Comments on: What About OUR Rights?

By: Henny

Henny — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:38:53 +0000

Regarding Zionist and their toady Folk Traitors welcomed in Moslems etc. shysters and cheap labour. Nationalist should stop believing they can be rid of them thru getting power via our rulers rigged ballot box and instead roll up their sleeves to build the democratic run work shop economic muscle to have the political power and might to be rid of the Folk Traitors with their democidic policies, which have brought Brits to the edge of extinction, then we can fulfil Keir Hardie's wild cat strike founded true Labour Party slogan "British Jobs for British Workers" and free our Folk from being cheap work and war fodder slaves in our country now a colony in Zion's Global Imperium of Usury. Cambrogie Manumit FPW __

By: bodica

bodica — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:46:52 +0000

I live in NYC, terribly homesick for the England that was. In recent years I’ve had the opportunity to return to Europe more frequently, and was delighted at first to find fellow “mushy peas” – as my American daughter calls us – all over France, Spain, Ireland, and increasingly in the US.

My delight turned to horror as I realized that the English, who traditionally lived within 50 miles of their ancestors grave sites, were being driven out of their own countries.

Where was the spirit, the derring do, the never say die, the “there will always be an England?”

I found you here and thank you for doing what I cannot – keeping the home fires burning. They burn in my heart, for sure.

We’ve had political correctness, ie, the thought police at work for thirty odd years. Never thought they’d silence Americans, but they have. I do believe the infiltration is strategic, and have seen the change in the islamic communities from “nice nice” to contempt and arrogance. BTW they “knew” that BO would “win” BO is the President Designate. He does not become the President elect until the Electoral College votes Dec 15th and with all the lawsuits demanding an honest copy (ie, not counterfeit) of his full Birth Cert, his fraud may be exposed.

Yes, there will be rioting, but as one general said, “better four days of rioting than four years of the destruction of Democracy”

American immigration was based on America’s need – domestic workers and gardeners; construction workers, milk farmers (NDakota) and so on. There was also allowance for political or religious persecution Now it seems to be based on the other nations’ whim. There is a respect for success in business; as often as not, alas, we let in crooks and bullies because they come with money.

America was founded by Christians of different denominations, but a fundamental belief in charity and redemption. Jews contributed greatly and enjoyed a shared faith in the Creator; though they do not see the promise of the Messiah as fulfilled, there is a foundation of faith, justice, sharing, education, excellence that resonates well with the Christian ethos.
islam claims to be an Abrahamic religion, but contempt for the Torah and later books of the Old Testament is profound, and the Christian use of Old Testament readings is profoundly mocked. There’s a you tube video of BO mocking Judeo-Christian beliefs.

I’m trying to say that the early founders came from different backgrounds, but were held together by the “gluon” of Christian thought and faith.

I do go on, so I’m going off. All you in England, give my great and glorious nation a hug from me.

Many thanks for your kind sentiments and best wishes, welcome to the website – Ed

By: coady

coady — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:37:47 +0000

i live in north west london, colindale, i would like to know where the B.N.P hang out, i would join them tommorrow if i could, london is a disgrace and it is not in small pockets of london neither it is spreading and spreading fast, mugging, drugs, burglary,why cant the government see this, every crime committed in london is mostly committed by a foreigner, its a fact or in places like harlesden and stonebridge where a certain breed have an enormous chip on their shoulder and who wont go to work, what use are they anyway?

By: Winston

Winston — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:05:24 +0000

Re HJ on November 2nd, 2008 7:08 pm and Ed’s comments:

HJ should have strictly said ‘a human being is not a fungible’ or ‘human beings are not fungibles’?

I doubt if many youngsters in Mandelson’s and Blair’s New Labour’s Education, Education, Yawn, Yawn etc, wud hav a clew wot dis wurd ment?

After watching that ‘What Islam Is Not’ video again posted by Ed/alphafour on October 28th, 2008 5:20 am, I needed a bit of light relief. I was forced to do five years of Latin but I actually loved it even though I don’t speak it now and nobody else seems to either. Anyway, perhaps we would all know what fungible meant if we had studied Latin at school?

Romans (not Muslims) Go Home is the title of the following video. However, could the occupying forces that were once Roman in many lands, give us some idea of what the Life Of Christian or Jewish Brians and Brianesses like ourselves might be like under the heel of Islam? Perhaps the following video isn’t that funny after all, as Muslims seem to ‘always look on the dark side of life’. Can you imagine the intolerant ‘religion of peace’ tolerating a similar film like ‘The Life Of Mo’? Neither can I.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IIAdHEwiAy8

By: HJ

HJ — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:08:27 +0000

Diversity is not our greatest strength; it is our greatest weakness.

Human beings are not fungible. You can’t replace a hundred indigenous Brits in a small village with a hundred Zulus and expect the village to remain the same. The same principle applies to the nation as a whole. People matter. People are different. They are different primarily because their genes are different. People are not interchangeable.

–
I can’t find ‘fungible’ in the dictionary HJ, did you make it up? – Ed.

………..
Edible mushrooms, maybe? -Other Ed

………..
It’s obscure but it exists!
fungible [fúnjib'l]
adj
perishable: describes goods such as grain or wine that are perishable and traded or exchanged in measurable quantities or numbers
n (plural fungibles)
something traded or substituted: a commodity that is fungible (often used in the plural)
- another Ed

What a clever lot we are ;-) – yet another Ed

By: jonny 209

jonny 209 — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:48:20 +0000

We should definitely be more like the Australians. I’m not totally sure on how they allow immigrants over there but I do know they do it on some sort of point scoring system, and you will only be accepted over there if:
1- If you have enough money to support yourself and your family.
2- If you have a trade that benefits their country; if you haven’t, then you’re not welcome.

Basically they are not forcing their own people out of jobs, houses, etc, etc. Something like that for England would be a better way to control immigration. How many doctor or pharmacist deaths do we need? Same with lorry drivers; if you were to pull over all British based haulage company trucks, I wonder how many drivers would be British? I’d say less than half of them. If this attitude was taken, there would also be more job opportunities for our own people and the unemployment would drop considerably. Are these not our rights as British citizens?

By: Winston

Winston — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:06:18 +0000

Re alphafour: I was born in Manchester and think I went to the college that alphafour refers to half a century ago. In those days it was a Catholic grammar school but already under serious threat from the anti-selection Marxists that were worming their way into the corridors of local power. My parents had little but I was given the opportunity of a first class education that the Liberal and Labour lefties (and today’s Conservatives) were about to deny others of my background to their eternal shame. It was governed by the Xaverian Brothers and life was extremely strict but fair. My apologies to alphafour if this is not the college to which he refers.

The area around Victoria Park was ‘hideously white’ in those days and what has occured in 50 years should serve as a dire warning of what is in store for the rest of this country, unless we stem and quickly reverse the tide of third world and especially Islamic immigration.

By: alphafour

alphafour — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:20:06 +0000

I think the majority of Muslims (or any other religions) do conform to our traditions. While I don't expect them to change to C of E, I do expect some change. My college is a Catholic one, and it's situated in a highly Muslim area. The majority of students or a large proportion are Muslim but they have no problems going to occasional Masses. They accept that going to a Catholic institution constitutes accepting the beliefs. This happens and the system is fine. The problem appears to be some people who anticipate somehow that such traditions might offend them. If I asked any muslim in my college they would tell me "No I don't agree with God and the Holy Trinity, but that's what the country believes in, and I wouldn't impose my beliefs on them as they haven't imposed theirs on us" It isn't the foreigners to blame. It's these freaks who have PC coming out of their backsides. - Your view that the majority of Muslims conform to our traditions is incorrect and probably down to the media spin and lies that good people such as yourself are bombarded with daily about Islam being a peaceful religion; it is anything but peaceful, or indeed thought by many, to not even being a religion. I would be guarded about the Muslim students appearing to accept your beliefs. This will only continue for as long as it suits them - Ed What Islam Is Not

By: safeasmilk

safeasmilk — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:02:25 +0000

My wife and I were outside South Africa House in the 1980s. We were members of the Labour Party and joined the Anti Nazi League (a Labour shadow puppet of the SWP) demonstrating for the right to democracy and self determination for native South Africans. We still believe in the rights of indigenous native peoples to the basic human rights of self determination, not to be oppressed discriminated against and marginalised in their own land. Therefore we have no choice but to support the British National Party.
As we remain fervently anti-Nazi we have also to fight against incorporation of Britain into a federal European superstate against the express wishes of the indigenous people of this great Union of four countries that is Britain.
Make no mistake, as an ex Labour insider I can state that mass immigration is seen as a way to achieve a more ‘permanent’ Labour Government with Essex and Kent marginals as the next target now London is ’safe’ in the hands of those who vote Labour tribally and those too stupid or illegal to vote at all. Watch out Canterbury, Deal, Barking, Rainham.

By: John L

John L — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:34:32 +0000

“I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Britain.” Wonderful, generous sentiment, but I’m not sure that I totally agree. There is basically only one good reason for imposing yourself on someone else’s country. This is that you admire the people of that country, their values, history and traditions and you wish to join them and be like them for that reason and that reason alone. It’s the same as joining a club or political party; in the normal run of things you’d never take that step unless you wanted to identify with them. Foisting yourself uninvited on someone else just because people can’t get their act together where you come from and you want to grab a bit of someone else’s pie is NOT a good reason for immigration, and suggests that you would probably view your new hosts as a convenient collective milchkau with duty to provide for your every need, whilst you would feel no sense of duty whatever towards your host. Which is EXACTLY the attitudes we see in a lot of our uninvited “friends from other climes” in this country. If I am supposed to be a charity worker or/and active benefactor for “U.K. International Doss Houses Plc”, I would prefer to be asked nicely first. I’m afraid that I would not give a very nice reply, though.

Indeed, primary motivation for immigration into our country is economic and financial(benefits), we can no longer talk in terms of the Windrush generation and the British Empire where Britain was seen as the mother country - Ed

By: WasaYank

WasaYank — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:53:15 +0000

Here’s an interesting news story for everyone!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3129625/Mother-is-denied-pill-by-Muslim-pharmacist.html

By: andy.woodhead

andy.woodhead — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:52:03 +0000

Brothers and Sisters, the only rights we have in our own country are to keep our mouths shut, pay our taxes and let our ’superiors’ decide what is best for us and it has been that way for over forty years now ! This was, I believe, part or whole of a speech delivered by John Howard before he left office as PM of Australia to be replaced by the more ‘Liberal’ Kevin Rudd (think Bliar with an Aussie accent). John Howard was a true patriot, sending boatloads of attempted illegals to Christmas Island, a fantastic way of welcoming the sort of scum that permeate the globe these days. Could we not do the same using Tristan da Cunha (apologies if sic) which I believe is still a British dependancy ? Now, there’s a thought…..

By: CharlieJ

CharlieJ — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:34:02 +0000

Indeed……what about MY rights?? I lost my inherited home to a Filipino immigrant as I firmly believe that the British courts were and still are scared of not giving her what she wants. I think that I am now a second class citizen in my own country and yet there is NOTHING but NOTHING that i am able to do. I know many of you will be thinking “you shouldn’t have married her” and yes it’s easy to be wise with hindsight but I thought living in the same home for 40 years may have stood for something and the courts may have supported a British citizen. HOW WRONG WAS I!! Any suggestions or help very greatfully accepted.
BNP FOREVER.

By: Erinmore

Erinmore — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:33:04 +0000

I believe I read this essay in some newspaper quite recently, but was not entirely impressed by the writer’s sentiments.

However, A Reader slips up when he/she effectively states that Britain is a land of immigrants by which he/she then proceeds to name the Danes, Romans, French, Dutch and Irish, a completely incorrect statement with regards to Britain being an alleged land of immigrants, of course.

It’s tantamount to asserting that Uganda is a nation of immigrants because the founding population might have comprised Nigerians, Liberians, Kenyans and/or Congolese, etc when, in fact, all of these consist of same-race nations.

Furthermore, the notion that racially alien groups can assimilate successfully with a distinctly different racial group, is poppycock of the highest degree simply because it cannot be done without a destructive knock-on effect on the racial homogeneity, heritage, language, beliefs, culture and traditions of the host indigenous population, not forgetting the human urge for any alien race(s) to impress and impose their own presence, languages, beliefs, cultures and traditions upon indigenous peoples themselves.

In short, racially alien immigration threatens the continued existence of a host nation’s very survival, birthright, lineage and exclusive ancestral ownership and continued possession of their own native homeland.

This is what he/she should have said, but lamentably failed to say so I will say it here and now on the British National Party website for the whole world to read.

By: Ian35

Ian35 — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:13:18 +0000

Pretty much sums up my views & opinions on the subject perfectly…. plus I dare say I’m not alone.

By: sparks199

sparks199 — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:36:19 +0000

Great article I’ve added it to my facebook notes on my profile

Nice one, welcome to the website - Ed

By: noImmigration

noImmigration — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:30:31 +0000

Foreigner guests in our country (perhaps excepting the Muslim party members) do not find our National Flag and other National symbols in any way offensive, just the same as when Brits go to work in foreign countries we don’t find their national flag offensive, in fact its quite the opposite, we expect to see it, and so do our guests. The only people that find our nationalism offensive unfortunately is other Brits, who are playing a very dangerous game.

By: screamingmad

screamingmad — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:48:40 +0000

Steiner

You are correct. This was of Australian origin. I picked it up on a random surf.
But I truly would have loved to be the original author.
I would, if the original writer made himself known to me like to shake him by the hand.
It encapsulates all that is wrong with this wonderful country of ours.
screamingmad

By: sumseyz

sumseyz — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:49:47 +0000

great article
more the reason for people to vote bnp

Welcome aboard – Ed

By: iiwn

iiwn — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:18:29 +0000

An immigrant has two responsibilities – he must make every effort to integrate and be prepared to leave behind the outward expression of his old way of life; he must ensure his offspring are fully assimilated with the host culture. Failure to do either means the immigrant is not an immigrant and something else.