Regular visitors to this site will know that following threats of violence against the staff of Internet hosting company LiveLeak, they reluctantly removed Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, video from their site.

Since then copies of the video have appeared, “like so many mushrooms” throughout Cyberspace, as defenders of freedom demonstrated both their contempt for appeasement and their refusal to be intimidated by threats from the “usual suspects”!

The good news is that LiveLeak have now reviewed their security and restated their commitment to freedom of speech by reposting the video.

In a statement that has appeared on their site this evening, they say:-

On the 28th of March LiveLeak.com was left with no other choice but to remove the film “fitna” from our servers following serious threats to our staff and their families. Since that time we have worked constantly on upgrading all security measures thus offering better protection for our staff and families. With these measures in place we have decided to once more make this video live on our site. We will not be pressured into censoring material which is legal and within our rules. We apologise for the removal and the delay in getting it back, but when you run a website you don’t consider that some people would be insecure enough to threaten our lives simply because they do not like the content of a video we neither produced nor endorsed but merely hosted.

We say – well said LiveLeak – there can be no appeasing those who would deny us our freedom of expression.

You can once again view “Fitna” here .

For years now, those who have so shamefully promoted immigration – the Tory and Labour parties in particular and lesser fry – such as the Lib-Dems, Greens and UKIP – have relentlessly excused their stance by claiming that “immigration is good for us”! Indeed, for decades now, expenses claiming politicians representing this gaggle of Establishment nation-wrecking vested interests have praised the “enrichment” visited upon us through “controlled” immigration. We, the people, who have borne the brunt of their folly, know differently of course!

And now, it would appear, we have arrived at a point in time when the Establishment itself is beginning to panic over the Pandora’s Box of mass migration they have so recklessly opened in our midst.

Contrary to what it may, at first glance, appear – the following is a major article from today’s Daily Telegraph – not from the BNP’s Voice of Freedom!

Enjoy:

Quote: For those of us who have felt unsettled, or even alarmed, by the exceptional scale of recent immigration to the United Kingdom, there has been one argument that has been difficult to rebut. It was, indeed, the very justification for the Government’s immigration policy, if it deserves to be so described: without the foreign workers who have poured in over the past 10 years, both legally and illegally, economic growth would have stalled and we would be a less prosperous nation.

The highest levels of immigration by far in our history may well have had other deleterious impacts, including that on the country’s cultural cohesion and, self-evidently, on the public services and infrastructure, strained by the rising population, and even the reintroduction of some serious diseases, such as TB, which had all but been eradicated. But we were assured by ministers and proponents of large-scale immigration, including business leaders and union bosses, that these were more than outweighed by the economic benefits that have accrued to the nation.

The problem with this argument is that it is not true. Unquote.

The rest of this article may be found: here

Not heard of the ‘Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill’. Don’t worry, not many people have.

Nevertheless, you need to be aware of this, ‘Bill‘, as it has almost finished it’s path through Parliament and could soon become a Law of the Land!

 

The Government is claiming that the ‘Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill’, is designed to lift the burden of red tape on business.

It also claims that the Bill it intends to take “further important steps towards modern and effective regulatory enforcement”.

Sounds so reasonable doesn’t it, but its got precious little to do with modernising anything, and an awful lot to do with  restricting your rights!

For under the small print of this ‘Bill’, faceless bureaucrats, across the country, will be given the power to bypass courts and hand out fines.

That this flies in the face of the most basic tenet of British Law – ‘Innocent until proven guilty’, is of no consequence to our governing regime!

Let’s face it, when you are intent on destroying the sovereignty of the whole country, what does it matter if you remove this principal in the process!

Ever since the signing of the ‘Magna Carta’, every Act enshrined in our Law to strengthen and defend our Constitution has striven to safeguard the rights of the individual against an overbearing state.

This ‘Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill’ rides roughshod over all of the legal protections that we’ve always taken for granted.

Therein lies the problem, we’ve been negligent, and taken our hard won constitutional protections for granted. We’ve forgotten that freedom is always under attack by those who want total power over the rest of us!

Wake up people, the jackals of a police state are circling ever nearer.

And to think they have the nerve to call us ‘fascists’!

Down through the history of the world, freedom has always had to be fought for.  It will always be so, and we forget at our peril!

The hour is late, but it is not yet too late. Give your support to the BNP  Better still, come and join us.

Together we can stop the three headed hydra of Westminster in its tracks, and return Britain to the truly free country we all want it to be!

 We are the only political force left in Britain of which the ‘establishment’ is truly afraid. Why?  Because they know that we speak for the people in ways that they cannot, and, because we unerringly shine a spotlight onto the dank crevices in which our political Quislings operate.

A newspaper report on this story may be found here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From today’s Times:

“I cannot claim to have been to Redwell in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, although on paper it would seem a pretty pleasant place, rather more prosperous than average. I have been through Yapton, in Arun, West Sussex, and that is distinctly desirable territory. I think I have cut across Lawford and New Bilton, in Warwickshire, too and while it was not quite the Cotswolds it was hardly a centre of deprivation or tense race relations either.

All of which makes a recent pattern in local council by-elections more unexpected. A by-election was held in Redwell West last Thursday. The Conservatives easily retained the seat but there in second place, eight votes ahead of Labour and with four times the strength of the Liberal Democrats was the British National Party candidate. At Yapton, seven days beforehand, the BNP had come third, a mere seven votes behind the Liberal Democrats, and with almost a fifth of the vote. A fortnight earlier Lawford and New Bilton had witnessed a cracking contest with Labour hanging on by a single vote over the Tories and with the BNP securely third on 15 per cent, well ahead of Nick Clegg’s contender.”

Full story here .

It has been confirmed today that the Government is fully aware that hundreds of illegal immigrants are working in care homes in Britain – including a known murderer and other criminals! Yet despite the obvious threat to our elderly and other vulnerable care home residents, presumably including children, the Government has declined to act – because they see these migrants as a source of cheap labour.

We quote . . . . In some homes more than half the employees have entered the country illegally and are now being entrusted with caring for old and vulnerable people. The immigration intelligence report found that one illegal worker was a murder suspect from the Philippines and others had been involved in the “abuse and mistreatment” of elderly people. The report, which was produced more than two years ago, warned that the problems were “widespread” and “significant”. But officials say its findings have been ignored. “Very few of these cases are acted on,” one official said. “Ministers have turned a blind eye in the obscene interests of costs. . . . . Many of the illegal workers were using false names and forged identity documents to bypass police criminal records checks. The suspected Filipino murderer had used fraudulent references to get a job at a care home in Plymouth. The report discloses that Home Office ministers had failed to tackle the problem because most of the illegal care home workers were from countries such as Zimbabwe, Nigeria and South Africa, which were not on the priority list identifying those who should be targeted. Unquote.

Whereas we have a Home Secretary who apparently requires the assistance of an armed police minder to accompany her to buy kebabs from eateries in “enriched” South London – no such consideration is afforded vulnerable British people placed in the “care” of foreigners whose only attribute appears to be that they are cheap and about whose backgrounds nothing is known!

Such is Labour’s commitment to care!

Read this about this shocking deriliction of responsibility by the Government here .

In a sign that politicians are starting to “break ranks” it has been reported that a former Labour minister has confirmed that politicians are claiming expenses and allowances out of greed – rather than need!

We quote:

MPs see the £23,000 of taxpayers’ money they can claim to pay for a second home as a “target to aim for”, a highly-respected former Labour minister has admitted.

Chris Mullin, a member of Parliament’s standards watchdog, said it was “human nature” that MPs would claim as much as they could get away with.

It is the first time an MP has confessed that the Additional Cost Allowance (ACA) is seen as an automatic entitlement and not a way of reimbursing legitimate expenditure.

Mr Mullin’s comments are certain to infuriate Commons Speaker Michael Martin, who last week launched a controversial battle to keep details of their expenses secret.

He spoke out as it emerged that MPs will not be forced to explain exactly what work is done by any relatives they employ using their public-funded staff allowance. Unquote.

Read the article in full: here .

You would have imagined by now that Europeans would be only too aware of the dangers of appeasement. Apparently not!

The following Europeanjournal film clip, which has been dubbed into English, is interesting for a number of reasons. However, we ask viewers to concentrate on the Moolenbeek marketplace scene and, in particular, to the reaction of the Brussels police to the harassment experienced by the film crew. As no filming apparently takes place following police “intervention” we can only assume that the “forces of law and order” ordered the film crew out of the area to appease those objecting to their presence.

The Eurojournal video clip may be found here .

We now invite viewers to contrast the behaviour of the Brussels police, as demonstrated above, with that as shown in the video below. Our second video clip deals with the “policing” of a peaceful protest against the Islamification of Europe held in central Brussels last year. It should be noted that the demonstration had previously been banned by the hard-left pro-Islam mayor of the city – on the grounds that it could offend many of his constituents!

This clip may be found here .

Is this the kind of European Union you want to be part of? Time to get out of the EU Fourth Reich and stay out!

We quote from an interesting article in today’s Sunday Telegraph, written by journalist Ben Leapman:-

“Three years ago I asked the House of Commons for details of MPs’ second-home expenses under the Freedom of Information Act. The Information Commissioner ordered partial disclosure, then the Information Tribunal went further by demanding full disclosure. Last week I thought my wait was finally over.

But the deadline for the Commons to release the paperwork came and went, and the following day the Speaker, Michael Martin, and his House of Commons Commission defied the rulings and appealed to the High Court. Now, thousands more pounds of taxpayers’ money will be wasted as lawyers thrash out the argument all over again.”

“The Speaker says his objection is to the release of MPs’ home addresses. I suspect this is a convenient ruse for old-guard MPs who do not want any scrutiny of how they spend their Additional Costs Allowance (ACA), which provides them with up to £23,000 a year for rent, mortgage, furniture and groceries.”

Unfortunately we are unable to agree with the author of this article on one point – he writes: “vast majority of law-abiding MPs” – but where is the evidence to support this assertion? Surely the published figures suggest that hundreds of current and former MPs have laid claim to public money under questionable circumstances – some more so than others! Indeed, every MP representing constituencies in the South East within commuting distance of The House, professing to “need” a second-home in London, for starters!

The rest of this article may be read: here .

In February, the Government conferred to the Association of Muslim Schools, a group of independent Islamic faith schools, the right to establish its own separate inspection arrangements. According to its website the association has already received £100,000 of taxpayers’ money in government funding.

This decision was made despite the fact that there have been a number of problems with independent Muslim faith schools before. The King Fahad academy, in Acton, West London, being a case in point. There it has been alleged that textbooks, describing Christians as pigs and Jews as monkeys, were in use!

Ofsted has acknowledged that it did not study the details of all the textbooks concerned in the King Fahad case. And, it remains a fact, that of over 600 visits by inspectors to Muslim faith schools, only 94 have been made public! Indeed, one educational expert has put forward the worrying claim that we do not properly know what is being taught in many Muslim schools.

Clearly we need to have proper inspections of faith schools by independent figures who are fluent in the relevant languages and, in the case of Islamic schools, aware of the ideological challenge posed by separatist Islamism.

A report on Newnight, first broadcast last year, highlights allegations concerning the King Fahad school in Acton.

Part 1 may be viewed: here .

Part 2 may be viewed: here

The BNP’s publicity department has produced three new items for the forthcoming local elections, and all candidates, election agents, organisers and activists are encouraged to make use of these highly effective and eye-catching tools to help propel our party to victory.

---

The first is a new BNP calling card – ideal for not-at-home canvassing or just handing out. They cost £10 per thousand.

---

The second is a ‘Don’t forget to Vote’ leaflet in A5 format. They cost £12 per thousand.

---

The third is a supplementary A5 leaflet. They cost £12 per thousand.

---

These items are available to order from Head Office, either on next month’s lit run, or via post (postal rates are the same as the national leaflets and can be found in Voice of Freedom) or by collection in bulk from Leeds.1) If a branch needs a make a BULK order to go on the LIT RUN, they must contact BNP Central office by EMAIL ONLY (Click Here) to place the order and have it delivered.2) Individuals or branches placing orders for delivery via POST need to call the National Treasurer’s office at 0871 0500 241 to make payment, whereupon the order will be dispatched via Royal Mail.3) If branches or individuals want to pick up a bulk order they need to call the National Treasurer’s office at 0871 0500 241 to make payment, whereupon instructions will be given regarding the pickup point, which will be from Leeds.

---

In addition, it is not too late for candidates to order their special local election leaflets from the Publicity Department. 

---

New to this year’s leaflet is the option for you to choose the FOUR main issues in your election address. You pick the issues from the accompanying sheet where each one is numbered between 1 and 10. You must list the numbers you pick as so ‘4, 5, 7, 10′ i.e. in order and separated by commas.

---

To make up a leaflet is simple – all you need to do is download a candidates’ information form here, and email it back to the publicity department. (Click Here.) The Publicity Department will gladly help out any inquiries about the process and pricing — please do not hesitate to ask.

 Is there no end to the PC madness afflicting Britain?

Drug-addicted prisoners forced to go “cold turkey” received compensation payments totalling £750,000 in the last year, according to official figures.

The payments stem from a test case by six prisoners settled out of court in November 2006 by the Home Office. They came after a High Court judge approved damages after their claims the practice amounted to an assault and breach of human rights.

Payments totalling £750,000 subsequently went to 197 prisoners forced to stop taking drugs at jails across England and Wales under the Opiate Dependent Prison Litigation.

The statistics show nationally more than £2 million was paid in compensation by publicly-run prisons in 2006/07 – incredibly enough, down 54 per cent on the previous year’s pay-outs which totalled £4.4 million.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw, released the data to MPs in response to a parliamentary question.

We witnessed yesterday how the enemies of freedom and western democracy, in a move that was entirely predictable, reportedly resorted to threats of violence against the staff of the NewsLeak Internet company, for daring to demonstrate a commitment to freedom of speech through hosting Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, controversial video “Fitna”.

What is not so widely known is that this follows, only by a few days, Internet company YouTube, being forced to remove several video clips from its site, following the Turkish Government ordering the blocking of access to the video-sharing Web site!

In a statement in Turkish sent to The Associated Press on Thursday, YouTube said the company “reviewed the videos that led to the most recent ban on access and removed them because of their content, which violate YouTube’s content policy.”

This follows a court in Ankara imposing a ban on access to the site at the request of a prosecutor who had argued the clips were disrespectful to Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey.

According to media reports: “Access to YouTube, which is owned by Google Inc., remained blocked in Turkey on Thursday morning, and Turkish authorities could not be reached for comment on when access might resume”.

Other governments have tried to block YouTube in their countries as well.

One recent gaff by Pakistan’s government led to a broader outage affecting most of the world because a Pakistani telecommunications company implementing the block made a mistake in its technical configuration.

The YouTube ban in Turkey has highlighted this Muslim country’s chequered record on free expression, which Turkey claims it wants to improve as part of its bid to join the European Union!

Although it is not known for sure, it is thought that the “offensive” videos removed to appease the Turkish Government, rightly or wrongly, linked Kemal Ataturk and his Muslim regime, with aspects of the extermination of some one to two million Christian Greeks and Armenians during and after, the First World War. This being a holocaust that the Turkish Government, even today, refuses to officially acknowledge – despite it occurring in living memory! Indeed the American ambassador in Constantinople at the time, described it thus:

The ambassador “accused the “Turkish government” of a campaign of “outrageous terrorizing, cruel torturing, driving of women into harems, debauchery of innocent girls, the sale of many of them at 80 cents each, the murdering of hundreds of thousands and the deportation to and starvation in the desert of other hundreds of thousands, [and] the destruction of hundreds of villages and many cities”, all part of “the willful execution” of a “scheme to annihilate the Armenian, Greek and Syrian Christians of Turkey.”

Returning to the subject of “Fitna” we can confirm, as we predicted yesterday evening, that copies of the video have popped up like mushrooms overnight throughout Cyberspace! In the cause of the preservation of freedom of speech, we can tell you that one such “mushroom” may be found: here .

Labour’s “aristocrats” certainly know what they are about when it comes to home improvements! According to today’s Daily Telegraph:

“Refurbishing the home and garden of the Speaker of the House of Commons has cost the taxpayer £1.7 million.

The bill includes more than £700,000 on furnishing and improving his official residence, figures released to The Daily Telegraph reveal today.

The disclosure that more than £100,000 a year has been spent on furniture, art and refurbishments will add to intense pressure on Michael Martin, who is leading controversial attempts to block the disclosure of MPs’ expenses.

Information released under freedom of information laws shows that since 2001, £148,900 has been spent on furniture for Speakers House; £191,000 on a new air-conditioning system; £13,000 on art and £291,000 on “building restoration and refurbishment”.

In total, taxpayers have spent £724,600 on the residence since Mr Martin, 62, became Speaker in October 2000. A further £992,000 has been spent on the Speaker’s garden although most of this work has been to improve security.

The total expenditure on Mr Martin’s residence is therefore more than £1.7 million.”

Full story here .

Meanwhile many pensioners, army families and hundreds of thousands of children live in substandard accommodation the length and breadth of the nation! Labour – the party of the privileged class!

We recently explained to readers our belief that the real reason that the issue of MPs expenses disclosure was being referred to the High Court was that of creating a further substantial delay – thereby “buying time” for the many dishonest MPs, past and present, involved to cover their tracks!

We today learn from the Guardian that this is almost certainly the case as MPs are clearly exploiting the High Court’s casework log jam in what many consider to be a “red herring” of a case. We use the phrase “red herring” because, in our opinion, this case is not being brought because it stands the slightest chance of succeeding, but merely to abuse legal process – at our expense – to delay publication of MPs expenses!

One further point is that the only bone of contention is that of the publication of MPs second homes addresses. Even if this was a genuine concern – which it is not – then there is absolutely no reason why MPs should not disclose details of their expenses claiming activities right now! Perhaps the likes of Dave “hug-a-hoodie” Cameron and Gordon Brown would like to lead by example and publish theirs into the public domain? No! We can’t imagine why not!

We quote from the Guardian:

“The decision whether to reveal the details of 14 MPs’ expenses will not be resolved for months because of a backlog at the high court, it emerged today.

The court’s administrative office has said that the case – involving the second-home expenses claimed by Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and 12 other high-profile figures – is “unlikely” to be heard for at least another eight weeks. Judgment is then expected to be reserved, delaying the process even further.”

Read the full story: here .

Meanwhile two London Labour MPs, that your news team have firmly in their sights, are husband and wife Alan and Ann Keen – who represent the adjacent West London constituencies of Feltham & Heston and Brentford & Isleworth respectively. Between them the pair have claimed around £200,000 in ACA alone between Q1 2001 and Q1 2006 – allegedly for a flat in Covent Garden – despite having their main residence only nine miles from The House in Brentford! Incidentally, their total combined expenses and allowances, claimed under all Parlaimentary categories for the same period, comes to around £1.3 million! This £1.3 million, of course, does NOT include salary, pension and other perks!

A local newspaper this week reported thus:

“The Keens stayed silent this week amid the escalating row over the Speaker of the House’s bid to keep details of MPs expenses secret. . . . . However a spokesperson for Hounslow’s MPs, Ann and Alan Keen, said the pair would not be commenting until the appeal is settled.

The Keens have long been under fire for using the second home allowance available to MPs for their second home in Westminster – despite having a home in Brentford, which is just nine miles from the Commons.”

Read the full story: here .

We learn this evening that Internet hosting operation, LiveLeak, have been forced to remove Dutch MP Geert Wilders “FITNA” video, following very serious threats to its staff. At the present time it is not known who is behind the threats or the nature of the threats. However, the cowardly ritualistic murder of Dutch film director Theo van Gogh, by an Islamic fanatic, does mean that all such threats have to be taken very seriously.

Unfortunately for those who would try to stifle our western democracy through naked fascism and criminality, many thousands of copies of the controversial video have been downloaded and it can only be a matter of time before they start appearing in “cyberspace”!

The fact that this has happened only goes to underline one of the themes of “FITNA” – that western democracy and freedom of speech are under attack by the enemies of freedom! Appeasement cannot be an option!

An explanatory message posted on the LiveLeak site reads:-

“Following threats to our staff of a very serious nature, and some ill informed reports from certain corners of the British media that could directly lead to the harm of some of our staff, Liveleak.com has been left with no other choice but to remove Fitna from our servers.
This is a sad day for freedom of speech on the net but we have to place the safety and well being of our staff above all else. We would like to thank the thousands of people, from all backgrounds and religions, who gave us their support. They realised LiveLeak.com is a vehicle for many opinions and not just for the support of one.

Perhaps there is still hope that this situation may produce a discussion that could benefit and educate all of us as to how we can accept one anothers culture.

We stood for what we believe in, the ability to be heard, but in the end the price was too high.”

See the LiveLeak announcement here .

An interesting story has today appeared in the media. It begins:

“To the pub owners who have renamed their hostelry in his honour, Sir John Hawkins is a hero. But to the Racial Equality Council, which has its offices just a few doors from the pub, he is a symbol of cruelty to his fellow man for his role in the slave trade. The christening of the Hawkins Meeting House close to Sir John’s birthplace in Plymouth has left the neighbouring parties at loggerheads, with the landlord forced to deny allegations that racism inspired his choice. The race group’s outrage is focused on the fact that Hawkins was the first Englishman to trade slaves, capturing and selling more than 1,200 African men. They say the use of his name for a pub is “offensive”.

“It’s very unfortunate that the pub has chosen to celebrate someone who had a history of being very involved with the transatlantic slave trade,” said a spokesman. “It will cause offence to anyone who understands the horrors of slavery. It’s an entirely inappropriate tribute. He is not someone Plymouth should be proud of.”

But landlord Leroy Lander, who took over the lease of the pub only three weeks ago, takes a different view on the 16th century figure, who was knighted for his exploits against the Spanish Armada and set up a charity for sick and elderly mariners.

“I did consider the implications of naming my pub after a famous slaver, but Sir John Hawkins is actually a very historical and important figure. He’s a real British hero with a dark past, but slavery is just a part of human history which every nation was responsible for. We have to ignore that and look at the good things about people. “

The rest of the article may be read here .

Now according to this news report, Plymouth’s Racial Equality Council’s (REC) problem with this proposal is that they object to the preservation of John Hawkin’s memory on account of his involvement in the embryonic British slave trade and that promoting his name demeans 21st century Plymouth.

However don’t we have a problem here?

From the fifteenth century, right up into the eighteenth, is it not a historical fact that West Country coasts and coastal waters were plagued by Muslim Barbary corsairs? In fact, doesn’t history record the loss of hundreds of vessels, from fishing smacks – right up to large merchant vessels, to these North African pirates? And wasn’t it common practice that having seized a ship, that its cargo, crew and any passengers be taken to North African ports to be sold off to the highest bidder in the slave and goods markets? Apparently white females were particularly highly prized, as they brought good prices!

Furthermore, does history not also record that Muslim slaving parties were landed on West Country coasts to raid isolated hamlets and farms for the purposes of capturing men, women and children to be sold as slaves?

The number of such unfortunates, taken from around the West Country and Welsh coasts over those centuries, is known to run into many thousands. This, of course, being a mere drop in the ocean when compared to the estimated 1.5 million Christian men, women and children kidnapped for slavery from the coasts of southern Europe, in particular those of Italy, Sicily and heroic little Malta, during the same period.

So you see our problem.

Whereas we can perhaps understand Plymouth’s REC being vocal over the proposal to name the premises in question after a former merchant/slaver/hero – we cannot understand why they have not demonstrated their commitment to “equality” by calling on the city’s Muslim leaders to apologise for their co-religionists part in the slaving of West Country folk – including no few former Plymouth residents. Indeed there must be families still resident in Plymouth who have lost ancestors to “The Trade” as practiced by Mohammedans!

Perhaps one of the West Country newspapers would like to take this issue up with the Plymouth REC? After all, it wouldn’t do for the Racial “Equality” Council to be seen acting unequally – would it?

  Figures released yesterday by the Office for National Statistics have shown that more than 20 per cent of Babies in Britain are born to immigrant mothers. In London, over half of children are born to mothers who hail from abroad.The breakdown from the Government’s Office for National Statistics showed that the proportion of children born to immigrant families has shot up over the past few years.

In the late 1990s, when the immigration boom ushered in by Tony Blair’s election was just beginning, around 13 per cent of all babies in Britain were born to mothers who came from abroad. The percentage rose rapidly after 1998 and passed the 20 per cent level in 2005.

According to the latest count, based on 2006 birth returns, 21 per cent of babies in the UK have mothers who were born abroad. In England the level is close to a quarter, at 23 per cent. But in London 53 per cent of children have mothers from abroad.

A report by the ONS said: “This is the highest proportion since the collection of the parents’ country of birth at birth registration was introduced in 1969.

“The increase continues the marked rise over the last decade: the proportion of births to mothers from outside the UK has risen from 13 per cent in 1996.”

The report also said that among births where details of fathers were included on the registration form, 15 per cent showed that both parents had been born abroad.

This suggests that around a third of foreign-born mothers who have children have a husband or partner who is British-born, the ONS said. It added that the greatest increase in babies born to mothers from abroad had come among mothers in their late 20s and early 30s. Among babies born to mothers aged between 25 and 30, more than a quarter, 26 per cent, are born to mothers born in foreign countries.

The figures tally with information on immigration which suggest the majority of new arrivals in the country are in their 20s.

The Government’s critics on migration warned yesterday that the figures show there is a growing risk to good integration in towns and cities.

Sir Andrew Green of the Migrationwatch think-tank said: “This is quite incontrovertible evidence of the massive impact of unlimited immigration on the whole nature of our society. It is absolutely essential that strict limits are placed on immigration if public confidence is to be restored.”

In some London boroughs the proportion of babies with foreign-born mothers is more than two thirds. Recent figures show that in the East London borough of Newham, 71 per cent of new mothers were born abroad. This was followed by Tower Hamlets (69 per cent) and Brent (68).

Outside London, Slough in Berkshire had the second highest rate of births to foreign-born mothers, at 48 per cent. It was followed by Luton, with 44 per cent.

Leicester and Birmingham, fourth and sixth respectively on the list, have been tipped to become the first cities in the country with a non-white majority.

British people, the clock is ticking . . .

  Some media headlines today refer to a case where three senior appeal judges have refused to recognise a marriage between a Muslim in Britain and a girl in Bangladesh that took place “over the telephone”, even though the union is valid according to Sharia law.In some previous cases, the courts have recognised foreign marriages on the basis that the law which applied was either that of the intended matrimonial home or the country to which the marriage had the greater connection.

In the particular case currently receiving media attention, the marriage was invalidated NOT because it was done under Sharia law over the phone, but because the 26-year-old would-be groom does not function above the level of a three-year-old. The court said he was highly suggestible and vulnerable and therefore lacked the capacity to marry and consent to sexual intercourse.

For this reason, the court said, it was unable to give valid consent to marriage under English law.

The would-be-groom’s parents, originating from Bangladesh but resident in England for many years, arranged for him to be married by telephone link to a bride chosen by them in Bangladesh with a view to his new wife, referred to as NK, obtaining a visa and joining him in Britain.

The marriage was valid under Sharia law and the law of Bangladesh and lawyers for the parents argued that it should therefore be recognised in English law. The court however held that the concept of the marriage under those circumstances, was “sufficiently offensive to the conscience of the English court that it should refuse to recognise it and should refuse to give effect to the law of Bangladesh and Sharia”.

The important lesson from this case is, however, the fact that such arranged marriages are routinely carried out, with ‘marriages’ taking place over the telephone, and because of the mad situation where Sharia law is already accepted as valid legal practice by the courts, such ‘brides’ are then given permission to settle in Britain.

This is obviously nothing but a simple con, whereby the Third World invasion of Britain is perpetuated by obviously arranged marriages to get around the immigration system.

A BNP government will end this practice of recognising Sharia law immediately, and retroactively implement a complete reversal of all con-artist marriage-immigration scams that have taken place under the traitorous Lib-Lab-Con Old Party regime.

All persons participating in this scam are therefore duly warned.

Earlier this evening, in a first time effort in a Northamptonshire town never before even leafleted by the Party, our candidate took 15.7% of the vote and second place!

The by-election, held in Wellingborough’s Redwell West Ward – a Tory stronghold – saw the Labour Party pushed into third place by BNP candidate Dave Robinson.

The result for Wellingborough Borough Council’s Redwell West Ward was:

1. Con. 665 (59.0%)
2. BNP 177 (15.7%)
3. Lab 169 (15.0%)
4. Lib-Dem 40 (3.5%)
5. UKIP 39 (3.5%)
6. Green 37 (3.3%)

The turnout was an amazing 47.1%

Congratulations to Dave Robinson and his campaign team for an astounding result in a new area for the BNP!