Beware private equity asset-strippers
May 30, 2007I’m no economist but it seems to me that the great boom we are alleged to have witnessed as part of the global economy is a fraud. Bill Bonner, writing in a recent issue of Money Week appeared to have summed it up succinctly when he asked why isn’t the money from this ‘boom’ trickling down? “While a ‘normal’ boom lifts wage earners, this one seems to have cast them down”, he wrote. “Why? It does not lift up all boats; it lifts only the luxury yachts. Why is that? Because it is an asset-price boom, not an economic boom.”
Those showing most interest of late in the asset-price boom have been the international private equity groups, such as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (once described as “the barbarian at the gates”), whose interest in taking over companies seems to centre on stripping out the assets of a company for a short-term profit and re-selling the corpse.
As we go to press KKR and other private equity groups are threatening to take over Boots the high street chemists in a move which could again threaten jobs and render the company vulnerable to asset stripping. The most important asset in the eyes of the private equity vultures is not what a company makes (they are in a minority in Britain) or what it sells, but the freehold properties that the companies own. This was the reason for the drive by several private equity companies to try and acquire the supermarket J Sainsbury. Like Boots, Sainsbury is regarded by the private equity people as a property company that also has shops. KKR may have given up their attempt because of the resistance of the Sainsbury family, who still have 17% of the equity, but Robert Tchenguiz, the Iranian property tycoon is still showing interest.
In its youthful days when it had the pioneer spirit now passed to the BNP, the Labour Party would have blocked the private equity asset-strippers head-on. Today, they are in cahoots with them. This was revealed by Peter Oborne writing in the Daily Mail 03.03.07 in an article headed “Worrying Questions Over Brown’s Private Banker”. This concerned the financier Sir Ronald Cohen who has been one of Gordon Brown’s most trusted informal advisers over the past decade and who has suddenly retired from business. According to Oborne, he will shortly emerge from the shadows of the City to become one of the most senior members of the inner circle of the next Prime Minister. “Sir Ronald is the founder of the private equity business, which makes massive profits out of buying, restructuring and then selling on great chunks of British business and which controls about a quarter of the country’s private industry”.
Further to this, back on February 27th the Daily Telegraph revealed that despite combined sales of more than £12 bn and operating profits of more than £400m, in total the 10 largest private equity-owned companies in the UK received a £11m corporation tax credit from the exchequer, and five of the companies paid not a single penny of UK corporation tax in 2005/6.
At least some politicians in Holland, unlike here, are showing concern at what is going on with private equity and hedge funds groups. They were accused of “plundering” Holland at a tense session of the Dutch parliament, as leading politicians called for new laws to curb their activities. “This ransacking of the country is not welcome”, said Elly Blanksma, a senior MP for the Christian Democrats.








