPhie,  Amesbury contact.

Through generous donations, a raffle and an auction, some £366 was raised for the election fund.

After the speech, members from all over Wiltshire and Bristol enjoyed a well deserved party and a great time was had by all.

Salisbury branch would like to wish all BNP members throughout Great Britain a very happy Christmas and a very active new year.