“Immigrants from Somalia, Turkey, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Iran are most likely to be out of work and claiming state benefits,” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-484927/Labour-thinktank-names-immigrants-drain-taxpayer.html - Ed

The locales are known as “Zones Urbaines Sensibles” or “Sensitive Urban Zones”. That means that these areas are off limits to French authorities.

Here is a list of these areas, with handy maps, just in case you might wish to avoid them:

http://i.ville.gouv.fr/divbib/doc/chercherZUS.htm

The flip side of no-go zones is extending Sharia law, which is also taking place in Europe. In Italy, for example, hudud punishments have included the cutting of limbs by vigilantes acting on behalf of unofficial qadis. Islamic law is active and endorsed in many parts of Britain.

e.g. as reported in the Daily Telegraph

“Aydarus Yusuf, 29, a youth worker from Somalia, recalled a stabbing case that was decided by an unofficial Somali court sitting in Woolwich, south-east London. Mr. Yusuf said a group of Somali youths were arrested on suspicion of stabbing another Somali teenager.

“The victim’s family told the police it would be settled out of court and the suspects were released on bail. A hearing was convened and elders ordered the assailants to compensate their victim. All their uncles and their fathers were there, said Mr. Yusuf. So they all put something towards that and apologized for the wrongdoing.”

Regarding the vile hate-preacher, Anjem Choudary (whose family live on £25,000 a year in benefits..which he regards a “jizya”..), I quote him:

“The Home Office say there are 1.5million Muslims but there were 1.5million ten years ago. Since then our brothers in Bethnal Green, Whitechapel and other places have had eight or nine children each. Eight children here, ten children, 15 children. There must be at least six million people.

“It may be by pure conversion that Britain will become an Islamic state. We may never need to conquer it from the outside.”

With the Muslim birth-rate THREE TIMES the national average back in 2001, this WILL happen unless we get a BNP government into power.

B’ham, Bradford, Luton, Leicester, Slough – the list could go on…

On a lighter note, a Hindu friend of mine has christened his son with an English name (Neil). When he registered Neil at a school he was asked what it stood for thinking it was an abbreviation. He just asked the guy what he thought it stood for and left it at that…

It’s just an example of the PC mindset of some people who naturally assume that someone will keep to their culture of origin just because they are not from indigenous roots.

The above site sems to be an official French site. (Possibly it’s an EU site -it’s not clear to me). That page, on immigration, is similar to the official British line (and incidentally lelps confirm Stringbag’s comment on fratricidal European wars).

France has been a country of immigrants for a long time – it adds more honestly that the 1920s (after the loss of 1.4M men, plus wounded) and 1960 were major waves – the British lie seems to be there’s always been huge immigration. After 1974, the economic crisis led to the official end of immigration, except for family reunification and asylum procedures. This of course is similar to the British set of lies – note the folliwng: It is difficult to know the exact number of immigrants, because immigrants’ children born in France are French. Of course they are! The French INSEE (French Natinal Institute fior Statistics) seems about as reliable as our bunch. 1999 census showed 4,310,000 immigrants … They account for 7.4% of the population, a proportion that has been the same since 1975. Preusmably all second and third and mixed (and illegals) count as non-immigrants.

http://www.insee.fr/en/ has a lok at their statistics – global economy, competitiveness, all the same phrasing – I’d expect immigrants to be described as cheap labour (with huge health, housing, crime and other costs offloaded onto the taxpayer) but haven’t checked carefully. But the idea that 7.5% only in France are immigrants looks like the sort of reassuring lie that is told in Britain where the figures and age group and breeding rate potential are all distorted.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4644766.stm

And did anyone look at the map??? Does it represent percentage of immigrants or Muslims? I really hope that it’s immigrants in general. It would be ’slightly’ better that way. I mean, come one, some districts have > 90% Muslims/immigrants. That is insane!

Zoubida! Why do things by halves… You want to go back to your roots, I’m sure a lot of French people would be more than happy to provide you with a one-way ticket!

Perhaps its because the principle local employer is a pork processing plant and that, in the knowledge of the difficulties in places like the Paris suburbs, the local mayors will not allow them to turn up and claim social housing – they just get shown the door..

Will an all brown England or France still be England and France? They’ll have the same country names, but the contents will be changed.

A nation is like a bucket. It is the contents of that bucket that are important. Take a bucket of white paint and add just a smidgen of black paint to it and you no longer have white paint. And, while this may sound overly simplistic, the principle is valid and it’s what is happening to us.

MaidofKent – as an expired Catholic (only in the religious sense), that story only serves to confirm the hold that such a huge organised religion has over people and populations. While Britain may be proud of its Christian heritage, time moves on and I believe the best route for organised Christianity is to concentrate on the spiritual and moral support the people may need while dropping much of the dogma and control.
While morality and decency must be reintroduced into the decadent elements of our society, there is no room for any organised control of minds (and bodies) through belief systems, Whether centred in Rome or the Middle East.
We discover more and more that our life is not a choice between Communist slavery or Capitalist slavery, that we can live much more in harmony with this planet that we only inhabit for a wink of an eye, while still rewarding the best of individual human endeavour. That we can celebrate our peaceful and humanitarian cultural differences between countries only by finally grasping a philosophy of life that is is slipping fast between our fingers – and it is not an “-ISM”!
It is called COMMON SENSE.
Common sense tells us that there is no need to overload this planet with people. Common Sense tells us not totake literally what was written long ago to teach and set moral standards to the population of the period in words that they could understand. Or the variety of books written by politically motivated people – for political or religious reasons in their day – purely in order to establish their power over people.
Common Sense tells us that only strong, free societies can help poorer countries to educate and build themselves up to equally strong and free societies. Common Sense tells us that we wont achieve this by (a) bombing them, (b) giving money to their corrupt leaders or (c) importing millions of their people along with their antiquated moralities and religions in order to sink our own hard fought freedoms.
I used to think that Western Europe had the most common sense in the world – what happened?

Picardie seems a bit low, when the figures were calculated had they just exported a shipment to “les rosbifs” and were awaiting fresh stocks?

This problem is replicated all over the Third World – and when they run out of space and food, like Locusts, they will head here to keep growing and feeding. That is the madness of mass immigration to this, or any other European country – we only have so much land space and resources, which, in my opinion, we should keep for ourselves and our own descendants. Why should the British people have to live in a country with too many people and too little food just to give some extra space to immigrants who have already outgrown their own lands?

It’s uncanny the similarity [as well as the hilarity] of those Manchester cops, who don’t seem to realise what stupid, daft PEANUTS they look.

-

Congratulations on becoming a grandad, Winston.
Best wishes and regards to your family.
- BNP Web Team

“They go by the euphemistic term Zones Urbaines Sensibles, or Sensitive Urban Zones, with the even more antiseptic acronym ZUS, and there are 751 of them as of last count. They are conveniently listed on one long webpage, complete with street demarcations and map delineations.

What are they? Those places in France that the French state does not control. They range from two zones in the medieval town of Carcassone to twelve in the heavily Muslim town of Marseilles, with hardly a town in France lacking in its ZUS. The ZUS came into existence in late 1996 and according to a 2004 estimate, nearly 5 million people live in them.

A more precise name for these zones would be Dar al-Islam, the place where Muslims rule.

For an insight into how bad things are, the police in Lyons demonstrated on Nov. 9, denouncing “violence against the forces of order.” Things have reached a pretty sad state when the police have to demonstrate in the streets against the criminals.” http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2006/11/the-751-no-go-zones-of-france.html